Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Inverse-designed non-reciprocal pulse router for chip-based LiDAR

This article has been updated

Abstract

Non-reciprocal devices such as isolators and circulators are key enabling technologies for communication systems, both at microwave and optical frequencies. Although non-reciprocal devices based on magnetic effects are available for free-space and fibre-optic communication systems, their on-chip integration has been challenging, primarily due to the concomitant high insertion loss, weak magneto-optical effects and material incompatibility. We show that χ(3) nonlinear resonators can be used to achieve all-passive, low-loss, bias-free non-reciprocal transmission for applications in photonic systems such as chip-scale LiDAR. A multi-port nonlinear Fano resonator is used as an on-chip, non-reciprocal pulse router for frequency comb-based optical ranging. Because time-reversal symmetry imposes stringent limitations on the operating power range and transmission of a single nonlinear resonator, we implement a cascaded Fano–Lorentzian resonator system that overcomes these limitations and substantially improves the insertion loss and operating power range of current state-of-the-art devices. This work provides a platform-independent design for non-reciprocal transmission and routing that is ideally suited for photonic integration.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: All-passive non-reciprocal transmission using a silicon photonic resonator.
Fig. 2: Non-reciprocal pulse routing and optical distance measurement.
Fig. 3: Non-reciprocal transmission in broad operating power range using cascaded nonlinear resonators.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history

  • 30 March 2020

    In the PDF version of this Article originally published online, Figs. 2 and 3 appeared in reverse order; this has now been amended. The HTML version was unaffected.

References

  1. 1.

    Yu, Z. & Fan, S. Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions. Nat. Photon. 3, 91–94 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lira, H., Yu, Z., Fan, S. & Lipson, M. Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 033901 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sounas, D. L. & Alù, A. Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation. Nat. Photon. 11, 774–783 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bi, L. et al. On-chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical resonators. Nat. Photon. 5, 758–762 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Monolithic integration of broadband optical isolators for polarization-diverse silicon photonics. Optica 6, 473–478 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huang, D. et al. Electrically driven and thermally tunable integrated optical isolators for silicon photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 271–278 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sohn, D. B., Kim, S. & Bahl, G. Time-reversal symmetry breaking with acoustic pumping of nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 12, 91–97 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kittlaus, E. A., Otterstrom, N. T., Kharel, P., Gertler, S. & Rakich, P. T. Non-reciprocal interband Brillouin modulation. Nat. Photon. 12, 613–619 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gallo, K., Assanto, G., Parameswaran, K. R. & Fejer, M. M. All-optical diode in a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 314–316 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fan, L. et al. An all-silicon passive optical diode. Science 335, 447–450 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mahmoud, A. M., Davoyan, A. R. & Engheta, N. All-passive nonreciprocal metastructure. Nat. Commun. 6, 8359 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yu, Y. et al. Nonreciprocal transmission in a nonlinear photonic-crystal fano structure with broken symmetry. Laser Photon. Rev. 9, 241–247 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Peng, B. et al. Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities. Nat. Phys. 10, 394–398 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chang, L. et al. Parity–time symmetry and variable optical isolation in active–passive-coupled microresonators. Nat. Photon. 8, 524–529 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Del Bino, L. et al. Microresonator isolators and circulators based on the intrinsic nonreciprocity of the Kerr effect. Optica 5, 279–282 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shi, Y., Yu, Z. & Fan, S. Limitations of nonlinear optical isolators due to dynamic reciprocity. Nat. Photon. 9, 388–392 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Komljenovic, T. et al. Photonic integrated circuits using heterogeneous integration on silicon. Proc. IEEE 106, 2246–2257 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fan, L. et al. Silicon optical diode with 40 dB nonreciprocal transmission. Opt. Lett. 38, 1259–1261 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kim, J., Kim, S. & Bahl, G. Complete linear optical isolation at the microscale with ultralow loss. Sci. Rep. 7, 1647 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Trocha, P. et al. Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs. Science 359, 887–891 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sounas, D. L. & Alù, A. Fundamental bounds on the operation of Fano nonlinear isolators. Phys. Rev. B 97, 115431 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sounas, D. L., Soric, J. & Alù, A. Broadband passive isolators based on coupled nonlinear resonances. Nat. Electron. 1, 113–119 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Piggott, A. Y. et al. Inverse design and demonstration of a compact and broadband on-chip wavelength demultiplexer. Nat. Photon. 9, 374–377 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Piggott, A. Y., Petykiewicz, J., Su, L. & Vučković, J. Fabrication-constrained nanophotonic inverse design. Sci. Rep. 7, 1786 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fano, U. Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts. Phys. Rev. 124, 1866–1878 (1961).

    ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fan, S., Suh, W. & Joannopoulos, J. D. Temporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical resonators. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 569–572 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fischer, K. A. et al. On-chip architecture for self-homodyned nonclassical light. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 044002 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yu, Y. et al. Fano resonance control in a photonic crystal structure and its application to ultrafast switching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 061117 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang, K. X., Yu, Z., Sandhu, S. & Fan, S. Fundamental bounds on decay rates in asymmetric single-mode optical resonators. Opt. Lett. 38, 100–102 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Salem, R. et al. Signal regeneration using low-power four-wave mixing on silicon chip. Nat. Photon. 2, 35–38 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Slavík, R. et al. All-optical phase and amplitude regenerator for next-generation telecommunications systems. Nat. Photon. 4, 690–695 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Li, L. et al. All-optical regenerator of multi-channel signals. Nat. Commun. 8, 884 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sun, J., Timurdogan, E., Yaacobi, A., Hosseini, E. S. & Watts, M. R. Large-scale nanophotonic phased array. Nature 493, 195–199 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dietrich, P.-I. et al. In situ 3D nanoprinting of free-form coupling elements for hybrid photonic integration. Nat. Photon. 12, 241–247 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Arbabi, A., Horie, Y., Ball, A. J., Bagheri, M. & Faraon, A. Subwavelength-thick lenses with high numerical apertures and large efficiency based on high-contrast transmitarrays. Nat. Commun. 6, 7069 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Cheng, Q., Rumley, S., Bahadori, M. & Bergman, K. Photonic switching in high performance datacenters. Opt. Express 26, 16022–16043 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Hadad, Y., Soric, J. C., Khanikaev, A. B. & Alù, A. Self-induced topological protection in nonlinear circuit arrays. Nat. Electron. 1, 178–182 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yu, Y., Xue, W., Semenova, E., Yvind, K. & Mork, J. Demonstration of a self-pulsing photonic crystal Fano laser. Nat. Photon. 11, 81–84 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bekele, D. A. et al. Pulse carving using nanocavity-enhanced nonlinear effects in photonic crystal Fano structures. Opt. Lett. 43, 955–958 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bekele, D. A. et al. Signal reshaping and noise suppression using photonic crystal Fano structures. Opt. Express 26, 19596–19605 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li, P. et al. All-optical analog comparator. Sci. Rep. 6, 31903 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Dong, G., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. High-contrast and low-power all-optical switch using Fano resonance based on a silicon nanobeam cavity. Opt. Lett. 43, 5977–5980 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Atabaki, A. H. et al. Integrating photonics with silicon nanoelectronics for the next generation of systems on a chip. Nature 556, 349–354 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tamura, K., Ippen, E., Haus, H. & Nelson, L. 77-fs pulse generation from a stretched-pulse mode-locked all-fiber ring laser. Opt. Lett. 18, 1080–1082 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Vuckovic, J. et al. Inverse design software for nanophotonic structures — spins. Stanford University http://techfinder.stanford.edu/technologies/S18-012_inverse (2018).

  46. 46.

    Su, L. et al. Nanophotonic inverse design with SPINS: software architecture and practical considerations. Appl. Phys. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5131263 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sapra, N. V. et al. Inverse design and demonstration of broadband grating couplers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 1–7 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yang, K. Y. et al. Bridging ultrahigh-Q devices and photonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 12, 297–302 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge insightful discussions with D. Sounas, W. Bogaerts, D. A. B. Miller, P. Del’Haye, M. Soltani, L. Chang and J. E. Bowers, and are also grateful for technical advice from C. Langrock, B. Buscaino, N. V. Sapra, L. Su and J. M. Kahn. The silicon devices were fabricated in the Stanford Nanofabrication Facility and the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities. K.Y.Y. acknowledges support from a Quantum and Nano Science and Engineering postdoctoral fellowship, J.S. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (grant no. DGE-1656518) and M.C. is supported by a Rubicon postdoctoral fellowship by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). This work is funded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under the AFOSR MURI programme (award no. FA9550-17-1-0002) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF4744 and GBMF4743). We thank G. Pomrenke and the AFOSR MURI programme management team for discussions throughout the project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.Y.Y., J.S., M.C., A.Alù and J.V. conceived the experiments. K.Y.Y., J.S. and M.C. designed the device. K.Y.Y. and J.S. fabricated and tested the devices with assistance from M.C., A.D., G.H.A., M.S. and D.V. M.C. and K.Y.Y. conducted numerical simulations. K.Y.Y. and A.D. conducted optical ranging measurement with assistance from J.S., M.C. and D.V. All authors analysed the data and contributed to writing the manuscript. J.V. and A.Alù supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jelena Vučković.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–12, Table 1 and discussion (eight sections).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, K.Y., Skarda, J., Cotrufo, M. et al. Inverse-designed non-reciprocal pulse router for chip-based LiDAR. Nat. Photonics 14, 369–374 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0606-0

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing