Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Global comparison of the BII with BMI and with the HF.


  1. Scholes, R. J. & Biggs, R. Nature 434, 45–49 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Newbold, T. et al. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2018–2 (IUCN, 2019);

  4. Purvis, A., De Palma, A. & Newbold, T. in State of Nature 2016 (eds Hayhow, D.vB. et al.) 70–71 (The State of Nature Partnership, London, 2016).

  5. Erb, K.-H. et al. Nature 553, 73–76 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lennox, G. D. et al. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 5680–5694 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Venter, O. et al. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Marco, M., Venter, O., Possingham, H. P. & Watson, J. E. M. Nat. Commun. 9, 4621 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Olson, D. M. et al. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip A. Martin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, P.A., Green, R.E. & Balmford, A. The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 862–863 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing