Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Amplified transboundary transport of haze by aerosol–boundary layer interaction in China

Abstract

Although air quality in China has substantially improved since 2013 as a consequence of the clean air action, severe haze events still frequently strike megacities despite strict local emissions reduction efforts. Long-range transport and local accumulation as well as chemical transformation have been deemed as key factors of heavy haze pollution; however, the formation mechanisms of regional long-lasting haze and the physical and chemical connections between different megacities clusters are still poorly understood. Here we present that long-range transport and aerosol–boundary layer feedback may interact rather than act as two isolated processes as traditionally thought by investigating typical regional haze events in northern and eastern China. This interaction can then amplify transboundary air pollution transport over a distance of 1,000 km and boost long-lasting secondary haze from the North China Plain to the Yangtze River delta. Earlier emission reduction before the pollution episodes would provide better air pollution mitigation in both regions. Our results show an amplified transboundary transport of haze by aerosol–boundary layer interaction in China and suggest the importance of coordinated cross-regional emission reduction with a focus on radiatively active species like black carbon.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Transboundary haze transport between northern and eastern China.
Fig. 2: Evolution of aerosol–PBL interaction and chemical compositions during the transboundary transport of haze.
Fig. 3: Source appointment and transport pathway of haze.
Fig. 4: A conceptual scheme of amplified transboundary transport of haze pollution by aerosol–PBL interactions.
Fig. 5: Implications of aerosol–PBL interaction on cross-regional coordinated emission control.

Data availability

The observation and simulation data that support the main findings of this study are available at figshare data publisher (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9963311.v6). The emission input used in this work is the mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory (MIX), which is archived at http://www.meicmodel.org/dataset-mix.html. The radiosonde measurements in Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive Version 2 are openly accessible at https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/igra. The original simulation data for multiple cross-regional pollution events used in this study are stored in a high-performance computing centre of Nanjing University due to large data storage and can be made available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

Data processing techniques are available on request from the corresponding author. The source code of the WRF-Chem model is archived on UCAR data repository (http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/download). The LPDM model can be acquired from the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model (http://www.ready.noaa.gov). The ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) analysis code that is embedded in NCAR Command Language version 6.40 is available at https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/dataset/ncl.640.html.

References

  1. 1.

    Huang, R. J. et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature 514, 218–222 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ding, A. J. et al. Enhanced haze pollution by black carbon in megacities in China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 2873–2879 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Guo, S. et al. Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17373–17378 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Li, H. et al. Rapid transition in winter aerosol composition in Beijing from 2014 to 2017: response to clean air actions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 11485–11499 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ding, A. et al. Significant reduction of PM2.5 in eastern China due to regional-scale emission control: evidences from the SORPES station, 2011–2018. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 11791–11801 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gao, M. et al. China’s Clean Air Action has suppressed unfavorable influences of climate on wintertime PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing since 2002. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 1497–1505 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang, J. D. et al. Particulate matter pollution over China and the effects of control policies. Sci. Total Environ. 584, 426–447 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sheehan, P., Cheng, E. J., English, A. & Sun, F. H. China’s response to the air pollution shock. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 306–309 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Huang, X., Wang, Z. L. & Ding, A. J. Impact of aerosol-PBL interaction on haze pollution: multiyear observational evidences in North China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 8596–8603 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhang, R. Y. et al. Formation of urban fine particulate matter. Chem. Rev. 115, 3803–3855 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Impact of synoptic weather patterns and inter-decadal climate variability on air quality in the North China Plain during 1980–2013. Atmos. Environ. 124, 119–128 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cai, W. J., Li, K., Liao, H., Wang, H. J. & Wu, L. X. Weather conditions conducive to Beijing severe haze more frequent under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 257–262 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Callahan, C. W., Schnell, J. L. & Horton, D. E. Multi-index attribution of extreme winter air quality in Beijing, China. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 4567–4583 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhang, G. et al. Seesaw haze pollution in North China modulated by the sub-seasonal variability of atmospheric circulation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 565–576 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhang, Q. et al. Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade. Nature 543, 705–709 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li, K., Liao, H., Cai, W. J. & Yang, Y. Attribution of anthropogenic influence on atmospheric patterns conducive to recent most severe haze over Eastern China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 2072–2081 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ding, A. J. et al. Ozone and fine particle in the western Yangtze River Delta: an overview of 1 yr data at the SORPES station. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 5813–5830 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cheng, Y. F. et al. Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China. Sci. Adv. 2, e1601530 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang, G. H. et al. Persistent sulfate formation from London fog to Chinese haze. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13630–13635 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Xie, Y. N. et al. Enhanced sulfate formation by nitrogen dioxide: implications from in situ observations at the SORPES station. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 12679–12694 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zheng, G. J. et al. Exploring the severe winter haze in Beijing: the impact of synoptic weather, regional transport and heterogeneous reactions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 2969–2983 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sun, Y. L. et al. Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution in Beijing in January 2013. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 4380–4398 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Moch, J. M. et al. Contribution of hydroxymethane sulfonate to ambient particulate matter: a potential explanation for high particulate sulfur during severe winter haze in Beijing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 11969–11979 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ding, A. J. et al. Intense atmospheric pollution modifies weather: a case of mixed biomass burning with fossil fuel combustion pollution in eastern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 10545–10554 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dong, Z. P. et al. Opposite long-term trends in aerosols between low and high altitudes: a testimony to the aerosol–PBL feedback. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 7997–8009 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Li, Z. Q. et al. Aerosol and boundary-layer interactions and impact on air quality. Natl Sci. Rev. 4, 810–833 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Petäjä, T. et al. Enhanced air pollution via aerosol–boundary layer feedback in China. Sci. Rep. 6, 18998 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wang, Z., Huang, X. & Ding, A. Dome effect of black carbon and its key influencing factors: a one-dimensional modelling study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 2821–2834 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gao, M. et al. Modeling study of the 2010 regional haze event in the North China Plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 1673–1691 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yang, Y. Q. et al. PLAM—a meteorological pollution index for air quality and its applications in fog–haze forecasts in North China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 1353–1364 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lou, S. J. et al. Black carbon amplifies haze over the North China Plain by weakening the East Asian winter monsoon. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 452–460 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ramanathan, V. et al. Warming trends in Asia amplified by brown cloud solar absorption. Nature 448, 575–578 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jacobson, M. Z. Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols. Nature 409, 695–697 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cappa, C. D. et al. Radiative absorption enhancements due to the mixing state of atmospheric black carbon. Science 337, 1078–1081 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bond, T. C. et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 5380–5552 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., Manoj, M. R., Moorthy, K. K. & Chin, M. Direct radiative effects of aerosols over South Asia from observations and modeling. Clim. Dynam. 49, 1411–1428 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wilcox, E. M. et al. Black carbon solar absorption suppresses turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11794–11799 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bharali, C., Nair, V. S., Chutia, L. & Babu, S. S. Modeling of the effects of wintertime aerosols on boundary layer properties over the Indo Gangetic Plain. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 4141–4157 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Harris, E. et al. Enhanced role of transition metal ion catalysis during in-cloud oxidation of SO2. Science 340, 727–730 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wang, C. Y., Li, P. G. & Liu, Y. Investigation of water-energy-emission nexus of air pollution control of the coal-fired power industry: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Energy Policy 115, 291–301 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Huang, N. E. et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454, 903–995 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wu, Z. & Huang, N. E. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Adv. Adapt. Data Anal. 1, 1–41 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Durre, I., Vose, R. S. & Wuertz, D. B. Overview of the Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive. J. Clim. 19, 53–68 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Stein, A. F. et al. NAAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 2059–2077 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ding, A. J., Wang, T. & Fu, C. B. Transport characteristics and origins of carbon monoxide and ozone in Hong Kong, South China. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 9475–9488 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Grell, G. A. et al. Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39, 6957–6975 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Huang, X. et al. Direct radiative effect by multicomponent aerosol over China. J. Clim. 28, 3472–3495 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Huang, X. et al. Pathways of sulfate enhancement by natural and anthropogenic mineral aerosols in China. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 14165–14179 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Li, M. et al. MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 935–963 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Huang, X. et al. Effects of aerosol–radiation interaction on precipitation during biomass-burning season in East China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 1–37 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2016YFC0200500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91544231, 41725020, 41922038 and 91744311), the National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control in China (DQGG0107-03) and the Jiangsu Provincial Fund on PM2.5 and O3 pollution mitigation. We thank Q. Zhang and K. He at Tsinghua University for helpful suggestions and colleagues at Nanjing University and Environmental Monitoring Centers at Shijiazhuang, Zhengzhou, Tianjin and other cities in eastern and northern China for their contributions on the field measurements.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.D. and X.H. conceived the study and led the overall scientific questions. X.H., A.D., Z.W. and K.D. made the data analysis and modelling studies. J.G. and F.C. provided the measurement data for cities in northern China. X.H. and A.D. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aijun Ding.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Primary Handling Editors: Xujia Jiang; Heike Langenberg; Rebecca Neely.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Time series and transport patterns of PM2.5 in eastern China during the cross-year haze event.

a, PM2.5 concentrations measured from Shijiazhuang, Zhengzhou, Jinan, Xuzhou, Nanjing and Shanghai in late December 2017 and early January 2018. Shaded squares mark the main periods of haze pollution for each city. b, Time series for low-frequency and relative synoptic variations (2-7 days) of PM2.5 in Nanjing for 2013-2018. c-d, Average PM2.5 concentrations and wind flows simulated by WRF-Chem for 28-29 December 2017 and 30 December 2017 – 1 January 2018, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Regional transport characteristics during the cross-year haze event.

72-hour retroplume (“footprint” residence time) showing transport pathways at Nanjing, Zhengzhou and Tianjin during this cross-region haze pollution. a, Nanjing (NJ) on 27 December; b, Zhengzhou (ZZ) on 28 December; c, Tianjin (TJ) on 29 December; d, Nanjing (NJ) on 31 December, 2017.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Evidence of intense aerosol-PBL feedback by regional transport between NCP and YRD.

a, Temperature difference between the 24-hour forecast by Global Forecast System (GFS) and radiosonde observations at 20:00 LT on 28 December, 2017. Note that circles mark the temperature disparities near the surface and crosses display those at 850 hPa. b, Spatial patterns of simulated BC concentration and wind at the same time with a. c, Cross section of vertical distribution of BC along the blue line in b. Grey lines denote the relative contribution from the YRD region. d, Cross section of simulated temperature difference due to aerosols’ radiative effect (filled contour) and the relative contribution from YRD (isolines).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Vertical structure and evolution of aerosol-PBL feedback in North China.

a, Temporal variation of Lidar measured normalized aerosol backscatter and modeled PM2.5 profiles at Shijiazhuang during 28-30 December 2017. Note that the dashed line marks the contribution from YRD emissions according to parallel simulations, and shadowed contour lines represent the temperature responses to ARI. b, Time series of difference between measured and simulated 2-meter air temperature without ARI, and time series of observed and simulated PM2.5 concentrations with/without considering aerosols’ radiative effect. c, Cross section of simulated difference in air temperature (filled contour) and relative humidity (isolines) due to ARI at 14:00 LT on 29 December, which was derived from the two simulation scenarios with and without ARI. d, Cross section of simulated difference in PM2.5 concentration (filled contour) and secondary sulfate formation rate due to ARI.

Extended Data Fig. 5 1-Dimensional modeling of cumulative impact of aerosol-PBL feedback along the transport pathway of pollution.

a-c, Diurnal variation of vertical air temperature difference (contour) due to ARI at Nanjing on 26 December, Jinan on 27 December, and Beijing on 28 December, simulated by WRF-Chem SCM. Note that the solid and dashed lines mark the PBL height with/without considering ARI, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Enhanced haze pollution in YRD due to cross-regional transport.

a, Vertical distribution of the source appointment of PM2.5, BC and SN (sulfate and nitrate) for YRD at different altitudes on 31 December derived from WRF-Chem simulations. The sizes of the pies denote the concentrations of PM2.5, BC and SN, with numbers in a unit of µg m-3 under the pies for reference. Red, yellow, blue and grey areas display contributions from YRD, Shandong (SD), NCP and other regions. b, WRF-Chem simulated PM2.5 source appointment at the altitude of 700 m (upper panel) and at the ground surface (lower panel) of the YRD region.

Extended Data Fig. 7 A conceptual scheme for the amplified transboundary transport of fine particles through aerosol-PBL feedback between YRD and NCP in China.

The upper panel shows how aerosol-PBL feedback was enhanced with depressed PBL, dimmed and humidified lower PBL when the warm and humid air transport from the YRD to NCP in the upper PBL. The lower panel shows how intensified aged secondary pollution in the NCP was transported to the YRD by cold fronts.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Evolution of transboundary transport of PM2.5 for 18 pollution cases during 2013-2017.

WRF-Chem simulation of zonal averaged wind vector and PM2.5 concentrations over 115-120 °E during 18 transboundary haze pollution cases. The time series of hourly PM2.5 concentrations in NCP and YRD region in each case are presented in Supplementary Fig. 2. Note that the beginning date of each event is labelled above each subplot.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Air temperature response due to aerosol-PBL interaction.

a, averaged spatial distribution of 2-meter temperature responses to aerosol-PBL interaction and mean wind vectors during Stage II of 18 cross-regional pollution events identified in Supplementary Fig. 2. b, Statistics of vertical profile of air temperature difference (Tdiff) and RH difference (RHdiff) between radiosonde observations and GFS 24-hour forecast at Beijing when haze pollution peaked in NCP. Lines and shaded areas mark the average and standard deviations, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Regional-scale PM2.5 mitigation due to in-advance and cross-regional coordinated emission control.

Zonal averaged PM2.5 reduction over 115-120 °E due to 2-day 50% emission cut in YRD before Stage I for 6 typical cross-regional cases during 2013-2017. Note that the beginning date of each event is labelled above each subplot.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Ding, A., Wang, Z. et al. Amplified transboundary transport of haze by aerosol–boundary layer interaction in China. Nat. Geosci. 13, 428–434 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0583-4

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing