Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An appeal to cost undermines food security risks of delayed mitigation

Matters Arising to this article was published on 30 April 2020

The Original Article was published on 30 July 2018

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Hasegawa, T. et al. Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 699–703 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J. & Piontek, F. A trend-preserving bias correction—the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst. Dyn. 4, 219–236 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jägermeyr, J. & Frieler, K. Spatial variations in crop growing seasons pivotal to reproduce global fluctuations in maize and wheat yields. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat4517 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tai, A. P. K., Martin, M. V. & Heald, C. L. Threat to future global food security from climate change and ozone air pollution. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 817–821 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Smajgl, A. et al. Responding to rising sea levels in the Mekong Delta. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 167–174 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gaupp, F., Hall, J., Hochrainer-Stigler, S. & Dadson, S. Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 54–57 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tigchelaar, M., Battisti, D. S., Naylor, R. L. & Ray, D. K. Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6644–6649 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Frank, S. et al. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 105004 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hasegawa, T. et al. Consequence of climate mitigation on the risk of hunger. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7245–7253 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Eshel, G., Shepon, A., Makov, T. & Milo, R. Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 11996–12001 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tilman, D. & Clark, M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515, 518–522 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Säll, S. & Gren, I. Effects of an environmental tax on meat and dairy consumption in Sweden. Food Policy 55, 41–53 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Agostini, P., Botteon, M. & Carraro, C. A carbon tax to reduce CO2 emissions in Europe. Energy Econ. 14, 279–290 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (United Nations, General Assembly, 1992).

  15. 15.

    IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

Download references


We thank J. Jacquet for her helpful input.

Author information




S.P.M., D.W.J. and M.N.H developed the idea for this manuscript. M.N.H. and S.P.DM. wrote the majority of the manuscript. All authors substantially contributed ideas, and revised and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew N. Hayek.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Chengcheng Fei and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayek, M.N., McDermid, S.P. & Jamieson, D.W. An appeal to cost undermines food security risks of delayed mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 418–419 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing