Sediment accumulation rates and thermal trackers suggest a substantial and global increase in erosion rates over the past few million years. That increase is commonly associated with the impact of the Northern Hemisphere glaciation, but methodological biases have led researchers to debate this hypothesis. Here, we test whether Himalayan erosion rates increased by measuring beryllium-10 (10Be) in the sediment of the Bengal Bay seabed. Sediment originated from rocks that produced 10Be under the impact of cosmic rays during erosion near surface. Thus, the 10Be concentrations indicate erosion rates. The 10Be concentration of the Bengal Bay sediment depends on the contributions of the Ganga and Brahmaputra rivers. Their sediments have distinct 10Be concentrations because of distinct elevations and erosion in their drainage basins. Variable contributions could thus complicate erosion-rate calculation. We traced these contributions by a provenance study using the strontium (Sr) and neodymium (Nd) isotopic sediment compositions. Within uncertainties of ±30%, our reconstructed past erosion rates show no long-term increase for the past six million years. This stability suggests that climatic changes during the late Cenozoic have an undetectable impact on the erosion patterns in the Himalayas, at least on the ten thousand to million year timescales accounted for by our dataset.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $15.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the Pangaea Repository: https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912098 (sample information, 10Be and Sr–Nd isotopic results, calculated fractions and erosion rates); https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912100 (10Be duplicate results); https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912101 (10Be blanks); https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912103 (major and trace element results); https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912108 (chemical analyses for river sediment); https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912109 (Sr–Nd and 10Be data from river sediment used for the fG and K(t) computation). Source data are provided with this paper.
The MATLAB and R codes used in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Hay, W. W., Sloan, J. L. & Wold, C. N. Mass/age distribution and composition of sediments on the ocean floor and the global rate of sediment subduction. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 14933–14940 (1988).
Molnar, P. & England, P. Late Cenozoic uplift of mountain ranges and global climate change: chicken or egg? Nature 346, 29–34 (1990).
Zhang, P. Z., Molnar, P. & Downs, W. R. Increased sedimentation rates and grain sizes 2–4 Myr ago due to the influence of climate change on erosion rates. Nature 410, 891–897 (2001).
Molnar, P. Late Cenozoic increase in accumulation rates of terrestrial sediment: how might climate change have affected erosion rates? Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 32, 67–89 (2004).
Herman, F. et al. Worldwide acceleration of mountain erosion under a cooling climate. Nature 504, 423–426 (2013).
Pedersen, V. K. & Egholm, D. L. Glaciations in response to climate variations preconditioned by evolving topography. Nature 493, 206–210 (2013).
Willenbring, J. K. & von Blanckenburg, F. Long-term stability of global erosion rates and weathering during late-Cenozoic cooling. Nature 465, 211–214 (2010).
Schumer, R. & Jerolmack, D. J. Real and apparent changes in sediment deposition rates through time. J. Geophys. Res. 114, F00A06 (2009).
Schildgen, T. F., van der Beek, P. A., Sinclair, H. D. & Thiede, R. C. Spatial correlation bias in late-Cenozoic erosion histories derived from thermochronology. Nature 559, 89–93 (2018).
Brown, E. T., Stallard, R. F., Larsen, M. C., Raisbeck, G. M. & Yiou, F. Denudation rates determined from the accumulation of in situ-produced 10Be in the Luquillo experimental forest, Puerto Rico. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 129, 193–202 (1995).
Granger, D. E., Fabel, D. & Palmer, A. N. Pliocene–Pleistocene incision of the Green River, Kentucky, determined from radioactive decay of cosmogenic 26Al and 10Be in mammoth cave sediments. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 113, 825–836 (2001).
Schaller, M. et al. A 30 000 yr record of erosion rates from cosmogenic 10Be in Middle European river terraces. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 204, 307–320 (2002).
Bierman, P. R., Shakun, J. D., Corbett, L. B., Zimmerman, S. R. & Rood, D. H. A persistent and dynamic East Greenland Ice Sheet over the past 7.5 million years. Nature 540, 256–260 (2016).
Puchol, N. et al. Limited impact of Quaternary glaciations on denudation rates in Central Asia. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 129, 479–499 (2017).
Raup, B. et al. The GLIMS geospatial glacier database: a new tool for studying glacier change. Glob. Planet. Change 56, 101–110 (2007).
Shi, Y. Characteristics of late Quaternary monsoonal glaciation on the Tibetan Plateau and in East Asia. Quat. Int. 97–98, 79–91 (2002).
An, Z. et al. Glacial–interglacial Indian summer monsoon dynamics. Science 333, 719–723 (2011).
Curray, J. R., Emmel, F. J. & Moore, D. G. The Bengal Fan: morphology, geometry, stratigraphy, history and processes. Mar. Pet. Geol. 19, 1191–1223 (2003).
Schwenk, T. & Spiess, V. in External Controls on Deep-Water Depositional Systems (eds Kneller, B. et al.) 107–131 (SEPM, 2009).
Clemens, S. C. et al. Expedition 353 summary. In Proc. IODP Vol. 353, https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.353.101.2016 (IODP, 2016).
France-Lanord, C. et al. Expedition 354 summary. In Proc. IODP Vol. 354, https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.354.101.2016 (IODP, 2016).
Bergmann, F., Schwenk, T., Spiess, V. & France-Lanord, C. Middle to late Pleistocene architecture and stratigraphy of the lower Bengal Fan—integrating multichannel seismic data and IODP Expedition 354 results. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 21, e2019GC008702 (2019).
Brown, E. T. et al. Examination of surface exposure ages of Antarctic moraines using in situ produced 10Be and 26Al. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 55, 2269–2283 (1991).
Arnold, M. et al. The French accelerator mass spectrometry facility ASTER: improved performance and developments. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 268, 1954–1959 (2010).
Braucher, R. et al. Preparation of ASTER in-house 10Be/9Be standard solutions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 361, 335–340 (2015).
Weber, M. E. & Reilly, B. T. Hemipelagic and turbiditic deposits constrain lower Bengal Fan depositional history through Pleistocene climate, monsoon, and sea level transitions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 199, 159–173 (2018).
Blum, M. et al. Allogenic and autogenic signals in the stratigraphic record of the deep-sea Bengal Fan. Sci. Rep. 8, 7973 (2018).
Lenard, S. J. P, Cruz, J., France-Lanord, C., Lavé, J. & Reilly, B. T. Data report: calcareous nannofossils and lithologic constraints on the age model of IODP Site U1450, Expedition 354, Bengal Fan. In Proc. IODP Vol. 354, https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.354.203.2020 (IODP, 2020).
Reilly, B.T. et al., Mid to late Pleistocene evolution of the Bengal Fan: integrating core and seismic observations for chronostratigraphic modeling of the IODP Expedition 354 8° North transect. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 21, e2019GC008878 (2020).
Lupker, M. et al. 10Be-derived Himalayan denudation rates and sediment budgets in the Ganga basin. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 333–334, 146–156 (2012).
Lupker, M. et al. 10Be systematics in the Tsangpo–Brahmaputra catchment: the cosmogenic nuclide legacy of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis. Earth Surf. Dyn. 5, 429–449 (2017).
Hein, C. J. et al. Post-glacial climate forcing of surface processes in the Ganges–Brahmaputra river basin and implications for carbon sequestration. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 478, 89–101 (2017).
Galy, A. & France-Lanord, C. Higher erosion rates in the Himalaya: geochemical constraints on riverine fluxes. Geology 29, 23–26 (2001).
Singh, S. K., Rai, S. K. & Krishnaswami, S. Sr and Nd isotopes in river sediments from the Ganga Basin: sediment provenance and spatial variability in physical erosion. J. Geophys. Res. 113, F03006 (2008).
Singh, S. K. & France-Lanord, C. Tracing the distribution of erosion in the Brahmaputra watershed from isotopic compositions of stream sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 202, 645–662 (2002).
Lauer, J. & Willenbring, J. Steady state reach-scale theory for radioactive tracer concentration in a simple channel/floodplain system. Geophy. Res. 115, F04018 (2010).
Contreras-Rosales, L. A. et al. Origin and fate of sedimentary organic matter in the northern Bay of Bengal during the last 18 ka. Glob. Planet. Change 146, 53–66 (2016).
Huyghe et al. Rapid exhumation since at least 13 Ma in the Himalaya recorded by detrital apatite fission-track dating of Bengal Fan (IODP Expedition 354) and modern Himalayan river sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 534, 116078 (2020).
Huntington, K. W., Blythe, A. E. & Hodges, K. V. Climate change and late Pliocene acceleration of erosion in the Himalaya. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 252, 107–118 (2006).
Yang, R., Herman, F., Fellin, M. G. & Maden, C. Exhumation and topographic evolution of the Namche Barwa syntaxis, eastern Himalaya. Tectonophysics 722, 43–52 (2018).
Schaller, M. et al. Paleoerosion rates from cosmogenic 10Be in a 1.3 Ma terrace sequence: response of the River Meuse to changes in climate and rock uplift. J. Geol. 112, 127–144 (2004).
Haeuselmann, P., Granger, D. E., Jeannin, P.-Y. & Lauritzen, S.-E. Abrupt glacial valley incision at 0.8 Ma dated from cave deposits in Switzerland. Geology 35, 143–146 (2007).
Goodbred, S. L. & Kuehl, S. A. The significance of large sediment supply, active tectonism, and eustasy on margin sequence development: late Quaternary stratigraphy and evolution of the Ganges–Brahmaputra delta. Sediment. Geol. 133, 227–248 (2000).
Burg, J.-P. et al. Exhumation during crustal folding in the Namche-Barwa syntaxis. Terra Nova 9, 53–56 (1997).
Zeitler, P. K. et al. in Toward an Improved Understanding of Uplift Mechanisms and the Elevation History of the Tibetan Plateau (eds Nie, J. et al.) 23–58 (GSA, 2014).
Najman, Y., Bracciali, L., Parrish, R. R., Chisty, E. & Copley, A. Evolving strain partitioning in the eastern Himalaya: the growth of the Shillong Plateau. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 433, 1–9 (2016).
Maurin, T. & Rangin, C. Structure and kinematics of the Indo-Burmese Wedge: recent and fast growth of the outer wedge. Tectonics 28, TC2010 (2009).
Govin, G. et al. Timing and mechanism of the rise of the Shillong Plateau in the Himalayan foreland. Geology 46, 279–282 (2018).
Curray, J. R. Possible greenschist metamorphism at the base of a 22-km sedimentary section, Bay of Bengal. Geology 19, 1097–1100 (1991).
Radhakrishna, M., Subrahmanyam, C. & Damodharan, T. Thin oceanic crust below Bay of Bengal inferred from 3-D gravity interpretation. Tectonophysics 493, 93–105 (2010).
Korschinek, G. et al. A new value for the half-life of 10Be by heavy-ion elastic recoil detection and liquid scintillation counting. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 268, 187–191 (2010).
Chmeleff, J., von Blanckenburg, F., Kossert, K. & Jakob, D. Determination of the 10Be half-life by multicollector ICP-MS and liquid scintillation counting. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 268, 192–199 (2010).
Lupker, M. et al. A Rouse-based method to integrate the chemical composition of river sediments: application to the Ganga basin. J. Geophys. Res. 116, F04012 (2011).
Charreau, J. et al. Basinga: A cell-by-cell GIS toolbox for computing basin average scaling factors, cosmogenic production rates and denudation rates. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 44, 2349–2365 (2019).
Martin, L. C. P. et al. The CREp program and the ICE-D production rate calibration database: a fully parameterizable and updated online tool to compute cosmic-ray exposure ages. Quat. Geochronol. 38, 25–49 (2017).
Braucher, R., Merchel, S., Borgomano, J. & Bourlès, D. L. Production of cosmogenic radionuclides at great depth: a multi element approach. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 309, 1–9 (2011).
Lal, D. Cosmic ray labeling of erosion surfaces: in situ nuclide production rates and erosion models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 104, 424–439 (1991).
Stone, J. O. Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 105, 23753–23759 (2000).
DiBiase, R. A. Increasing vertical attenuation length of cosmogenic nuclide production on steep slopes negates topographic shielding corrections for catchment erosion rates. Earth Surf. Dyn. 6, 923–931 (2018).
Rosenkranz, R., Schildgen, T., Wittmann, H. & Spiegel, C. Coupling erosion and topographic development in the rainiest place on Earth: reconstructing the Shillong Plateau uplift history with in-situ cosmogenic 10Be. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 483, 39–51 (2018).
Huyghe, P., Galy, A., Mugnier, J.-L. & France-Lanord, C. Propagation of the thrust system and erosion in the Lesser Himalaya: geochemical and sedimentological evidence. Geology 29, 1007–1010 (2001).
Robinson, D. M., DeCelles, P. G., Patchett, P. J. & Garzione, C. N. The kinematic evolution of the Nepalese Himalaya interpreted from Nd isotopes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 192, 507–521 (2001).
Huyghe, P., Mugnier, J. L., Gajurel, A. P. & Delcaillau, B. Tectonic and climatic control of the changes in the sedimentary record of the Karnali River section (Siwaliks of western Nepal). Isl. Arc 14, 311–327 (2005).
Chirouze, F. et al. Tectonics, exhumation, and drainage evolution of the eastern Himalaya since 13 Ma from detrital geochemistry and thermochronology, Kameng River section, Arunachal Pradesh. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 125, 523–538 (2013).
Bracciali, L. et al. Plio-Pleistocene exhumation of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and its domal ‘pop-up’. Earth-Sci. Rev. 160, 350–385 (2016).
Gébelin, A. et al. The Miocene elevation of Mount Everest. Geology 41, 799–802 (2013).
Garzione, C. N. et al. High times on the Tibetan Plateau: paleoelevation of the Thakkhola Graben, Nepal. Geology 28, 339–342 (2000).
Galy, A., France-Lanord, C. & Derry, L. A. The late Oligocene-early Miocene Himalayan belt constraints deduced from isotopic compositions of early Miocene turbidites in the Bengal Fan. Tectonophysics 260, 109–118 (1996).
Yang, Y. et al. Eolian dust forcing of river chemistry on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau since 8 Ma. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 464, 200–210 (2017).
Goldstein, S. L., O’nions, R. K. & Hamilton, P. J. A Sm–Nd isotopic study of atmospheric dusts and particulates from major river systems. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 70, 221–236 (1984).
Carignan, J. et al. Routine analyses of trace elements in geological samples using flow injection and low pressure on-line liquid chromatography coupled to ICP-MS: a study of geochemical reference materials BR, DR-N, UB-N, AN-G and GH. Geostand. Newslett. 25, 187–198 (2001).
Morin, G. L’érosion et l’altération et leur évolution depuis le tardi-Pléistocène: Analyse des processus d’érosion à partir de sédiments de rivière actuels et passés au Népal Central. PhD thesis, Univ. Lorraine (2015).
Tarantola, A. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation (Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2005).
Goodbred, S. L. et al. Piecing together the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna river delta: use of sediment provenance to reconstruct the history and interaction of multiple fluvial systems during Holocene delta evolution. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 126, 1495–1510 (2014).
