Abstract

Ultracold molecules are ideal platforms for many important applications, ranging from quantum simulation1,2,3,4,5 and quantum information processing 6,7 to precision tests of fundamental physics2,8,9,10,11. Producing trapped, dense samples of ultracold molecules is a challenging task. One promising approach is direct laser cooling, which can be applied to several classes of molecules not easily assembled from ultracold atoms12,13. Here, we report the production of trapped samples of laser-cooled CaF molecules with densities of 8 × 107 cm−3 and at phase-space densities of 2 × 10−9, 35 times higher than for sub-Doppler-cooled samples in free space14. These advances are made possible by efficient laser cooling of optically trapped molecules to well below the Doppler limit, a key step towards many future applications. These range from ultracold chemistry to quantum simulation, where conservative trapping of cold and dense samples is desirable. In addition, the ability to cool optically trapped molecules opens up new paths towards quantum degeneracy.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Micheli, A., Brennen, G. K. & Zoller, P. A toolbox for lattice-spin models with polar molecules. Nat. Phys. 2, 341–347 (2006).

  2. 2.

    Carr, L. D., DeMille, D., Krems, R. V. & Ye, J. Cold and ultracold molecules: science, technology and applications. New J. Phys. 11, 055049 (2009).

  3. 3.

    Pupillo, G. et al. Cold atoms and molecules in self-assembled dipolar lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 050402 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Büchler, H. P. et al. Strongly correlated 2D quantum phases with cold polar molecules: controlling the shape of the interaction potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060404 (2007).

  5. 5.

    Blackmore, J. A. et al. Ultracold molecules: a platform for quantum simulation. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1804.02372v1 (2018).

  6. 6.

    DeMille, D. Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002).

  7. 7.

    Yelin, S. F., Kirby, K. & Côté, R. Schemes for robust quantum computation with polar molecules. Phys. Rev. A 74, 050301 (2006).

  8. 8.

    ACME Collaboration Order of magnitude smaller limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron. Science 343, 269–272 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Kara, D. M. et al. Measurement of the electrons electric dipole moment using YbF molecules: methods and data analysis. New J. Phys. 14, 103051 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Lim, J. et al. Laser cooled YbF molecules for measuring the electron’s electric dipole moment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 123201 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Kozyryev, I. & Hutzler, N. R. Precision measurement of time-reversal symmetry violation with laser-cooled polyatomic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 133002 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Rosa, M. D. Laser-cooling molecules. Eur. Phys. J. D 31, 395–402 (2004).

  13. 13.

    Kozyryev, I., Baum, L., Matsuda, K. & Doyle, J. M. Proposal for laser cooling of complex polyatomic molecules. ChemPhysChem 17, 3641–3648 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Williams, H. J. et al. Magnetic trapping and coherent control of laser-cooled molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 163201 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Yan, B. et al. Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules. Nature 501, 521–525 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Ospelkaus, S. et al. Quantum-state controlled chemical reactions of ultracold potassium-rubidium molecules. Science 327, 853–857 (2010).

  17. 17.

    Barry, J. F., McCarron, D. J., Norrgard, E. B., Steinecker, M. H. & DeMille, D. Magneto-optical trapping of a diatomic molecule. Nature 512, 286–289 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Norrgard, E., McCarron, D., Steinecker, M., Tarbutt, M. & DeMille, D. Sub-millikelvin dipolar molecules in a radio-frequency magneto-optical trap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 063004 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Steinecker, M. H., McCarron, D. J., Zhu, Y. & DeMille, D. Improved radio-frequency magneto-optical trap of SrF molecules. ChemPhysChem 17, 3664–3669 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Truppe, S. et al. Molecules cooled below the Doppler limit. Nat. Phys. 13, 1173–1176 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Anderegg, L. et al. Radio frequency magneto-optical trapping of CaF with high density. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 103201 (2017).

  22. 22.

    McCarron, D. J., Steinecker, M. H., Zhu, Y. & DeMille, D. Magnetically-trapped molecules efficiently loaded from a molecular MOT. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1712.01462 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Stellmer, S., Pasquiou, B., Grimm, R. & Schreck, F. Laser cooling to quantum degeneracy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263003 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Hu, J. et al. Creation of a Bose-condensed gas of 87Rb by laser cooling. Science 358, 1078–1080 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Truppe, S. et al. An intense, cold, velocity-controlled molecular beam by frequency-chirped laser slowing. New J. Phys. 19, 022001 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Devlin, J. A. & Tarbutt, M. R. Three-dimensional doppler, polarization-gradient, and magneto-optical forces for atoms and molecules with dark states. New J. Phys. 18, 123017 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Grynberg, G. & Courtois, J.-Y. Proposal for a magneto-optical lattice for trapping atoms in nearly-dark states. Europhys. Lett. 27, 41–46 (1994).

  28. 28.

    Sievers, F. et al. Simultaneous sub-Doppler laser cooling of fermionic 6Li and 40K on the D 1 line: theory and experiment. Phys. Rev. A 91, 023426 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Burchianti, A. et al. Efficient all-optical production of large 6Li quantum gases using D 1 gray-molasses cooling. Phys. Rev. A 90, 043408 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Colzi, G. et al. Sub-Doppler cooling of sodium atoms in gray molasses. Phys. Rev. A 93, 023421 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Kozyryev, I. et al. Sisyphus laser cooling of a polyatomic molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 173201 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Kosicki, M. B., Kedziera, D. & Zuchowski, P. S. Ab initio study of chemical reactions of cold SrF and CaF molecules with alkali-metal and alkaline-earth-metal atoms: the implications for sympathetic cooling. J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 4152–4159 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Lim, J., Frye, M. D., Hutson, J. M. & Tarbutt, M. R. Modeling sympathetic cooling of molecules by ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. A 92, 053419 (2015).

  34. 34.

    Quéméner, G. & Bohn, J. L.. Shielding 2Σ ultracold dipolar molecular collisions with electric fields. Phys. Rev. A 93, 012704 (2016).

  35. 35.

    Schlosser, N., Reymond, G. & Grangier, P. Collisional blockade in microscopic optical dipole traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 023005 (2002).

  36. 36.

    Yavuz, D. D. et al. Fast ground state manipulation of neutral atoms in microscopic optical traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 063001 (2006).

  37. 37.

    Endres, M. et al. Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays. Science 354, 1024–1027 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Barredo, D., de Léséleuc, S., Lienhard, V., Lahaye, T. & Browaeys, A. An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays. Science 354, 1021–1023 (2016).

  39. 39.

    Vuletić, V., Chin, C., Kerman, A. J. & Chu, S. Degenerate Raman sideband cooling of trapped cesium atoms at very high atomic densities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5768–5771 (1998).

  40. 40.

    Roos, C. F. et al. Experimental demonstration of ground state laser cooling with electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5547–5550 (2000).

  41. 41.

    Kaufman, A. M., Lester, B. J. & Regal, C. A. Cooling a single atom in an optical tweezer to its quantum ground state. Phys. Rev. X 2, 041014 (2012).

  42. 42.

    Thompson, J. D., Tiecke, T. G., Zibrov, A. S., Vuletić, V. & Lukin, M. D. Coherence and Raman sideband cooling of a single atom in an optical tweezer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 133001 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Army Research Office (ARO). B.L.A. acknowledges support from NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program. L.W.C. acknowledges support from Max Planck Harvard Research Center for Quantum Optics. We thank the Greiner group for lending us a 1,064-nm fibre amplifier.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Loïc Anderegg
    • , Benjamin L. Augenbraun
    • , Yicheng Bao
    • , Sean Burchesky
    • , Lawrence W. Cheuk
    •  & John M. Doyle
  2. Harvard-MIT Center for Ultracold Atoms, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Loïc Anderegg
    • , Benjamin L. Augenbraun
    • , Yicheng Bao
    • , Sean Burchesky
    • , Lawrence W. Cheuk
    • , Wolfgang Ketterle
    •  & John M. Doyle
  3. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Wolfgang Ketterle

Authors

  1. Search for Loïc Anderegg in:

  2. Search for Benjamin L. Augenbraun in:

  3. Search for Yicheng Bao in:

  4. Search for Sean Burchesky in:

  5. Search for Lawrence W. Cheuk in:

  6. Search for Wolfgang Ketterle in:

  7. Search for John M. Doyle in:

Contributions

All authors contributed to all aspects of this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loïc Anderegg.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0191-z