Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Why we need good mentoring


Cancer research relies on key values such as creativity, collaboration, research integrity and resource sharing. A positive research environment which fosters these key values is becoming a decisive factor for some funders and research institutions. To create a supportive research culture in laboratories, the training and mentoring of young scientists is important. However, the fast-paced and fierce competition for funding and jobs can present a challenge to the younger generation of scientists who depend on the guidance and mentorship of scientific leaders. The annual Nature Awards for Mentoring in Science have been created to bring attention to one of the most essential but least recognized skills in scientific leadership. Thus far, 35 scientists from across the world, who are working in a range of disciplines, have been recognized by this award for their outstanding scientific mentorship. In this Viewpoint, we have asked three recipients of this award who work in fields associated with cancer research about their views on good mentoring, and how a revised approach to mentorship can help to achieve a positive research culture and contribute to scientific discovery.

The contributors

Martin Clynes was founding Director of the National Institute for Cellular Biotechnology at Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, and he has an interest in several applications of cell culture. His cancer-related interests, working closely with clinical experts, include research on mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance and investigation of potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers in pancreatic, lung and breast cancer and in cutaneous melanoma. His research has contributed to a number of clinical trials.

Anita Corbett received her undergraduate degree in chemistry from Colgate University and her PhD degree in biochemistry from Vanderbilt University. She was a postdoctoral fellow at Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School before joining the Department of Biochemistry at Emory University School of Medicine in 1997. In 2016, she moved to the Department of Biology at Emory University, where she is a tenured professor of biology and Co-Director of the Emory MD/PhD Program.

Julie Overbaugh, PhD, is the Endowed Chair for Graduate Education and Associate Director for Cancer Research Career Enhancement at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Her research focuses on HIV transmission and the study of HIV immunity, including how it evolves and its impact on infection risk and pathogenesis. This research has been a long-standing collaboration with the Kenya Research Program. She has served in numerous leadership roles for grant review groups and major meetings in her field.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Overbaugh, J. et al. A healthy work–life balance can enhance research. Nature 477, 27–28 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beckett, S. Worstward Ho (Grove Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Valantine, H. A. & Collins, F. S. National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12240–12242 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, L. G. et al. Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLOS ONE 8, e79147 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McGee, R., Saran, S. & Krulwich, T. A. Diversity in the biomedical research workforce: developing talent. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 79, 397–411 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schultheiss, K. Ghost advising. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2018).

  7. Vale, R. D. Keep your eyes on the prize. Cell 177, 506–509 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wanda Hackett Enterprises. Effective communication styles inventory scoring form A. WHE (1998).

Download references


The authors acknowledge the many mentees who have helped them embrace mentoring as an important skill throughout the years. A.C. also appreciates the insights of C. Freeman as they share ongoing conversations about mentoring.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Martin Clynes, Anita Corbett or Julie Overbaugh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clynes, M., Corbett, A. & Overbaugh, J. Why we need good mentoring. Nat Rev Cancer 19, 489–493 (2019).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing