Abstract
Pressure reduction in liquids may result in vaporization and bubble formation—a process known as cavitation. It is commonly observed in hydraulic machinery, ship propellers and even in the context of medical therapy within the human body. Although cavitation may be beneficial for the removal of malign tissue, in many cases it is unwanted due to its ability to erode nearly any material in close contact. The current understanding is that the origins of heterogeneous cavitation are nucleation sites where stable gas cavities reside, for example, on contaminant particles, submerged surfaces or shell-stabilized microscopic bubbles1,2. Here we present the discovery of an atomically smooth interface between two immiscible liquids acting as a nucleation site. The non-polar liquid has a higher gas solubility and, upon pressure reduction, it acts as a gas reservoir as gas accumulates at the interface. We describe experiments that reveal the formation of cavitation on non-polar droplets in contact with water, and elucidate the working mechanism that leads to the nucleation of gas pockets through simulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the Paper and its Supplementary Information. The original experimental recordings are available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6912298.
Code availability
Codes used for the present simulations are community codes available to any reader free of charges, namely the LAMMPS molecular dynamics software.
References
Atchley, A. A. & Prosperetti, A. The crevice model of bubble nucleation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1065–1084 (1989).
Marschall, H. B., Mørch, K. A., Keller, A. P. & Kjeldsen, M. Cavitation inception by almost spherical solid particles in water. Phys. Fluids 15, 545–553 (2003).
Harvey, E. N., McElroy, W. D. & Whiteley, A. H. On cavity formation in water. J. Appl. Phys. 18, 162–172 (1947).
Crum, L. A. Tensile strength of water. Nature 278, 148–149 (1979).
Borkent, B. M., Gekle, S., Prosperetti, A. & Lohse, D. Nucleation threshold and deactivation mechanisms of nanoscopic cavitation nuclei. Phys. Fluids 21, 102003 (2009).
ichi Tsuda, S., Takagi, S. & Matsumoto, Y. A study on the growth of cavitation bubble nuclei using large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. Fluid Dyn. Res. 40, 606–615 (2008).
Watanabe, H., Inaoka, H. & Ito, N. Ripening kinetics of bubbles: a molecular dynamics study. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 124707 (2016).
Holl, J. W. Nuclei and cavitation. J. Basic Eng. 92, 681–688 (1970).
Zheng, Q., Durben, D. J., Wolf, G. H. & Angell, C. A. Liquids at large negative pressures: water at the homogeneous nucleation limit. Science 254, 829–832 (1991).
Azouzi, M. E. M., Ramboz, C., Lenain, J.-F. & Caupin, F. A coherent picture of water at extreme negative pressure. Nat. Phys. 9, 38–41 (2013).
Debenedetti, P. G. Metastable Liquids: Concepts and Principles Vol. 1 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1996).
Caupin, F. & Herbert, E. Cavitation in water: a review. C. R. Phys. 7, 1000–1017 (2006).
Gao, Z., Wu, W. & Wang, B. The effects of nanoscale nuclei on cavitation. J. Fluid Mech. 911, A20 (2021).
Rosselló, J. M. & Ohl, C.-D. On-demand bulk nanobubble generation through pulsed laser illumination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 044502 (2021).
Riess, J. G. Understanding the fundamentals of perfluorocarbons and perfluorocarbon emulsions relevant to in vivo oxygen delivery. Artif. Cells Blood Substit. Immobil. Biotechnol. 33, 47–63 (2005).
Lorton, O. et al. Molecular oxygen loading in candidate theranostic droplets stabilized with biocompatible fluorinated surfactants: particle size effect and application to in situ 19F MRI mapping of oxygen partial pressure. J. Magn. Reson. 295, 27–37 (2018).
Holman, R. et al. Perfluorocarbon emulsion contrast agents: a mini review. Front. Chem 9, 810029 (2022).
Desgranges, S. et al. Micron-sized PFOB liquid core droplets stabilized with tailored-made perfluorinated surfactants as a new class of endovascular sono-sensitizers for focused ultrasound thermotherapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 7, 927–939 (2019).
Pfeiffer, P. et al. Thermally assisted heterogeneous cavitation through gas supersaturation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 194501 (2022).
Mezger, M. et al. High-resolution in situ X-ray study of the hydrophobic gap at the water/octadecyl-trichlorosilane interface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18401–18404 (2006).
Lubetkin, S. D. Why is it much easier to nucleate gas bubbles than theory predicts? Langmuir 19, 2575–2587 (2003).
Cahn, J. W. & Hilliard, J. E. Free energy of a nonuniform system. III. Nucleation in a two-component incompressible fluid. J. Chem. Phys. 31, 688–699 (1959).
Giacomello, A., Chinappi, M., Meloni, S. & Casciola, C. M. Geometry as a catalyst: how vapor cavities nucleate from defects. Langmuir 29, 14873–14884 (2013).
Zhou, Y., Li, B., Gu, Y. & Chen, M. A molecular dynamics simulation study on the cavitation inception of water with dissolved gases. Mol. Phys. 117, 1894–1902 (2019).
Kuritz, N., Murat, M., Balaish, M., Ein-Eli, Y. & Natan, A. PFC and triglyme for Li-air batteries: a molecular dynamics study. J. Phys. Chem. B . 120, 3370–3377 (2016).
Schürmann, A. et al. Diffusivity and solubility of oxygen in solvents for metal/oxygen batteries: a combined theoretical and experimental study. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3095–A3099 (2018).
Kopechek, J., Park, E., Mei, C.-S., McDannold, N. & Porter, T. Accumulation of phase-shift nanoemulsions to enhance MR-guided ultrasound-mediated tumor ablation in vivo. J. Healthc. Eng. 4, 109–126 (2013).
Moyer, L. C. et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation enhancement in vivo via phase-shift nanodroplets compared to microbubbles. J. Ther. Ultrasound 3, 7 (2015).
Lorton, O. et al. Enhancement of HIFU thermal therapy in perfused tissue models using micron-sized FTAC-stabilized PFOB-core endovascular sonosensitizers. Int. J. Hyperth. 37, 1116–1130 (2020).
Huang, L. et al. Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma by changing the acoustic environment: microbubble contrast agent (SonoVue) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Int. J. Hyperth. 36, 243–251 (2019).
Rapet, J., Quinto-Su, P. A. & Ohl, C.-D. Cavitation inception from transverse waves in a thin liquid gap. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024041 (2020).
Martínez, L., Andrade, R., Birgin, E. G. & Martínez, J. M. PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2157–2164 (2009).
Tortora, M. et al. The interplay among gas, liquid and solid interactions determines the stability of surface nanobubbles. Nanoscale 12, 22698–22709 (2020).
Battino, R., Rettich, T. R. & Tominaga, T. The solubility of nitrogen and air in liquids. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 13, 563–600 (1984).
Costa Gomes, M. F., Deschamps, J. & Pádua, A. A. Effect of bromine substitution on the solubility of gases in hydrocarbons and fluorocarbons. Fluid Ph. Equilibria 251, 128–136 (2007).
Martyna, G. J., Klein, M. L. & Tuckerman, M. Nosé-Hoover chains: the canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 97, 2635–2643 (1992).
Martyna, G. J., Tobias, D. J. & Klein, M. L. Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4177–4189 (1994).
Marchio, S., Meloni, S., Giacomello, A. & Casciola, C. M. Wetting and recovery of nano-patterned surfaces beyond the classical picture. Nanoscale 11, 21458–21470 (2019).
Abascal, J. & Vega, C. A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 234505 (2006).
Jiang, J. & Sandler, S. I. Separation of CO2 and N2 by adsorption in C168 schwarzite: a combination of quantum mechanics and molecular simulation study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 11989–11997 (2005).
Acknowledgements
M. Pumera is acknowledged for providing the magnetic beads. We thank A. Eremin for the confocal thickness measurements. This work was financially supported by the European Social Fund (no. ZS/2019/10/103050) as part of the initiative ‘Sachsen-Anhalt WISSENSCHAFT Spitzenforschung/Synergien’, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (programme no. PF 951/3-1), the ‘Fondo per l’incentivazione alla ricerca (FIR), 2020’ from the University of Ferrara in Italy, and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement UCOM no. 813766.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.-D.O. designed the study, R.S. selected the inclusion, and P.P. performed the experiments and analysed the data. S.M. designed the simulation campaign. M.S. performed the simulations with the help of M.T. S.M., M.S., M.T. and C.M.C. analysed the simulation data. P.P. and S.M. and R.H. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results, read, revised and approved the final version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Physics thanks Shu Takagi, John Ralston, Nathan Speirs and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–7 and Discussion.
Supplementary Video 1
A 1-ns branch of the atomistic sample of the MD trajectory at −20 MPa.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pfeiffer, P., Shahrooz, M., Tortora, M. et al. Heterogeneous cavitation from atomically smooth liquid–liquid interfaces. Nat. Phys. 18, 1431–1435 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01764-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01764-z