Extreme magnetic field-boosted superconductivity

Article metrics


Applied magnetic fields underlie exotic quantum states, such as the fractional quantum Hall effect1 and Bose–Einstein condensation of spin excitations2. Superconductivity, however, is inherently antagonistic towards magnetic fields. Only in rare cases3,4,5 can these effects be mitigated over limited fields, leading to re-entrant superconductivity. Here, we report the coexistence of multiple high-field re-entrant superconducting phases in the spin-triplet superconductor UTe2 (ref. 6). We observe superconductivity in the highest magnetic field range identified for any re-entrant superconductor, beyond 65 T. Although the stability of superconductivity in these high magnetic fields challenges current theoretical models, these extreme properties seem to reflect a new kind of exotic superconductivity rooted in magnetic fluctuations7 and boosted by a quantum dimensional crossover8.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Magnetic field-induced superconducting and polarized phases of UTe2.
Fig. 2: Re-entrance of superconductivity in UTe2.
Fig. 3: Angle dependence of the field-induced superconducting and polarized phases of UTe2.
Fig. 4: Temperature dependence of SCFP in UTe2.

Data availability

The data represented in Figs. 14 are available as source data in Supplementary Data 1–4. All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Stormer, H. L. Nobel lecture: the fractional quantum Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 875–889 (1999).

  2. 2.

    Zapf, V., Jaime, M. & Batista, C. D. Bose–Einstein condensation in quantum magnets. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 563–614 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Meul, H. W. et al. Observation of magnetic-field-induced superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 497–500 (1984).

  4. 4.

    Uji, S. et al. Magnetic-field-induced superconductivity in a two-dimensional organic conductor. Nature 410, 908–910 (2001).

  5. 5.

    Konoike, T. et al. Magnetic-field-induced superconductivity in the antiferromagnetic organic superconductor κ−(BETS)2FeBr4. Phys. Rev. B 70, 094514 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Ran, S. et al. Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet superconductivity. Science 365, 684–687 (2019).

  7. 7.

    Mineev, V. P. Reentrant superconductivity in URhGe. Phys. Rev. B 91, 014506 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Lebed, A. G. & Sepper, O. Quantum limit in a magnetic field for triplet superconductivity in a quasi-one-dimensional conductor. Phys. Rev. B 90, 024510 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Jaccarino, V. & Peter, M. Ultra-high-field superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 290–292 (1962).

  10. 10.

    Lévy, F., Sheikin, I., Grenier, B. & Huxley, A. D. Magnetic field-induced superconductivity in the ferromagnet URhGe. Science 309, 1343–1346 (2005).

  11. 11.

    Lévy, F., Sheikin, I. & Huxley, A. Acute enhancement of the upper critical field for superconductivity approaching a quantum critical point in URhGe. Nat. Phys. 3, 460–463 (2007).

  12. 12.

    Aoki, D. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in heavy fermion UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 88, 043702 (2019).

  13. 13.

    Aoki, D. et al. Extremely large and anisotropic upper critical field and the ferromagnetic instability in UCoGe. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 78, 113709 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Huxley, A. D., Yates, S. J. C., Lévy, F. & Sheikin, I. Odd-parity superconductivity and the ferromagnetic quantum critical point. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 76, 051011 (2007).

  15. 15.

    Hattori, T. et al. Relationship between ferromagnetic criticality and the enhancement of superconductivity induced by transverse magnetic fields in UCoGe. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 83, 073708 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Knafo, W. et al. High-field moment polarization in the ferromagnetic superconductor UCoGe. Phys. Rev. B 86, 184416 (2012).

  17. 17.

    De Boer, F. R. et al. High-magnetic-field and high-pressure effects in monocrystalline URu2Si2. Phys. B+C. 138, 1–6 (1986).

  18. 18.

    Balicas, L. et al. Superconductivity in an organic insulator at very high magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067002 (2001).

  19. 19.

    Hattori, K. & Tsunetsugu, H. p-Wave superconductivity near a transverse saturation field. Phys. Rev. B 87, 064501 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Sherkunov, Y., Chubukov, A. V. & Betouras, J. J. Effects of Lifshitz transitions in ferromagnetic superconductors: the case of URhGe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 097001 (2018).

  21. 21.

    Dupuis, N. & Montambaux, G. Superconductivity of quasi-one-dimensional conductors in a high magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 49, 8993–9008 (1994).

  22. 22.

    Sato, M. & Ando, Y. Topological superconductors: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Kallin, C. & Berlinsky, J. Chiral superconductors. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 054502 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Sarma, S. D., Freedman, M. & Nayak, C. Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation. npj Quant. Inf. 1, 15001 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Karzig, T. et al. Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum computation with Majorana zero modes. Phys. Rev. B 95, 235305 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Miyake, A. et al. Metamagnetic transition in heavy fermion superconductor UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 88, 063706 (2019).

  27. 27.

    Knebel, G. et al. Field-reentrant superconductivity close to a metamagnetic transition in the heavy-fermion superconductor UTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 88, 063707 (2019).

  28. 28.

    Palm, E. C. & Murphy, T. P. Very low friction rotator for use at low temperatures and high magnetic fields. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 237–239 (1999).

  29. 29.

    Altarawneh, M. M., Mielke, C. H. & Brooks, J. S. Proximity detector circuits: an alternative to tunnel diode oscillators for contactless measurements in pulsed magnetic field environments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 066104 (2009).

  30. 30.

    Ghannadzadeh, S. et al. Measurement of magnetic susceptibility in pulsed magnetic fields using a proximity detector oscillator. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 113902 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Singleton, J. et al. Observation of the Fulde–Ferrell–Larkin–Ovchinnikov state in the quasi-two-dimensional organic superconductor κ–(BEDT–TTF)2Cu(NCS)2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 12, L641 (2000).

  32. 32.

    Goddard, P. A. et al. Experimentally determining the exchange parameters of quasi-two-dimensional Heisenberg magnets. New J. Phys. 10, 083025 (2008).

Download references


We acknowledge helpful discussions with A. Lebed and V. Yakovenko. W.T.F. is grateful for the support of the Schmidt Science Fellows programme in partnership with the Rhodes Trust. Research at the University of Maryland was supported by the US National Science Foundation Division of Materials Research Award No. DMR-1610349 (support for sample preparation), the US Department of Energy (DOE) Award No. DE-SC-0019154 (support for experimental measurements) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through Grant No. GBMF4419 (support for materials synthesis). Work performed at NHMFL was supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1644779, the State of Florida, DOE and through the DOE Basic Energy Sciences Field Work Project Science in 100 T. A portion of this work was supported by the NHMFL User Collaboration Grants Program. Identification of commercial equipment does not imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST.

Author information

N.P.B. directed the project. S.R., W.T.F. and S.R.S. synthesized the single crystalline samples. S.R., I.-L.L., J.S. and F.B. performed the magnetoresistance, PDO and magnetization measurements in the pulsed field. Y.S.E., D.J.C., P.M.N. and D.G. performed the magnetoresistance measurements in the d.c. field. C.E. and H.K. performed magnetoresistance measurements in low magnetic fields. S.R. and N.P.B. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Correspondence to Sheng Ran or Nicholas P. Butch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–5.

Supplementary Data 1

Source data for Fig. 1.

Supplementary Data 2

Source data for Fig. 2.

Supplementary Data 3

Source data for Fig. 3.

Supplementary Data 4

Source data for Fig. 4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark