Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Make global biodiversity information useful to national decision-makers

Participants in the Convention on Biological Diversity’s processes for implementing the Kunming-Montréal Global Biodiversity Framework need clarity on what makes biodiversity information useful to national decision-makers. Here we present seven preconditions of useful biodiversity information and describe how these can be supported through regional support centres and south–south cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Seven preconditions of useful biodiversity information.

References

  1. Convention on Biological Diversity. Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice Twenty-Fifth Meeting: Annotated Provisional Agenda (CBD, 2023).

  2. Hardisty, A. R. et al. Ecol. Inform. 49, 22–31 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stephenson, P. J. & Stengel, C. PLoS ONE 15, e0242923 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez, A. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02171-0 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kays, R. & Wikelski, M. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 859–869 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stephenson, P. J. et al. Biol. Conserv. 213, 335–340 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peterson, A. T. & Soberón, J. Biodivers. Conserv. 27, 1277–1288 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jetz, W. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 539–551 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meyer, H. & Pebesma, E. Nat. Commun. 13, 2208 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wyborn, C. & Evans, M. C. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1322–1324 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhatt, R. et al. Environ. Conserv. 47, 15–21 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Atickem, A. et al. Nature 570, 297–300 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dike, V. N. et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 447–449 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cash, D. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8086–8091 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Roche, D. G. et al. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13835 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amano, T. et al. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001296 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Convention on Biological Diversity. Monitoring Framework for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD, 2022).

  18. Posner, S. M., McKenzie, E. & Ricketts, T. H. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1760–1765 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Capacity-building and Development and Technical and Scientific Cooperation (CBD, 2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Naskrecki (E. O. Wilson Biodiversity Laboratory, Gorongosa National Park) for his contributions during the roundtable discussion and G. Dubois (European Commission Joint Research Centre) for comments on a first draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Falko T. Buschke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

F.B., C.C. and E.H.S. work as part of the BIOPAMA 2 Programme (Funded by the European Commission), which established and supports regional organisations expressing interest in the open call for Regional and/or Subregional Technical and Scientific Cooperation Support Centres under the Convention on Biological Diversity. A.v.H. works as part of the COMBO+ Programme, funded by AFD (French Development Agency) and FFEM (French Environmental Fund), which supports spatial information platforms in host countries to make data publicly available to promote the use of appropriate data in biodiversity inclusive planning and decision-making on economic project development. T.H. is a member of the CBD Informal Advisory Group on Technical and Scientific Cooperation (IAG-TSC) and as such will be involved in the selection process for the regional and sub-regional support centres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buschke, F.T., Capitani, C., Sow, E.H. et al. Make global biodiversity information useful to national decision-makers. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 1953–1956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02226-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02226-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing