The IPCC has been successful at building its scientific authority, but it will require institutional reform for staying relevant to new and changing political contexts. Exploring a range of alternative future pathways for the IPCC can help guide crucial decisions about redefining its purpose.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Carraro, C. et al. Science 350, 34–35 (2015).
Lee, H. Science 350, 1007 (2015).
Hulme, M., Zorita, E., Stocker, T. F., Price, J. & Christy, J. R. Nature 463, 730–732 (2010).
Stocker, T. F. & Plattner, G.-K. Nature 513, 163–165 (2014).
De Pryck, K. & Hulme, M. A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Bak-Coleman, J. et al. Nature 617, 462–464 (2023).
De Pryck, K. Glob. Policy 12, 80–89 (2021).
Borie, M., Mahony, M., Obermeister, N. & Hulme, M. Glob. Environ. Change 68, 102261 (2021).
Earth Negotiations Bulletin—Summary of the 57th Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IISD, 2022); https://go.nature.com/43UtH9E
Schipper, E. L. F., Dubash, N. K. & Mulugetta, Y. Climatic Change 168, 18 (2021).
Chen, D. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 1 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Pielke, R. A. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Klinsky, S. et al. Glob. Environ. Change 44, 170–173 (2017).
Jebeile, J. Soc. Epistemol. 34, 453–468 (2020).
Raman, S. & Pearce, W. WIREs Clim. Change 11, e672 (2020).
Beck, S., Forsyth, T. & Mahony, M. One Earth 5, 586–588 (2022).
Hartz, F. WIREs Clim. Change 14, e814 (2023).
Fazey, I. et al. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 40, 54–70 (2018).
O’Neill, S. J., Hulme, M., Turnpenny, J. & Screen, J. A. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 997–1002 (2010).
Victor, D. G. Nature 520, 27–29 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work partly originates from a workshop organized by National Institute for Environmental Studies in April 2023, where S.A., K.D.P. and M.H. participated. S.A. acknowledges the financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists [20K20022]. M.H. acknowledges the financial support from the Department of Geography, University of Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asayama, S., De Pryck, K., Beck, S. et al. Three institutional pathways to envision the future of the IPCC. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 877–880 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01780-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01780-8