Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Quantifying forest degradation requires a long-term, landscape-scale approach

Forests are spatially and temporally dynamic, such that forest degradation is best quantified across whole landscapes and over the long term. The European Union’s forest degradation policy, which focuses on contemporary primary forest conversion to plantations, ignores other globally prevalent forestry practices that can flip forests into a degraded state.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Forest degradation as an alternative stable state.

References

  1. European Union. OJ L. 150, 206–247 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. FAO & UNEP. The State of the World’s Forests 2020 (FAO & UNEP, 2020).

  3. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment – Key Findings (FAO, 2020).

  4. Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. World Bank. European Union wood imports by country in US$ thousand 2021. WITS Data, https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/EUN/Year/LTST/TradeFlow/Import/Partner/by-country/Product/44-49_Wood (accessed 15 February 2024).

  6. Betts, M. G. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 709–719 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Law, B. E. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3663–3668 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghazoul, J., Burivalova, Z., Garcia-Ulloa, J. & King, L. A. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 622–632 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter, M. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999).

  10. Lesiv, M. et al. Sci. Data 9, 199 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fagan, M. E. et al. Nat. Sustain. 5, 681–688 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, E., Beckley, T. M. & de Graaf, M. Environ. Rev. 32, 1–15 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Betts, M. G. et al. Biol. Rev. 96, 1301–1317 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen, A. J. et al. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12822 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, N. L. et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 234–240 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jetz, W. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 539–551 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Balmford, G. Cerrulo, N. Ferrari, A. Fitch, M. Sutton, M. Swanson, and M. Weldy for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation grant LTER8 DEB-2025755, NSF-DISES 2108354, NASA GEDI Science Team grant 80HQTR21T0013, and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) 2022-67019-37130. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US Government determination or policy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.G.B., Z.Y. and S.P.H. conceptualized the work; Z.Y. and M.G.B. performed mapping and analysis; M.G.B. wrote the original draft; and M.G.B., Z.Y., A.S.H, J.H., F.H., D.L., E.S. and S.P.H. reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew G. Betts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Extended data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure 1 caption and Supplementary methods for its creation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Betts, M.G., Yang, Z., Hadley, A.S. et al. Quantifying forest degradation requires a long-term, landscape-scale approach. Nat Ecol Evol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02409-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02409-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing