Much research and policy effort is being expended on ways to conserve living nature while enabling the economic and social development needed to increase equity and end poverty. We propose this will only be possible if policy shifts away from conservation targets that focus on avoiding losses towards processes that consider net outcomes for biodiversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
World Conservation Strategy (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, World Wildlife Fund and United Nations Environment Programme, 1980); https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/wcs-004.pdf
Sharm El-Sheik Declaration: Investing in Biodiversity for People and Planet CBD/COP/14/12 (UNEP, 2018); https://goo.gl/f3hzXi
Collins, A. et al. The Global Risks Report 2019 (World Economic Forum, 2019); http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2019.pdf
Maxwell, S. L. et al. Science 347, 1075–1076 (2015).
Maron, M., Simmonds, J. S. & Watson, J. E. M. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1194–1195 (2018).
Renwick, A. R. et al. PLoS ONE 12, e0173876 (2017).
Kremen, C. & Merenlender, A. M. Science 362, eaau6020 (2018).
Turner, W. R. et al. BioScience 62, 85–92 (2012).
Arlidge, W. N. S. et al. BioScience 68, 336–347 (2018).
Pilgrim, J. D. et al. Conserv. Lett. 6, 376–384 (2013).
Kiesecker, J. M., Copeland, H., Pocewicz, A. & McKenney, B. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 261–266 (2009).
Visconti, P. et al. Science 364, 239–241 (2019).
Maron, M. et al. Nat. Sustain. 1, 19–27 (2018).
Bull, J. W., Suttle, K. B., Gordon, A., Singh, N. J. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Oryx 47, 369–380 (2013).
Bull, J. W. & Strange, N. Nat. Sustain. 1, 790–798 (2018).
Global Inventory of Biodiversity Offset Projects (IUCN, 2019); https://portals.iucn.org/offsetpolicy/
IUCN Policy on Biodiversity Offsets (IUCN, 2016); https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/resrecfiles/WCC_2016_RES_059_EN.pdf
Akçakaya, H. R. et al. Conserv. Biol. 32, 1128–1138 (2018).
Bull, J. W. & Maron, M . Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20160600 (2016).
Hoffman, M. et al. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1303–1313 (2015).
Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. A. & Koch, A. Nature 568, 25–28 (2019).
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer L. A.) (IPCC, 2014).
Dinerstein, E. et al. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2869 (2019).
Marques, A. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 628–637 (2019).
Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M. & Watson, J. E. M. Nature 536, 143–145 (2016).
Koch, A., Brierley, C., Maslin, M. M. & Lewis, S. L. Quat. Sci. Rev. 207, 13–36 (2019).
Martin, T. G. & Watson, J. E. M. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 122–124 (2016).
Egler, H.-P. & Frazao, R. Sustainable Infrastructure and Finance: How to Contribute to a Sustainable Future Working Paper 16/09 (UNEP, 2016).
The Belt and Road Initiative: WWF Recommendations and Spatial Analysis WWF Briefing Paper (WWF, 2017); http://tiny.cc/it6e7y
Hughes, A. C. Conserv. Biol. 33, 883–894 (2019).
Nijman, V. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 1101–1114 (2010).
Linkie, M. et al. Biol. Conserv. 219, 105–109 (2018).
The World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC, 2018); www.protectedplanet.net
Venter, O. et al. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).
di Marco, M., Venter, O., Possingham, H. P. & Watson, J. E. M. Nat. Commun. 9, 4621 (2018).
Minnemeyer, S., Laestadius, L., Sizer, N., Saint-Laurent, C. & Potapov, P. Atlas of Forest and Landscape Restoration Opportunities (World Resources Institute, 2014).
Losos, E., Pfaff, A., Olander, L., Mason, S. & Morgan, S. Reducing Environmental Risks from Belt and Road Initiative Investments in Transportation Infrastructure Policy Research Working Paper 8718 (World Bank Group, 2019).
We thank G. M. Mace and C. Bryan for feedback on a draft version of this manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Latest estimate of the spatial distribution of anthropogenic impacts upon nature, the terrestrial ‘human footprint’ [data from 18,19], against proposed development corridors for BRI . Note that the human footprint addresses the ‘ecosystems’ dimension of biodiversity only. Yellow border = area displayed in Box 1 (China and Central Asia).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Map of the central and eastern BRI region featuring examples of primarily illegally traded wildlife products, along with the approximate direction of trade.
Overlaid onto the human footprint and main BRI corridors displayed in Extended Data Fig. 1.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Global Inventory of Biodiversity Offset Policies (GIBOP) policy scores (0 – 3) for the 196 parties to the CBD.
The recently developed GIBOP  reports the results of the most comprehensive global analysis of national net outcome-type conservation policies. The interpretation of GIBOP policy score, in terms of the existence of national policies applying a mitigation hierarchy to biodiversity impacts, is given in the figure. Inset: Rule of Law index (World Justice Project, 2019) scores against GIBOP policy score for the 123 of those countries for which data are available, giving an indication of the likelihood of legal compliance, grouped again by GIBOP policy score.
About this article
Cite this article
Bull, J.W., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Addison, P.F.E. et al. Net positive outcomes for nature. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 4–7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1022-z
This article is cited by
Nature Food (2023)
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2023)
Regulation, the hybrid market, and species conservation: The case of conservation banking in California
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2022)