Article | Published:

Mammal diversity influences the carbon cycle through trophic interactions in the Amazon

Nature Ecology & Evolutionvolume 1pages16701676 (2017) | Download Citation



Biodiversity affects many ecosystem functions and services, including carbon cycling and retention. While it is known that the efficiency of carbon capture and biomass production by ecological communities increases with species diversity, the role of vertebrate animals in the carbon cycle remains undocumented. Here, we use an extensive dataset collected in a high-diversity Amazonian system to parse out the relationship between animal and plant species richness, feeding interactions, tree biomass and carbon concentrations in soil. Mammal and tree species richness is positively related to tree biomass and carbon concentration in soil—and the relationship is mediated by organic remains produced by vertebrate feeding events. Our research advances knowledge of the links between biodiversity and carbon cycling and storage, supporting the view that whole community complexity—including vertebrate richness and trophic interactions—drives ecosystem function in tropical systems. Securing animal and plant diversity while protecting landscape integrity will contribute to soil nutrient content and carbon retention in the biosphere.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A correction to this article is available online at

Change history

  • 19 October 2017

    In the version of this Article originally published, the surname of Ted K. Raab was misspelt. This error has now been corrected in all versions of the Article.


  1. 1.

    Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).

  2. 2.

    Aarssen, L. W. High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80, 183–184 (1997).

  3. 3.

    Tilman, D., Lehman, C. L. & Thomson, K. T. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1857–1861 (1997).

  4. 4.

    Cardinale, B. J. et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Bot. 98, 572–592 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Fornara, D. A. & Tilman, D. Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation. J. Ecol. 96, 314–322 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Cong, W. F. et al. Plant species richness promotes soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in grasslands without legumes. J. Ecol. 102, 1163–1170 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Poorter, L. et al. Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1314–1328 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Lange, M. et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nat. Commun. 6, 6707 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Fierer, N. et al. Reconstructing the microbial diversity and function of pre-agricultural tallgrass prairie soils in the United States. Science 342, 621–624 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Marichal, R. et al. Soil macroinvertebrate communities and ecosystem services in deforested landscapes of Amazonia. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 83, 177–185 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Allgeier, J. E., Layman, C. A., Mumby, P. J. & Rosemond, A. D. Biogeochemical implications of biodiversity and community structure across multiple coastal ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 85, 117–132 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Bello, C. et al. Defaunation affects carbon storage in tropical forests. Sci. Adv. 1, e1501105 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Dos Santos Neves, N., Feer, N., Salmon, S., Chateil, C. & Ponge, C. J. F. The impact of red howler monkey latrines on the distribution of main nutrients and on topsoil profiles in a tropical rainforest. Austral Ecol. 35, 549–559 (2010).

  15. 15.

    Sitters, J., Maechler, M. J., Edwards, P. J., Suter, W. & Venterink, H. O. Interactions between C:N:P stoichiometry and soil macrofauna control dung decomposition of savanna herbivores. Funct. Ecol. 28, 776–786 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Barton, P. S., Cunningham, S. A., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Manning, A. D. The role of carrion in maintaining biodiversity and ecological processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Oecologia 171, 761–772 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Parmenter, R. R. & MacMahon, J. A. Carrion decomposition and nutrient cycling in a semiarid shrub-steppe ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 79, 637–661 (2009).

  18. 18.

    Hawlena, D., Strickland, M. S., Bradford, M. A. & Schmitz, O. J. Fear of predation slows plant-litter decomposition. Science 336, 1434–1438 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Lehmann, J. & Kleber, M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528, 60–68 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Frank, D. A., Depriest, T., McLauchlan, K. & Risch, A. C. Topographic and ungulate regulation of soil C turnover in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 495–504 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Ritchie, M. E. Plant compensation to grazing and soil carbon dynamics in a tropical grassland. PeerJ 2, e233 (2014).

  22. 22.

    McSherry, M. E. & Ritchie, M. E. Effects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1347–1357 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Hooper, D. U., Schulze, E. D. & Mooney, H. A. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function (Springer, Berlin, 1993).

  24. 24.

    Fragoso, J. M. V. & Huffman, J. M. Seed-dispersal and seedling recruitment patterns by the last Neotropical megafaunal element in Amazonia, the tapir. J. Trop. Ecol. 16, 369–385 (2000).

  25. 25.

    Stevenson, P. R. & Guzmán-Caro, D. C. Nutrient transport within and between habitats through seed dispersal processes by woolly monkeys in north-western Colombia. Am. J. Primatol. 72, 992–1003 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Nichols, E. et al. Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol. Conserv. 141, 1461–1474 (2008).

  27. 27.

    Kurten, E. L. Cascading effects of contemporaneous defaunation on tropical forest communities. Biol. Conserv. 163, 22–32 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Kurten, E. L., Wright, S. J. & Carson, W. P. Hunting alters seedling functional trait composition in a neotropical forest. Ecology 96, 1923–1932 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Hoehn, P., Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2283–2291 (2008).

  30. 30.

    Lefcheck, J. S. et al. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats. Nat. Commun. 6, 6936 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Iwamura, T., Lambin, E. F., Silvius, K. M., Luzar, J. B. & Fragoso, J. M. V. Agent-based modeling of hunting and subsistence agriculture on indigenous lands: understanding interactions between social and ecological systems. Environ. Model. Softw. 58, 109–127 (2014).

  32. 32.

    Read, J. M. et al. Space, place, and hunting patterns among indigenous peoples of the Guyanese Rupununi region. J. Lat. Am. Geogr. 9, 213–243 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Luzar, J. B. et al. Large-scale environmental monitoring by indigenous peoples. BioScience. 6, 771–781 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Luzar, J. B., Silvius, K. M. & Fragoso, J. M. V. Church affiliation and meat taboos in indigenous communities of Guyanese Amazonia. Hum. Ecol. 40, 833–845 (2012).

  35. 35.

    Fragoso, J. M. V. et al. Line transect surveys underdetect terrestrial mammals: implications for the sustainability of subsistence hunting. PLoS ONE 11, e0152659 (2016).

  36. 36.

    Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).

  37. 37.

    Anderson, D. R., Laake, J. L., Crain, B. R. & Burnham, K. P. Guidelines for line transect sampling of biological populations. J. Wildlife Manage. 43, 70–78 (1979).

  38. 38.

    Butt, N., Epps, K., Overman, H., Iwamura, T. & Fragoso, J. M. V. Assessing carbon stocks using indigenous peoples’ field measurements in Amazonian Guyana. Forest Ecol. Manage. 338, 191–199 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Batjes, N. H. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47, 151–163 (1996).

  40. 40.

    Silva, L. C. R. et al. Can savannas become forests? A coupled analysis of nutrient stocks and fire thresholds in central Brazil. Plant Soil 373, 829–842 (2013).

  41. 41.

    Sheil, D., Ladd, B., Silva, L. C., Laffan, S. W. & Van Heist, M. How are soil carbon and tropical biodiversity related? Environ. Conserv. 43, 231–241 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002).

  43. 43

    R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Satistical Computing, Vienna, 2017).

  44. 44.

    Grace, J. B. Structural Equation Models and Natural Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006).

  45. 45.

    Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), Version 10 (StatSoft, Tulsa, 2001).

Download references


We thank the Guyana Environmental Protection Agency and the Ministry of Amerindian Affairs for permission to work in the Rupununi. We thank the National Science Foundation (NSF; Grant BE/CNH 05 08094), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and Stanford University for financial and administrative support. We thank the Iwokrama International Centre for Rainforest Conservation, the North Rupununi District Development Board, and the Deep South Toshaos’ Council for support in Guyana. K. Epps, D. Turner and E. Kurten collaborated with soil sampling and analyses. N. Butts and A. Cummings sampled tree diversity and carbon in trees. Additionally, A. R. Larrinaga, A. Baselga and C. Gómez provided useful suggestions and collaborated with GIS work. We thank H. Mooney, C. Field, E. Garnier, C. Violle, A. Milcu, S. Hattenschwiler, B. Shipley, C. Tucker, M. Grennié, A. M. Cortizas, B. Glaser, A. da Rocha, L. García de Jalón and the Guitián lab for comments on the manuscript. S. García created the illustration. We thank the Makushi, Wapishana and Wai-Wai technicians whose fieldwork and local knowledge made this research possible.

Author information


  1. Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    • Mar Sobral
    •  & José M. V. Fragoso
  2. Center of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, CNRS, Montpellier, 34293, France

    • Mar Sobral
  3. Department of Zoology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Spain

    • Mar Sobral
  4. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    • Kirsten M. Silvius
  5. State University of New York-ESF, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    • Han Overman
  6. Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, 21941, Brazil

    • Luiz F. B. Oliveira
  7. Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    • Ted K. Raab
  8. The California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA

    • José M. V. Fragoso


  1. Search for Mar Sobral in:

  2. Search for Kirsten M. Silvius in:

  3. Search for Han Overman in:

  4. Search for Luiz F. B. Oliveira in:

  5. Search for Ted K. Raab in:

  6. Search for José M. V. Fragoso in:


J.M.V.F., M.S., K.M.S. and L.F.B.O. conceptualized this study. M.S. completed the statistical analyses. J.M.V.F., K.M.S., H.O., L.F.B.O., T.K.R. and other colleagues designed the field study and/or oversaw data collection. M.S. and K.M.S. drafted the manuscript with all authors participating in revisions.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mar Sobral.

Electronic supplementary material

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary tables and figures.

About this article

Publication history





Further reading