A straightforward global layout of carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) is imperative for limiting global warming well below 2 °C. Here, we propose a cost-effective strategy for matching carbon sources and sinks on a global scale. Results show 3,093 carbon clusters and 432 sinks in 85 countries and regions are selected to achieve 92 GtCO2 mitigation by CCUS, 64% of which will be sequestered into sedimentary basins for aquifer storage and 36% will be used for CO2-EOR (enhanced oil recovery). Of the identified source–sink matching, 80% are distributed within 300 km and are mainly located in China, the United States, the European Union, Russia and India. The total cost is ~0.12% of global cumulative gross domestic product. Of countries with CO2-EOR, 75% will turn into profitable at the oil price over US$100 per barrel. These findings indicate our proposed layout is economically feasible. However, its implementation requires global collaboration on financial and technological transfer.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The codes that support the methods of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Szulczewski, M. L., MacMinn, C. W., Herzog, H. J. & Juanes, R. Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5185–5189 (2012).
Mac Dowell, N., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N. & Maitland, G. C. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 243–249 (2017).
20 Years of Carbon Capture and Storage (International Energy Agency, 2016). .
Wei, Y.-M. et al. Climate engineering management: an emerging interdisciplinary subject. J. Model. Manag. 15, 685–702 (2019).
Exploring Clean Energy Pathways: The Role of CO2 Storage (International Energy Agency, 2019).
Bui, M. et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1062–1176 (2018).
Dahowski, R. T., Li, X., Davidson, C. L., Wei, N. & Dooley, J. J. Regional Opportunities for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in China: A Comprehensive CO2 Storage Cost Curve and Analysis of the Potential for Large Scale Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in the People’s Republic of China No. PNNL-19091 (Pacific Northwest National Lab, 2009).
Building the Cost Curve for CO2 Storage: European Sector Report 2005/2 (IEAGHG, 2005).
Middleton, R. S. et al. The cross-scale science of CO2 capture and storage: from pore scale to regional scale. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7328–7345 (2012).
Middleton, R. S. & Bielicki, J. M. A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS. Energy Policy 37, 1052–1060 (2009).
Sanchez, D. L., Johnson, N., McCoy, S. T., Turner, P. A. & Mach, K. J. Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4875 (2018).
He, Y. J. et al. Optimal source–sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems under uncertainty. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 778–785 (2013).
Han, J. H., Ryu, J. H. & Lee, I. B. Two-stage stochastic programming model for planning CO2 utilization and disposal infrastructure considering the uncertainty in the CO2 emission. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 13435–13443 (2012).
Edwards, R. W. & Celia, M. A. Infrastructure to enable deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8815–8824 (2018).
Wang, P. et al. Carbon capture and storage in China’s power sector: optimal planning under the 2 °C constraint. Appl. Energy 263, 114694 (2020).
Morbee, J., Serpa, J. & Tzimas, E. Optimised deployment of a European CO2 transport network. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 7, 48–61 (2012).
Understanding Industrial CCS Hubs and Clusters (Global CCS Institute, 2016); https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications-reports-research/understanding-industrial-ccs-hubs-and-clusters/
IPCC. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (eds Metz, B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
Building the Costs Curves for CO2 Storage: North America (International Energy Agency, 2005).
National Assessment of Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage Resources—Results v.1.1, Circular 1386 (US Geological Survey, 2013); https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1386/
Task Force on Clusters, Hubs, and Infrastructure (Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum, 2020); https://www.cslforum.org/cslf/sites/default/files/documents/Task-Force_CO2-Hubs-Clusters-Infrastructure-and-CCS_Annual-Report_2019-2020.pdf
Goodman, A. et al. U.S. DOE methodology for the development of geologic storage potential for carbon dioxide at the national and regional scale. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 5, 952–965 (2011).
Osmonson, L. M. et al. Geologic Provinces of the World (US Geological Survey, 2000); https://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/wep/dds60/wep_prv.htm#Entity_and_Attribute_Information
Riahi, K. et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
CARMAv3.0: Carbon Monitoring for Action: Power Plants (Center for Global Development, accessed 18 May 2020); https://www.cgdev.org/topics/carbon-monitoring-action
FLIGHT Tool: Facility Level Information on GreenHouse gases Tool (US Envarionmental Protection Agency, accessed 19 May 2020); http://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp
European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register v.4.2 data (European Environment Agency, accessed 05/15 May 2020); http://prtr.ec.europa.eu
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Janssens-Maenhout, G. & Muntean, M. High resolution temporal profiles in the emissions database for global atmospheric research. Sci. Data 7, 121 (2020).
Friedl, M. A. et al. MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 168–182 (2010).
Lackey, Greg et al. Managing well leakage risks at a geologic carbon storage site with many wells. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 88, 182–194 (2019).
Li, X., Liu, Y., Bai, B. & Fang, Z. Ranking and screening of CO2 saline aquifer storage zones in China. Chin. J. Rock. Mech. Eng. 25, 963–968 (2006).
Ogawa, T., Nakanishi, S., Shidahara, T., Okumura, T. & Hayashi, E. Saline-aquifer CO2 sequestration in Japan-methodology of storage capacity assessment. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 5, 318–326 (2011).
Su, X., Xu, W. & Du, S. Basin-scale CO2 storage capacity assessment of deep saline aquifers in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China. Greenh. Gas. Sci. Technol. 3, 266–280 (2013).
Qiao, X., Li, G., Li, M. & Wang, Z. CO2 storage capacity assessment of deep saline aquifers in the Subei Basin, East China. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 11, 52–63 (2012).
Calvo, R. & Gvirtzman, Z. Assessment of CO2 storage capacity in southern Israel. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con. 14, 25–38 (2013).
Silva, P. N. K. D., Ranjith, P. G. & Choi, S. K. A study of methodologies for CO2 storage capacity estimation of coal. Fuel 91, 1–15 (2012).
Comparison Between Methodologies Recommended for Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Geologic Media Phase III Report: April 21 (Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum, 2008).
Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United State and Canada 2nd edn (US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Office of Fossil Energy, 2008).
Zhou, Q., Birkholzer, J. T., Tsang, C.-F. & Rutqvist, J. A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formation. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 2, 626–639 (2008).
Goodman, A. et al. Comparison of methods for geologic storage of carbon dioxide in saline formations. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 18, 329–342 (2013).
Aminu, M. D., Nabavi, S. A., Rochelle, C. A. & Manovic, V. A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage. Appl. Energy 208, 1389–1419 (2017).
Hendriks, C., Graus, W. & van Bergen, F. Global Carbon Dioxide Storage Potential and Costs (Ecofys, 2004).
van der Meer, L. G. H. The conditions limiting CO2 storage in aquifers. Energy Convers. Manag. 34, 959–966 (1993).
Wei, Y.-M. et al. Self-preservation strategy for approaching global warming targets in the post-Paris Agreement era. Nat. Commun. 11, 1624 (2020).
Wei, Y.-M. et al. An integrated assessment of INDCs under shared socioeconomic pathways: an implementation of C3IAM. Nat. Hazards 92, 585–618 (2018).
Azzolina, N. A. et al. How green is my oil? A detailed look at greenhouse gas accounting for CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) sites. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 51, 369–379 (2016).
Lapillonne, B. et al. World Energy Technology Outlook–2050–WETO-H2 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007); https://espas.secure.europarl.europa.eu/orbis/sites/default/files/generated/document/en/WETO-H2.pdf
Wu, X. D., Yang, Q., Chen, G. Q., Hayat, T. & Alsaedi, A. Progress and prospect of CCS in China: using learning curve to assess the cost-viability of a 2 × 600 MW retrofitted oxyfuel power plant as a case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60, 1274–1285 (2016).
Li, S., Zhang, X., Gao, L. & Jin, H. Learning rates and future cost curves for fossil fuel energy systems with CO2 capture: methodology and case studies. Appl. Energy 93, 348–356 (2012).
Rubin, E. S., Chen, C. & Rao, A. B. Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage. Energy Policy 35, 4444–4454 (2007).
Leeson, D., Dowell, N. M., Shah, N., Petit, C. & Fennell, P. S. A techno-economic analysis and systematic review of carbon capture and storage (CCS) applied to the iron and steel, cement, oil refining and pulp and paper industries, as well as other high purity sources. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 61, 71–84 (2017).
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of China’s National Key R&D Program (grant no. 2016YFA0602603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 71622012, 71822401, 71521002 and 72073014) and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. JQ19035). We thank our colleagues for their support and acknowledge help from CEEP-BIT.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Richard Middleton and Ning Wei for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, YM., Kang, JN., Liu, LC. et al. A proposed global layout of carbon capture and storage in line with a 2 °C climate target. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 112–118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00960-0