Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reduced European aerosol emissions suppress winter extremes over northern Eurasia

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 13 May 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Winter extreme weather events receive major public attention due to their serious impacts1, but the dominant factors regulating their interdecadal trends have not been clearly established2,3. Here, we show that the radiative forcing due to geospatially redistributed anthropogenic aerosols mainly determined the spatial variations of winter extreme weather in the Northern Hemisphere during 1970–2005, a unique transition period for global aerosol forcing4. Over this period, the local Rossby wave activity and extreme events (top 10% in wave amplitude) exhibited marked declining trends at high latitudes, mainly in northern Eurasia. The combination of long-term observational data and a state-of-the-art climate model revealed the unambiguous signature of anthropogenic aerosols on the wintertime jet stream, planetary wave activity and surface temperature variability on interdecadal timescales. In particular, warming due to aerosol reductions in Europe enhanced the meridional temperature gradient on the jet’s poleward flank and strengthened the zonal wind, resulting in significant suppression in extreme events over northern Eurasia. These results exemplify how aerosol forcing can impact large-scale extratropical atmospheric dynamics, and illustrate the importance of anthropogenic aerosols and their spatiotemporal variability in assessing the drivers of extreme weather in historical and future climate.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: LWA trends from reanalysis and model simulation over December to February during 1970–2005.
Fig. 2: CESM wintertime changes from 1970–2005 (DIFF).
Fig. 3: Observed and simulated variations in December to February Tmin over Eurasia (0–150° E, 20–80° N).
Fig. 4: CESM future wintertime changes in DIFF during 2015–2045.

Data availability

The reanalysis products used in this study are publicly available from the NCAR Research Data Archive (https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds628.0/). Monthly mean climate indices are available from the NOAA Climate Prediction Center (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/climateindices/list/).

Code availability

The code of the NCAR CESM model used in this study is available at http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/download/get_source.html. The scripts used to process the model data can be found on the public website of corresponding author Y.W. (http://web.gps.caltech.edu/~yzw/share/Wang-2020-NCC).

Change history

  • 13 May 2020

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Cohen, J., Pfeiffer, K. & Francis, J. A. Warm Arctic episodes linked with increased frequency of extreme winter weather in the United States. Nat. Commun. 9, 869 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sun, L., Perlwitz, J. & Hoerling, M. What caused the recent “Warm Arctic, Cold Continents” trend pattern in winter temperatures? Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5345–5352 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Barnes, E. A., Dunn-Sigouin, E., Masato, G. & Woollings, T. Exploring recent trends in Northern Hemisphere blocking. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 638–644 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang, Y., Jiang, J. H. & Su, H. Atmospheric responses to the redistribution of anthropogenic aerosols. J. Geophys. Res. 120, 9625–9641 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Scaife, A. A., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V., Moberg, A. & Knight, J. R. European climate extremes and the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Clim. 21, 72–83 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Schneider, T., Bischoff, T. & Płotka, H. Physics of changes in synoptic midlatitude temperature variability. J. Clim. 28, 2312–2331 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cohen, J. et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nat. Geosci. 7, 627–637 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J.Evidence for a wavier jet stream in response to rapid Arctic warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 014005 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Seidel, D. J. et al. Widening of the tropical belt in a changing climate. Nat. Geosci. 1, 21–24 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Screen, J. A. et al. Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models. Nat. Geosci. 11, 155–163 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Seinfeld, J. H. et al. Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol–cloud interactions in the climate system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5781–5790 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fan, J., Wang, Y., Rosenfeld, D. & Liu, X. Review of aerosol–cloud interactions: mechanisms, significance, and challenges. J. Atmos. Sci. 73, 4221–4252 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guo, J. et al. Declining frequency of summertime local-scale precipitation over eastern China from 1970–2010 and its potential link to aerosols. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 5700–5708 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  15. 15.

    Bollasina, M. A., Ming, Y. & Ramaswamy, V. Anthropogenic aerosols and the weakening of the South Asian summer monsoon. Science 334, 502–505 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li, Z. et al. Aerosol and monsoon climate interactions over Asia. Rev. Geophys. 54, 866–929 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang, Y., Zhang, R. & Saravanan, R. Asian pollution climatically modulates mid-latitude cyclones following hierarchical modelling and observational analysis. Nat. Commun. 5, 3098 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Booth, B. B., Dunstone, N. J., Halloran, P. R., Andrews, T. & Bellouin, N. Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North Atlantic climate variability. Nature 484, 228–232 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Allen, R. J., Sherwood, S. C., Norris, J. R. & Zender, C. S. Recent Northern Hemisphere tropical expansion primarily driven by black carbon and tropospheric ozone. Nature 485, 350–354 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang, Y. et al. Elucidating the role of anthropogenic aerosols in arctic sea ice variations. J. Clim. 31, 99–114 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chen, G., Lu, J., Burrows, D. A. & Leung, L. R. Local finite-amplitude wave activity as an objective diagnostic of midlatitude extreme weather. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 10952–10960 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Peings, Y., Cattiaux, J., Vavrus, S. & Magnusdottir, G. Late twenty-first-century changes in the midlatitude atmospheric circulation in the CESM large ensemble. J. Clim. 30, 5943–5960 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Coumou, D., Lehmann, J. & Beckmann, J. The weakening summer circulation in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes. Science 348, 324–327 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liu, J. P., Curry, J. A., Wang, H. J., Song, M. R. & Horton, R. M. Impact of declining Arctic sea ice on winter snowfall. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4074–4079 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Röthlisberger, M., Pfahl, S. & Martius, O. Regional-scale jet waviness modulates the occurrence of midlatitude weather extremes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 10989–10997 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rhines, A., McKinnon, K. A., Tingley, M. P. & Huybers, P. Seasonally resolved distributional trends of North American temperatures show contraction of winter variability. J. Clim. 30, 1139–1157 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Martineau, P., Chen, G. & Burrows, D. A. Wave events: climatology, trends, and relationship to Northern Hemisphere winter blocking and weather extremes. J. Clim. 30, 5675–5697 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wilks, D. S. The stippling shows statistically significant grid points: how research results are routinely overstated and overinterpreted, and what to do about it. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 2263–2273 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Garfinkel, C. I. & Waugh, D. W. Tropospheric Rossby wave breaking and variability of the latitude of the eddy-driven jet. J. Clim. 27, 7069–7085 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Smith, D. M. et al. Role of volcanic and anthropogenic aerosols in the recent global surface warming slowdown. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 936–940 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Harada, Y. et al. The JRA-55 reanalysis: representation of atmospheric circulation and climate variability. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 94, 269–302 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Feichter, J., Roeckner, E., Lohmann, U. & Liepert., B. Nonlinear aspects of the climate response to greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing. J. Clim. 17, 2384–2398 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ming, Y. & Ramaswamy, V. Nonlinear climate and hydrological responses to aerosol effects. J. Clim. 22, 1329–1339 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ming, Y., Ramaswamy, V. & Chen, G. A model investigation of aerosol-induced changes in boreal winter extratropical circulation. J. Clim. 24, 6077–6091 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the NASA ROSES ACMAP and CCST, and NSF grants AGS-1700727 and AGS-1742178. We acknowledge the support of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with NASA. We also acknowledge high-performance computing support from Pleiades, provided at NASA Ames. The CESM project is supported primarily by the National Science Foundation. All correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Y.W. (yuan.wang@caltech.edu).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.W. and J.H.J. designed the research. Y.W. obtained the data and performed the model simulations. T.L., Y.W., G.C. and Y.L.Y. analysed the data. Y.W. wrote the paper. J.H.S., G.C., Y.L.Y., H.S., J.H.J. and T.L. commented on and edited the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuan Wang or Jonathan H. Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Marie McGraw, Zhaoyi Shen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–7 and discussion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Le, T., Chen, G. et al. Reduced European aerosol emissions suppress winter extremes over northern Eurasia. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 225–230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0693-4

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing