Three thousand years of wild capuchin stone tool use

Abstract

The human archaeological record changes over time. Finding such change in other animals requires similar evidence, namely, a long-term sequence of material culture. Here, we apply archaeological excavation, dating and analytical techniques to a wild capuchin monkey (Sapajus libidinosus) site in Serra da Capivara National Park, Brazil. We identify monkey stone tools between 2,400 and 3,000 years old and, on the basis of metric and damage patterns, demonstrate that capuchin food processing changed between ~2,400 and 300 years ago, and between ~100 years ago and the present day. We present the first example of long-term tool-use variation outside of the human lineage, and discuss possible mechanisms of extended behavioural change.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: The Caju BPF2 site, Serra da Capivara National Park, Brazil.
Fig. 2: Examples of hammerstones and anvils from Caju BPF2.

Data availability

All data pertaining to the study are included within the text and Supplementary Information. Access to the collections is available upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Stout, D. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 1050–1059 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Harmand, S. et al. Nature 521, 310–315 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Potts, R. Curr. Anthropol. 53, S299–S317 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mercader, J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3043–3048 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Proffitt, T., Haslam, M., Mercader, J., Boesch, C. & Luncz, L. V. J. Hum. Evol. 124, 117–139 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Haslam, M. et al. J. Hum. Evol. 96, 134–138 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Haslam, M. et al. Curr. Biol. 26, R521–R522 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Proffitt, T. et al. Nature 539, 85–88 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Falótico, T. & Ottoni, E. B. PloS ONE 8, e79535 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Falótico, T. & Ottoni, E. B. Behaviour 153, 421–442 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Falótico, T., Siqueira, J. O. & Ottoni, E. B. Sci. Rep. 7, 6278 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mannu, M. & Ottoni, E. B. Am. J. Primatol. 71, 242–251 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Spagnoletti, N. et al. J. Hum. Evol. 61, 97–107 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ferreira, R. G., Emidio, R. A. & Jerusalinsky, L. Am. J. Primatol. 72, 270–275 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Visalberghi, E. et al. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 132, 426–444 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Falótico, T. et al. Primates 59, 385–394 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moraes, B. L. C. D., Souto, A. D. S. & Schiel, N. Am. J. Primatol. 76, 967–977 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Boëda, E. et al. Antiquity 88, 927–941 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lahaye, C. et al. Quat. Geochronol. 30, 445–451 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Pessiss, A.-M., Martin, G. & Guidon, N. Os Biomas e as sociedades Humanas Na Pré- História Da Região Do Parque Nacional Serra Da Capivara, Brasil Vol. II-B (FUMDAHM, 2014).

  21. 21.

    Leakey, M. D. Olduvai Gorge Vol. 3 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1971).

  22. 22.

    Torre, Idela & Mora, R. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 21, 781–823 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Braun, D. R. et al. J. Hum. Evol. 55, 1053–1063 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Leakey, M. D. After the Australopithecines: Stratigraphy, Ecology, and Culture Change in the Middle Pleistocene (eds Butzer, K. W. & Isaac, G. L.) 477–493 (Mouton, 1975).

  25. 25.

    Arroyo, A. & de la Torre, I. J. Archaeol. Sci. 74, 23–34 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Arroyo, A. & de La Torre, I. J. Hum. Evol. 20, 402–421 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mora, R. & de la Torre, I. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 24, 179–192 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Eshchar, Y., Izar, P., Visalberghi, E., Resende, B. D. & Fragaszy, D. M. Anim. Cogn. 19, 605–618 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by a European Research Council Starting Investigator Grant (No. 283959) to M.H.; a São Paulo Research Foundation award to T.F. (No. 2013/05219-0) and E.B.O. (No. 2014/04818-0); a CNPq PQ Grant (No. 308746/2017-1) to E.B.O.; a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship (No. ECF-2015-396) awarded to R.A.S.; and a British Academy Fellowship (No. pf170157) awarded to T.P. Support for fieldwork and analysis was provided by N. Guidon and G. Daltrini Felice of FUMDHAM. Fieldwork at SCNP was approved by Brazilian environmental protection agencies (IBAMA/ICMBio Nos. 37609-5 and 37615-5). We thank L. V. Luncz for assistance in identification of primate material and R. F. de Oliveira for assistance in coordinating the excavation team and identification of primate material.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.F. and M.H. undertook excavation and initial data collection. T.F., T.P., M.H. and E.B.O. conceived the study. T.P. conducted the technological analysis. R.A.S. conducted radiocarbon dating of samples and produced associated figures and tables. T.P. and T.F. wrote the paper and Supplementary online material, with contributions from M.H., E.B.O. and R.A.S. T.P. generated all figures and graphs.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomos Proffitt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Analysis, Supplementary Figs. 1–14, Supplementary Tables 1–3 and Supplementary References

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falótico, T., Proffitt, T., Ottoni, E.B. et al. Three thousand years of wild capuchin stone tool use. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 1034–1038 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0904-4

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing