Adults punish moral transgressions to satisfy both retributive motives (such as wanting antisocial others to receive their ‘just deserts’) and consequentialist motives (such as teaching transgressors that their behaviour is inappropriate). Here, we investigated whether retributive and consequentialist motives for punishment are present in children approximately between the ages of five and seven. In two preregistered studies (N = 251), children were given the opportunity to punish a transgressor at a cost to themselves. Punishment either exclusively satisfied retributive motives by only inflicting harm on the transgressor, or additionally satisfied consequentialist motives by teaching the transgressor a lesson. We found that children punished when doing so satisfied only retributive motives, and punished considerably more when doing so also satisfied consequentialist motives. Together, these findings provide evidence for the presence of both retributive and consequentialist motives in young children.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All data related to these studies are publicly available on OSF at https://osf.io/ht7j6/.
Most analyses were conducted in SPSS and using freely available packages in the R environment for statistical computing. All syntax and code are available at https://osf.io/ht7j6/.
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003).
Henrich, J. et al. Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327, 1480–1484 (2010).
Vidmar, N. & Miller, D. T. Social psychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law Soc. Rev. 14, 565–602 (1980).
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R. & Schwarze, B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3, 367–388 (1982).
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Third-party punishment and social norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 63–87 (2004).
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002).
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S. & Richerson, P. J. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 3531–3535 (2003).
Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B. & Van Lange, P. A. Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 137, 594–615 (2011).
Mathew, S. & Boyd, R. Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11375–11380 (2011).
Kant, I. in Why Punish? How Much? A Reader on Punishment (ed. Tonry, M. H.) 31–36 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
Bentham, J. in What Is Justice? Classic and Contemporary Readings (eds Soloman, R. C. & Murphy, M. C.) 215–220 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).
Funk, F., McGeer, V. & Gollwitzer, M. Get the message: punishment is satisfying if the transgressor responds to its communicative intent. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40, 986–997 (2014).
Baron, J. in Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications (eds. Mellers, B. & Baron, J.) 109–137 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M. & Robinson, P. H. Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 284–299 (2002).
Crockett, M. J., Özdemir, Y. & Fehr, E. The value of vengeance and the demand for deterrence. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 2279–2286 (2014).
Goodwin, G. P. & Gromet, D. M. Punishment. WIREs Cogn. Sci. 5, 561–572 (2014).
Keller, L. B., Oswald, M. E., Stucki, I. & Gollwitzer, M. A closer look at an eye for an eye: laypersons’ punishment decisions are primarily driven by retributive motives. Soc. Justice Res. 23, 99–116 (2010).
Nadelhoffer, T., Heshmati, S., Kaplan, D. & Nichols, S. Folk retributivism and the communication confound. Econ. Philos. 29, 235–261 (2013).
Ouss, A. & Peysakhovich. When punishment doesn’t pay. J. Law Econ. 58, 625–655 (2015).
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P. & Mahajan, N. How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19931–19936 (2011).
Vaish, A., Missana, M. & Tomasello, M. Three‐year‐old children intervene in third‐party moral transgressions. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 29, 124–130 (2011).
Heyman, G. D., Loke, I. C. & Lee, K. Children spontaneously police adults’ transgressions. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 150, 155–164 (2016).
Yucel, M. & Vaish, A. Young children tattle to enforce moral norms. Soc. Dev. 27, 924–936 (2018).
House, B. R. et al. Social norms and cultural diversity in the development of third-party punishment. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20192794 (2020).
Jordan, J. J., McAuliffe, K. & Warneken, F. Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12710–12715 (2014).
McAuliffe, K., Jordan, J. J. & Warneken, F. Costly third-party punishment in young children. Cognition 134, 1–10 (2015).
Yang, F., Choi, Y. J., Misch, A., Yang, X. & Dunham, Y. In defense of the commons: young children negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Psychol. Sci. 29, 1598–1611 (2018).
Yudkin, D. A., Van Bavel, J. J. & Rhodes, M. Young children police in-group members at personal cost. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 149, 182–191 (2019).
Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Restorative justice in children. Curr. Biol. 25, 1731–1735 (2015).
Kanakogi, Y. et al. Preverbal infants affirm third-party interventions that protect victims from aggressors. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0037 (2017).
Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P. & Rand, D. G. Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature 530, 473–476 (2016).
Twardawski, M., Tang, K. T. & Hilbig, B. E. Is it all about retribution? The flexibility of punishment goals. Soc. Justice Res. 33, 195–218 (2020).
Bommarito, N. Virtuous and vicious anger. J. Ethics Soc. Philos. 11, 1–27 (2017).
Flanagan, O. The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).
Leboeuf, C. in The Moral Psychology of Anger (eds Cherry, M. & Flanagan, O.) 15–30 (Rowman & Littlefield International, 2017).
Nussbaum, M. C. Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, and Justice (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).
Silvermint, D. Rage and virtuous resistance. J. Polit. Philos. 25, 461–486 (2017).
Tessman, L. Burdened Virtues: Virtue Ethics for Liberatory Struggles (Oxford Univ. Press, 2005).
Srinivasan, A. The aptness of anger. J. Polit. Philos. 26, 123–144 (2018).
FeldmanHall, O., Sokol-Hessner, P., Van Bavel, J. J. & Phelps, E. A. Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself. Nat. Commun. 5, 5306 (2014).
Heffner, J. & FeldmanHall, O. Why we don’t always punish: preferences for non-punitive responses to moral violations. Sci. Rep. 9, 13219 (2019).
Miller, D. T. & McCann, C. D. Children’s reactions to the perpetrators and victims of injustices. Child Dev. 50, 861–868 (1979).
We thank the Crockett Lab and the Mind and Development Lab for their valuable feedback in the design and methodology of the present studies. We also thank A. Buck, A. Gollwitzer, S. Hollander, C. Johnson, E. Mahaffey, S. Minnillo, A. Morra, I. Munday, A. Sacchi, C. Seita and C. Welsh for assistance with the data collection. Finally, we thank the generous and wonderful parents, children and schools who helped us with this project.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Primary handling editor: Charlotte Payne.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Marshall, J., Yudkin, D.A. & Crockett, M.J. Children punish third parties to satisfy both consequentialist and retributive motives. Nat Hum Behav (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00975-9