Alloy modelling has a history of machine-learning-like approaches, preceding the tide of data-science-inspired work. The dawn of computational databases has made the integration of analysis, prediction and discovery the key theme in accelerated alloy research. Advances in machine-learning methods and enhanced data generation have created a fertile ground for computational materials science. Pairing machine learning and alloys has proven to be particularly instrumental in pushing progress in a wide variety of materials, including metallic glasses, high-entropy alloys, shape-memory alloys, magnets, superalloys, catalysts and structural materials. This Review examines the present state of machine-learning-driven alloy research, discusses the approaches and applications in the field and summarizes theoretical predictions and experimental validations. We foresee that the partnership between machine learning and alloys will lead to the design of new and improved systems.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
Thermodynamically-guided machine learning modelling for predicting the glass-forming ability of bulk metallic glasses
Scientific Reports Open Access 11 July 2022
A comparison of explainable artificial intelligence methods in the phase classification of multi-principal element alloys
Scientific Reports Open Access 08 July 2022
npj Computational Materials Open Access 28 June 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O. & Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559, 547–555 (2018).
Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S. & Marques, M. A. L. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5, 83 (2019).
Muratov, E. N. et al. QSAR without borders. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 3525–3564 (2020).
Curtarolo, S. et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat. Mater. 12, 191–201 (2013).
Tanaka, I., Rajan, K. & Wolverton, C. Data-centric science for materials innovation. MRS Bull. 43, 659–663 (2018).
Behler, J. Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 074106 (2011).
Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 058301 (2012).
Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).
Huang, B. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Communication: Understanding molecular representations in machine learning: The role of uniqueness and target similarity. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 161102 (2016).
Shapeev, A. V. Moment tensor potentials: A class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153–1173 (2016).
Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019).
Pozdnyakov, S. N. et al. Incompleteness of atomic structure representations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 166001 (2020).
Faber, F., Lindmaa, A., von Lilienfeld, O. A. & Armiento, R. Crystal structure representations for machine learning models of formation energies. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 1094–1101 (2015).
Zhang, L., Han, J., Wang, H., Car, R. & Weinan, E. Deep potential molecular dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 143001 (2018).
Bach, S. et al. On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation. PLoS One 10, e0130140 (2015).
Montavon, G., Samek, W. & Müller, K.-R. Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks. Digit. Signal. Process. 73, 1–15 (2018).
Lapuschkin, S. et al. Unmasking Clever Hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn. Nat. Commun. 10, 1096 (2019).
Rosenbrock, C. W., Homer, E. R., Csányi, G. & Hart, G. L. W. Discovering the building blocks of atomic systems using machine learning: application to grain boundaries. NPJ Comput. Mater. 3, 29 (2017).
Schütt, K. T., Arbabzadah, F., Chmiela, S., Müller, K. R. & Tkatchenko, A. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 13890 (2017).
Schaffer, J. P. Saxena, A. Antolovich, S. D. Sanders, T. H. Jr. & Warner, S. B. The Science and Design of Engineering Materials 2nd edn. (WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1999).
Callister, W. D., Jr. & Rethwisch, D. G. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction 10th edn. (Wiley, 2018).
Wei, S.-H., Ferreira, L. G. & Zunger, A. First-principles calculation of temperature-composition phase diagrams of semiconductor alloys. Phys. Rev. B 41, 8240 (1990).
Pan, J. et al. Perfect short-range ordered alloy with line-compound-like properties in the ZnSnN2:ZnO system. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 63 (2020).
Stevanović, V., Zakutayev, A. & Lany, S. Composition dependence of the band gap and doping in Cu2O-based alloys as predicted by an extension of the dilute-defect model. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2, 044005 (2014).
Jiang, J. Chen, M. & Fan, J. A. Deep neural networks for the evaluation and design of photonic devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 10.1038/s41578-020-00260-1 (2020).
Vasudevan, R., Pilania, G. & Balachandran, P. V. Machine learning for materials design and discovery. J. Appl. Phys. 129, 070401 (2021).
Hastie, T. Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. H. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, 2001).
Batra, R. Song, L. & Ramprasad, R. Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning. Nat. Rev. Mater. 10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y (2020).
Mueller, T., Kusne, A. G. & Ramprasad, R. Machine learning in materials science: Recent progress and emerging applications. Rev. Comput. Chem. 29, 186–273 (2016).
Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Machine learning in materials design and discovery: Examples from the present and suggestions for the future. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 120301 (2018).
Kalidindi, S. R. Feature engineering of material structure for AI-based materials knowledge systems. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 041103 (2020).
Sanchez, J. M., Ducastelle, F. & Gratias, D. Generalized cluster description of multicomponent systems. Phys. A 128, 334–350 (1984).
de Fontaine, D. in Solid State Physics Vol. 47 (eds Ehrenreich, H. & Turnbull, D.) 33–176 (Academic Press, 1994).
Hart, G. L. W., Curtarolo, S., Massalski, T. B. & Levy, O. Comprehensive search for new phases and compounds in binary alloy systems based on platinum-group metals, using a computational first-principles approach. Phys. Rev. X 3, 041035 (2013).
Oses, C. et al. AFLOW-CHULL: Cloud-oriented platform for autonomous phase stability analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 2477–2490 (2018).
Toher, C., Oses, C., Hicks, D. & Curtarolo, S. Unavoidable disorder and entropy in multi-component systems. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5, 69 (2019).
Sarker, P. et al. High-entropy high-hardness metal carbides discovered by entropy descriptors. Nat. Commun. 9, 4980 (2018).
Yong, J. et al. Robust topological surface state of kondo insulator SmB6 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 222403 (2014).
Bergerhoff, G., Hundt, R., Sievers, R. & Brown, I. D. The inorganic crystal structure data base. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 23, 66–69 (1983).
Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOW: An automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery. Comput. Mater. Sci. 58, 218–226 (2012).
Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).
Jain, A. et al. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50, 2295–3310 (2011).
Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. NOMAD: The FAIR concept for big data-driven materials science. MRS Bull. 43, 676–682 (2018).
van de Walle, A. & Ceder, G. Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations. J. Phase Equilib. 23, 348–359 (2002).
Hart, G. L. W., Blum, V., Walorski, M. J. & Zunger, A. Evolutionary approach for determining first-principles hamiltonians. Nat. Mater. 4, 391–394 (2005).
Nelson, L. J., Hart, G. L. W., Zhou, F. & Ozoliņš, V. Compressive sensing as a paradigm for building physics models. Phys. Rev. B 87, 035125 (2013).
de Jong, M. et al. A statistical learning framework for materials science: Application to elastic moduli of k-nary inorganic polycrystalline compounds. Sci. Rep. 6, 34256 (2016).
Isayev, O. et al. Universal fragment descriptors for predicting properties of inorganic crystals. Nat. Commun. 8, 15679 (2017).
Koinuma, H. & Takeuchi, I. Combinatorial solid-state chemistry of inorganic materials. Nat. Mater. 3, 429–438 (2004).
Jóhannesson, G. H. et al. Combined electronic structure and evolutionary search approach to materials design. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 255506 (2002).
Ceder, G., Morgan, D., Fischer, C., Tibbetts, K. & Curtarolo, S. Data-mining driven quantum mechanics for the prediction of structure. MRS Bull. 31, 981–985 (2006).
Curtarolo, S., Morgan, D. & Ceder, G. Accuracy of ab initio methods in predicting the crystal structures of metals: A review of 80 binary alloys. Calphad 29, 163–211 (2005).
Bligaard, T. et al. Pareto-optimal alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4527–4529 (2003).
Fischer, C. C., Tibbetts, K. J., Morgan, D. & Ceder, G. Predicting crystal structure by merging data mining with quantum mechanics. Nat. Mater. 5, 641–646 (2006).
Villars, P. et al. Crystal Impact, Pauling File. Inorganic Materials Database and Design System, Binaries Edition (ASM International, 2003).
Hautier, G., Fischer, C., Ehrlacher, V., Jain, A. & Ceder, G. Data mined ionic substitutions for the discovery of new compounds. Inorg. Chem. 50, 656–663 (2011).
Suh, C. & Rajan, K. Data mining and informatics for crystal chemistry: establishing measurement techniques for mapping structure-property relationships. Mater. Sci. Technol. 25, 466–471 (2009).
Legrain, F. et al. Vibrational properties of metastable polymorph structures by machine learning. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 2460–2466 (2018).
Malinov, S., Sha, W. & Guo, Z. Application of artificial neural network for prediction of time–temperature–transformation diagrams in titanium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 283, 1–10 (2000).
Malinov, S. & Sha, W. Application of artificial neural networks for modelling correlations in titanium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 365, 202–211 (2004).
Liu, S. et al. Physics-informed machine learning for composition–process–property design: Shape memory alloy demonstration. Appl. Mater. Today 22, 100898 (2021).
Schütt, K. T. et al. How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: Towards fast prediction of electronic properties. Phys. Rev. B 89, 205118 (2014).
Sutton, C. et al. Crowd-sourcing materials-science challenges with the NOMAD 2018 Kaggle competition. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5, 111 (2019).
Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 145301 (2018).
Chen, C., Ye, W., Zuo, Y., Zheng, C. & Ong, S. P. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals. Chem. Mater. 31, 3564–3572 (2019).
Noh, J. et al. Inverse design of solid-state materials via a continuous representation. Matter 1, 1370–1384 (2019).
Schmidt, M. & Lipson, H. Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science 324, 81–85 (2009).
Ghiringhelli, L. M., Vybiral, J., Levchenko, S. V., Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. Big data of materials science: Critical role of the descriptor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105503 (2015).
Ouyang, R., Curtarolo, S., Ahmetcik, E., Scheffler, M. & Ghiringhelli, L. M. SISSO: A compressed-sensing method for identifying the best low-dimensional descriptor in an immensity of offered candidates. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 083802 (2018).
Yuan, F. & Mueller, T. Identifying models of dielectric breakdown strength from high-throughput data via genetic programming. Sci. Rep. 7, 17594 (2017).
Udrescu, S.-M. & Tegmark, M. AI Feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2631 (2020).
Owolabi, T. O., Akande, K. O. & Olatunji, S. O. Prediction of superconducting transition temperatures for Fe-based superconductors using support vector machine. Adv. Phys. Theor. Appl. 35, 12–26 (2014).
Owolabi, T. O., Akande, K. O. & Olatunji, S. O. Estimation of superconducting transition temperature TC for superconductors of the doped MgB2 system from the crystal lattice parameters using support vector regression. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 28, 75–81 (2015).
Isayev, O. et al. Materials cartography: representing and mining materials space using structural and electronic fingerprints. Chem. Mater. 27, 735–743 (2015).
Stanev, V. et al. Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperature. NPJ Comput. Mater. 4, 29 (2018).
Kusne, A. G. et al. On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 5966 (2020).
Cheng, Y. Q. & Ma, E. Atomic-level structure and structure–property relationship in metallic glasses. Prog. Mater. Sci. 56, 379–473 (2011).
Zberg, B., Uggowitzer, P. J. & Löffler, J. F. MgZnCa glasses without clinically observable hydrogen evolution for biodegradable implants. Nat. Mater. 8, 887–891 (2009).
Inoue, A. Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 48, 279–306 (2000).
Miracle, D. B. A structural model for metallic glasses. Nat. Mater. 3, 697–702 (2004).
Sheng, H. W., Luo, W. K., Alamgir, F. M., Bai, J. M. & Ma, E. Atomic packing and short-to-medium-range order in metallic glasses. Nature 439, 419–425 (2006).
Laws, K. J., Miracle, D. B. & Ferry, M. A predictive structural model for bulk metallic glasses. Nat. Commun. 6, 8123 (2015).
Lu, Z. P. & Liu, C. T. A new glass-forming ability criterion for bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 50, 3501–3512 (2002).
Mondal, K. & Murty, B. S. On the parameters to assess the glass forming ability of liquids. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351, 1366–1371 (2005).
Cheney, J. & Vecchio, K. S. Prediction of glass-forming compositions using liquidus temperature calculations. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 471, 135–143 (2007).
Perim, E. et al. Spectral descriptors for bulk metallic glasses based on the thermodynamics of competing crystalline phases. Nat. Commun. 7, 12315 (2016).
Ford, D. C., Hicks, D., Oses, C., Toher, C. & Curtarolo, S. Metallic glasses for biodegradable implants. Acta Mater. 176, 297–305 (2019).
Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A. & Wolverton, C. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2, 16028 (2016).
Ren, F. et al. Accelerated discovery of metallic glasses through iteration of machine learning and high-throughput experiments. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq1566 (2018).
Ward, L. et al. A machine learning approach for engineering bulk metallic glass alloys. Acta Mater. 159, 102–111 (2018).
Sun, Y. T., Bai, H. Y., Li, M. Z. & Wang, W. H. Machine learning approach for prediction and understanding of glass-forming ability. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 3434–3439 (2017).
Dasgupta, A. et al. Probabilistic assessment of glass forming ability rules for metallic glasses aided by automated analysis of phase diagrams. Sci. Rep. 9, 357 (2019).
Tripathi, M. K., Chattopadhyay, P. P. & Ganguly, S. Multivariate analysis and classification of bulk metallic glasses using principal component analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 107, 79–87 (2015).
Keong, K. G., Sha, W. & Malinov, S. Artificial neural network modelling of crystallization temperatures of the Ni–P based amorphous alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 365, 212–218 (2004).
Cai, A.-H., Wang, H., Li, X.-S., Chen, H. & An, W.-K. Progress of component design methods for bulk metallic glass. Mater. Des. 28, 2694–2697 (2007).
Cai, A.-H., Xiong, X., Liu, Y., An, W.-K. & Tan, J.-Y. Artificial neural network modeling of reduced glass transition temperature of glass forming alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 111909 (2008).
Cai, A.-H. et al. Artificial neural network modeling for undercooled liquid region of glass forming alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 48, 109–114 (2010).
Cai, A. H. et al. Prediction of critical cooling rate for glass forming alloys by artificial neural network. Mater. Des. 52, 671–676 (2013).
Xiong, J., Zhang, T.-Y. & Shi, S.-Q. Machine learning prediction of elastic properties and glass-forming ability of bulk metallic glasses. MRS Commun. 9, 576–585 (2019).
Fang, S., Xiao, X., Xia, L., Li, W. & Dong, Y. Relationship between the widths of supercooled liquid regions and bond parameters of Mg-based bulk metallic glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 321, 120–125 (2003).
Xiong, J., Shi, S.-Q. & Zhang, T.-Y. A machine-learning approach to predicting and understanding the properties of amorphous metallic alloys. Mater. Des. 187, 108378 (2020).
Kawazoe, Y. Yu, J.-Z. Tsai, A.-P. & Masumoto, T. (eds) Nonequilibrium Phase Diagrams of Ternary Amorphous Alloys (Springer, 1997).
Gao, M. C. Yeh, J. W. Liaw, P. K. & Zhang, Y. High-Entropy Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, 2016).
Miracle, D. B. High entropy alloys as a bold step forward in alloy development. Nat. Commun. 10, 1805 (2019).
George, E. P., Raabe, D. & Ritchie, R. O. High-entropy alloys. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 515–534 (2019).
Yeh, J.-W. et al. Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principle elements: Novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 6, 299–303 (2004).
Cantor, B., Chang, I. T. H., Knight, P. & Vincent, A. J. B. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 375–377, 213–218 (2004).
Senkov, O. N., Miller, J. D., Miracle, D. B. & Woodward, C. Accelerated exploration of multi-principal element alloys with solid solution phases. Nat. Commun. 6, 6529 (2015).
Gorsse, S., Miracle, D. B. & Senkov, O. N. Mapping the world of complex concentrated alloys. Acta Mater. 135, 177–187 (2017).
Gludovatz, B. et al. A fracture-resistant high-entropy alloy for cryogenic applications. Science 345, 1153–1158 (2014).
Li, Z., Pradeep, K. G., Deng, Y., Raabe, D. & Tasan, C. C. Metastable high-entropy dual-phase alloys overcome the strength–ductility trade-off. Nature 534, 227–230 (2016).
Li, Z., Tasan, C. C., Springer, H., Gault, B. & Raabe, D. Interstitial atoms enable joint twinning and transformation induced plasticity in strong and ductile high-entropy alloys. Sci. Rep. 7, 40704 (2017).
Islam, N., Huang, W. & Zhuang, H. L. Machine learning for phase selection in multi-principal element alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 150, 230–235 (2018).
Huang, W., Martin, P. & Zhuang, H. L. Machine-learning phase prediction of high-entropy alloys. Acta Mater. 169, 225–236 (2019).
Zhang, Y. M., Yang, S. & Evans, J. R. G. Revisiting Hume-Rothery’s rules with artificial neural networks. Acta Mater. 56, 1094–1105 (2008).
Nong, Z.-S. et al. Stability and structure prediction of cubic phase in as cast high entropy alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 30, 363–369 (2014).
Jiang, X., Zhang, R., Zhang, C., Yin, H. & Qu, X. Fast prediction of the quasi phase equilibrium in phase field model for multicomponent alloys based on machine learning method. Calphad 66, 101644 (2019).
Tancret, F., Toda-Caraballo, I., Menou, E. & Rivera Díaz-Del-Castillo, P. E. J. Designing high entropy alloys employing thermodynamics and gaussian process statistical analysis. Mater. Des. 115, 486–497 (2017).
Menou, E. et al. Evolutionary design of strong and stable high entropy alloys using multi-objective optimisation based on physical models, statistics and thermodynamics. Mater. Des. 143, 185–195 (2018).
Li, Y. & Guo, W. Machine-learning model for predicting phase formations of high-entropy alloys. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 095005 (2019).
Abu-Odeh, A. et al. Efficient exploration of the High Entropy Alloy composition-phase space. Acta Mater. 152, 41–57 (2018).
Asensio Domínguez, L., Goodall, R. & Todd, I. Prediction and validation of quaternary high entropy alloys using statistical approaches. Mater. Sci. Technol. 31, 1201–1206 (2015).
Qi, J., Cheung, A. M. & Poon, S. J. High entropy alloys mined from binary phase diagrams. Sci. Rep. 9, 15501 (2019).
Dai, D. et al. Using machine learning and feature engineering to characterize limited material datasets of high-entropy alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 175, 109618 (2020).
Miracle, D. B. & Senkov, O. N. A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater. 122, 448–511 (2017).
Lederer, Y., Toher, C., Vecchio, K. S. & Curtarolo, S. The search for high entropy alloys: A high-throughput ab-initio approach. Acta Mater. 159, 364–383 (2018).
Menou, E. et al. Computational design of light and strong high entropy alloys (HEA): Obtainment of an extremely high specific solid solution hardening. Scr. Mater. 156, 120–123 (2018).
Kaufmann, K. et al. Discovery of high-entropy ceramics via machine learning. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 42 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. Phase prediction in high entropy alloys with a rational selection of materials descriptors and machine learning models. Acta Mater. 185, 528–539 (2020).
Shapeev, A. Accurate representation of formation energies of crystalline alloys with many components. Comput. Mater. Sci. 139, 26–30 (2017).
Grabowski, B. et al. Ab initio vibrational free energies including anharmonicity for multicomponent alloys. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5, 80 (2019).
Zhang, J. et al. Robust data-driven approach for predicting the configurational energy of high entropy alloys. Mater. Des. 185, 108247 (2020).
Kostiuchenko, T., Körmann, F., Neugebauer, J. & Shapeev, A. Impact of lattice relaxations on phase transitions in a high-entropy alloy studied by machine-learning potentials. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5, 55 (2019).
Meshkov, E. A., Novoselov, I. I., Shapeev, A. V. & Yanilkin, A. V. Sublattice formation in CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy. Intermetallics 112, 106542 (2019).
Jafary-Zadeh, M., Khoo, K. H., Laskowski, R., Branicio, P. S. & Shapeev, A. V. Applying a machine learning interatomic potential to unravel the effects of local lattice distortion on the elastic properties of multi-principal element alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 803, 1054–1062 (2019).
Li, X.-G., Chen, C., Zheng, H., Zuo, Y. & Ong, S. P. Complex strengthening mechanisms in the NbMoTaW multi-principal element alloy. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 70 (2020).
Wen, C. et al. Machine learning assisted design of high entropy alloys with desired property. Acta Mater. 170, 109–117 (2019).
Kim, G. et al. First-principles and machine learning predictions of elasticity in severely lattice-distorted high-entropy alloys with experimental validation. Acta Mater. 181, 124–138 (2019).
Chang, Y.-J., Jui, C.-Y., Lee, W.-J. & Yeh, A.-C. Prediction of the composition and hardness of high-entropy alloys by machine learning. JOM 71, 3433–3442 (2019).
Rickman, J. M. et al. Materials informatics for the screening of multi-principal elements and high-entropy alloys. Nat. Commun. 10, 2618 (2019).
Wu, Q. et al. Uncovering the eutectics design by machine learning in the Al–Co–Cr–Fe–Ni high entropy system. Acta Mater. 182, 278–286 (2020).
Batchelor, T. A. A. et al. High-entropy alloys as a discovery platform for electrocatalysis. Joule 3, 834–845 (2019).
Xue, D. et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat. Commun. 7, 11241 (2016).
Gopakumar, A. M., Balachandran, P. V., Xue, D., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Multi-objective optimization for materials discovery via adaptive design. Sci. Rep. 8, 3738 (2018).
Solomou, A. et al. Multi-objective Bayesian materials discovery: Application on the discovery of precipitation strengthened NiTi shape memory alloys through micromechanical modeling. Mater. Des. 160, 810–827 (2018).
Xue, D. et al. An informatics approach to transformation temperatures of NiTi-based shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 125, 532–541 (2017).
Mahmoudi, M. et al. On the printability and transformation behavior of nickel-titanium shape memory alloys fabricated using laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J. Manuf. Process. 35, 672–680 (2018).
Dehghannasiri, R. et al. Optimal experimental design for materials discovery. Comput. Mater. Sci. 129, 311–322 (2017).
Jiang, X. et al. An materials informatics approach to Ni-based single crystal superalloys lattice misfit prediction. Comput. Mater. Sci. 143, 295–300 (2018).
Tancret, F. Computational thermodynamics, Gaussian processes and genetic algorithms: combined tools to design new alloys. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 045013 (2013).
Menou, E., Ramstein, G., Bertrand, E. & Tancret, F. Multi-objective constrained design of nickel-base superalloys using data mining- and thermodynamics-driven genetic algorithms. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 24, 055001 (2016).
Conduit, B. D., Jones, N. G., Stone, H. J. & Conduit, G. J. Design of a nickel-base superalloy using a neural network. Mater. Des. 131, 358–365 (2017).
Hu, X. et al. Two-way design of alloys for advanced ultra supercritical plants based on machine learning. Comput. Mater. Sci. 155, 331–339 (2018).
Yoshitake, S., Narayan, V., Harada, H., Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. & Mackay, D. J. C. Estimation of the γ and γ′ lattice parameters in nickel-base superalloys using neural network analysis. ISIJ Int. 38, 495–502 (1998).
Chandran, M., Lee, S. C. & Shim, J.-H. Machine learning assisted first-principles calculation of multicomponent solid solutions: estimation of interface energy in Ni-based superalloys. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 26, 025010 (2018).
Goldsmith, B. R., Esterhuizen, J., Liu, J.-X., Bartel, C. J. & Sutton, C. Machine learning for heterogeneous catalyst design and discovery. AIChE J. 64, 2311–2323 (2018).
Kitchin, J. R. Machine learning in catalysis. Nat. Catal. 1, 230–232 (2018).
Toyao, T. et al. Machine learning for catalysis informatics: Recent applications and prospects. ACS Catal. 10, 2260–2297 (2020).
Orupattur, N. V., Mushrif, S. H. & Prasad, V. Catalytic materials and chemistry development using a synergistic combination of machine learning and ab initio methods. Comput. Mater. Sci. 174, 109474 (2020).
Logadottir, A. et al. The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi relation and the volcano plot for ammonia synthesis over transition metal catalysts. J. Catal. 197, 229–231 (2001).
Nørskov, J. K. et al. Universality in heterogeneous catalysis. J. Catal. 209, 275–278 (2002).
Hammer, B. & Norskov, J. K. Why gold is the noblest of all the metals. Nature 376, 238–240 (1995).
Kitchin, J. R., Nørskov, J. K., Barteau, M. A. & Chen, J. G. Modification of the surface electronic and chemical properties of Pt(111) by subsurface 3d transition metals. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10240–10246 (2004).
Panapitiya, G. et al. Machine-learning prediction of CO adsorption in thiolated, Ag-alloyed Au nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 17508–17514 (2018).
Li, Z., Ma, X. & Xin, H. Feature engineering of machine-learning chemisorption models for catalyst design. Catal. Today 280, 232–238 (2017).
Li, Z., Wang, S., Chin, W. S., Achenie, L. E. & Xin, H. High-throughput screening of bimetallic catalysts enabled by machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 24131–24138 (2017).
Ma, X., Li, Z., Achenie, L. E. K. & Xin, H. Machine-learning-augmented chemisorption model for CO2 electroreduction catalyst screening. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 3528–3533 (2015).
Pankajakshan, P. et al. Machine learning and statistical analysis for materials science: Stability and transferability of fingerprint descriptors and chemical insights. Chem. Mater. 29, 4190–4201 (2017).
Toyao, T. et al. Toward effective utilization of methane: Machine learning prediction of adsorption energies on metal alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 8315–8326 (2018).
Andersen, M., Levchenko, S. V., Scheffler, M. & Reuter, K. Beyond scaling relations for the description of catalytic materials. ACS Catal. 9, 2752–2759 (2019).
Tran, K. & Ulissi, Z. W. Active learning across intermetallics to guide discovery of electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction and H2 evolution. Nat. Catal. 1, 696–703 (2018).
Back, S. et al. Convolutional neural network of atomic surface structures to predict binding energies for high-throughput screening of catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 4401–4408 (2019).
Zhong, M. et al. Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature 581, 178–183 (2020).
Boes, J. R. & Kitchin, J. R. Modeling segregation on AuPd(111) surfaces with density functional theory and Monte Carlo simulations. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 3479–3487 (2017).
Cao, L., Li, C. & Mueller, T. The use of cluster expansions to predict the structures and properties of surfaces and nanostructured materials. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 2401–2413 (2018).
Cao, L. & Mueller, T. Rational design of Pt3Ni surface structures for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 17735–17747 (2015).
Cao, L., Niu, L. & Mueller, T. Computationally generated maps of surface structures and catalytic activities for alloy phase diagrams. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22044–22051 (2019).
Mueller, T. Ab initio determination of structure-property relationships in alloy nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 86, 144201 (2012).
Wang, L.-L., Tan, T. L. & Johnson, D. D. Configurational thermodynamics of alloyed nanoparticles with adsorbates. Nano Lett. 14, 7077–7084 (2014).
Tan, T. L., Wang, L.-L., Johnson, D. D. & Bai, K. A comprehensive search for stable Pt–Pd nanoalloy configurations and their use as tunable catalysts. Nano Lett. 12, 4875–4880 (2012).
Jia, Q. et al. Roles of Mo surface dopants in enhancing the ORR performance of octahedral PtNi nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 18, 798–804 (2018).
Cao, L. et al. Differential surface elemental distribution leads to significantly enhanced stability of PtNi-based ORR catalysts. Matter 1, 1567–1580 (2019).
Wang, L.-L., Tan, T. L. & Johnson, D. D. Nanoalloy electrocatalysis: simulating cyclic voltammetry from configurational thermodynamics with adsorbates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 28103–28111 (2015).
Li, C. et al. Improved prediction of nanoalloy structures by the explicit inclusion of adsorbates in cluster expansions. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 18040–18047 (2018).
Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).
Artrith, N. & Kolpak, A. M. Grand canonical molecular dynamics simulations of Cu–Au nanoalloys in thermal equilibrium using reactive ANN potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 110, 20–28 (2015).
Artrith, N. & Kolpak, A. M. Understanding the composition and activity of electrocatalytic nanoalloys in aqueous solvents: A combination of DFT and accurate neural network potentials. Nano Lett. 14, 2670–2676 (2014).
Kang, J. et al. First-principles database driven computational neural network approach to the discovery of active ternary nanocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 24539–24544 (2018).
Hajinazar, S., Sandoval, E. D., Cullo, A. J. & Kolmogorov, A. N. Multitribe evolutionary search for stable Cu–Pd–Ag nanoparticles using neural network models. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 8729–8742 (2019).
Jinnouchi, R. & Asahi, R. Predicting catalytic activity of nanoparticles by a DFT-aided machine-learning algorithm. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 4279–4283 (2017).
Jäger, M. O. J., Morooka, E. V., Federici Canova, F., Himanen, L. & Foster, A. S. Machine learning hydrogen adsorption on nanoclusters through structural descriptors. NPJ Comput. Mater. 4, 37 (2018).
Carrasquilla, J. & Melko, R. G. Machine learning phases of matter. Nat. Phys. 13, 431–434 (2017).
van Nieuwenburg, E. P. L., Liu, Y.-H. & Huber, S. D. Learning phase transitions by confusion. Nat. Phys. 13, 435–439 (2017).
Kusne, A. G. et al. On-the-fly machine-learning for high-throughput experiments: search for rare-earth-free permanent magnets. Sci. Rep. 4, 6367 (2014).
Jha, R., Chakraborti, N., Diercks, D. R., Stebner, A. P. & Ciobanu, C. V. Combined machine learning and CALPHAD approach for discovering processing-structure relationships in soft magnetic alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 150, 202–211 (2018).
Nelson, J. & Sanvito, S. Predicting the Curie temperature of ferromagnets using machine learning. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 104405 (2019).
Yoshizawa, Y., Oguma, S. & Yamauchi, K. New Fe-based soft magnetic alloys composed of ultrafine grain structure. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 6044–6046 (1988).
Rao, K. P. & Prasad, Y. K. D. V. Neural network approach to flow stress evaluation in hot deformation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 53, 552–566 (1995).
Larkiola, J., Myllykoski, P., Nylander, J. & Korhonen, A. S. Prediction of rolling force in cold rolling by using physical models and neural computing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 60, 381–386 (1996).
Chun, M. S., Biglou, J., Lenard, J. G. & Kim, J. G. Using neural networks to predict parameters in the hot working of aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86, 245–251 (1999).
Malinov, S., Sha, W. & McKeown, J. J. Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties in titanium alloys using artificial neural network. Comput. Mater. Sci. 21, 375–394 (2001).
Guo, Z. & Sha, W. Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties of maraging steels using artificial neural network. Comput. Mater. Sci. 29, 12–28 (2004).
Mandal, S., Sivaprasad, P. V., Venugopal, S. & Murthy, K. P. N. Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate and predict the deformation behavior of stainless steel type AISI 304L during hot torsion. Appl. Soft Comput. 9, 237–244 (2009).
Sun, Y. et al. Development of constitutive relationship model of Ti600 alloy using artificial neural network. Comput. Mater. Sci. 48, 686–691 (2010).
Ji, G., Li, F., Li, Q., Li, H. & Li, Z. A comparative study on Arrhenius-type constitutive model and artificial neural network model to predict high-temperature deformation behaviour in Aermet100 steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 4774–4782 (2011).
Haghdadi, N., Zarei-Hanzaki, A., Khalesian, A. R. & Abedi, H. R. Artificial neural network modeling to predict the hot deformation behavior of an A356 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 49, 386–391 (2013).
Reddy, N. S., Panigrahi, B. B., Ho, C. M., Kim, J. H. & Lee, C. S. Artificial neural network modeling on the relative importance of alloying elements and heat treatment temperature to the stability of α and β phase in titanium alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 107, 175–183 (2015).
Gavard, L., Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H., MacKay, D. J. C. & Suzuki, S. Bayesian neural network model for austenite formation in steels. Mater. Sci. Technol. 12, 453–463 (1996).
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. & MacKay, D. J. C. Gaussian process modelling of austenite formation in steel. Mater. Sci. Technol. 15, 287–294 (1999).
Capdevila, C., Caballero, F. G. & García de Andrés, C. Determination of Ms temperature in steels: A Bayesian neural network model. ISIJ Int. 42, 894–902 (2002).
Capdevila, C., Caballero, F. G. & García De Andrés, C. Analysis of effect of alloying elements on martensite start temperature of steels. Mater. Sci. Technol. 19, 581–586 (2003).
Davies, R. H., Dinsdale, A. T., Gisby, J. A., Robinson, J. A. J. & Martin, S. M. MTDATA — thermodynamic and phase equilibrium software from the national physical laboratory. Calphad 26, 229–271 (2002).
Tapia, G., Elwany, A. H. & Sang, H. Prediction of porosity in metal-based additive manufacturing using spatial Gaussian process models. Addit. Manuf. 12, 282–290 (2016).
Tapia, G., Khairallah, S., Matthews, M., King, W. E. & Elwany, A. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94, 3591–3603 (2018).
Meng, L. & Zhang, J. Process design of laser powder bed fusion of stainless steel using a Gaussian process-based machine learning model. JOM 72, 420–428 (2020).
Boyce, B. L. & Uchic, M. D. Progress toward autonomous experimental systems for alloy development. MRS Bull. 44, 273–280 (2019).
Ling, J., Hutchinson, M., Antono, E., Paradiso, S. & Meredig, B. High-dimensional materials and process optimization using data-driven experimental design with well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 6, 207–217 (2017).
Godaliyadda, G. M. D. et al. A supervised learning approach for dynamic sampling. Electron. Imaging 2016, 1 (2016).
DeCost, B. L., Lei, B., Francis, T. & Holm, E. A. High throughput quantitative metallography for complex microstructures using deep learning: A case study in ultrahigh carbon steel. Microsc. Microanal. 25, 21–29 (2019).
Takahashi, K. & Tanaka, Y. Material synthesis and design from first principle calculations and machine learning. Comput. Mater. Sci. 112, 364–367 (2016).
Mahfouf, M., Jamei, M. & Linkens, D. A. Optimal design of alloy steels using multiobjective genetic algorithms. Mater. Manuf. Process. 20, 553–567 2005).
Ozerdem, M. S. & Kolukisa, S. Artificial neural network approach to predict mechanical properties of hot rolled, nonresulfurized, AISI 10xx series carbon steel bars. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 199, 437–439 (2008).
Ozerdem, M. S. & Kolukisa, S. Artificial neural network approach to predict the mechanical properties of Cu–Sn–Pb–Zn–Ni cast alloys. Mater. Des. 30, 764–769 (2009).
Wilk-Kolodziejczyk, D., Regulski, K. & Gumienny, G. Comparative analysis of the properties of the nodular cast iron with carbides and the austempered ductile iron with use of the machine learning and the support vector machine. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 87, 1077–1093 (2016).
Murugananth, M., Babu, S. S. & David, S. A. Optimization of shielded metal arc weld metal composition for Charpy toughness. Weld. J. 83, 267-S–276-S (2004).
Conduit, B. D., Jones, N. G., Stone, H. J. & Conduit, G. J. Probabilistic design of a molybdenum-base alloy using a neural network. Scr. Mater. 146, 82–86 (2018).
An, W.-K. et al. Optimization of composition of as-cast chromium white cast iron based on wear-resistant performance. Mater. Des. 30, 2339–2344 (2009).
Slavkovic, R., Jugovic, Z., Dragicevic, S., Jovicic, A. & Slavkovic, V. An application of learning machine methods in prediction of wear rate of wear resistant casting parts. Comput. Ind. Eng. 64, 850–857 (2013).
Paulson, N. H., Priddy, M. W., McDowell, D. L. & Kalidindi, S. R. Data-driven reduced-order models for rank-ordering the high cycle fatigue performance of polycrystalline microstructures. Mater. Des. 154, 170–183 (2018).
Schooling, J. M., Brown, M. & Reed, P. A. S. An example of the use of neural computing techniques in materials science—the modelling of fatigue thresholds in Ni-base superalloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 260, 222–239 (1999).
Brun, F. et al. Theoretical design of ferritic creep resistant steels using neural network, kinetic, and thermodynamic models. Mater. Sci. Technol. 15, 547–554 (1999).
Shin, D., Yamamoto, Y., Brady, M. P., Lee, S. & Haynes, J. A. Modern data analytics approach to predict creep of high-temperature alloys. Acta Mater. 168, 321–330 (2019).
Thankachan, T. et al. Artificial neural network to predict the degraded mechanical properties of metallic materials due to the presence of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42, 28612–28621 (2017).
Rovinelli, A. et al. Assessing reliability of fatigue indicator parameters for small crack growth via a probabilistic framework. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 25, 045010 (2017).
Rovinelli, A. et al. Predicting the 3D fatigue crack growth rate of small cracks using multimodal data via Bayesian networks: In-situ experiments and crystal plasticity simulations. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 115, 208–229 (2018).
Feng, S., Zhou, H. & Dong, H. Using deep neural network with small dataset to predict material defects. Mater. Des. 162, 300–310 (2019).
Gossett, E. et al. AFLOW-ML: A RESTful API for machine-learning predictions of materials properties. Comput. Mater. Sci. 152, 134–145 (2018).
Taylor, R. H. et al. A RESTful API for exchanging materials data in the AFLOWLIB.org consortium. Comput. Mater. Sci. 93, 178–192 (2014).
Fernandez-Zelaia, P., Joseph, V., Kalidindi, S. R. & Melkote, S. N. Estimating mechanical properties from spherical indentation using Bayesian approaches. Mater. Des. 147, 92–105 (2018).
Wisner, B. & Kontsos, A. Investigation of particle fracture during fatigue of aluminum 2024. Int. J. Fatigue 111, 33–43 (2018).
Chatterjee, S., Murugananth, M. & Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. δ TRIP steel. Mater. Sci. Technol. 23, 819–827 (2007).
Xiong, J., Zhang, T. & Shi, S. Machine learning of mechanical properties of steels. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 1247–1255 (2020).
Chaudhary, N., Abu-Odeh, A., Karaman, I. & Arróyave, R. A data-driven machine learning approach to predicting stacking faulting energy in austenitic steels. J. Mater. Sci. 52, 11048–11076 (2017).
Mangal, A. & Holm, E. A. Applied machine learning to predict stress hotspots I: Face centered cubic materials. Int. J. Plast. 111, 122–134 (2018).
Mangal, A. & Holm, E. A. A comparative study of feature selection methods for stress hotspot classification in materials. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 7, 87–95 (2018).
Abbassi, F., Belhadj, T., Mistou, S. & Zghal, A. Parameter identification of a mechanical ductile damage using Artificial Neural Networks in sheet metal forming. Mater. Des. 45, 605–615 (2013).
Agrawal, A. et al. Exploration of data science techniques to predict fatigue strength of steel from composition and processing parameters. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 3, 90–108 (2014).
Agrawal, A. & Choudhary, A. An online tool for predicting fatigue strength of steel alloys based on ensemble data mining. Int. J. Fatigue 113, 389–400 (2018).
Seko, A., Maekawa, T., Tsuda, K. & Tanaka, I. Machine learning with systematic density-functional theory calculations: Application to melting temperatures of single- and binary-component solids. Phys. Rev. B 89, 054303 (2014).
Carrete, J., Li, W., Mingo, N., Wang, S. & Curtarolo, S. Finding unprecedentedly low-thermal-conductivity half-Heusler semiconductors via high-throughput materials modeling. Phys. Rev. X 4, 011019 (2014).
Legrain, F., Carrete, J., van Roekeghem, A., Madsen, G. K. H. & Mingo, N. Materials screening for the discovery of new half-Heuslers: Machine learning versus ab initio methods. J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 625–632 (2017).
Carrete, J., Mingo, N., Wang, S. & Curtarolo, S. Nanograined half-Heusler semiconductors as advanced thermoelectrics: An ab initio high-throughput statistical study. Adv. Func. Mater. 24, 7427–7432 (2014).
Sparks, T. D., Gaultois, M. W., Oliynyk, A., Brgoch, J. & Meredig, B. Data mining our way to the next generation of thermoelectrics. Scr. Mater. 111, 10–15 (2016).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Oses, C., Toher, C. & Curtarolo, S. High-entropy ceramics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 295–309 (2020).
Sun, S., Ouyang, R., Zhang, B. & Zhang, T.-Y. Data-driven discovery of formulas by symbolic regression. MRS Bull. 44, 559–564 (2019).
Hernandez, A., Balasubramanian, A., Yuan, F., Mason, S. A. M. & Mueller, T. Fast, accurate, and transferable many-body interatomic potentials by symbolic regression. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5, 112 (2019).
Iten, R., Metger, T., Wilming, H., del Rio, L. & Renner, R. Discovering physical concepts with neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010508 (2020).
Routh, P. K., Liu, Y., Marcella, N., Kozinsky, B. & Frenkel, A. I. Latent representation learning for structural characterization of catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 2086–2094 (2021).
Schmidt, J., Benavides-Riveros, C. L. & Marques, M. A. L. Machine learning the physical nonlocal exchange–correlation functional of density-functional theory. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 6425–6431 (2019).
Lei, X. & Medford, A. J. Design and analysis of machine learning exchange-correlation functionals via rotationally invariant convolutional descriptors. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 063801 (2019).
Kalita, B., Li, L., McCarty, R. J. & Burke, K. Learning to approximate density functionals. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 818–826 (2021).
Dick, S. & Fernandez-Serra, M. Machine learning accurate exchange and correlation functionals of the electronic density. Nat. Commun. 11, 3509 (2020).
Andersen, C. W. et al. OPTIMADE: an API for exchanging materials data. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02068 (2021).
Schmitz, G., Godtliebsen, I. H. & Christiansen, O. Machine learning for potential energy surfaces: An extensive database and assessment of methods. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 244113 (2019).
Artrith, N., Urban, A. & Ceder, G. Constructing first-principles phase diagrams of amorphous LixSi using machine-learning-assisted sampling with an evolutionary algorithm. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241711 (2018).
Mueller, T., Johlin, E. & Grossman, J. C. Origins of hole traps in hydrogenated nanocrystalline and amorphous silicon revealed through machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 89, 115202 (2014).
Yang, K., Oses, C. & Curtarolo, S. Modeling off-stoichiometry materials with a high-throughput ab-initio approach. Chem. Mater. 28, 6484–6492 (2016).
Okhotnikov, K., Charpentier, T. & Cadars, S. Supercell program: a combinatorial structure-generation approach for the local-level modeling of atomic substitutions and partial occupancies in crystals. J. Cheminform. 8, 17 (2016).
Kikuchi, R. A theory of cooperative phenomena. Phys. Rev. 81, 988 (1951).
Sanchez, J. M. & de Fontaine, D. The fcc Ising model in the cluster variation approximation. Phys. Rev. B 17, 2926 (1978).
Zhang, Y., Blum, V. & Reuter, K. Accuracy of first-principles lateral interactions: Oxygen at Pd(100). Phys. Rev. B 75, 235406 (2007).
Stampfl, C., Kreuzer, H. J., Payne, S. H., Pfnür, H. & Scheffler, M. First-principles theory of surface thermodynamics and kinetics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2993 (1999).
Fichthorn, K. A., Merrick, M. L. & Scheffler, M. A kinetic Monte Carlo investigation of island nucleation and growth in thin-film epitaxy in the presence of substrate-mediated interactions. Appl. Phys. A 75, 17–23 (2002).
Connolly, J. W. D. & Williams, A. R. Density-functional theory applied to phase transformations in transition-metal alloys. Phys. Rev. B 27, 5169 (1983).
Blum, V., Hart, G. L. W., Walorski, M. J. & Zunger, A. Using genetic algorithms to map first-principles results to model Hamiltonians: Application to the generalized Ising model for alloys. Phys. Rev. B 72, 165113 (2005).
Seko, A. et al. First-principles study of cation disordering in MgAl2O4 spinel with cluster expansion and Monte Carlo simulation. Phys. Rev. B 73, 094116 (2006).
Van der Ven, A., Thomas, J. C., Xu, Q., Swoboda, B. & Morgan, D. Nondilute diffusion from first principles: Li diffusion in LixTiS2. Phys. Rev. B 78, 104306 (2008).
Laks, D. B., Ferreira, L., Froyen, S. & Zunger, A. Efficient cluster expansion for substitutional systems. Phys. Rev. B 46, 12587 (1992).
Mueller, T. & Ceder, G. Bayesian approach to cluster expansions. Phys. Rev. B 80, 024103 (2009).
Cockayne, E. & van de Walle, A. Building effective models from sparse but precise data: Application to an alloy cluster expansion model. Phys. Rev. B 81, 012104 (2010).
Nelson, L. J., Ozoliņš, V., Reese, C. S., Zhou, F. & Hart, G. L. W. Cluster expansion made easy with Bayesian compressive sensing. Phys. Rev. B 88, 155105 (2013).
Zunger, A., Wang, L. G., Hart, G. L. W. & Sanati, M. Obtaining Ising-like expansions for binary alloys from first principles. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 10, 685 (2002).
Hart, G. L. W. & Forcade, R. W. Algorithm for generating derivative structures. Phys. Rev. B 77, 224115 (2008).
Seko, A., Togo, A., Oba, F. & Tanaka, I. Structure and stability of a homologous series of tin oxides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 045702 (2008).
Seko, A., Koyama, Y. & Tanaka, I. Cluster expansion method for multicomponent systems based on optimal selection of structures for density-functional theory calculations. Phys. Rev. B 80, 165122 (2009).
Mueller, T. & Ceder, G. Exact expressions for structure selection in cluster expansions. Phys. Rev. B 82, 184107 (2010).
van de Walle, A. & Ceder, G. First-principles computation of the vibrational entropy of ordered and disordered Pd3V. Phys. Rev. B 61, 5972 (2000).
Nguyen, A. H., Rosenbrock, C. W., Reese, C. S. & Hart, G. L. W. Robustness of the cluster expansion: Assessing the roles of relaxation and numerical error. Phys. Rev. B 96, 014107 (2017).
Daw, M. S. & Baskes, M. I. Semiempirical, quantum mechanical calculation of hydrogen embrittlement in metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983).
van der Oord, C., Dusson, G., Csányi, G. & Ortner, C. Regularised atomic body-ordered permutation-invariant polynomials for the construction of interatomic potentials. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 1, 015004 (2020).
Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion of scalar, vectorial, and tensorial properties including magnetism and charge transfer. Phys. Rev. B 102, 024104 (2020).
Dusson, G. et al. Atomic cluster expansion: Completeness, efficiency and stability. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03550 (2019).
Willatt, M. J., Musil, F. & Ceriotti, M. Atom-density representations for machine learning. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 154110 (2019).
Seko, A. Machine learning potentials for multicomponent systems: The Ti-Al binary system. Phys. Rev. B 102, 174104 (2020).
Hajinazar, S., Thorn, A., Sandoval, E. D., Kharabadze, S. & Kolmogorov, A. N. MAISE: Construction of neural network interatomic models and evolutionary structure optimization. Comput. Phys. Commun. 259, 107679 (2021).
Dolgirev, P. E., Kruglov, I. A. & Oganov, A. R. Machine learning scheme for fast extraction of chemically interpretable interatomic potentials. AIP Adv. 6, 085318 (2016).
Brown, W. M., Thompson, A. P. & Schultz, P. A. Efficient hybrid evolutionary optimization of interatomic potential models. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 024108 (2010).
Slepoy, A., Peters, M. D. & Thompson, A. P. Searching for globally optimal functional forms for interatomic potentials using genetic programming with parallel tempering. J. Comput. Chem. 28, 2465–2471 (2007).
Kenoufi, A. & Kholmurodov, K. T. Symbolic regression of interatomic potentials via genetic programming. Biol. Chem. Res. 2, 1–10 (2015).
Makarov, D. E. & Metiu, H. Fitting potential-energy surfaces: a search in the function space by directed genetic programming. J. Chem. Phys. 108, 590–598 (1998).
Unke, O. T. & Meuwly, M. PhysNet: A neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3678–3693 (2019).
Gilmer, J., Schoenholz, S. S., Riley, P. F., Vinyals, O. & Dahl, G. E. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 70, 1263–1272 (2017).
Duvenaud, D. et al. in Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 28, 2224–2232 (2015).
Kearnes, S., McCloskey, K., Berndl, M., Pande, V. & Riley, P. Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 30, 595–608 (2016).
Jørgensen, P. B. Jacobsen, K. W. & Schmidt, M. N. in 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Elsevier, 2018).
Rosenbrock, C. W. et al. Machine-learned interatomic potentials for alloys and alloy phase diagrams. NPJ Comput. Mater. 7, 24 (2021).
Gubaev, K., Podryabinkin, E. V., Hart, G. L. W. & Shapeev, A. V. Accelerating high-throughput searches for new alloys with active learning of interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 156, 148–156 (2019).
Mueller, T., Hernandez, A. & Wang, C. Machine learning for interatomic potential models. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 050902 (2020).
Nyshadham, C. et al. Machine-learned multi-system surrogate models for materials prediction. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5, 51 (2019).
Zuo, Y. et al. Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 731–745 (2020).
Pettifor, D. G. A chemical scale for crystal-structure maps. Solid State Commun. 51, 31–34 (1984).
Pettifor, D. G. The structures of binary compounds. I. Phenomenological structure maps. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 19, 285 (1986).
Pettifor, D. G. Structure maps revisited. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, V13 (2003).
Levy, O., Hart, G. L. W. & Curtarolo, S. Structure maps for hcp metals from first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 81, 174106 (2010).
Zunger, A. Systematization of the stable crystal structure of all AB-type binary compounds: A pseudopotential orbital-radii approach. Phys. Rev. B 22, 5839 (1980).
Zunger, A. in Structure and Bonding in Crystals Ch. 5 (eds O’Keeffe, M. & Navrotsky, A.) 73–135 (Academic Press, 1981).
Martynov, A. I. & Batsanov, S. S. New approach to the determination of atom electronegativity. Zh. Neorg. Khim. 25, 3171–3175 (1980).
Villars, P. in Crystal Structures of Intermetallic Compounds (eds Westbrook, J. H. & Fleischer, R. L.) 1–49 (Wiley, 2000).
The authors thank Luca Ghiringhelli, Aleksey Kolmogorov, Axel van de Walle, Atsuto Seko, Chris Wolverton, Karsten Reuter, Anton Van der Ven, Corey Oses, Ohad Levy, Mike Mehl and Xiomara Campilongo for valuable discussions. The authors thank Liang Cao for providing Fig. 4b. T.M. acknowledges support by DOD-ONR (N00014-15-1-2681). C.T. acknowledges support by NSF (DMR-1921909). S.C. and C.T. acknowledge support by DOD-ONR (N00014-15-1-2863, N00014-16-1-2326, N00014-17-1-2876).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Materials thanks Vladan Stevanovic, Tong-Yi Zhang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Hart, G.L.W., Mueller, T., Toher, C. et al. Machine learning for alloys. Nat Rev Mater 6, 730–755 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00340-w
Thermodynamically-guided machine learning modelling for predicting the glass-forming ability of bulk metallic glasses
Scientific Reports (2022)
A comparison of explainable artificial intelligence methods in the phase classification of multi-principal element alloys
Scientific Reports (2022)
npj Computational Materials (2022)
npj Computational Materials (2022)
npj Computational Materials (2022)