Delft Hydraulics & Danish Hydraulics Institute River Survey Project, Flood Action Plan 24 (Water Resource Planning Organization, 1996).
Morin, G. P. et al. Annual sediment transport dynamics in the Narayani Basin, Central Nepal: assessing the impacts of erosion processes in the annual sediment budget. J. Geophys. Res. 123, 2341–2376 (2018).
Lenard, S. J. P. The evolution of the Himalaya since the Late Miocene, as told by the history of its erosion (Evolution de l’Himalaya de la fin du Miocène à nos jours à partir de l’Histoire de son érosion). PhD thesis, Univ. Lorraine (2019).
Hetényi, G. et al. Segmentation of the Himalayas as revealed by arc-parallel gravity anomalies. Sci. Rep. 6, 33866 (2016).
Leya, I. et al. The production of cosmogenic nuclides in stony meteoroids by galactic cosmic-ray particles. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 35, 259–286 (2000).
Lifton, N. Implications of two Holocene time-dependent geomagnetic models for cosmogenic nuclide production rate scaling. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 433, 257–268 (2016).
Muscheler, R., Beer, J., Kubik, P. W. & Synal, H.-A. Geomagnetic field intensity during the last 60,000 years based on 10Be and 36Cl from the summit ice cores and 14C. Quat. Sci. Rev. 24, 1849–1860 (2005).
Valet, J.-P., Meynadier, L. & Guyodo, Y. Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years. Nature 435, 802–805 (2005).
Biggin, A. J., McCormack, A. & Roberts, A. Paleointensity database updated and upgraded. Eos 91, 15–16 (2010).
Nishiizumi, K. et al. Cosmic ray production rates of 10Be and 26Al in quartz from glacially polished rocks. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 94, 17907–17915 (1989).
Lupker, M. et al. Increasing chemical weathering in the Himalayan system since the Last Glacial Maximum. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 365, 243–252 (2013).
The samples were provided by IODP (International Ocean Discovery Program). We acknowledge the team of IODP Kochi Core Center for their assistance in sample collection, and the teams of CRPG (Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques), SARM (Service d’Analyses des Roches et des Minéraux) and CEREGE (Centre de Recherche et d’Enseignement de Géosciences de l’Environnement) for their assistance in sample preparation and measurements. We thank A. Galy sharing some Sr-Nd data and providing data quality control. The 10Be measurements were performed at the ASTER AMS national facility (Accélérateur pour les Sciences de la Terre, Environnement, Risques, at CEREGE, Aix en Provence), which is supported by the INSU/CNRS (Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), the ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) through the ‘Projets thématiques d’excellence’ programme for the ‘Equipements d’excellence’ ASTER-CEREGE action and IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement). We acknowledge the support of a Université de Lorraine-CRPG PhD fellowship and a Université de Poitiers A.T.E.R. (Attaché Temporaire d’Enseignement et de Recherche) of S.L., the support of IODP France, and the support of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), under grant ANR-17-CE01-0018 (Himal Fan project). G.A., D.L.B. and K.K. are members of the ASTER team.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Primary Handling Editor: James Super.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Effect of the variations of the geomagnetic dipole on the 10Be production rate.
a, 10Be production rate normalised to modern values as a function of time, for a basin of Himalayan hypsometry at a latitude of 28°N. Two dipole temporal databases are explored: (1) the continuous Muscheler-SINT sediment database81,82 and (2) the discrete PINT lava flow database83. A 100 kyr-long averaging sliding window is applied to the PINT record to buffer the data dispersion and fill the data voids. The resulting curve with the 1σ uncertainty envelope is presented. b, 10Be normalised production rate distribution for the two databases. Despite distinct periods (0–2 Ma vs 0–5 Ma) and resolution (0.5 kyr vs ~50 kyr), the distribution of both databases is similar for low frequency (period > 100 kyr) signal variations.
a, Calibration of the fG obtained using Sr concentration versus the fG obtained using Sr-Nd isotopic data, for the Bengal Fan and the Lower Meghna River samples having both measurements. Thanks to the distinct Sr concentrations of the Ganga and Brahmaputra sediment (b), this calibration makes it possible to derive a fraction fG for samples having a Sr concentration measurement without a Sr-Nd isotopic measurement. b, Sr concentration as a function of Al/Si, a proxy for granulometry53, for the Ganga, Brahmaputra and Lower Meghna bulk sediment (this study and ref. 85). The coarser fraction, that is the sandy bedload, of the Lower Meghna sediment overlaps with the composition of Brahmaputra sediment whereas the finer fraction, that is the suspended load, corresponds to a mixing of sediment between the Ganga and the Brahmaputra sediment.
a, Geochemical budget: Fe/Si vs Al/Si distribution of sediment in the Ganga plain. The geochemical poles for the (1) plain outlet, the (2) range outlet and the (3) plain deposits are represented by colour-filled stars surrounded by border-coloured 1σ uncertainty envelopes. While the plain outlet was previously assessed from (1) data of the Ganga at Harding Bridge53, we estimated the other poles (Methods) with (2) data from the Narayani-Gandak at the Himalayan front76 and (3) data from the Gandak megafan72 and from a new Siwalik section77. For comparison, the shaded black stars and envelopes represent the previous approximations of ref. 53 for these poles. b, Granulometric budget: cumulative distribution of grain size (logarithmic scale) for the Ganga and Narayani measured at variable depth and discharge values. The granulometric fraction favoured for 10Be measurements in this study is 125–250 μm.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Impact of the variable contribution of Ganga and Brahmaputra sediment on 10Be paleoconcentrations.
The chart shows the distribution of 10Be paleoconcentrations of the Bengal Fan and the Lower Meghna River sand as a function of (1) the fraction fG of the Bengal Fan and Lower Meghna sand issued from the Ganga Basin (on the x-axis) and (2) the deposition age of sand (in colour, blue for the Lower Meghna sand, red to yellow for the Bengal Fan sand younger than 0.5 Ma and white to black for the older sand). Each sample is represented by a small dot of colour. For clarity, uncertainties are not presented but are visible in Fig. 2. The average for each interval defined in Fig. 2 is displayed by square dots with 1σ uncertainty bars. The modern Ganga (G) and Brahmaputra (B) poles are shown by pink stars30,31,33,35. The zone of potential values obtained by a mixing of modern Ganga and Brahmaputra sand is shown by the pink polygon. Despite some scattering at ca. 2–4 Ma, the values averaged over the intervals seem independent from the fraction of Ganga sand and appear stable.
One might prefer dividing the period of study according to different averaging intervals than the ones we selected (Fig. 2). For instance, one could merge the 4.5–3.5 Ma interval with the 6.5–4.5 Ma interval. This new division does not alter the evolution of the mean 10Be paleoconcentration (a), the mean fG (b) and the mean paleoerosion rate (c), and associated conclusions.
A 75–250 μm fraction was selected for the four samples with little coarse material > 125 μm. Despite a limited set of analyses in two different size fractions, 75–125 μm and 125–250 μm, the grain size does not have a major influence on 10Be concentration (variations by less than 20% on average). One sample (U1444A-7H) displays a larger value for the coarsest fraction and might be explained by a larger proportion of Brahmaputra coarse sediment in this fraction (modern 10Be concentrations of the Ganga and Brahmaputra sand in Fig. 2b). The overall agreement between the 75–250 μm and 125–250 μm fractions makes it possible to plot and discuss the data issued from these two granulometric fractions on the same graphs. Source data
About this article
Cite this article
Lenard, S.J.P., Lavé, J., France-Lanord, C. et al. Steady erosion rates in the Himalayas through late Cenozoic climatic changes. Nat. Geosci. 13, 448–452 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0585-2