Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 8, pages 14–17 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

For the concept of nature positive to succeed as the lodestar for international action on biodiversity conservation, it must build upon lessons learned from the application of the mitigation hierarchy — or risk becoming mere greenwash.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Only high-integrity accounting will genuinely support the goal of nature positive.

References

  1. Bull, J. W. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 4–7 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Locke, H. et al. A Nature-Positive World: The Global Goal for Nature (Wildlife Conservation Society, 2020).

  3. zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. J. Clean. Prod. 379, e134798 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Obura, D. O. et al. One Earth 6, 105–117 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Convention on Biological Diversity. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. cbd.int, https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/e6d3/cd1d/daf663719a03902a9b116c34/cop-15-l-25-en.pdf (2023).

  6. Milner-Gulland, E. J. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1243–1244 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brownlie, S. & Treweek, J. in Sustainability Assessment (ed. Gibson, R.) 239–259 (Routledge, 2016).

  8. Barbé, H. & Frascaria-Lacoste, N. Sustainability 13, 12726 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme. Working for Biodiversity Net Gain: An Overview of the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP) 2004–2018 (BBOP, 2018).

  10. IUCN. Biodiversity Offsets Policy (IUCN, 2016).

  11. Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. One Earth 4, 75–87 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12664 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bull, J. W. et al. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20, 370–378 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maron, M. et al. Bioscience 66, 489–498 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacob, C., Pioch, S. & Thorin, S. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 60, 83–98 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Utamiputri, P., Bennun, L., Edwards, S. & Bull, J. W. One Earth 1, 305–315 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. DCCEEW. Nature Positive Plan: Better for the Environment, Better for Business (Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, 2022).

  18. Bond, A., Pope, J., Morrison-Saunders, A., Retief, F. & Gunn, J. A. E. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 45, 46–53 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor, A. Land of Plenty: A Nature-positive Pathway to Decarbonise UK Agriculture and Land Use (WWF-UK, 2022).

  20. NatureFinance & Pollination. Biodiversity Credit Markets: The Role of Law, Regulation and Policy (Taskforce on Nature Markets, 2023).

  21. World Economic Forum. Biodiversity Credits: Unlocking Financial Markets for Nature-Positive Outcomes (WEF, 2022)

  22. Pilgrim, J. D. et al. Conserv. Lett. 6, 376–384 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bull, J. W. et al. Nature 604, 420–424 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Redford, K. H., Padoch, C. & Sunderland, T. Conserv. Biol. 27, 437–438 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors (except M.C.E) are members of IUCN’s Thematic Group on Impact Mitigation and Ecological Compensation, part of the Commission on Ecosystem Management, and thank group members for valuable discussions on the topic. J.P.G.J. thanks the Prince Bernhard Chair foundation for funding. S.O.S.E.z.E. is supported by EU Horizon 2020 project SUPERB (systemic solutions for upscaling of urgent ecosystem restoration for forest related biodiversity), (grant ref: GA 101036849). E.J.M.-G. acknowledges support from the Leverhulme Trust via its support for the Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Martine Maron

  2. Centre for Biodiversity & Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Martine Maron

  3. Rewilding Europe, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Fabien Quétier

  4. Terrasos, Bogotá, Colombia

    Mariana Sarmiento

  5. Independent consultant, London, UK

    Kerry ten Kate

  6. Public Service Research Group, School of Business, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    Megan C. Evans

  7. Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Joseph W. Bull, Sophus O. S. E. zu Ermgassen & E. J. Milner-Gulland

  8. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, Bangor, UK

    Julia P. G. Jones

  9. Department of Biology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Julia P. G. Jones

  10. Susie Brownlie & Associates, Cape Town, South Africa

    Susie Brownlie

  11. eCountability Ltd, Cullompton, UK

    Jo Treweek

  12. Wildlife Conservation Society, Cape Town, South Africa

    Amrei von Hase

Authors
  1. Martine Maron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabien Quétier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mariana Sarmiento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kerry ten Kate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Megan C. Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joseph W. Bull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Julia P. G. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sophus O. S. E. zu Ermgassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. E. J. Milner-Gulland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Susie Brownlie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jo Treweek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Amrei von Hase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martine Maron.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare the following associations relevant to this material; in their various roles with these organizations, all authors promote international good practice in conserving biodiversity and mitigating impacts. M.M., F.Q., M.C.E, S.O.S.E.z.E., E.J.M.-G., K.t.K. and A.v.H. have advised government, nongovernment organizations and industry bodies on nature positive and the mitigation hierarchy. Terrasos (M.S.) provides advisory services for companies applying the mitigation hierarchy and provides biodiversity compensation solutions through habitat banks and other means. Rewilding Europe (F.Q.) has a commercial arm that invests in ecosystem restoration projects in Europe. J.W.B. directs Wild Business Ltd, which provides research-based technical advisory services for selected organizations implementing nature-positive strategies or applying the mitigation hierarchy. Susie Brownlie & Associates (S.B.) advises environmental nongovernmental organizations on good practice in impact assessment and mitigation, and on occasion supports developers in designing and implementing offsets. K.t.K. is a non-executive director of Finance Earth, a mission-driven social enterprise, working in partnership with environmental organizations to protect and restore nature using market-based mechanisms and implementing bespoke financial tools. eCountability Ltd (J.T.) advises on best practice implementation of the mitigation hierarchy and natural capital assessment and accounting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maron, M., Quétier, F., Sarmiento, M. et al. ‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy. Nat Ecol Evol 8, 14–17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02199-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02199-2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene