Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence for metastable photo-induced superconductivity in K3C60


Excitation of high-Tc cuprates and certain organic superconductors with intense far-infrared optical pulses has been shown to create non-equilibrium states with optical properties that are consistent with transient high-temperature superconductivity. These non-equilibrium phases have been generated using femtosecond drives, and have been observed to disappear immediately after excitation, which is evidence of states that lack intrinsic rigidity. Here we make use of a new optical device to drive metallic K3C60 with mid-infrared pulses of tunable duration, ranging between one picosecond and one nanosecond. The same superconducting-like optical properties observed over short time windows for femtosecond excitation are shown here to become metastable under sustained optical driving, with lifetimes in excess of ten nanoseconds. Direct electrical probing, which becomes possible at these timescales, yields a vanishingly small resistance with the same relaxation time as that estimated by terahertz conductivity. We provide a theoretical description of the dynamics after excitation, and justify the observed slow relaxation by considering randomization of the order-parameter phase as the rate-limiting process that determines the decay of the light-induced superconductor.


Non-equilibrium orders in complex materials include photo-induced ferroelectricity1,2, magnetic polarization in antiferromagnets3 and transient superconductivity in the normal state of cuprates and organic conductors4,5,6,7,8,9. Among these, much work has been dedicated to alkali-doped fullerides of the A3C60 family (Fig. 1a), which exhibit tunable high-temperature superconductivity at equilibrium10,11,12,13,14,15 (Fig. 1b). The dynamical manipulation of superconductivity in these materials6,7 has been demonstrated by using optical pulses at mid-infrared frequencies that are tuned in the vicinity of local vibrational resonances of the C60 molecules.

Fig. 1: Crystal structure, phase diagram, equilibrium phase transition and short-lived, light-induced phase in K3C60.

a, Crystal structure of the molecular superconductor K3C60. C60 molecules are arranged in a face-centred cubic lattice. Potassium atoms (red) occupy the interstitial voids. b, Phase diagram of the A3C60 alkali-doped fullerene family as a function of the inverse unit cell volume 1/Vcell. The ground state of the material can be tuned by chemical or physical pressure. The solid grey line indicates the boundary between the insulating and metallic/superconducting phases. The blue dashed line highlights the dependence of the superconducting transition temperature Tc as a function of 1/Vcell. The star indicates the K3C60 compound investigated in the present work, which becomes superconducting for T < Tc = 20 K. c, Equilibrium reflectivity (sample–diamond interface), real and imaginary part of the optical conductivity of K3C60 measured upon cooling across the equilibrium superconducting transition. The blue shading indicates the change of spectral weight in these quantities across the thermally driven superconducting transition. d, Same quantities measured at equilibrium (red lines), 1 ps (blue filled dots) and 5 ps (light blue triangles) after photoexcitation. The blue shading indicates the change of spectral weight in these quantities induced by photoexcitation. The light and dark blue lines are Drude–Lorentz fits to the transient optical data (Supplementary Section 6). These data were acquired at a base temperature T = 100 K with a fluence of 3 mJ cm−2 and a pulse duration of 100 fs.

Source data

The evidence reported so far is summarized in Fig. 1c,d. K3C60 powders were held at a base temperature of \(T = 100\,{\mathrm{K}} \gg T_{\mathrm{c}} = 20\,{\mathrm{K}}\) and irradiated with 100-fs-long, 7.3-µm-wavelength (\(\hbar {\omega}\approx 170\,{\mathrm{meV}}\), where ħ is Planck’s constant and ω is angular frequency) pulses at a fluence of 3 mJ cm−2, which yielded a short-lived transient state with large changes in the terahertz optical properties. The transient optical response was probed with phase-sensitive, time-domain terahertz spectroscopy, which directly yields the real and imaginary part of the reflectance and hence can be used to retrieve the complex optical conductivity without the need of Kramers–Kronig transformations (Supplementary Section 4 and refs. 6,7). The transient low-frequency optical conductivity induced by femtosecond excitation was almost indistinguishable from that of the equilibrium superconducting state measured in the same material at \(T \ll T_{\mathrm{c}} = 20\,{\mathrm{K}}\) (compare to Fig. 1c). Such ‘superconducting-like’ optical properties consist of a perfect low-energy reflectance (R = 1), a vanishingly small real part of the optical conductivity σ1(ω) for all photon energies lower than the energy gap 2Δ and an imaginary conductivity σ2(ω) that diverges toward low frequencies as 1/ω, which itself is indicative of a large zero-frequency conductivity.

