Abstract

Graphene with massless Dirac fermions can have exceptionally strong third-order optical nonlinearities. Yet reported values of nonlinear optical susceptibilities for third-harmonic generation (THG), four-wave mixing (FWM) and self-phase modulation vary over six orders of magnitude. Such variation likely arises from frequency-dependent resonance effects of different processes in graphene under different doping. Here, we report an experimental study of THG and FWM in graphene using gate tuning to adjust the doping level and vary the resonant condition. We find that THG and sum-frequency FWM are strongly enhanced in heavily doped graphene, while the difference-frequency FWM appears just the opposite. Difference-frequency FWM exhibited a novel divergence towards the degenerate case in undoped graphene, leading to a giant enhancement of the nonlinearity. The results are well supported by theory. Our full understanding of the diverse nonlinearity of graphene paves the way towards future design of graphene-based nonlinear optoelectronic devices.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Bonaccorso, F., Sun, Z., Hasan, T. & Ferrari, A. C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photon. 4, 611–622 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Koppens, F. H. L., Chang, D. E. & García de Abajo, F. J. Graphene plasmonics: a platform for strong light-matter interactions. Nano Lett. 11, 3370–3377 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Nair, R. R. et al. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 320, 1308–1308 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Mak, K. F. et al. Measurement of the optical conductivity of graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 196405 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Koppens, F. H. L. et al. Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 780–793 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Sun, Z., Martinez, A. & Wang, F. Optical modulators with 2D layered materials. Nat. Photon. 10, 227–238 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Wang, F. et al. Gate-variable optical transitions in graphene. Science 320, 206–209 (2008).

  8. 8.

    Liu, M. et al. A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature 474, 64–67 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Chen, C. et al. Controlling inelastic light scattering quantum pathways in graphene. Nature 471, 617–620 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Mikhailov, S. A. Non-linear electromagnetic response of graphene. Europhys. Lett. 79, 27002 (2007).

  11. 11.

    Glazov, M. M. & Ganichev, S. D. High frequency electric field induced nonlinear effects in graphene. Phys. Rep. 535, 101–138 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Kumar, N. et al. Third harmonic generation in graphene and few-layer graphite films. Phys. Rev. B 87, 121406 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Hong, S. et al. Optical third-harmonic generation in graphene. Phys. Rev. X 3, 021014 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Säynätjoki, A. et al. Rapid large-area multiphoton microscopy for characterization of graphene. ACS Nano 7, 8441–8446 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Woodward, R. I. et al. Characterization of the second- and third-order nonlinear optical susceptibilities of monolayer MoS2 using multiphoton microscopy. 2D Mater. 4, 011006 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Hendry, E., Hale, P. J., Moger, J., Savchenko, A. K. & Mikhailov, S. A. Coherent nonlinear optical response of graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 097401 (2010).

  17. 17.

    Ciesielski, R. et al. Graphene near-degenerate four-wave mixing for phase characterization of broadband pulses in ultrafast microscopy. Nano Lett. 15, 4968–4972 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Zhang, H. et al. Z-scan measurement of the nonlinear refractive index of graphene. Opt. Lett. 37, 1856–1858 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Yang, H. et al. Giant two-photon absorption in bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 11, 2622–2627 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Dremetsika, E. et al. Measuring the nonlinear refractive index of graphene using the optical Kerr effect method. Opt. Lett. 41, 3281–3284 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Vermeulen, N. et al. Negative Kerr nonlinearity of graphene as seen via chirped-pulse-pumped self-phase modulation. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 044006 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Gu, T. et al. Regenerative oscillation and four-wave mixing in graphene optoelectronics. Nat. Photon. 6, 554–559 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Wu, R. et al. Purely coherent nonlinear optical response in solution dispersions of graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 11, 5159–5164 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Sun, D. et al. Coherent control of ballistic photocurrents in multilayer epitaxial graphene using quantum interference. Nano Lett. 10, 1293–1296 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Yoshikawa, N., Tamaya, T. & Tanaka, K. High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation. Science 356, 736–738 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Giorgianni, F. et al. Strong nonlinear terahertz response induced by Dirac surface states in Bi2Se3 topological insulator. Nat. Commun. 7, 11421 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Wu, L. et al. Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals. Nat. Phys. 13, 350–355 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Third order optical nonlinearity of graphene. New J. Phys. 16, 53014 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Third-order nonlinearity of graphene: effects of phenomenological relaxation and finite temperature. Phys. Rev. B 91, 235320 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Margulis, V. A., Muryumin, E. E. & Gaiduk, E. A. Frequency dependence of optical third-harmonic generation from doped graphene. Phys. Lett. A 380, 304–310 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Mikhailov, S. A. Quantum theory of the third-order nonlinear electrodynamic effects of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 93, 085403 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Rostami, H. & Polini, M. Theory of third-harmonic generation in graphene: a diagrammatic approach. Phys. Rev. B 93, 161411 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Alexander, K., Savostianova, N. A., Mikhailov, S. A., Kuyken, B. & Van Thourhout, D. Electrically tunable optical nonlinearities in graphene-covered SiN waveguides characterized by four-wave mixing. ACS Photon. 4, 3039–3044 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Das, A. et al. Monitoring dopants by Raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor. Nat. Nanotech. 3, 210–215 (2008).

  35. 35.

    Ye, J. T. et al. Liquid-gated interface superconductivity on an atomically flat film. Nat. Mater. 9, 125–128 (2009).

  36. 36.

    Li, Z. Q. et al. Dirac charge dynamics in graphene by infrared spectroscopy. Nat. Phys. 4, 532–535 (2008).

  37. 37.

    Liu, W. T. et al. Nonlinear broadband photoluminescence of graphene induced by femtosecond laser irradiation. Phys. Rev. B 82, 081408 (2010).

  38. 38.

    Shen, Y. R. The Principles of Nonlinear Optics (Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 1984).

  39. 39.

    Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, New York, NY, 2008).

  40. 40.

    Sarma, S. D., Adam, S., Hwang, E. H. & Rossi, E. Electronic transport in two-dimensional graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 407–470 (2011).

  41. 41.

    Lui, C. H., Mak, K. F., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Ultrafast photoluminescence from graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 127404 (2010).

  42. 42.

    Shi, S.-F. et al. Controlling graphene ultrafast hot carrier response from metal-like to semiconductor-like by electrostatic gating. Nano Lett. 14, 1578–1582 (2014).

  43. 43.

    Constant, T. J., Hornett, S. M., Chang, D. E. & Hendry, E. All-optical generation of surface plasmons in graphene. Nat. Phys. 12, 124–127 (2015).

  44. 44.

    Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Second order optical nonlinearity of graphene due to electric quadrupole and magnetic dipole effects. Sci. Rep. 7, 43843 (2017).

  45. 45.

    Wang, Y., Tokman, M. & Belyanin, A. Second-order nonlinear optical response of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 94, 195442 (2016).

  46. 46.

    Xu, X. Z. et al. Ultrafast growth of single-crystal graphene assisted by a continuous oxygen supply. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 930–935 (2016).

  47. 47.

    Xu, X. Z. et al. Ultrafast epitaxial growth of metre-sized single-crystal graphene on industrial Cu foil. Sci. Bull. 62, 1074–1080 (2017).

  48. 48.

    Li, X. et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324, 1312–1314 (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work at Fudan University was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (grant no. 2014CB921601), National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2016YFA0301002, 2016YFA0300900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 91421108, 11622429, 11374065), and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (grant no. 16JC1400401). Part of the sample fabrication was performed at Fudan Nano-fabrication Laboratory. K.L. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51522201). J.E.S. is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Y.-R.S. acknowledges support from the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, US Department of Energy (contract no. DE-AC03-76SF00098).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Tao Jiang, Di Huang.

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics, Key Laboratory of Micro and Nano Photonic Structures (MOE), Department of Physics, and Institute for Nanoelectronic Devices and Quantum Computing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    • Tao Jiang
    • , Di Huang
    • , Yuwei Shan
    • , Yangfan Yi
    • , Yunyun Dai
    • , Lei Shi
    • , Jian Zi
    • , Yuen-Ron Shen
    • , Wei-Tao Liu
    •  & Shiwei Wu
  2. Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin, China

    • Jinluo Cheng
  3. International Center for Quantum Design of Functional Materials, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, and Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    • Xiaodong Fan
    •  & Changgan Zeng
  4. CAS Key Laboratory of Strongly-Coupled Quantum Matter Physics, and Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    • Xiaodong Fan
    •  & Changgan Zeng
  5. State Key Laboratory for Mesoscopic Physics and School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China

    • Zhihong Zhang
    •  & Kaihui Liu
  6. Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing, China

    • Lei Shi
    • , Jian Zi
    • , Wei-Tao Liu
    •  & Shiwei Wu
  7. Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    • J. E. Sipe
  8. Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    • Yuen-Ron Shen

Authors

  1. Search for Tao Jiang in:

  2. Search for Di Huang in:

  3. Search for Jinluo Cheng in:

  4. Search for Xiaodong Fan in:

  5. Search for Zhihong Zhang in:

  6. Search for Yuwei Shan in:

  7. Search for Yangfan Yi in:

  8. Search for Yunyun Dai in:

  9. Search for Lei Shi in:

  10. Search for Kaihui Liu in:

  11. Search for Changgan Zeng in:

  12. Search for Jian Zi in:

  13. Search for J. E. Sipe in:

  14. Search for Yuen-Ron Shen in:

  15. Search for Wei-Tao Liu in:

  16. Search for Shiwei Wu in:

Contributions

S.W. and W.-T.L. conceived and supervised the project. T.J., D.H., Y.S. and Y.Y. prepared the devices and performed the experiments, with assistance from Y.D., L.S. and J.Z. on gate-dependent optical transmittance measurement. X.F., Z.Z., K.L. and C.Z. provided the chemical vapour deposition-grown graphene samples. T.J., D.H., J.C., J.E.S., Y.-R.S., W.-T.L. and S.W. analysed the data. T.J., D.H., J.E.S., Y.-R.S., W.-T.L. and S.W. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei-Tao Liu or Shiwei Wu.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Texts 1–5; Supplementary Table 1; Supplementary Figures 1–6.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0175-7

Further reading Further reading