Reaction–diffusion processes1 have been widely used to study dynamical processes in epidemics2,3,4 and ecology5 in networked metapopulations. In the context of epidemics6, reaction processes are understood as contagions within each subpopulation (patch), while diffusion represents the mobility of individuals between patches. Recently, the characteristics of human mobility7, such as its recurrent nature, have been proven crucial to understand the phase transition to endemic epidemic states8,9. Here, by developing a framework able to cope with the elementary epidemic processes, the spatial distribution of populations and the commuting mobility patterns, we discover three different critical regimes of the epidemic incidence as a function of these parameters. Interestingly, we reveal a regime of the reaction–diffussion process in which, counter-intuitively, mobility is detrimental to the spread of disease. We analytically determine the precise conditions for the emergence of any of the three possible critical regimes in real and synthetic networks.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Marro, J. & Dickman, R. Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005).
Colizza, V., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Vespignani, A. Reaction–diffusion processes and metapopulation models in heterogeneous networks. Nat. Phys. 3, 276–282 (2007).
Colizza, V. & Vespignani, A. Invasion threshold in heterogeneous metapopulation networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 148701 (2007).
Hufnagel, L., Brockmann, D. & Geisel, T. Forecast and control of epidemics in a globalized world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15124–15129 (2004).
Hanski, I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396, 41–50 (1998).
Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P. & Vespignani, A. Epidemic processes in complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925–979 (2015).
Gonzalez, M. C., Hidalgo, C. A. & Barabasi, A.-L. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453, 779–782 (2008).
Balcan, D. et al. Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21484–21489 (2009).
Balcan, D. & Vespignani, A. Phase transitions in contagion processes mediated by recurrent mobility patterns. Nat. Phys. 7, 581–586 (2011).
Sattenspiel, L. & Dietz, K. A structured epidemic model incorporating geographic mobility among regions. Math. Biosci. 128, 71–91 (1995).
Grenfell, B. & Harwood, J. (Meta)population dynamics of infectious diseases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 395–399 (1997).
Keeling, M. J. & Rohani, P. Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008).
Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O. E. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2004).
Bajardi, P., Barrat, A., Natale, F., Savini, L. & Colizza, V. Dynamical patterns of cattle trade movements. PLoS ONE 6, e19869 (2011).
Ball, F. et al. Seven challenges for metapopulation models of epidemics, including households models. Epidemics 10, 63–67 (2015).
Funk, S. et al. Nine challenges in incorporating the dynamics of behaviour in infectious diseases models. Epidemics 10, 21–25 (2015).
Eubank, S. et al. Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks. Nature 429, 180–184 (2004).
Ferguson, N. M. et al. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature 442, 448–452 (2006).
Van den Broeck, W. et al. The GLEaMviz computational tool, a publicly available software to explore realistic epidemic spreading scenarios at the global scale. BMC Infect. Dis. 11, 37 (2011).
Lofgren, E. T. et al. Opinion: mathematical models: a key tool for outbreak response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 18095–18096 (2014).
Scarpino, S. V., Allard, A. & Hebert-Dufresne, L. The effect of a prudent adaptive behaviour on disease transmission. Nat. Phys. 12, 1042–1046 (2016).
Marcus, R. A. Brief comments on perturbation theory of a nonsymmetric matrix: the GF matrix. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 2612–2616 (2001).
Estrada, E., Meloni, S., Sheerin, M. & Moreno, Y. Epidemic spreading in random rectangular networks. Phys. Rev. E 94, 052316 (2016).
Gross, T., D’Lima, C. J. D. & Blasius, B. Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 208701 (2006).
Schwarzkopf, Y., Rákos, A. & Mukamel, D. Epidemic spreading in evolving networks. Phys. Rev. E 82, 036112 (2010).
Shaw, L. B. & Schwartz, I. B. Fluctuating epidemics on adaptive networks. Phys. Rev. E 77, 066101 (2008).
Barton, N. H. The probability of fixation of a favoured allele in a subdivided population. Genet. Res. 62, 149–157 (1993).
Whitlock, M. C. Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics 164, 767–779 (2003).
Colizza, V., Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Valleron, A.-J. & Vespignani, A. Modeling the worldwide spread of pandemic influenza: Baseline case and containment interventions. PLoS Med. 4, 0095–0110 (2007).
Kitsak, M. et al. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nat. Phys. 6, 888–893 (2010).
Escobar-Morales, G. Cali en Cifras 2013 (Departamento Administrativo de Planeación, Santiago de Cali, 2013).
We acknowledge S. Meloni for the very many discussions and useful suggestions. J.G.-G. and A.A. acknowledge financial support from MINECO (projects FIS2015-71582-C2 and FIS2014-55867-P) and from the Departamento de Industria e Innovación del Gobierno de Aragón y Fondo Social Europeo (FENOL group E-19). A.A. acknowledges also financial support from the ICREA Academia, the James S. McDonnell Foundation.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Soriano-Paños, D. & Arenas, A. Critical regimes driven by recurrent mobility patterns of reaction–diffusion processes in networks. Nature Phys 14, 391–395 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-017-0022-7
BMC Public Health (2021)
Communications Physics (2021)
Critical behavior in interdependent spatial spreading processes with distinct characteristic time scales
Communications Physics (2021)
Nonlinear Dynamics (2021)
Effects of social distancing and isolation on epidemic spreading modeled via dynamical density functional theory
Nature Communications (2020)