Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Planning a family

Nature Reviews Chemistry volume 6, pages 673–675 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

To write this article, we spoke to members of the supramolecular chemistry community, including the International Women in Supramolecular Chemistry network. We are not attributing anyone’s name to their story to protect their anonymity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Oakley, A. From Here to Maternity: Becoming a Mother (Penguin, 1981).

  2. Wilson, H. & Huntingdon, A. Deviant (m)others: the construction of teenage motherhood in contemporary discourse. J. Soc. Policy 35, 59–76 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Slater, A. et al. Pregnancy in the lab. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 163–164 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Douglass, A. in Motherhood, the Elephant in the Laboratory: Women Scientists Speak Out (ed. Monosson, E.) 63–66 (Cornell University, 2008).

  5. Russo, C. & Minello, A. Labouring academia: higher education never-ending youth and geriatric pregnancy issues. Ital. J. Sociol. Educ. 13, 145–170 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mason, M. A. & Ekman, E. M. Mothers on the Fast Track: How a New Generation can Balance Family and Careers (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).

  7. Smith, D. Family-friendly science. Chemistry World (20 November 2018); https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/family-friendly-science/3009749.article

  8. Breaking the barriers: Women’s retention and progression in the chemical sciences (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019); https://www.rsc.org/globalassets/02-about-us/our-strategy/inclusion-diversity/womens-progression/media-pack/v18_vo_inclusion-and-diversity-_womans-progression_report-web-.pdf

  9. Social Sciences Feminist Network Research Interest Group. The burden of invisible work in academia: social inequalities and time use in five university departments. Humboldt J. Soc. Relat. 39, 228–245 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leigh, J. S. et al. Women In Supramolecular Chemistry: Collectively Crafting the Rhythms of Our Work and Lives in STEM (Policy, 2022).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

    Jennifer S. Leigh

  2. School of Science and Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA

    Nathalie Busschaert

  3. Department of Chemistry, University College London, London, UK

    Cally J. E. Haynes

  4. School of Chemistry and Forensic Science, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

    Jennifer R. Hiscock

  5. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Kristin M. Hutchins

  6. Kekulé-Institut für Organische Chemie und Biochemie, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Larissa K. S. von Krbek

  7. Otto Diels Institute of Organic Chemistry, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Anna J. McConnell

  8. Department of Chemistry and Materials Innovation Factory, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK

    Anna G. Slater

  9. Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK

    David K. Smith

  10. School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

    Emily R. Draper

Authors
  1. Jennifer S. Leigh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathalie Busschaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cally J. E. Haynes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer R. Hiscock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kristin M. Hutchins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Larissa K. S. von Krbek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Anna J. McConnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anna G. Slater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. David K. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Emily R. Draper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily R. Draper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leigh, J.S., Busschaert, N., Haynes, C.J.E. et al. Planning a family. Nat Rev Chem 6, 673–675 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00427-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00427-0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing