The majority of patients with cancers of unknown primary have unfavourable outcomes when they receive empirical chemotherapy. The shift towards using precision medicine-based treatment strategies involves two options: tissue-agnostic or site-specific approaches. Here, we reflect on how cytology-based deep learning tools can be leveraged in these approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
André, F., Rassy, E., Marabelle, A., Michiels, S. & Besse, B. Forget lung, breast or prostate cancer: why tumour naming needs to change. Nature 626, 26–29 (2024).
Rassy, E. & Pavlidis, N. Progress in refining the clinical management of cancer of unknown primary in the molecular era. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 17, 541–554 (2020).
Tian, F. et al. Prediction of tumor origin in cancers of unknown primary origin with cytology-based deep learning. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02915-w (2024).
Ma, W. et al. New techniques to identify the tissue of origin for cancer of unknown primary in the era of precision medicine: progress and challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 25, bbae028 (2024).
Fizazi, K. et al. LBA15_PR - A phase III trial of empiric chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine or systemic treatment tailored by molecular gene expression analysis in patients with carcinomas of an unknown primary (CUP) site (GEFCAPI 04). Ann. Oncol. 30, v851 (2019).
Luo, Z. et al. 1208MO A randomized phase III trial of site-specific therapy guided by the 90-gene expression assay versus empiric chemotherapy in patients with cancer of unknown primary. Ann. Oncol. 34, S712 (2023).
Conway, A.-M. et al. Molecular characterisation and liquid biomarkers in carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP): taking the ‘U’ out of ‘CUP’. Br. J. Cancer 120, 141–153 (2019).
Rassy, E. & Andre, F. Can precision oncology benefit patients with cancers of unknown primary? Oncologist 28, 829–831 (2023).
Mileshkin, L. et al. LBA16 Primary analysis of efficacy and safety in the CUPISCO trial: a randomised, global study of targeted therapy or cancer immunotherapy guided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) vs platinum-based chemotherapy (CTX) in newly diagnosed, unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Ann. Oncol. 34, S1254–S1255 (2023).
Tateo, V. et al. Agnostic approvals in oncology: getting the right drug to the right patient with the right genomics. Pharmaceuticals 16, 614 (2023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
E.R. reports institutional grants from Gilead; travel, accommodations and expenses fees from Eli Lilly, Gilead, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche; and honoraria for lectures and presentations from Eli Lilly, Novartis and Seagen, none of which are related to the treatment of CUP. N.P. declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rassy, E., Pavlidis, N. Predicting tumour origin with cytology-based deep learning: hype or hope?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-024-00906-x
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-024-00906-x