Shared responsibility in collective decisions

Article metrics

Abstract

Research investigating collective decision-making has focused primarily on the improvement of accuracy in collective decisions and less on the motives that drive individuals to make these decisions. We argue that a strong but neglected motive for making collective decisions is minimizing the material and psychological burden of an individual’s responsibility. Making difficult decisions with others shields individuals from the consequences of negative outcomes by reducing regret, punishment and stress. Considering shared responsibility as a another key motivation to join groups helps understand behaviours with societal implications such as political voting, committing norm violations, predicting natural disasters and making health-related decisions.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Motives for collective decision-making.

References

  1. 1.

    Kameda, T., Wisdom, T., Toyokawa, W. & Inukai, K. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 15, 673–689 (2012).

  2. 2.

    Sumpter, D. J., Krause, J., James, R., Couzin, I. D. & Ward, A. J. Curr. Biol. 18, 1773–1777 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Surowiecki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. (Bantam Dell, 2005).

  4. 4.

    Sunstein, C.R. & Hastie, R. Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter. (Harvard Business Press, 2015).

  5. 5.

    Bahrami, B. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 367, 1350–1365 (2012).

  6. 6.

    Bang, D. & Frith, C. D. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170193 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Koriat, A. Science 336, 360–362 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Mahmoodi, A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3835–3840 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Bahrami, B. et al. Science 329, 1081–1085 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Kurvers, R. H. J. M. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8777–8782 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Prelec, D., Seung, H. S. & McCoy, J. Nature 541, 532–535 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Navajas, J., Niella, T., Garbulsky, G., Bahrami, B. & Sigman, M. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 126–132 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Herzog, S. M., Litvinova, A., Yahosseini, K. S., Tump, A. N. & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. The ecological rationality of the wisdom of crowds. in Taming Uncertainty (eds Hertwig, R., Pleskac, T. J., Pachur, T. & The Center for Adaptive Rationality) (MIT Press, in the press).

  14. 14.

    Packer, C. & Ruttan, L. Am. Nat. 132, 159–198 (1988).

  15. 15.

    LeFebvre, R. & Franke, V. Societies (Basel) 3, 128–146 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Becker, G. S. & Murphy, K. M. Q. J. Econ. 107, 1137–1160 (1992).

  17. 17.

    Battalio, R., Samuelson, L. & Huyck, J. V. Econometrica 69, 749–764 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Toelch, U. & Dolan, R. J. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 579–589 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Tyler, T.R. Why People Cooperate: The Role of Social Motivations. (Princeton University Press, 2011).

  20. 20.

    Hoppitt, W. & Laland, K.N. Social Learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models. (Princeton University Press, 2013).

  21. 21.

    Heyes, C. J. Comp. Psychol. 126, 193–202 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Galton, F. Nature 75, 450–451 (1907).

  23. 23.

    Mercier, H., Trouche, E., Yama, H., Heintz, C. & Girotto, V. Think. Reason. 21, 341–355 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Pfeiffer, U. J. et al. Neuroimage 101, 124–137 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. (Psychology Press, 2004).

  26. 26.

    Robbins, J. M. & Krueger, J. I. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 9, 32–47 (2005).

  27. 27.

    Stevens, M. et al. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 28, 2100–2108 (2018).

  28. 28.

    Tyler, T.R. Social justice. in APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 2: Group Processes. 95–122 (American Psychological Association, 2015).

  29. 29.

    Darley, J. M. & Latané, B. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 8, 377–383 (1968).

  30. 30.

    Guerin, B. Diffusion of responsibility. in The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2011).

  31. 31.

    Forsyth, D. R., Zyzniewski, L. E. & Giammanco, C. A. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28, 54–65 (2002).

  32. 32.

    Caine, B. T. & Schlenker, B. R. J. Psychol. 101, 149–156 (1979).

  33. 33.

    Forsyth, D. R. & Schlenker, B. R. J. Pers. 45, 220–236 (1977).

  34. 34.

    Leary, M.R. & Forsyth, D.R. Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors. in Group Processes 167–188 (Sage Publications, Inc, 1987).

  35. 35.

    Miller, R. S. & Schlenker, B. R. Soc. Psychol. Q. 48, 85–89 (1985).

  36. 36.

    Baumeister, R. F., Ainsworth, S. E. & Vohs, K. D. Behav. Brain Sci. 39, e137 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Feng, C. et al. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 663–677 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Morgan, P. M. & Tindale, R. S. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 87, 44–65 (2002).

  39. 39.

    Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A. & Schopler, J. Psychol. Bull. 129, 698–722 (2003).

  40. 40.

    Turner, M. E. & Pratkanis, A. R. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 73, 105–115 (1998).

  41. 41.

    Simms, A. & Nichols, T. J. Manag. Policy Pract. 15, 58–67 (2014).

  42. 42.

    Levine, D. K. & Palfrey, T. R. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 101, 143–158 (2007).

  43. 43.

    Hortensius, R. & de Gelder, B. Neuroimage 93, 53–58 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Fischer, P. et al. Psychol. Bull. 137, 517–537 (2011).

  45. 45.

    Martin, K. K. & North, A. C. Comput. Human Behav. 44, 124–131 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Philpot, R., Liebst, L. S., Levine, M., Bernasco, W., & Lindegaard, M. R. Postprint - Would I be helped? Cross-national CCTV footage shows that intervention is the norm in public conflicts. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nqscj (2019).

  47. 47.

    Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F. & Helbing, D. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9020–9025 (2011).

  48. 48.

    Farrell, S. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E625–E625 (2011).

  49. 49.

    Rauhut, H., Lorenz, J., Schweitzer, F. & Helbing, D. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E626 (2011).

  50. 50.

    Haggard, P. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 196–207 (2017).

  51. 51.

    Caspar, E. A., Christensen, J. F., Cleeremans, A. & Haggard, P. Curr. Biol. 26, 585–592 (2016).

  52. 52.

    Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S. & Haggard, P. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 138–145 (2016).

  53. 53.

    Dewey, J. A., Pacherie, E. & Knoblich, G. Cognition 132, 383–397 (2014).

  54. 54.

    Li, P. et al. Neuroimage 52, 1727–1733 (2010).

  55. 55.

    Nicolle, A., Bach, D. R., Frith, C. & Dolan, R. J. Soc. Neurosci. 6, 178–189 (2011).

  56. 56.

    Pacherie, E. Synthese 190, 1817–1839 (2013).

  57. 57.

    Pacherie, E. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 13, 25–46 (2014).

  58. 58.

    Gallotti, M. & Frith, C. D. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 160–165 (2013).

  59. 59.

    Obhi, S. S. & Hall, P. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 655–662 (2011).

  60. 60.

    van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Sebanz, N. & Knoblich, G. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 1267–1279 (2012).

  61. 61.

    van der Wel, R. P. R. D. Cognition 140, 49–59 (2015).

  62. 62.

    Murayama, K. et al. Cereb. Cortex 25, 1241–1251 (2015).

  63. 63.

    Dworkin, S. I., Mirkis, S. & Smith, J. E. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 117, 262–266 (1995).

  64. 64.

    Marmot, M. G., Bosma, H., Hemingway, H., Brunner, E. & Stansfeld, S. Lancet 350, 235–239 (1997).

  65. 65.

    Botti, S. & Lyengar, S. S. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 312–326 (2004).

  66. 66.

    Botti, S. & McGill, A. L. J. Consum. Res. 33, 211–219 (2006).

  67. 67.

    Anderson, C. J. Psychol. Bull. 129, 139–167 (2003).

  68. 68.

    Steffel, M., Williams, E. F., Morwitz, V. & Morales, A. J. Consum. Res. 44, 1015–1032 (2018).

  69. 69.

    Dhar, R. J. Behav. Decis. Making 9, 265–281 (1996).

  70. 70.

    Tversky, A. & Shafir, E. Psychol. Sci. 3, 358–361 (1992).

  71. 71.

    Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N. & Simonson, I. J. Mark. Res. 44, 347–356 (2007).

  72. 72.

    Dhar, R. & Nowlis, S. M. J. Consum. Res. 25, 369–384 (1999).

  73. 73.

    Luce, M. F. J. Consum. Res. 24, 409–433 (1998).

  74. 74.

    Redelmeier, D. A. & Shafir, E. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 273, 302–305 (1995).

  75. 75.

    Tetlock, P. E. & Boettger, R. J. Behav. Decis. Making 7, 1–23 (1994).

  76. 76.

    Edelson, M. G., Polania, R., Ruff, C. C., Fehr, E. & Hare, T. A. Science 361, eaat0036 (2018).

  77. 77.

    Harvey, N. & Fischer, I. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70, 117–133 (1997).

  78. 78.

    Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R. & Cialdini, R. B. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26, 1002–1012 (2000).

  79. 79.

    Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. The Enigma of Reason. (Harvard University Press, 2017)

  80. 80.

    Vig, E. K., Starks, H., Taylor, J. S., Hopley, E. K. & Fryer-Edwards, K. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 22, 1274–1279 (2007).

  81. 81.

    Botti, S., Orfali, K. & Iyengar, S. S. J. Consum. Res. 36, 337–352 (2009).

  82. 82.

    Lehtonen, J. & Jaatinen, K. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70, 449–458 (2016).

  83. 83.

    Connolly, T. & Zeelenberg, M. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11, 212–216 (2002).

  84. 84.

    Frith, C.D. & Metzinger, T.K. What’s the use of consciousness? How the stab of conscience made us really conscious. in The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. (eds Engel, A.K. et al.) (MIT Press, 2016).

  85. 85.

    Gilovich, T. & Medvec, V. H. Psychol. Rev. 102, 379–395 (1995).

  86. 86.

    Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W. & Manstead, A. S. R. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 81, 143–154 (2000).

  87. 87.

    Bourgeois-Gironde, S. How regret moves individual and collective choices towards rationality. in Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making: Rational Decision-Making within the Bounds of Reason (ed. Altman, M.) 188–204 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017).

  88. 88.

    Connolly, T., Ordóñez, L. D. & Coughlan, R. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70, 73–85 (1997).

  89. 89.

    Ordóñez, L. D. & Connolly, T. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 81, 132–142 (2000).

  90. 90.

    Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W. & Manstead, A. S. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 74, 254–272 (1998).

  91. 91.

    Kulakova, E., Khalighinejad, N. & Haggard, P. Conscious. Cogn. 49, 237–244 (2017).

  92. 92.

    Frith, C. D. Neuropsychologia 55, 137–142 (2014).

  93. 93.

    Camille, N. et al. Science 304, 1167–1170 (2004).

  94. 94.

    Coricelli, G. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1255–1262 (2005).

  95. 95.

    Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., van der Pligt, J. & de Vries, N. K. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 65, 148–158 (1996).

  96. 96.

    Zeelenberg, M. & Beattie, J. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 72, 63–78 (1997).

  97. 97.

    Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 63–87 (2004).

  98. 98.

    Dai, X. Toward a reputation state: the social credit system project of China. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3193577 (2018).

  99. 99.

    Bartling, B. & Fischbacher, U. Rev. Econ. Stud. 79, 67–87 (2012).

  100. 100.

    Williams, G. Responsibility. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 2161-0002 http://www.iep.utm.edu/responsi/ (2019).

  101. 101.

    Edwards, J. Theories of criminal law. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; (ed. Edward, N.Z.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2018).

  102. 102.

    Waytz, A. & Young, L. Psychol. Sci. 23, 77–85 (2012).

  103. 103.

    Newheiser, A.-K., Sawaoka, T. & Dovidio, J. F. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48, 931–936 (2012).

  104. 104.

    Gerstenberg, T. & Lagnado, D. A. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 729–736 (2012).

  105. 105.

    Zultan, R., Gerstenberg, T. & Lagnado, D. A. Cognition 125, 429–440 (2012).

  106. 106.

    Lagnado, D. A., Gerstenberg, T. & Zultan, R. Cogn. Sci. 37, 1036–1073 (2013).

  107. 107.

    Duch, R., Stevenson, R. & Przepiorka, W. Responsibility attribution for collective decision makers. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59, 372–389 (2015).

  108. 108.

    Gerstenberg, T. & Lagnado, D.A. Attributing responsibility: actual and counterfactual worlds. in Oxford Studies of Experimental Philosophy (eds Knobe, J., Lombrozo, T. & Nichols, S.) 91–130 (Oxford University Press, 2014).

  109. 109.

    Coffee, J. C. Mich. Law Rev. 79, 386–459 (1981).

  110. 110.

    Ohlin, J. D. J. Int. Crim. Justice 5, 69–90 (2005).

  111. 111.

    Jacobson, J. et al. Joint enterprise: righting a wrong turn? Prison Reform Trust http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Joint%20Enterprise%20Righting%20a%20Wrong%20Turn.pdf (2016).

  112. 112.

    Grossman, E. Political Insight 10, 30–34 (2019).

  113. 113.

    Hogarth, R.M. What’s a “good” decision? Issues in assessing procedural and ecological quality. in The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (eds Keren, G. & Wu, G.) 952–972 (Wiley, 2015).

  114. 114.

    Frey, R., Hertwig, R. & Herzog, S. M. Med. Decis. Making 34, 258–269 (2014).

  115. 115.

    Frey, R., Herzog, S. M. & Hertwig, R. BMJ Open 8, e022289 (2018).

  116. 116.

    Aspinall, W. Nature 463, 294–295 (2010).

  117. 117.

    Hertwig, R., Pleskac, T. J., Pachur, T, & the Center for Adaptive Rationality Taming Uncertainty. (MIT Press, in press).

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.E.Z. is supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 538149). B.B. was supported by a starting grant from the European Research Council (NEUROCODEC, 309865), the NOMIS Foundation and the Humboldt Foundation. We thank S. Goss and D. Ain for editing the manuscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

M.E.Z., B.B. and R.H. wrote the perspective.

Correspondence to Marwa El Zein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading