Abstract

The black body remains the most prominent source of light for absolute radiometry1. Its main alternative, synchrotron radiation, requires costly and large facilities2. Quantum optics offers a new radiometric source: parametric down-conversion (PDC), a nonlinear optical process, in which pairwise photon correlations enable absolute calibration of photodetectors3,4,5,6. Since the emission rate crucially depends on the brightness of the electromagnetic field, quantum-mechanical fluctuations of the vacuum7 can be seen as a seed of spontaneous PDC, and their amplitude is a natural radiometric standard. Thus, they allow for the calibration of the spectral radiance of light sources8,9,10,11 by measuring the ratio between seeded and unseeded PDC. Here, we directly use the frequency spectrum of the electromagnetic vacuum to trigger spontaneous PDC and employ the generated light to infer the spectral response of a spectrometer over a broad spectral range. Then, we deduce the absolute quantum efficiency from the spectral shape of PDC in the high-gain regime, without relying on a seed or reference detector. Our results compare well with the ones obtained with a reference lamp, demonstrating a promising primary radiation standard.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Hollandt, J. et al. in Optical Radiometry: Volume 41 (Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences) (eds Parr, A. C. et al.) Ch. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005).

  2. 2.

    Lemke, D. & Labs, D. The Synchrotron Radiation of the 6-GeV DESY Machine as a Fundamental Radiometric Standard. Appl. Opt. 6, 1043–1048 (1967).

  3. 3.

    Klyshko, D. N. Use of two-photon light for absolute calibration of photoelectric detectors. Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 10, 1112–1117 (1980).

  4. 4.

    Malygin, A. A., Penin, A. N. & Sergienko, A. V. Absolute calibration of the sensitivity of photodetectors using a biphotonic field. JETP Lett. 33, 477–480 (1981).

  5. 5.

    Polyakov, S. V. & Migdall, A. L. High accuracy verification of a correlated-photon-based method for determining photon-counting detection efficiency. Opt. Express 15, 1390–1407 (2007).

  6. 6.

    Rarity, J. G., Ridley, K. D. & Tapster, P. R. Absolute measurement of detector quantum efficiency using parametric downconversion. Appl. Opt. 26, 4616–4619 (1987).

  7. 7.

    Klyshko, D. N. Photons and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach, Boca Raton, 1989).

  8. 8.

    Klyshko, D. N. Utilization of vacuum fluctuations as an optical brightness standard. Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 7, 591–595 (1977).

  9. 9.

    Kitaeva, G. Kh., Penin, A. N., Fadeev, V. V. & Yanait, Yu. A. Measurement of brightness of light fluxes using vacuum fluctuations as a reference. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 24, 564–566 (1979).

  10. 10.

    Migdall, A., Datla, R., Sergienko, A., Orszak, J. S. & Shih, Y. H. Measuring absolute infrared spectral radiance with correlated visible photons: technique verification and measurement uncertainty. Appl. Opt. 37, 3455–3463 (1998).

  11. 11.

    Kornienko, V. V., Kitaeva, G. Kh., Sedlmeir, F., Leuchs, G. & Schwefel, H. G. Towards terahertz detection and calibration through spontaneous parametric down-conversion in the terahertz idler-frequency range generated by a 795 nm diode laser system. APL Photon. 3, 051704 (2018).

  12. 12.

    Lemieux, S. et al. Engineering the frequency spectrum of bright squeezed vacuum via group velocity dispersion in an SU(1, 1) interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 183601 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Milonni, P. Field quantization and radiative processes in dispersive dielectric media. J. Mod. Opt. 42, 1991–2004 (1995).

  14. 14.

    Spasibko, K. Yu, Iskhakov, T., Sh. & Chekhova, M. V. Spectral properties of high-gain parametric down-conversion. Opt. Express 20, 7507–7515 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Hsu, F.-K. & Lai, C.-W. Absolute instrument spectral response measurements using angle-resolved parametric fluorescence. Opt. Express 21, 18538–18552 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Dayan, B. Theory of two-photon interactions with broadband down-converted light and entangled photons. Phys. Rev. A 76, 043813 (2007).

  17. 17.

    Agafonov, I. N., Chekhova, M. V. & Leuchs, G. Two-color bright squeezed vacuum. Phys. Rev. A 82, 011801 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Allevi, A. et al. Coherence properties of high-gain twin beams. Phys. Rev. A 90, 063812 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Brida, G., Meda, A., Genovese, M., Predazzi, E. & Ruo-Berchera, I. Systematic study of the PDC speckle structure for quantum imaging applications. J. Mod. Opt. 56, 201–208 (2009).

  20. 20.

    Pérez, A. M. et al. Bright squeezed-vacuum source with 1.1 spatial mode. Opt. Lett. 39, 2403–2406 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Yoon, H. W., Gibson, C. E. & Barnes, P. Y. Realization of the National Institute of Standards and Technology detector-based spectral irradiance scale. Appl. Opt. 41, 5879–5890 (2002).

  22. 22.

    Datla, R. U. & Parr, A. C. in Optical Radiometry: Volume 41 (Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences) (eds Parr, A. C. et al.) Ch. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005).

  23. 23.

    Eimerl, D., Davis, L., Velsko, S., Graham, E. K. & Zalkin, A. Optical, mechanical, and thermal properties of barium borate. J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1968–1983 (1987).

  24. 24.

    Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics (Academic, Burlington, 2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank O. Reshef for valuable discussions. This research was performed as part of a collaboration within the Max Planck-University of Ottawa Centre for Extreme and Quantum Photonics, whose support we gratefully acknowledge. This work was supported by the Canada First Research Excellence Fund award on Transformative Quantum Technologies and by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC). R.F. acknowledges the financial support of the Banting postdoctoral fellowship of the NSERC and S.L. the financial support from Le Fonds de Recherche du Québec Nature et Technologies.

Author information

Author notes

    • Enno Giese

    Present address: Institut für Quantenphysik and Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany

    • Robert Fickler

    Present address: Photonics Laboratory, Physics Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    • Samuel Lemieux
    • , Enno Giese
    • , Robert Fickler
    •  & Robert W. Boyd
  2. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany

    • Maria V. Chekhova
  3. Physics Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

    • Maria V. Chekhova
  4. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

    • Maria V. Chekhova
  5. Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

    • Robert W. Boyd

Authors

  1. Search for Samuel Lemieux in:

  2. Search for Enno Giese in:

  3. Search for Robert Fickler in:

  4. Search for Maria V. Chekhova in:

  5. Search for Robert W. Boyd in:

Contributions

M.V.C. conceived the idea for relative calibration. S.L., E.G. and R.F. extended that idea to the absolute calibration scheme. S.L. and R.F designed the experiment. S.L. conducted the experiment and performed the data analysis. S.L., E.G. and R.F. wrote the manuscript. M.V.C. and R.W.B. supervised the project. All authors contributed to scientific discussions.

Competing interests

S.L., M.V.C. and R.W.B., along with coinventors M. Manceau and G. Leuchs, the University of Ottawa and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, have an international patent application (PCT/IB2017/056450) currently pending, about the relative calibration using PDC. E.G. and R.F. declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Lemieux.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Material.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0447-2