Universality of clone dynamics during tissue development

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 16 March 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

The emergence of complex organs is driven by the coordinated proliferation, migration and differentiation of precursor cells. The fate behaviour of these cells is reflected in the time evolution of their progeny, termed clones, which serve as a key experimental observable. In adult tissues, where cell dynamics is constrained by the condition of homeostasis, clonal tracing studies based on transgenic animal models have advanced our understanding of cell fate behaviour and its dysregulation in disease1,2. But what can be learnt from clonal dynamics in development, where the spatial cohesiveness of clones is impaired by tissue deformations during tissue growth? Drawing on the results of clonal tracing studies, we show that, despite the complexity of organ development, clonal dynamics may converge to a critical state characterized by universal scaling behaviour of clone sizes. By mapping clonal dynamics onto a generalization of the classical theory of aerosols, we elucidate the origin and range of scaling behaviours and show how the identification of universal scaling dependences may allow lineage-specific information to be distilled from experiments. Our study shows the emergence of core concepts of statistical physics in an unexpected context, identifying cellular systems as a laboratory to study non-equilibrium statistical physics.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Clonal dynamics during tissue development.
Fig. 2: Origin of scaling and universality in clonal dynamics during development.
Fig. 3: Universality of cluster sizes in different tissue types and organisms.

Change history

  • 16 March 2018

    In the version of this Letter originally published, Steffen Rulands was not listed as a corresponding author. This has been corrected in all versions of the Letter.

References

  1. 1.

    Kretzschmar, K. & Watt, F. M. Lineage tracing. Cell 148, 33–45 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Blanpain, C. & Simons, B. D. Unravelling stem cell dynamics by lineage tracing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 489–502 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Morrison, S. J. & Spradling, A. C. Stem cells and niches: Mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell 132, 598–611 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Klein, A. M. & Simons, B. D. Universal patterns of stem cell fate in cycling adult tissues. Development 138, 3103–3111 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rulands, S. & Simons, B. D. Tracing cellular dynamics in tissue development, maintenance and disease. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 43, 38–45 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Klein, A. M., Doupé, D. P., Jones, P. H. & Simons, B. D. Mechanism of murine epidermal maintenance: Cell division and the voter model. Phys. Rev. E. 77, 031907 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bondue, A. & Blanpain, C. Mesp1: A key regulator of cardiovascular lineage commitment. Circ. Res. 107, 1414–1427 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lescroart, F. et al. Early lineage restriction in temporally distinct populations of Mesp1 progenitors during mammalian heart development. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 829–840 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chabab, S. et al. Uncovering the number and clonal dynamics of Mesp1 progenitors during heart morphogenesis. Cell Rep. 14, 1–10 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wuidart, A. et al. Quantitative lineage tracing strategies to resolve multipotency in tissue-specific stem cells. Genes Dev. 30, 1261–1277 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Meilhac, S. M. et al. A retrospective clonal analysis of the myocardium reveals two phases of clonal growth in the developing mouse heart. Development 130, 3877–3889 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sedmera, D. & Thompson, R. P. Myocyte proliferation in the developing heart. Dev. Dyn. 240, 1322–1334 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Foret, L. et al. A general theoretical framework to infer endosomal network dynamics from quantitative image analysis. Curr. Biol. 22, 1381–1390 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Krapisky, P. L., Redner, S. & Ben-Naim, E. A Kinetic View of Statistical Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010).

  15. 15.

    Friedlander, S. K. Smoke, Dust, and Haze (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).

  16. 16.

    Hendriks, E. M., Ernst, M. H. & Ziff, R. M. Coagulation equations with gelation. J. Stat. Phys. 31, 519–563 (1983).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ranft, J. et al. Fluidization of tissues by cell division and apoptosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20863–20868 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Redner, S. in Disorder and Fracture (NATO ASI Series vol. 204) (eds Charmet, J. C. et al.) (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1990).

  19. 19.

    Friedlander, S. K. & Wang, C. S. The self-preserving particle size distribution for coagulation by Brownian motion. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 22, 126–132 (1966).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gupta, V. & Poss, K. D. Clonally dominant cardiomyocytes direct heart morphogenesis. Nature 484, 479–484 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Clayton, E. et al. A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis. Nature 446, 185–189 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Olesen, P., Ferkinghoff-Borg, J., Jensen, M. H. & Mathiesen, J. Diffusion, fragmentation, and coagulation processes: analytical and numerical results. Phys. Rev. E 72, 031103 (2006).

  23. 23.

    Saga, Y. et al. MesP1 is expressed in the heart precursor cells and required for the formation of a single heart tube. Development 126, 3437–3447 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

B.D.S. acknowledges the support of the Wellcome Trust (grant number 098357/Z/12/Z). F.L. is supported by a long-term EMBO fellowship and the postdoctoral fellowship of the FNRS. S.C. is supported by a FRIA/FNRS fellowship. C.B. is supported by the ULB, a research grant of the FNRS, the Foundation Bettencourt Schueller, the Foundation ULB and the Foundation Baillet Latour. M.S. is supported by an MRC doctoral training award and A.P. is supported by MRC research grant MR/K018329/1. M.H. is a Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Dale Fellow and is jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (104151/Z/14/Z); M.H. and N.P. are funded by a Horizon 2020 grant (LSFM4LIFE). C.H. was funded by a Cambridge Stem Cell Institute Seed funding award for interdisciplinary research awarded to M.H. and B.D.S. We are grateful to K. D. Poss and V. Gupta for making a digital version of their data available to us.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.R. and B.D.S. conceived the project. S.C., F.L., C.J.H., N.P. and M.S. performed the experiments and collected the raw data. M.H. supervised the liver experiments. S.R. developed the theory, and performed the modelling and statistical analysis. S.R. and B.D.S drafted the manuscript. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Steffen Rulands or Benjamin D. Simons.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

We have complied with all relevant ethical regulations. Mesp1-Cre mice colonies were maintained in a certified animal facility in accordance with European guidelines. These experiments were approved by the local ethical committee under the reference #LA1230332(CEBEA). Research using mice for pancreas and liver samples has been regulated under the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012 following ethical review by the University of Cambridge Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB). These experimental data sets were obtained as by-products from other research projects undertaken by the respective laboratories.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary material

Supplementary Figs S1 & S2, Supplementary Theory, Supplementary References 1–10

Life Sciences Reporting Summary(PDF 68 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rulands, S., Lescroart, F., Chabab, S. et al. Universality of clone dynamics during tissue development. Nature Phys 14, 469–474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0055-6

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing