Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Disease ecology

A batty concept goes viral

A field test suggests that orally ingestible, spreadable vaccines to combat rabies will transmit widely among vampire bats in the wild, offering a more humane — and effective — alternative to the bat culling practiced throughout Latin America today.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Population-level susceptibility to rabies is elevated under culling versus spreadable vaccine interventions.


  1. Bärnighausen, T., Bloom, D. E., Cafiero-Fonseca, E. T. & O’Brien, J. C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12313–12319 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basinski, A. J. et al. Vaccine 36, 675–682 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bull, J. J., Smithson, M. W. & Nuismer, S. L. Trends Microbiol. 26, 6–15 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakker, K. M. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Belotto, A., Leanes, L. F., Schneider, M. C., Tamayo, H. & Correa, E. Virus Res. 111, 5–12 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider, M. C. et al. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 25, 260–269 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Linhart, S. B., Crespo, R. F. & Mitchell, G. C. Bol. Oficina Sanit. Panam. 6, 31–38 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Streicker, D. G. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 3384–3392 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stading, B. et al. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11, e0005958 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stading, B. R. et al. Vaccine 34, 5352–5358 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aguilar-Setién, A. et al. J. Wildl. Dis. 38, 539–544 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aguilar-Sétien, A. et al. Vaccine 16, 1122–1126 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Almeida, M. F., Martorelli, L. F. A., Aires, C. C., Barros, R. F. & Massad, E. Virus Res. 137, 275–277 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergner, L. M. et al. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 128–143 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson, R. D., Elias, D. J. & Mitchell, G. C. J. Wildl. Manage. 41, 736–739 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Calisher, C. H., Childs, J. E., Field, H. E., Holmes, K. V. & Schountz, T. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19, 531–545 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cara E. Brook.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brook, C.E. A batty concept goes viral. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 1620–1621 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing