Correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene


Electron–electron interactions play an important role in graphene and related systems and can induce exotic quantum states, especially in a stacked bilayer with a small twist angle1,2,3,4,5,6,7. For bilayer graphene where the two layers are twisted by the ‘magic angle’, flat band and strong many-body effects lead to correlated insulating states and superconductivity4,5,6,7. In contrast to monolayer graphene, the band structure of untwisted bilayer graphene can be further tuned by a displacement field8,9,10, providing an extra degree of freedom to control the flat band that should appear when two bilayers are stacked on top of each other. Here, we report the discovery and characterization of displacement field-tunable electronic phases in twisted double bilayer graphene. We observe insulating states at a half-filled conduction band in an intermediate range of displacement fields. Furthermore, the resistance gap in the correlated insulator increases with respect to the in-plane magnetic fields and we find that the g factor, according to the spin Zeeman effect, is ~2, indicating spin polarization at half-filling. These results establish twisted double bilayer graphene as an easily tunable platform for exploring quantum many-body states.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Correlated insulating states at half-filling tuned by displacement fields.
Fig. 2: Hall resistances and quantum oscillations.
Fig. 3: Parallel magnetic-field response of a half-filling correlated insulator.
Fig. 4: The ρxx versus T behaviour in the 1.33° device.

Data availability

The data represented in Figs. 1c–f, 2a–c, 3a–d and 4 are provided with the paper as Source Data. All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Moiré bands in twisted double layer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12233–12237 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cao, Y. et al. Superlattice-induced insulating states and valley-protected orbits in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 116804 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kim, K. et al. Tunable moiré bands and strong correlations in small twist angle bilayer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3364–3369 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lu, X. et al. Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene. Nature 574, 653–657 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature 459, 820–823 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Castro, E. V. et al. Biased bilayer graphene: semiconductor with a gap tunable by the electric fields effect. Rev. Phys. Lett. 99, 216802 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang, Y.-H., Mao, D., Cao, Y., Jarillo-Herrero, P. & Senthil, T. Nearly flat Chern bands. Phys. Rev. B 99, 075127 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sharpe, A. L. et al. Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters fillings in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 365, 605–608 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Serlin, M. et al. Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure. Science 367, 900–903 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xu, C. & Balents, L. Topological superconductivity in twisted multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 087001 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Po, H. C., Watanabe, H. & Vishwanath, A. Fragile topology and Wannier obstructions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 126402 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cao, Y. et al. Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near Planckian dissipation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 076801 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu, C.-C., Zhang, L.-D., Chen, W.-Q. & Yang, F. Chiral spin density wave and d+id superconductivity in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 217001 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Koshino, M. et al. Maximally localized Wannier orbitals and the extended Hubbard model for twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031087 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Po, H. C., Zou, L., Vishwanath, A. & Senthil, T. Origin of Mott insulating behavior and superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031089 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen, G. et al. Evidence of a gate-tunable Mott insulator in trilayer graphene moiré superlattice. Nat. Phys. 15, 237–241 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chen, G. et al. Signatures of gate-tunable superconductivity in trilayer graphene/boron nitride moiré superlattice. Nature 572, 215–219 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chen, G. et al. Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moiré superlattice. Nature 579, 56–61 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li, Z. Q. et al. Band structure asymmetry of bilayer graphene revealed by infrared spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 037403 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dean, C. R. et al. Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moiré superlattices. Nature 497, 598–602 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ponomarenko, L. A. et al. Cloning of Dirac fermions in graphene superlattices. Nature 497, 594–597 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hunt, B. et al. Massive Dirac fermions and Hofstadter butterfly in a van der Waals heterostructure. Science 340, 1427–1430 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yang, W. et al. Epitaxial growth of single-domain graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Mater. 12, 792–797 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Maher, P. et al. Tunable fractional quantum Hall phases in bilayer graphene. Science 345, 61–64 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Polshyn, H. et al. Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 15, 1011–1016 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Erickson, A. S. et al. Ferromagnetism in the Mott insulator Ba2NaOsO6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 016404 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lee, J. Y. et al. Theory of correlated insulating behavior and spin–triplet superconductivity in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 10, 5333 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liu, X. et al. Spin-polarized correlated insulator and superconductor in twisted double bilayer graphene. Preprint at (2019).

  33. 33.

    Cao, Y. et al. Electric field tunable correlated states and magnetic phase transitions in twisted bilayer–bilayer graphene. Preprint at (2019).

  34. 34.

    Kim, K. et al. Van der Waals heterostructures with high accuracy rotational alignment. Nano Lett. 16, 1989–1995 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang, L. et al. One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material. Science 342, 614–617 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chen, G. et al. Emergence of tertiary Dirac points in graphene moiré superlattices. Nano Lett. 6, 3576–3581 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    LAMMPS molecular dynamics simulator (Sandia National Laboratories, 2020);

  38. 38.

    Brenner, D. W. et al. A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 783–802 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kolmogorov, A. N. & Crespi, V. H. Registry-dependent interlayer potential for graphitic systems. Phys. Rev. B 71, 235415 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Slater, J. C. & Koster, G. F. Simplified LCAO method for the periodic potential problem. Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Trambly de Laissardière, G., Mayou, D. & Magaud, L. Numerical studies of confined states in rotated bilayers of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 86, 125413 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Haddadi, F., Wu, Q., Kruchkov, A. J. & Yazyev, O. V. Moiré flat bands in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. (2020).

  43. 43.

    Wu, Q., Zhang, S., Song, H.-F., Troyer, M. & Soluyanov, A. A. WannierTools: an open-source software package for novel topological materials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405–416 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We appreciate helpful discussions with G. Chen at UC Berkeley, G. Pan and S. Li at the Institute of Physics (IOP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and also help with transport measurements from F. Gao and Y. Li at IOP, CAS. G.Z. is grateful for financial support from NSFC (grants nos. 11834017 and 61888102), the Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS (grant no. XDB30000000), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS (grant no. QYZDB-SSW-SLH004) and the National Key R&D program (grant no. 2016YFA0300904). Q.W. and O.V.Y. acknowledge support from NCCR MARVEL. Z.Y.M. acknowledges support from the National Key R&D Program (2016YFA0300502), the Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS (XDB28000000), the NSFC (11574359) and the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China (17303019). K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan, A3 Foresight by JSPS and the CREST (JPMJCR15F3), JST. Numerical calculations were performed at the Swiss National Supercomputing Center (CSCS) under project no. s832, the facilities of Scientific IT and Application Support Center of EPFL, the Center for Quantum Simulation Sciences in the Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Computational Initiative of the Faculty of Science at the University of Hong Kong and the Platform for Data-Driven Computational Materials Discovery at the Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Guangdong, China.

Author information




G.Z. supervised the work and C.S. conceived the project. C.S. and Y.C. fabricated the devices. C.S. performed the transport measurements and data analysis. Q.W. and O.V.Y. carried out numerical calculations. K.W. and T.T. provided hBN crystals. C.S., Z.Y.M. and G.Z. wrote the paper. All other authors were involved in discussions of this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangyu Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Resistance mapping plots of all devices.

The resistance is plotted as a function of top and back gate voltages. Devices in our studies varies from 0.98° to 1.33°. The white dash line in f marks D/ε0 = -0.4V/nm.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Single-particle band gaps in the 0.98°-device.

a, Optical microscope image of the 0.98°-device. b, Schematic of device structure. c, Single-particle gaps at n=0, n=±ns and n=±3ns with respect to displacement field. The thermal-activation gaps are fitted with Arrhenius formula R~exp(Δ/2kT). Error bars are estimated from the uncertainty in the range of simply activated regime.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Calculated band structures of 1.3° twisted double bilayer graphene in various displacement fields.

The electric fields (and corresponding displacement fields calculated with the relative dielectric constant of hBN) in a, b, c and d are 0, |E|=50mV/nm (|D|/ε00.2V/nm), |E|=90mV/nm (|D|/ε00.36V/nm) and |E|=200mV/nm (|D|/ε00.8V/nm), respectively. Because of ignoring screening effects in TDBG, the calculated regime of displacement field to produce isolated flat band would be relatively lower than experimental results. In our calculations, energies are shifted such that CNP is located at zero energy.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Hall carrier density measurements in the 1.28°-device.

The Hall carrier density nH=-1/(eRH) in the 1.28°-device is plotted as a function of gate-induced charge density. The data are acquired at magnetic field B=2T and D/ε0=-0.4V/nm. Vertical colored bars correspond to various fillings of flat conduction band. The Hall carrier density switches types of Hall carriers at n=0, n=ns/2 and n=ns, and strictly follows nH=n, nH=n-ns/2 and nH=n-ns in the vicinity of correspondingly empty, half and full filling of flat conduction band. This behavior serves a definitely evidence of fully opened gap at half filling.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Quantum oscillations in the absence of half-filling correlated state in the 1.28°-device.

a, Transformed resistance mapping plot from Fig. 1d as a function of n and D. Line A, B and C denote the corresponding gate sweeping traces. Line C is the sweeping trace for Fig. 2b. b, Optical microscope picture of the 1.28°-device. c, e, Magneto resistance vs. carrier density n in perpendicular magnetic field B with gate voltage swept along trace A and B, respectively. At the same density, displacement field in e is always stronger than c. d, f, Schematic diagram of Landau levels observed in c and e, respectively. Landau levels originated from CNP and superlattice band edge are plotted with blue and orange colors, respectively. Fractal Landau levels are plotted with red colors.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Quantum oscillations in the 1.33°-device.

a, Magnetoresistance oscillations in perpendicular magnetic field B varied from 0T to 9T and at D/ε0=-0.4V/nm. b, Schematic of Landau levels observed in a. Dark blue lines, light blue lines and red lines track Landau levels fanning from CNP, Landau levels fanning from half filling and fractal Landau levels, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Resistivity as a function of temperature at and near 1/2 and 3/4 fillings in various perpendicular magnetic fields.

a, c, Temperature-dependent resistivity behaviors rightly at half filling (a) and 3/4 filling (c). The inset figure in a shows thermal activation gaps at B=0T, 1T, 3T and 6T. The fitting is denoted by lines in the main figure according to Arrhenius formula. The 3/4-filling insulating state is induced at B=6T. b, d, T-dependent resistivity behaviors at electron-doped half filling (b) and 3/4 filling (d). All the data are acquired in the 1.33°-device.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Correlated insulators enhanced by parallel magnetic fields in the 1.31°-device.

a, b, Resistivity as a function of D and n at B||=0T(a) and B||=9T(b). c, Zoomed-in image for clear displaying of 1/4 and 1/2 filling insulators at B||=9T. d, Resistivity versus density n at D/ε0=-0.4V/nm corresponding to the dash line in c. e, B|| dependence of all insulating states, including B||-induced 1/4-filling and enhanced half-filling correlated states. f, A fitted effective g factor according to the spin-Zeeman effect. The data in f show thermal-activation gaps at various B||. Error bars in f are estimated from the uncertainty in the range of simply activated regime.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Twist angle inhomogeneity in the 1.33°-device.

a, Schematic of measurement configuration and optical image of the 1.33°-device. b, c, d, Resistance color plot versus carrier density n and displacement field D at 1.6K acquired between contacts shown in a. We could extract twist angle θ=1.33°±0.01° as well as θ=1.11°±0.04° between contacts 4 and 5 according to the carrier density ns/2 or ns in d. The errors here are estimated from the uncertainty in determining resistance peaks in d. The discussed transport data in main text and Methods for 1.33°-device were acquired between contacts 3 and 4.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Zero resistivity in the 1.28°-device.

Temperature-varied resistivity data were acquired at n=2.45×1012cm−2 and D/ε0=0.463V/nm, where a blue dot is located in the inset figure. The inset figure shows resistance mapping as a function of Vbg and Vtg for the 1.28°-device at T=3K.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–5, Table 1 and discussions.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Source Data Fig. 2

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Source Data Fig. 3

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Source Data Fig. 4

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, C., Chu, Y., Wu, Q. et al. Correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 520–525 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading