Non-reciprocal devices such as isolators and circulators are key enabling technologies for communication systems, both at microwave and optical frequencies. Although non-reciprocal devices based on magnetic effects are available for free-space and fibre-optic communication systems, their on-chip integration has been challenging, primarily due to the concomitant high insertion loss, weak magneto-optical effects and material incompatibility. We show that χ(3) nonlinear resonators can be used to achieve all-passive, low-loss, bias-free non-reciprocal transmission for applications in photonic systems such as chip-scale LiDAR. A multi-port nonlinear Fano resonator is used as an on-chip, non-reciprocal pulse router for frequency comb-based optical ranging. Because time-reversal symmetry imposes stringent limitations on the operating power range and transmission of a single nonlinear resonator, we implement a cascaded Fano–Lorentzian resonator system that overcomes these limitations and substantially improves the insertion loss and operating power range of current state-of-the-art devices. This work provides a platform-independent design for non-reciprocal transmission and routing that is ideally suited for photonic integration.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $14.08 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Yu, Z. & Fan, S. Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions. Nat. Photon. 3, 91–94 (2009).
Lira, H., Yu, Z., Fan, S. & Lipson, M. Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 033901 (2012).
Sounas, D. L. & Alù, A. Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation. Nat. Photon. 11, 774–783 (2017).
Bi, L. et al. On-chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical resonators. Nat. Photon. 5, 758–762 (2011).
Zhang, Y. et al. Monolithic integration of broadband optical isolators for polarization-diverse silicon photonics. Optica 6, 473–478 (2019).
Huang, D. et al. Electrically driven and thermally tunable integrated optical isolators for silicon photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 271–278 (2016).
Sohn, D. B., Kim, S. & Bahl, G. Time-reversal symmetry breaking with acoustic pumping of nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 12, 91–97 (2018).
Kittlaus, E. A., Otterstrom, N. T., Kharel, P., Gertler, S. & Rakich, P. T. Non-reciprocal interband Brillouin modulation. Nat. Photon. 12, 613–619 (2018).
Gallo, K., Assanto, G., Parameswaran, K. R. & Fejer, M. M. All-optical diode in a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 314–316 (2001).
Fan, L. et al. An all-silicon passive optical diode. Science 335, 447–450 (2012).
Mahmoud, A. M., Davoyan, A. R. & Engheta, N. All-passive nonreciprocal metastructure. Nat. Commun. 6, 8359 (2015).
Yu, Y. et al. Nonreciprocal transmission in a nonlinear photonic-crystal fano structure with broken symmetry. Laser Photon. Rev. 9, 241–247 (2015).
Peng, B. et al. Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities. Nat. Phys. 10, 394–398 (2014).
Chang, L. et al. Parity–time symmetry and variable optical isolation in active–passive-coupled microresonators. Nat. Photon. 8, 524–529 (2014).
Del Bino, L. et al. Microresonator isolators and circulators based on the intrinsic nonreciprocity of the Kerr effect. Optica 5, 279–282 (2018).
Shi, Y., Yu, Z. & Fan, S. Limitations of nonlinear optical isolators due to dynamic reciprocity. Nat. Photon. 9, 388–392 (2015).
Komljenovic, T. et al. Photonic integrated circuits using heterogeneous integration on silicon. Proc. IEEE 106, 2246–2257 (2018).
Fan, L. et al. Silicon optical diode with 40 dB nonreciprocal transmission. Opt. Lett. 38, 1259–1261 (2013).
Kim, J., Kim, S. & Bahl, G. Complete linear optical isolation at the microscale with ultralow loss. Sci. Rep. 7, 1647 (2017).
Trocha, P. et al. Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs. Science 359, 887–891 (2018).
Sounas, D. L. & Alù, A. Fundamental bounds on the operation of Fano nonlinear isolators. Phys. Rev. B 97, 115431 (2018).
Sounas, D. L., Soric, J. & Alù, A. Broadband passive isolators based on coupled nonlinear resonances. Nat. Electron. 1, 113–119 (2018).
Piggott, A. Y. et al. Inverse design and demonstration of a compact and broadband on-chip wavelength demultiplexer. Nat. Photon. 9, 374–377 (2015).
Piggott, A. Y., Petykiewicz, J., Su, L. & Vučković, J. Fabrication-constrained nanophotonic inverse design. Sci. Rep. 7, 1786 (2017).
Fano, U. Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts. Phys. Rev. 124, 1866–1878 (1961).
Fan, S., Suh, W. & Joannopoulos, J. D. Temporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical resonators. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 569–572 (2003).
Fischer, K. A. et al. On-chip architecture for self-homodyned nonclassical light. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 044002 (2017).
Yu, Y. et al. Fano resonance control in a photonic crystal structure and its application to ultrafast switching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 061117 (2014).
Wang, K. X., Yu, Z., Sandhu, S. & Fan, S. Fundamental bounds on decay rates in asymmetric single-mode optical resonators. Opt. Lett. 38, 100–102 (2013).
Salem, R. et al. Signal regeneration using low-power four-wave mixing on silicon chip. Nat. Photon. 2, 35–38 (2008).
Slavík, R. et al. All-optical phase and amplitude regenerator for next-generation telecommunications systems. Nat. Photon. 4, 690–695 (2010).
Li, L. et al. All-optical regenerator of multi-channel signals. Nat. Commun. 8, 884 (2017).
Sun, J., Timurdogan, E., Yaacobi, A., Hosseini, E. S. & Watts, M. R. Large-scale nanophotonic phased array. Nature 493, 195–199 (2013).
Dietrich, P.-I. et al. In situ 3D nanoprinting of free-form coupling elements for hybrid photonic integration. Nat. Photon. 12, 241–247 (2018).
Arbabi, A., Horie, Y., Ball, A. J., Bagheri, M. & Faraon, A. Subwavelength-thick lenses with high numerical apertures and large efficiency based on high-contrast transmitarrays. Nat. Commun. 6, 7069 (2015).
Cheng, Q., Rumley, S., Bahadori, M. & Bergman, K. Photonic switching in high performance datacenters. Opt. Express 26, 16022–16043 (2018).
Hadad, Y., Soric, J. C., Khanikaev, A. B. & Alù, A. Self-induced topological protection in nonlinear circuit arrays. Nat. Electron. 1, 178–182 (2018).
Yu, Y., Xue, W., Semenova, E., Yvind, K. & Mork, J. Demonstration of a self-pulsing photonic crystal Fano laser. Nat. Photon. 11, 81–84 (2017).
Bekele, D. A. et al. Pulse carving using nanocavity-enhanced nonlinear effects in photonic crystal Fano structures. Opt. Lett. 43, 955–958 (2018).
Bekele, D. A. et al. Signal reshaping and noise suppression using photonic crystal Fano structures. Opt. Express 26, 19596–19605 (2018).
Li, P. et al. All-optical analog comparator. Sci. Rep. 6, 31903 (2016).
Dong, G., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. High-contrast and low-power all-optical switch using Fano resonance based on a silicon nanobeam cavity. Opt. Lett. 43, 5977–5980 (2018).
Atabaki, A. H. et al. Integrating photonics with silicon nanoelectronics for the next generation of systems on a chip. Nature 556, 349–354 (2018).
Tamura, K., Ippen, E., Haus, H. & Nelson, L. 77-fs pulse generation from a stretched-pulse mode-locked all-fiber ring laser. Opt. Lett. 18, 1080–1082 (1993).
Vuckovic, J. et al. Inverse design software for nanophotonic structures — spins. Stanford University http://techfinder.stanford.edu/technologies/S18-012_inverse (2018).
Su, L. et al. Nanophotonic inverse design with SPINS: software architecture and practical considerations. Appl. Phys. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5131263 (2020).
Sapra, N. V. et al. Inverse design and demonstration of broadband grating couplers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 1–7 (2019).
Yang, K. Y. et al. Bridging ultrahigh-Q devices and photonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 12, 297–302 (2018).
We acknowledge insightful discussions with D. Sounas, W. Bogaerts, D. A. B. Miller, P. Del’Haye, M. Soltani, L. Chang and J. E. Bowers, and are also grateful for technical advice from C. Langrock, B. Buscaino, N. V. Sapra, L. Su and J. M. Kahn. The silicon devices were fabricated in the Stanford Nanofabrication Facility and the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities. K.Y.Y. acknowledges support from a Quantum and Nano Science and Engineering postdoctoral fellowship, J.S. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (grant no. DGE-1656518) and M.C. is supported by a Rubicon postdoctoral fellowship by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). This work is funded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under the AFOSR MURI programme (award no. FA9550-17-1-0002) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF4744 and GBMF4743). We thank G. Pomrenke and the AFOSR MURI programme management team for discussions throughout the project.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, K.Y., Skarda, J., Cotrufo, M. et al. Inverse-designed non-reciprocal pulse router for chip-based LiDAR. Nat. Photonics 14, 369–374 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0606-0
Optics Communications (2021)
Nonlinearity-induced asymmetric diffraction in a hybrid A/B structure with two azo-containing materials
Applied Physics Letters (2021)
Dynamic phase manipulation of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers via on-chip integration of microfluidic channels
Optics Express (2021)
A directional Gaussian smoothing optimization method for computational inverse design in nanophotonics
Materials & Design (2021)
Advanced Photonics Research (2021)