These observations have generated interest, as they may make it possible to achieve photo-induced superconducting states4,5,6,7,9,16,17 at or in the vicinity of room temperature. However, all of the experiments reported have indicated the presence of states that disappear immediately after optical excitation (see optical properties measured at 5 ps time delay in Fig. 1d). These short lifetimes would prevent most applications and have even raised controversy over the data interpretation itself18,19.

In this Article, we explore the possibility of longer-lived superconductivity under a sustained optical drive. First, we modified the experimental set-up used for the experiments shown in Fig. 1 and lengthened the 7.3 µm wavelength pump pulses by making them propagate in a dispersive CaF2 rod (Fig. 2a). These chirped pump pulses had a duration τp ≈ 1 ps, which enabled a sixfold increase in the pulse energy density (up to 18 mJ cm−2) without a corresponding increase in the peak electric field. This longer pulse duration allowed us to conduct these experiments at pulse energy densities that would damage the sample at femtosecond pulse durations, and hence it enabled the exploration of a new regime of excitation.

Fig. 2: Long-lived, light-induced phase in K3C60 generated with intense, 1-ps-long excitation pulses.

a, Schematic of the experimental set-up for pump–probe experiments producing 1-ps-long pump pulses centred at a mid-infrared (MIR) wavelength of 7.3 µm. These pulses have been generated in an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) and subsequent difference frequency generation (DFG) of the signal and idler beams. The 7.3-µm-wavelength, 100-fs-long pulses are stretched by linear propagation in a highly dispersive CaF2 rod. The photo-induced changes in the optical response of K3C60 upon irradiation are detected with transient terahertz time-domain spectroscopy using electro-optic sampling (EOS) for detection of the reflected terahertz field. b, Equilibrium reflectivity (sample–diamond interface), real and imaginary part of the optical conductivity of K3C60 measured at equilibrium (red lines), 10 ps, 300 ps and 12 ns (blue filled symbols) after photoexcitation. The blue shading indicates the change of spectral weight in these quantities induced by photoexcitation. The dark blue lines are Drude–Lorentz fits to the transient optical data (Supplementary Section 6). These data were acquired at a base temperature T = 100 K with a fluence of 18 mJ cm−2 and a pump-pulse duration of 1 ps.

Source data

The pump-induced changes in the low-frequency reflectivity and complex optical conductivity (Fig. 2b) were measured on the same sample and at the same temperature T = 100 K as for the experiments of Fig. 1. Representative reflectivity spectra R(ω) and complex optical conductivity, σ1(ω)+2(ω), measured for a 1 ps pump-pulse duration and 18 mJ cm−2 fluence are reported for time delays of –5 ps, 10 ps, 300 ps and 12 ns. These plots indicate a similar response to that shown in Fig. 1d (perfect reflectivity (R = 1), gapped σ1(ω) and a divergent σ2(ω)), although with a far longer relaxation time of at least 300 ps.

A more comprehensive exploration of sustained optical driving, beyond the limited pulse-width tunability of the set-up shown in Fig. 2, is shown in Figs. 3, 4 and 5. These measurements made use of a newly developed optical device, based on a CO2-gas laser that was optically synchronized to a femtosecond Ti:Al2O3 laser, and that delivered 10.6 µm wavelength pulses with durations that could be tuned between 5 ps and 1.3 ns (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3: Long-lived, light-induced phase in K3C60 generated with intense, 300-ps-long excitation pulses.

a, Schematic of the experimental set-up for pump–probe experiments that produced picosecond pulses of duration variable between 5 ps and 1.3 ns, centred at 10.6 µm wavelength and with a pulse energy of up to 10 mJ. The pulses are generated by seeding a CO2-gas laser with a femtosecond source. After amplification in a second CO2-gas laser, the pulse duration is tuned by semiconductor slicing. The photo-induced changes in the optical response of K3C60 upon irradiation are detected with transient terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. b, Equilibrium reflectivity (sample–diamond interface), real and imaginary part of the optical conductivity of K3C60 measured at equilibrium (red lines), 100 ps and 1 ns (blue filled symbols) after photoexcitation. The dark blue lines are Drude–Lorentz fits to the transient optical data (Supplementary Section 6). These data were acquired at a base temperature T = 100 K with a fluence of 53 mJ cm−2 and a pump-pulse duration of 300 ps. The blue shading indicates the change of spectral weight in these quantities induced by photoexcitation. c, Time dependence of the average reflectivity and real part of the optical conductivity σ1(ω) in the region of the photo-induced gap (2–10 meV). These data were acquired at a base temperature T = 100 K with a fluence of 25 mJ cm−2 and a pump-pulse duration of 200 ps. Triangles and circles denote measurements on two different samples. The top panel shows the measured time profile of the excitation pulse. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the respective quantity over the averaged range. The red dashed lines represent the equilibrium average value of σ1(ω) at equilibrium. The blue shading indicates the change of <σ1(ω)> from the equilibrium value after photoexcitation.

Source data

Fig. 4: Transient resistivity measurements of the long-lived, light-induced phase in K3C60.

a, Time evolution of the transient resistivity ρ0 obtained from an extrapolation to zero frequency of a Drude–Lorentz fit to the transient optical conductivities (Supplementary Section 6). Error bars represent the ρ0 confidence interval obtained from the fit. The inset shows a schematic depiction of the experimental arrangement indicating pump and probe beam and their electric fields in red and blue, respectively. b, Resistance of a laser-irradiated K3C60 pellet that was embedded in a microstrip transmission line as a function of time after photoexcitation. The resistance value is obtained from a transient two-point transport measurement in which contributions from contact resistances are calibrated from a static four-point measurement. The shaded area indicates an estimate of the systematic error that is introduced by this calibration (see the main text and Supplementary Sections 79). The inset shows a schematic of the electrical transport experiment with gold electrodes on K3C60 in yellow and the region of current flow in teal. The pump beam and its electric field are displayed in red. These data were acquired at a base temperature T = 100 K with a fluence of ~25 mJ cm−2. The pump-pulse durations were 200 ps and 75 ps for the optical and transport measurements, respectively.

Source data

Fig. 5: Pump-pulse duration and fluence dependence of the long-lived, light-induced phase in K3C60.

a, Pulse-length dependence of the resistance of a laser-irradiated K3C60 pellet measured at three different representative fluences of 1.5 mJ cm−2, 10 mJ cm−2 and 25 mJ cm−2. For the higher fluence values of 10 mJ cm−2 and 25 mJ cm−2, the minimum achievable pulse length is higher owing to limitations of our experimental set-up. Resistance values were measured right after the end of the pump pulse. The shading represents the standard deviation calculated on average from a set of 300, 70 and 10 measurements per point, respectively. The sample resistance was obtained as in Fig. 4 by calibrating the contributions of contact resistance in the transient two-terminal measurement from a static four-point measurement (Supplementary Section 8). The dashed grey line highlights R − Rcontact = 0. b, Corresponding fluence dependence of the calibrated sample resistance measured at a constant pump-pulse duration of 95 ps, with dotted lines identifying the different fluence values. The solid blue curve is a guide to the eye. The error bars display the standard deviation of the mean. The top panels schematically show how the shape of the excitation pulse evolves as function of their duration (a) and fluence (b). The shading represents the excitation fluence with darker shades of grey indicating a larger fluence. These data were measured at a base temperature T = 100 K.

Source data

Near-infrared femtosecond pulses from a Ti:Al2O3 laser were converted to a wavelength of 10.6 µm with an optical parametric amplifier and were used to seed a CO2 laser oscillator20. The oscillator emitted trains of nanosecond-long pulses, out of which the most intense was selected by a Pockels cell and amplified to an energy of 10 mJ in a second, multi-pass CO2 laser amplifier. The duration of these amplified pulses was then tuned as shown in Fig. 3a. The ‘front’ and the ‘back’ of the 1-ns-long CO2 pulses were ‘sliced’ using a pair of photoexcited semiconductor wafers as plasma mirrors21,22,23. As the wafers were set at Brewster’s angle and their bandgap was much larger than the 117 meV photon energy of the CO2 laser, these were almost perfectly transparent when unexcited. Pairs of femtosecond optical pulses struck each wafer at adjustable time delays, making these reflective owing to the injection of dense electron hole plasmas. Pump pulses with a duration tunable from 5 ps to 1.3 ns were generated in this way and used to pump the K3C60 sample (Supplementary Section 3), which was probed with the same time-domain terahertz reflectivity probe used for the experiments of Figs. 1 and 2.

Figure 3b displays snapshots of the transient optical properties (R(ω), σ1(ω), σ2(ω)) measured for K3C60 at T = 100 K before photoexcitation and 100 ps and 1 ns after photoexcitation with a 300-ps-long pulse centred at a wavelength of 10.6 µm. As these measurements were obtained for a repetition rate of 18 Hz, the signal-to-noise ratio is reduced compared with that of the cases shown in Figs. 1 and 2, which were measured at 500 Hz.

The transient optical spectra measured in these conditions showed the same superconducting-like features as reported in Figs. 1d and 2b for all pump-pulse durations up to 1 ns after excitation. Note that the 10.6 µm wavelength radiated by the CO2 laser is different from the 7.3 µm wavelength used in the experiments of Figs. 1 and 2. However, excitation with femtosecond optical pulses at this wavelength had previously been shown to induce the same transient optical signatures generated with 7.3 µm wavelength excitation, although with a lower efficiency6.

The time evolution of the terahertz optical properties is shown in Fig. 3c. The top panel shows the average reflectivity R(ω) in the region where σ1(ω) exhibited a gap (2–10 meV). The lower panel shows the average value of the corresponding real part of the optical conductivity σ1(ω), which reached zero after optical excitation, reflecting full gapping. Both quantities remained unchanged after excitation for all time delays measured up to 1 ns. Extended measurements indicate a lifetime of the light-induced superconducting state of τd ≈ 10 ns (Supplementary Section 11).

From the optical spectra, we also extracted an estimate of the ‘zero-frequency resistivity’ \(\rho _0 = 1/\lim _{\omega \to 0}\sigma _1\left( \omega \right)\), which is based on a Drude–Lorentz fit to the transient optical properties (Supplementary Section 6). This fitting procedure yielded a vanishingly small ρ0(t) for all time delays after excitation (Fig. 4a).

Estimates of ρ0 from optical measurements were complemented with direct electrical measurements. The K3C60 pellets were incorporated into lithographically patterned microstrip transmission lines. Their resistance was tracked at different times after excitation by transmitting a 1 ns voltage probe pulse that yielded time-resolved two-terminal resistance measurements (Supplementary Sections 7 and 8). The contributions due to contact resistance were normalized by performing equilibrium four-terminal measurements that were subtracted from the time-resolved resistance measurements (Supplementary Section 8). Figure 4b shows the time evolution of the two-terminal resistance of a K3C60 pellet measured at T = 100 K upon photoexcitation in similar conditions to those of the optical experiments reported in Fig. 3. As seen in the resistivity extrapolated from the optical measurements (compare to Fig. 4a), upon excitation the resistance drops to a value that is compatible with zero and recovers on the same timescale of tens of nanoseconds that was extracted from the fitted results of Fig. 4a (Supplementary Section 11).

The electrical probe experiments were repeated by varying the excitation pulse duration and fluence. Figure 5a shows exemplary pump-pulse duration dependencies of the measured sample photoresistivity for excitation fluences of 1.5 mJ cm−2, 10 mJ cm−2 and 25 mJ cm−2. The photoresistivity was mostly independent of the pump-pulse duration and depended only on the total energy of the excitation pulse. This is also underscored by the data shown in Fig. 5b, which illustrates the dependence of the sample resistance on the excitation fluence at a constant pulse duration. A long-lived state featuring zero resistance was observed for all excitation fluences in excess of 20 mJ cm−2.

These data provide evidence for a metastable state of K3C60 with a very large positive photoconductivity. The observation of such a large and positive photoconductivity would be highly unconventional for a metal, which generally exhibits photoconductivities of less than 1% (refs. 24,25,26) and which are often negative27, especially when excitation is performed in the mid-infrared and far away from inter-band transitions. Rather, the combined observation of a vanishingly small resistance with the transient terahertz optical spectra shown in Fig. 3 substantiates the assignment of a metastable superconducting state.

Note that the photo-induced high-temperature state survives far longer than the drive pulse, and hence exhibits intrinsic rigidity at timescales when the coherence is no longer supplied by the external drive. In search for a mechanism behind this long lifetime, we applied a phenomenological time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau model to capture the dynamics of the superconducting order parameter after laser excitation. In this model, we did not address the microscopic mechanism for the formation of superconducting order, but posited its emergence under optical excitation for a base temperature far in excess of the equilibrium transition temperature Tc. As argued in ref. 28, the normal state of unconventional superconductors that are susceptible to being ordered with light may be that of a phase-incoherent bosonic fluid, in which superconducting fluctuations are present already. Hence, we consider a hypothetical situation in which phase synchronization is established by a light field, and we study how one such order is lost after the driving pulse has been turned off.

In our time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau simulations, a local superconducting order parameter \(\psi _m\left( t \right) = \left| {\psi _m} \right|e^{i\varphi _m}\) was assigned on each lattice site. The average of these wave functions through the whole lattice \(\left\langle {\psi _m} \right\rangle\) described the macroscopic properties of the system (Supplementary Section 13). The relaxation of a superconducting state \(\left( {\left| {\left\langle {\psi _m} \right\rangle } \right| > 0} \right)\) to the equilibrium metallic one \(\left( {\left| {\left\langle {\psi _m} \right\rangle } \right| = 0} \right)\) can happen either by a fast decrease of the amplitudes of the local order parameter |ψm| (that is, by annihilation of Cooper pairs) or by randomization of the order-parameter phase φm. By construction, the latter dominates in a phase-incoherent superconductor, in which phase fluctuations are considerably larger than the amplitude ones. In this case, the local free energy surface shows a minimum, even above Tc, at a finite local order-parameter amplitude |ψm| and suppresses amplitude fluctuations (Fig. 6a). We found that, whereas the relaxation to the non-superconducting ground state occurs by thermally driven diffusion of the local phases, the synchronized state can survive considerably longer than that observed in many cases that consider amplitude relaxation only29,30.

Fig. 6: Modelling of the relaxation of the superconducting order parameter.

a, Local free energy potential as a function of the local complex superconducting order parameter ψm. The arrow indicates the phase diffusion channel. b, Time evolution of the integrated loss of spectral weight in the region of the superconducting gap (left axis, blue dots and triangles denote measurements on two different samples) and corresponding modelling (right axis, solid blue curve) using a time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau framework as described in the main text. The grey dotted line is a guide to the eye. ce, Snapshots of the on-site complex order parameters ψm for three different time delays of 0 ns (c) (right after excitation), 1 ns (d) and 25 ns (e).

Source data

Figure 6b displays the time dependence of the integrated spectral weight loss over the optical gap \({\Delta}\sigma _1 = {\int} {\left[ {\sigma _1^{{\mathrm{equil}}}\left( \omega \right) - \sigma _1^{{\mathrm{trans}}}\left( \omega \right)} \right]{\rm{d}}\omega }\), a quantity that is proportional to the superfluid density in a superconductor. Here, \(\sigma _1^{{\mathrm{trans}}}\left( \omega \right)\) and \(\sigma _1^{{\mathrm{equil}}}\left( \omega \right)\) are the real parts of the optical conductivities measured in the photo-induced and equilibrium state, respectively. This quantity can be compared to the normalized amplitude of the averaged order parameter |ψm| that is extracted from the time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau simulations (Supplementary Section 13), yielding a relaxation time of ~12 ns. Figure 6c–e complements this observation and shows the time evolution of the local complex order parameters ψm that were extracted from the same simulations 0 ns, 1 ns and 25 ns after excitation. These snapshots show directly how in this model the local order parameters ψm evolve by randomizing their phase φm around a ring at constant |ψm| until the metallic state at \(\left| {\left\langle {\psi _m} \right\rangle } \right| = 0\) is reached.

In this context, questions remain about the microscopic origin of the metastable light-induced superconducting state. From the observation that the amplitude of the effect is dependent only on the integrated pulse area, it becomes clear that, at least in the long-pulse regime, the previously proposed non-linear phonon mechanism6, which was suggested to generate a displaced crystal structure, is most likely not correct. If it were correct, one would expect a response that depends on some power of the electric field, rather than on only the total energy of the pulse. That said, mechanisms based on the parametric coupling of the light field to the electronic properties, either to amplify a superconducting order parameter31,32,33 or to cool selected degrees of freedom34,35, are not necessarily inconsistent with these observations.

Our findings prompt comparison with previously measured responses that were observed under sustained driving, such as the microwave enhancement of conventional superconductivity36,37. One evident difference with these measurements is that the temperature scale observed here is far larger than that reported in the microwave-enhancement case. Furthermore, in the case of microwave-enhanced Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer superconductivity, the effect was observed only for excitation below the superconducting gap, which was interpreted to be a result of quasi-particle redistribution and of renormalization of the parameters entering the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer equations38. In the microwave experiments, complementary measurements, in which excitation was tuned immediately above the gap, yielded a reduction of the superconducting order. Here, our experiments are conducted in a different regime; that is, at pump-photon energies that are at least one order of magnitude larger than the low-temperature equilibrium superconducting gap, and in a regime in which the primary coupling of the mid-infrared radiation is not with the condensate, but with other high-energy excitations, such as molecular vibrations or collective electronic modes. Hence, it is unlikely that the mechanism invoked for microwave enhancement can explain these observations.

Other experimental reports have documented a sustained, metastable enhancement of superconductivity in oxygen-deficient YBa2Cu3O7−δ samples after exposure to radiation with frequencies ranging from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared39,40,41. However, in all of these cases, the superconducting transition temperature of the irradiated superconductor never exceeded the equilibrium transition temperature at optimal doping. These observations were either interpreted as a result of photodoping towards a more metallic state favouring superconductivity, or involved annealing of oxygen-deficient samples. By contrast, the data reported here show enhanced superconducting properties well above the highest equilibrium transition temperature observed in any one of the A3C60 compounds13, by excitation with photon energies away from inter-band transitions. Therefore, none of the previously invoked mechanisms offers a plausible explanation for our findings.

The discovery of a metastable light-induced state with clear signatures of superconductivity holds compelling promise in the quest to extend lifetimes even further. New lasers that are capable of generating longer pulses or suitably designed trains of pulses could be developed to sustain the coherence of this state. Extended lifetimes will also open up the possibility of studying these effects with other low-frequency probes, which range from measurements of magnetic susceptibility to scattering and transport methods. Recent theoretical42 and experimental43 reports suggest that the superconducting order parameter can be influenced also by the electromagnetic environment of an optical cavity. Indeed, observations made in alkali-doped fullerides43 could be expanded on by combining cavity settings with external driving44 as a means to reduce the required excitation and hence dissipation and heating.


All methods can be found in the Supplementary Information.

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper. All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Nova, T. F., Disa, A. S., Fechner, M. & Cavalleri, A. Metastable ferroelectricity in optically strained SrTiO3. Science 364, 1075–1079 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Li, X. et al. Terahertz field–induced ferroelectricity in quantum paraelectric SrTiO3. Science 364, 1079–1082 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Disa, A. S. et al. Polarizing an antiferromagnet by optical engineering of the crystal field. Nat. Phys. 16, 937–941 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fausti, D. et al. Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe-ordered cuprate. Science 331, 189–191 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hu, W. et al. Optically enhanced coherent transport in YBa2Cu3O6.5 by ultrafast redistribution of interlayer coupling. Nat. Mater. 13, 705–711 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mitrano, M. et al. Possible light-induced superconductivity in K3C60 at high temperature. Nature 530, 461–464 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cantaluppi, A. et al. Pressure tuning of light-induced superconductivity in K3C60. Nat. Phys. 14, 837–841 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Buzzi, M. et al. Photo-molecular high temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. X 10, 031028 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu, B. et al. Pump frequency resonances for light-induced incipient superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6.5. Phys. Rev. X 10, 011053 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hebard, A. F. et al. Superconductivity at 18 K in potassium-doped C60. Nature 350, 600–601 (1991).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Xiang, X.-D. et al. Synthesis and electronic transport of single crystal K3C60. Science 256, 1190–1191 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gunnarsson, O. Alkali-doped Fullerides: Narrow-band Solids with Unusual Properties (World Scientific, 2004).

  13. 13.

    Ganin, A. Y. et al. Polymorphism control of superconductivity and magnetism in Cs3C60 close to the Mott transition. Nature 466, 221–225 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Takabayashi, Y. et al. The disorder-free non-BCS superconductor Cs3C60 emerges from an antiferromagnetic insulator parent state. Science 323, 1585–1590 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Takabayashi, Y. & Prassides, K. Unconventional high-Tc superconductivity in fullerides. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150320 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nicoletti, D. et al. Optically induced superconductivity in striped La2−xBaxCuO4 by polarization-selective excitation in the near infrared. Phys. Rev. B 90, 100503 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cremin, K. A. et al. Photoenhanced metastable c-axis electrodynamics in stripe-ordered cuprate La1.885Ba0.115CuO4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19875 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nicoletti, D., Mitrano, M., Cantaluppi, A. & Cavalleri, A. Comment on ‘Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy of transient metallic and superconducting states’. Preprint at (2015).

  19. 19.

    Orenstein, J. & Dodge, J. S. Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy of transient metallic and superconducting states. Phys. Rev. B 92, 134507 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Babzien, M., Pogorelsky, I. V. & Polanskiy, M. Solid-state seeding of a high power picosecond carbon dioxide laser. AIP Conf. Proc. 1777, 110001 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Alcock, A. J. & Corkum, P. B. Ultra-short pulse generation with CO2 lasers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 298, 365–376 (1980).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Alcock, A. J., Corkum, P. B. & James, D. J. A fast scalable switching technique for high‐power CO2 laser radiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 27, 680–682 (1975).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mayer, B. et al. Sub-cycle slicing of phase-locked and intense mid-infrared transients. New J. Phys. 16, 063033 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Waterman, A. T. An equilibrium theory of electrical conduction. Phys. Rev. 22, 259–270 (1923).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bartlett, R. S. Photo-resistance effect for metals at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. 26, 247–255 (1925).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wilson, T. C. Photoconductivity of metal films. Phys. Rev. 55, 316–317 (1939).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Heyman, J. N. et al. Carrier heating and negative photoconductivity in graphene. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 015101 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Uemura, Y. J. Dynamic superconductivity responses in photoexcited optical conductivity and Nernst effect. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 104801 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lucas, G. & Stephen, M. J. Relaxation of the superconducting order parameter. Phys. Rev. 154, 349–353 (1967).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Madan, I. et al. Nonequilibrium optical control of dynamical states in superconducting nanowire circuits. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao0043 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Babadi, M., Knap, M., Martin, I., Refael, G. & Demler, E. Theory of parametrically amplified electron-phonon superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 96, 014512 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Knap, M., Babadi, M., Refael, G., Martin, I. & Demler, E. Dynamical Cooper pairing in nonequilibrium electron-phonon systems. Phys. Rev. B 94, 214504 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    von Hoegen, A. et al. Parametrically amplified phase-incoherent superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6+x. Preprint at (2020).

  34. 34.

    Denny, S. J., Clark, S. R., Laplace, Y., Cavalleri, A. & Jaksch, D. Proposed parametric cooling of bilayer cuprate superconductors by terahertz excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 137001 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Nava, A., Giannetti, C., Georges, A., Tosatti, E. & Fabrizio, M. Cooling quasiparticles in A3C60 fullerides by excitonic mid-infrared absorption. Nat. Phys. 14, 154–159 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Anderson, P. W. & Dayem, A. H. Radio-frequency effects in superconducting thin film bridges. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 195–197 (1964).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wyatt, A. F. G., Dmitriev, V. M., Moore, W. S. & Sheard, F. W. Microwave-enhanced critical supercurrents in constricted tin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1166–1169 (1966).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Eliashberg, G. & Film, M. Superconductivity stimulated by a high-frequency field. JETP Lett. 11, 114–116 (1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yu, G., Heeger, A. J., Stucky, G., Herron, N. & McCarron, E. M. Transient photoinduced conductivity in semiconducting single crystals of YBa2Cu3O6.3: search for photoinduced metallic state and for photoinduced superconductivity. Solid State Commun. 72, 345–349 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yu, G. et al. Phase separation of photogenerated carriers and photoinduced superconductivity in high-Tc materials. Phys. Rev. B 45, 4964–4977 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nieva, G. et al. Photoinduced enhancement of superconductivity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2159–2161 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schlawin, F., Cavalleri, A. & Jaksch, D. Cavity-mediated electron-photon superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 133602 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Thomas, A. et al. Exploring superconductivity under strong coupling with the vacuum electromagnetic field. Preprint at (2019).

  44. 44.

    Gao, H., Schlawin, F., Buzzi, M., Cavalleri, A. & Jaksch, D. Photo-induced electron pairing in a driven cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 053602 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The research leading to these results received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 319286 (QMAC). We acknowledge support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft via the Cluster of Excellence ‘The Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging’ (EXC 1074 – project ID 194651731). E.W. was supported by a fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. We thank M. Volkmann for his technical assistance in the construction of the new optical apparatus presented in this work. We are also grateful to E. König, B. Fiedler and B. Höhling for their support in the fabrication of the electronic transport samples, and to J. Harms for assistance with graphics. Open access funding was provided by the Max Planck Society.

Author information




M. Budden, T.G., M. Buzzi, G.J., G.M., Y.L. and A.C. conceived the experiment. A.C. supervised the project. The set-up shown in Fig. 2 was built and related measurements were performed by M. Buzzi and G.J. The set-up shown in Fig. 3 was developed by M. Budden and T.G. with support of Y.L. and related measurements were performed by M. Budden and T.G. Data analysis of the optical measurements was conducted by M. Budden, T.G., M. Buzzi and G.J. Transport measurements (Figs. 4 and 5) were performed by M. Budden and T.G. with support by T.M. and G.M. Preparation of the samples for electronic transport was carried out by M. Budden, T.G. and E.W. Custom measurement electronics and circuit simulations were performed by T.M. and G.M. K3C60 samples were provided by D.P. and M.R. The Ginzburg–Landau model of the superconducting order parameter relaxation was developed by F.S. and D.J. The manuscript was written by M. Budden, M. Buzzi, T.G., T.M., G.M. and A.C. with contributions from all other authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. Budden or A. Cavalleri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Physics thanks Giulio Cerullo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Sections 1–13, including figures.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Source Data Fig. 2

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Source Data Fig. 3

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Source Data Fig. 4

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Source Data Fig. 5

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Source Data Fig. 6

Numerical data used to generate graphs in the figures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Budden, M., Gebert, T., Buzzi, M. et al. Evidence for metastable photo-induced superconductivity in K3C60. Nat. Phys. (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing