Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reply to: Regional records improve data quality in determining plant extinction rates

The Original Article was published on 09 March 2020

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Humphreys, A. M., Govaerts, R., Ficinski, S. Z., Lughadha, E. N. & Vorontsova, M. S. Global dataset shows geography and life form predict modern plant extinction and rediscovery. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1043–1047 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 14 (Standards and Petitions Committee, IUCN, 2019);

  3. 3.

    Knapp, W. M. et al. Regional records improve data quality in determining plant extinction rates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. (2020).

  4. 4.

    Rejmánek, M. Vascular plant extinctions in California: a critical assessment. Divers. Distrib. 24, 129–136 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Knapp, W. M. et al. Dryad Data from: Regional Records Improve Data Quality in Determining Plant Extinction Rates (Dryad Digital Repository, 2019);

  6. 6.

    World Checklist of Selected Plant Families (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2018);

  7. 7.

    Barraclough, T. G. & Humphreys, A. M. The evolutionary reality of species and higher taxa in plants: a survey of post-modern opinion and evidence. New Phytol. 207, 291–296 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mace, G. M. The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359, 711–719 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Isaac, N. J. B., Turvey, S. T., Collen, B., Waterman, C. & Baillie, J. E. M. Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS ONE 2, e296 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Forest, F. et al. Gymnosperms on the EDGE. Sci. Rep. 8, 6053 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hills, R., Bachman, S., Forest, F., Moat, J. & Wilkin, P. Incorporating evolutionary history into conservation assessments of a highly threatened group of species, South African Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 123, 296–307 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    NatureServe Explorer: An Online Encyclopedia of Life (NatureServe, 2019);

  13. 13.

    Brummitt, R. K. World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions 2nd edn (Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001).

  14. 14.

    POWO: Plants of the World online (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2020);

Download references

Author information




A.M.H. and E.N.L. wrote the paper with contributions from M.S.V. and R.G. All authors approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Aelys M. Humphreys or Rafaël Govaerts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Humphreys, A.M., Vorontsova, M.S., Govaerts, R. et al. Reply to: Regional records improve data quality in determining plant extinction rates. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 515–516 (2020).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing