The urban imprint on plant phenology

Article metrics

Subjects

Abstract

The modification of the surface radiation and energy balance in urban areas causes the temperatures in these areas to exceed those of the surrounding countryside. It has thus been suggested that urban environments may serve as field laboratories for studying the effects of a warming climate on biota in a space-for-time substitution. Here we investigated changes in the timing of plant phenology and temperature across study sites that differed in the degree of urbanization using publicly available pan-European datasets for the period 1981–2010. We found a significant advancement in the phenological phases of leaf development, flowering and fruiting with higher degrees of urbanization, whereas a significant delay was observed for phenological phases of leaf senescence. In addition to these phenological changes, an increase in air temperature with higher degrees of urbanization was observed. This increase was largest during the periods of leaf development, flowering and fruiting and smallest during the period of leaf senescence. On the basis of these results, we show that the apparent temperature sensitivity of phenological phases to urban warming is either significantly dampened (leaf development, flowering and fruiting) or reversed (leaf senescence) compared with the temperature sensitivity inferred from temporal changes in phenology and temperature. We conclude that gradients in urbanization represent a poor analogue for the temporal changes in plant phenology, apparently owing to confounding factors associated with urbanization.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Coefficients of the MLR analysis describe unique changes in plant phenology with changes in UF.
Fig. 2: Coefficients of the MLR regression analysis describe unique changes in air temperature with changes in UF.
Fig. 3: Apparent temperature sensitivities of aggregated phenological phases.
Fig. 4: Coefficients of the MLR analysis describe unique changes in plant phenology over time.

Data availability

The phenological data used in this study are available from www.pep725.eu and the air temperature data from www.ecad.eu. The data underlying the CORINE land cover, the imperviousness degree and the European settlement map are available from the Copernicus Land Monitoring Service (https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european).

Code availability

The MATLAB (MathWorks) scripts used to analyse data are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3422079.

References

  1. 1.

    Cleland, E. E., Chuine, I., Menzel, A., Mooney, H. A. & Schwartz, M. D. Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 357–365 (2007).

  2. 2.

    Zhou, B., Rybski, D. & Kropp, J. P. On the statistics of urban heat island intensity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5486–5491 (2013).

  3. 3.

    Stewart, I. D. & Oke, T. R. Local climate zones for urban temperature. Stud. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 1879–1900 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Jochner, S. & Menzel, A. Urban phenological studies—past, present, future. Environ. Pollut. 203, 250–261 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Neil, K. & Wu, J. Effects of urbanization on plant flowering phenology: a review. Urban Ecosyst. 9, 243–257 (2006).

  6. 6.

    Menzel, A. et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1969–1976 (2006).

  7. 7.

    Harrison, T., Winfree, R. & Evans, K. Urban drivers of plant–pollinator interactions. Funct. Ecol. 29, 879–888 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Zhao, S., Liu, S. & Zhou, D. Prevalent vegetation growth enhancement in urban environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6313–6318 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Wang, S. et al. Urban–rural gradients reveal joint control of elevated CO2 and temperature on extended photosynthetic seasons. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1076–1085 (2019).

  10. 10.

    Herrmann, D. L., Schifman, L. A. & Shuster, W. D. Widespread loss of intermediate soil horizons in urban landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6751–6755 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Zipper, S. C., Schatz, J., Kucharik, C. J. & Loheide, S. P. Urban heat island-induced increases in evapotranspirative demand. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 873–881 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Mitchell, L. E. et al. Long-term urban carbon dioxide observations reveal spatial and temporal dynamics related to urban characteristics and growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2912–2917 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Grange, S. K., Lewis, A. C., Moller, S. J. & Carslaw, D. C. Lower vehicular primary emissions of NO2 in Europe than assumed in policy projections. Nat. Geosci. 10, 914–918 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Tsai, D. H., Wang, J. L., Wang, C. H. & Chan, C. C. A study of ground-level ozone pollution, ozone precursors and subtropical meteorological conditions in central Taiwan. J. Environ. Monit. 10, 109–118 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Jochner, S. et al. The effects of short- and long-term air pollutants on plant phenology and leaf characteristics. Environ. Pollut. 206, 382–389 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Honour, S. L., Bell, J. N., Ashenden, T. W., Cape, J. N. & Power, S. A. Responses of herbaceous plants to urban air pollution: effects on growth, phenology and leaf surface characteristics. Environ. Pollut. 157, 1279–1286 (2009).

  17. 17.

    Sanz, J. et al. Plant phenology, growth and nutritive quality of Briza maxima: responses induced by enhanced ozone atmospheric levels and nitrogen enrichment. Environ. Pollut. 159, 423–430 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Škvareninová, J. et al. Effects of light pollution on tree phenology in the urban environment. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 25, 282–290 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Massetti, L. Assessing the impact of street lighting on Platanus x acerifolia phenology. Urban For. Urban Green. 34, 71–77 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Gorton, A. J., Moeller, D. A. & Tiffin, P. Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20180968 (2018).

  21. 21.

    Stewart, I. D. A systematic review and scientific critique of methodology in modern urban heat island literature. Int. J. Climatol. 31, 200–217 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Comber, A. & Brunsdon, C. A spatial analysis of plant phenophase changes and the impact of increases in urban land use. Int. J. Climatol. 35, 972–980 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Jochner, S. C., Sparks, T. H., Estrella, N. & Menzel, A. The influence of altitude and urbanisation on trends and mean dates in phenology (1980–2009). Int J. Biometeorol. 56, 387–394 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Roetzer, T., Wittenzeller, M., Haeckel, H. & Nekovar, J. Phenology in central Europe – differences and trends of spring phenophases in urban and rural areas. Int J. Biometeorol. 44, 60–66 (2000).

  25. 25.

    Templ, B. et al. Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data. Int J. Biometeorol. 62, 1109–1113 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Klein Tank, A. M. G. et al. Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment. Int. J. Climatol. 22, 1441–1453 (2002).

  27. 27.

    Chrysanthou, A., van der Schrier, G., van den Besselaar, E. J. M., Klein Tank, A. M. G. & Brandsma, T. The effects of urbanization on the rise of the European temperature since 1960. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 7716–7722 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Keenan, T. F., Richardson, A. D. & Hufkens, K. On quantifying the apparent temperature sensitivity of plant phenology. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16114 (2019).

  29. 29.

    van Hove, L. W. A. et al. Temporal and spatial variability of urban heat island and thermal comfort within the Rotterdam agglomeration. Build. Environ. 83, 91–103 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Peterson, T. C. & Owen, T. W. Urban heat island assessment: metadata are important. J. Clim. 18, 2637–2646 (2005).

  31. 31.

    Zhou, Y. et al. A global map of urban extent from nightlights. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 054011 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Meier, U. in Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science (ed. Schwartz, M. D.) 269–283 (Kluwer Academic, 2003).

  33. 33.

    Fu, Y. H. et al. Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature 526, 104–107 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Phenological data were provided by the members of the PEP725 project. We acknowledge the air temperature data providers of the ECA&D project. This work was partially supported through a grant by the Austrian National Science Fund (FWF, grant number FP27176-B16).

Author information

G.W. conceived the study, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript together with E.T. and A.H.

Correspondence to Georg Wohlfahrt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–12 including figure legends.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wohlfahrt, G., Tomelleri, E. & Hammerle, A. The urban imprint on plant phenology. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 1668–1674 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41559-019-1017-9

Download citation

Further reading