Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

Global climate adaptation assessed by structured expert judgement for coastal areas

Assessing progress and gaps in climate adaptation is a key policy concern, and also raises scientific challenges around which metrics should be used and who should assess progress. A structured expert judgement using local case studies shows that, for coastal areas, today’s global adaptation is halfway to achieving the full adaptation potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The global coastal adaptation imprint.

References

  1. Berrang-Ford, L. et al. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 989–1000 (2021). A systematic review that analyses more than 1,600 papers on adaptation across regions and sectors.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Neill, B. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) Ch. 16 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022). This chapter of the IPCC sixth assessment report presents an analysis of the literature on adaptation, and discusses key climate risks.

  3. Morgan, M. G. Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7176–7184 (2014). This is a foundational paper for anyone interested in understanding the benefits and limitations of expert judgement approaches.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Majszak, M. & Jebeile, J. Expert judgment in climate science: how it is used and how it can be justified. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 100, 32–38 (2023). This paper complements ref. 3 by discussing the pros and cons of using expert judgement methods in climate analyses (such as risk assessments).

  5. Beauchamp, E. & Bueno, M. d. P. Global Stocktake: Three Priorities to Drive Adaptation (IIED, 2021); https://pubs.iied.org/20601iiedThis policy brief presents the main policy challenges related to the UNFCCC Global Stocktake.

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Magnan, A. K. et al. Status of global coastal adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01834-x (2023).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Global climate adaptation assessed by structured expert judgement for coastal areas. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 1168–1169 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01844-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01844-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing