International migration and climate adaptation in an era of hardening borders

Abstract

Climate change will almost certainly generate higher rates of migration and displacement within low-income countries, but will it also generate more international migration? This depends on the receptiveness of destination countries, many of which are currently restricting immigration, criminalizing asylum seekers and using emergent technologies to tighten borders. Should these trends persist, migration to higher-income countries will decline, trapping people in deteriorating situations and reducing adaptive capacity in low-income countries. The United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration provides an alternative pathway for international migration that builds capacity and sustainability for a climate-disrupted future. The implications of current trends for migrants, policymakers and researchers are detailed in this Perspective.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    McLeman, R. Climate and Human Migration: Past Experiences, Future Challenges (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  2. 2.

    Rigaud, K. K. et al. Groundswell: Preparing for Internal Climate Migration (World Bank, 2018).

  3. 3.

    Adger, W. N. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 755–791 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  4. 4.

    Black, R. et al. The effect of environmental change on human migration. Glob. Environ. Change 21, S3–S11 (2011).

  5. 5.

    United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. UN Document A/RES/73/195 (19 December 2018).

  6. 6.

    Cross-National Comparisons of Internal Migration: An Update on Global Patterns and Trends Technical Report No. 2013/1(UN DESA, 2013).

  7. 7.

    International Migration Report 2017: Highlights Report No. ST/ESA/SER.A/404 (Population Division, UN DESA, 2017).

  8. 8.

    Azose, J. J. & Raftery, A. E. Estimation of emigration, return migration, and transit migration between all pairs of countries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 116–122 (2019).

  9. 9.

    Statistical Yearbooks: Figures at a Glance (UNHCR, 2017); http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html

  10. 10.

    Abel, G. J. & Sander, N. Quantifying global international migration flows. Science 343, 1520–1522 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Gemenne, F. Why the numbers don’t add up: a review of estimates and predictions of people displaced by environmental changes. Glob. Environ. Change 21, S41–S49 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Warner, K. & Afifi, T. Where the rain falls: evidence from 8 countries on how vulnerable households use migration to manage the risk of rainfall variability and food insecurity. Clim. Dev. 6, 1–17 (2014).

  13. 13.

    McLeman, R. Thresholds in climate migration. Popul. Environ. 39, 319–338 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Fussell, E. in The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Migration and Displacement (eds McLeman, R. & Gemenne, F.) 277–288 (Routledge, 2018).

  15. 15.

    Global Report on Internal Displacement (International Displacement Monitoring Center, 2018).

  16. 16.

    McLeman, R. A. Climate and Human Migration: Past Experiences, Future Challenges (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  17. 17.

    Arnell, N. W. & Gosling, S. N. The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Clim. Change 134, 387–401 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Winsemius, H. C. et al. Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 381–385 (2016).

  19. 19.

    IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

  20. 20.

    Alfieri, L. et al. Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world. Earth Future 5, 171–182 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Walsh, K. J. E. et al. Tropical cyclones and climate change. WIREs Clim. Change 7, 65–89 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Sobel, A. H. et al. Human influence on tropical cyclone intensity. Science 353, 242–246 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Bacmeister, J. T. et al. Projected changes in tropical cyclone activity under future warming scenarios using a high-resolution climate model. Climatic Change 146, 547–560 (2018).

  24. 24.

    Naumann, G. et al. Global changes in drought conditions under different levels of warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 3285–3296 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Tietjen, B. et al. Climate change‐induced vegetation shifts lead to more ecological droughts despite projected rainfall increases in many global temperate drylands. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2743–2754 (2017).

  26. 26.

    World Population Prospects 2017 (UN DESA, 2017); https://population.un.org/wpp/Graphs/Probabilistic/POP/TOT

  27. 27.

    Kummu, M. et al. The world’s road to water scarcity: shortage and stress in the 20th century and pathways towards sustainability. Sci. Rep. 6, 38495 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Koutroulis, A. G. Dryland changes under different levels of global warming. Sci. Total Environ. 655, 482–511 (2019).

  29. 29.

    Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmermann, J. & Nicholls, R. J. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding — a global assessment. PLoS ONE 10, e0131375 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Seto, K. C. Exploring the dynamics of migration to mega-delta cities in Asia and Africa: contemporary drivers and future scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change 21, S94–S107 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Merkens, J.-L., Lincke, D., Hinkel, J., Brown, S. & Vafeidis, A. T. Regionalisation of population growth projections in coastal exposure analysis. Clim. Change 151, 413–426 (2018).

  32. 32.

    Birth Rate, Crude (Per 1,000 People) (World Bank, 2019); https://go.nature.com/2O641Su

  33. 33.

    Population Statistics: Statistics for Development (Pacific Community, 2019); https://sdd.spc.int/en/stats-by-topic/population-statistics

  34. 34.

    Hauer, M. E., Evans, J. M. & Mishra, D. R. Millions projected to be at risk from sea-level rise in the continental United States. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 691–695 (2016).

  35. 35.

    Tacoli, C. Crisis or adaptation? Migration and climate change in a context of high mobility. Environ. Urban. 21, 513–525 (2009).

  36. 36.

    Afifi, T. et al. Human mobility in response to rainfall variability: opportunities for migration as a successful adaptation strategy in eight case studies. Migr. Dev. 5, 254–274 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Black, R. Climate change: migration as adaptation. Nature 478, 447–449 (2011).

  38. 38.

    Gemenne, F. & Blocher, J. How can migration serve adaptation to climate change? Challenges to fleshing out a policy ideal. Geogr. J. 183, 336–347 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Adger, W. N., Campos, R. S. de & Mortreux, C. in The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Displacement and Migration (eds McLeman, R. & Gemenne, F.) 29–41 (Routledge, 2018).

  40. 40.

    Tebboth, M. G. L., Conway, D. & Adger, W. N. Mobility endowment and entitlements mediate resilience in rural livelihood systems. Glob. Environ. Change 54, 172–183 (2019).

  41. 41.

    Stark, O. & Bloom, D. E. The new economics of labor migration. Am. Econ. Rev. 75, 173–178 (1985).

  42. 42.

    Adger, W. N. Vulnerability. Glob. Environ. Change 16, 268–281 (2006).

  43. 43.

    Smit, B. & Wandel, J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob. Environ. Change 16, 282–292 (2006).

  44. 44.

    Call, M., Gray, C., Yunus, M. & Emch, M. Disruption, not displacement: environmental variability and temporary migration in Bangladesh. Glob. Environ. Change 46, 157–165 (2017).

  45. 45.

    Coniglio, N. D. & Pesce, G. Climate variability and international migration: an empirical analysis. Environ. Dev. Econ. 20, 438–468 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Funkhauser, E. The choice of migration destination: a longitudinal approach using pre-migration outcomes. Rev. Dev. Econ. 13, 626–640 (2009).

  47. 47.

    Kugler, A. & Yuksel, M. Effects of Low-Skilled Immigration on US Natives: Evidence from Hurricane Mitch (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2008).

  48. 48.

    Loebach, P. Household migration as a livelihood adaptation in response to a natural disaster: Nicaragua and Hurricane Mitch. Popul. Environ. 38, 185–206 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Nevada and Idaho Are the Nation’s Fastest-Growing States Media Release No. CB18–193 (US Census Bureau, 2018); https://go.nature.com/32wSVLC

  50. 50.

    Curtis, K., Fussell, E. & DeWaard, J. Recovery migration after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: spatial concentration and intensification in the migration system. Demography 52, 1269–1293 (2015).

  51. 51.

    Gautier, D., Denis, D. & Locatelli, B. Impacts of drought and responses of rural populations in West Africa: a systematic review. WIREs Clim. Change 7, 666–681 (2016).

  52. 52.

    Wiederkehr, C., Beckmann, M. & Hermans, K. Environmental change, adaptation strategies and the relevance of migration in Sub-Saharan drylands. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, L113003 (2018).

  53. 53.

    Hunter, L. M., Murray, S. & Riosmena, F. Rainfall variation and U.S. migration from Rural Mexico. Int. Migr. Rev. 47, 874–909 (2013).

  54. 54.

    Viswanathan, B. & Kavi Kumar, K. S. Weather, agriculture and rural migration: evidence from state and district level migration in India. Environ. Dev. Econ. 20, 469–492 (2015).

  55. 55.

    Cai, R., Feng, S., Oppenheimer, M. & Pytlikova, M. Climate variability and international migration: the importance of the agricultural linkage. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 79, 135–151 (2016).

  56. 56.

    Cattaneo, C. & Peri, G. The migration response to increasing temperatures. J. Dev. Econ. 122, 127–146 (2016).

  57. 57.

    Hugo, G. Internal and international migration in East and Southeast Asia: exploring the linkages. Popul. Space Place 22, 651–668 (2016).

  58. 58.

    Garip, F. & Asad, A. L. Network effects in Mexico–U.S. migration: disentangling the underlying social mechanisms. Am. Behav. Sci. 60, 1168–1193 (2016).

  59. 59.

    King, R. & Skeldon, R. ‘Mind the gap!’ Integrating approaches to internal and international migration. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 36, 1619–1646 (2010).

  60. 60.

    Hauer, M. Migration induced by sea-level rise could reshape the US population landscape. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 321–325 (2017).

  61. 61.

    van Hear, N., Bakewell, O. & Long, K. Push–pull plus: reconsidering the drivers of migration. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 44, 927–944 (2018).

  62. 62.

    Buchanan, K. New Zealand:Climate Change RefugeeCase Overview (US Law Library of Congress, 2015).

  63. 63.

    Walters, L. NZ plans for inevitable climate-related migration. Newsroom (New Zealand) (30 April 2019); https://go.nature.com/2pcjNmA

  64. 64.

    Curtain, R., Dornan, M., Doyle, J. & Howes, S. Pacific Possible: Labour Mobility: The Ten Billion Dollar Prize (World Bank, 2016).

  65. 65.

    McNamara, K. E. Cross-border migration with dignity in Kiribati. Force. Migr. Rev. 49, 62 (2015).

  66. 66.

    Rieffel, L. The Global Compact on Migration: Dead on Arrival? (Brookings Institute, 2018).

  67. 67.

    Connor, P. & Krogstad, J. M. Many Worldwide Oppose More Migration—Both Into and Out of Their Countries (Pew Research Center, 2018).

  68. 68.

    Czaika, M. & DiLillo, A. The geography of anti-immigrant attitudes across Europe, 2002–2014. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 44, 2453–2479 (2018).

  69. 69.

    Lawlor, A. & Tolley, E. Deciding who’s legitimate: news media framing of immigrants and refugees. Int. J. Commun. 11, 967–991 (2017).

  70. 70.

    Butz, A. M. & Kehrberg, J. E. Anti‐immigrant sentiment and the adoption of state immigration policy. Policy Stud. J. 47, 605–623 (2019).

  71. 71.

    Wright, J. D. & Esses, W. M. It’s security, stupid! Voters’ perceptions of immigrants as a security risk predicted support for Donald Trump in the 2016 US presidential election. J. Appl. Psychol. 49, 36–49 (2018).

  72. 72.

    Gorodzeisky, A. & Semyonov, M. Competitive threat and temporal change in anti-immigrant sentiment: insights from a hierarchical age-period-cohort model. Soc. Sci. Res. 73, 31–44 (2018).

  73. 73.

    Dennison, J. & Geddes, A. A rising tide? The salience of immigration and the rise of anti‐immigration political parties in Western Europe. Polit. Q 90, 107–116 (2019).

  74. 74.

    Gravelle, T. B. Politics, time, space, and attitudes toward US–Mexico border security. Polit. Geogr. 65, 107–116 (2018).

  75. 75.

    Jones, R. & Johnson, C. Border militarisation and the re-articulation of sovereignty. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 41, 187–200 (2016).

  76. 76.

    Chambers, S., Boyce, G. A., Launius, S. & Dinsmore, A. Mortality, surveillance and the tertiary “funnel effect” on the U. S.-Mexico border: a geospatial modeling of the geography of deterrence. J. Borderl. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2019.1570861 (2019).

  77. 77.

    Peterie, M. Technologies of control: asylum seeker and volunteer experiences in Australian immigration detention facilities. J. Sociol. 55, 181–198 (2019).

  78. 78.

    Baldwin-Edwards, M. & Lutterbeck, D. Coping with the Libyan migration crisis. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 45, 2241–2257 (2018).

  79. 79.

    Brown, K. Venezuelans flee violence in Ecuador. The New Internationalist (30 January 2019).

  80. 80.

    Katz, J. What happened when a nation erased birthright citizenship. The Atlantic (12 November 2018).

  81. 81.

    Astariko, S. Somalia boundary wall works praised by MPs. The Star (Kenya) (17 November 2018).

  82. 82.

    Walker, M. The other U.S. Border? Techno-cultural-rationalities and fortification in Southern Mexico. Environ. Plan. A. 50, 948–968 (2018).

  83. 83.

    Subramanian, C. India election 2019: echoes of Trump in Modi’s border politics. BBC News Online (21 May 2019).

  84. 84.

    York, G. Anti-immigrant attacks inflame South African election. The Globe and Mail (6 May 2019).

  85. 85.

    Glouftsios, G. Governing circulation through technology within EU border security practice-networks. Mobilities 13, 185–199 (2018).

  86. 86.

    Metz, C. Parts of a ‘virtual’ border wall, built with the tech behind driverless cars. New York Times (19 September 2018).

  87. 87.

    Boyce, G. The rugged border: surveillance, policing and the dynamic materiality of the US/Mexico frontier. Environ. Plan. D 34, 245–262 (2016).

  88. 88.

    Bier, D. & Feeney, M. Drones on the Border: Efficacy and Privacy Implications. Immigration and Refugee Policy Brief No. 5 (Cato Institute, 2018).

  89. 89.

    CBP to Test the Operational Use of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems in 3 U.S. Border Patrol Sectors (US Customs and Border Protection, 2017).

  90. 90.

    Sontowski, S. Speed, timing and duration: contested temporalities, techno-political controversies and the emergence of the EU’s smart border. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 44, 2730–2746 (2018).

  91. 91.

    Tazzioli, M. Containment through mobility: migrants’ spatial disobediences and the reshaping of control through the hotspot system. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 44, 2764–2779 (2018).

  92. 92.

    Csernatoni, R. Constructing the EU’s high-tech borders: FRONTEX and dual-use drones for border management. Eur. Secur. 27, 175–200 (2018).

  93. 93.

    Koslowski, R. & Schulzke, M. Drones along borders: border security UAVs in the United States and the European Union. Int. Stud. Perspect. 19, 305–324 (2018).

  94. 94.

    Akhter, M. The proliferation of peripheries: militarized drones and the reconfiguration of global space. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 43, 64–80 (2019).

  95. 95.

    Freed, J. Eyes on the sea: companies compete for Australian maritime surveillance contract. Reuters World News (4 March 2019).

  96. 96.

    Dijstelbloem, H. Migration tracking is a mess. Nature 543, 32–43 (2017).

  97. 97.

    Meaker, M. Europe is using smartphone data as a weapon to deport refugees. Wired (2 July 2018).

  98. 98.

    Privacy Impact Assessment for the Electronic Surveillance System (ELSUR) (Department of Homeland Security, 2010).

  99. 99.

    Snell, R. Feds use anti-terror tool to hunt the undocumented. Detroit News (19 May 2017).

  100. 100.

    Fisher, D. X. O., Burridge, A. & Gill, N. The political mobilities of reporting: tethering, slickness and asylum control. Mobilities 14, 632–647 (2019).

  101. 101.

    Newell, B. C., Gomez, R. & Guajardo, V. E. Information seeking, technology use, and vulnerability among migrants at the United States–Mexico border. Inf. Soc. 32, 176–191 (2016).

  102. 102.

    Kim, H. & Lingel, J. Working through paradoxes: transnational migrants’ urban learning tactics using locative technology. Mob. Media Commun. 4, 221–236 (2016).

  103. 103.

    Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J. & Vonk, H. Smart refugees: how Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making. Soc. Media Soc. 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764439 (2018).

  104. 104.

    Scheel, S. Real fake? Appropriating mobility via Schengen visa in the context of biometric border controls. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 44, 2747–2763 (2018).

  105. 105.

    Garza, V. Unheard and deported: the unconstitutional denial of habeas corpus in expedited removal. Houst. Law Rev. 56, 881–926 (2019).

  106. 106.

    Stanley, E. Expanding crimmigration: the detention and deportation of New Zealanders from Australia. Aust. N. Z. J. Criminol. 51, 519–536 (2017).

  107. 107.

    Cusumano, E. & Gombeer, K. In deep waters: the legal, humanitarian and political implications of closing Italian ports to migrant rescuers. Mediterr. Polit. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2018.1532145 (2019).

  108. 108.

    Hayes, B. Migration and data protection: doing no harm in an age of mass displacement, mass surveillance and “big data”. Int. Rev. Red. Cross 99, 179–209 (2017).

  109. 109.

    Massey, D. S., Pren, K. A. & Durand, J. Why border enforcement backfired. Am. J. Sociol. 121, 1557–1600 (2016).

  110. 110.

    Cornelius, W. A. Death at the border: efficacy and unintended consequences of US immigration control policy. Popul. Dev. Rev. 27, 661–685 (2001).

  111. 111.

    Efforts by DHS to Estimate Southwest Border Security between Ports of Entry (Department of Homeland Security, 2017).

  112. 112.

    Migrant Deaths Remain High Despite Sharp Fall in US–Mexico Border Crossings in 2017. Media Release No. 6GEB2018 (International Organization for Migration, 2018).

  113. 113.

    Romano, P. P. O. & Villavicencio, F. J. C. Risk of death and aggressions encountered while illegally crossing the U.S.–Mexico Border. Migr. Int. 7, 9–41 (2014).

  114. 114.

    Williams, K. & Mountz, A. Between enforcement and precarity: externalization and migrant deaths at sea. Int. Migr. 56, 74–89 (2018).

  115. 115.

    Slack, J., Martínez, D. E., Lee, A. E. & Whiteford, S. The geography of border militarization: violence, death and health in Mexico and the United States. J. Lat. Am. Geogr. 15, 7–32 (2016).

  116. 116.

    Kivisto, P. The politics of cruelty. Sociol. Q. 60, 191–200 (2019).

  117. 117.

    Adger, W. N. et al. Focus on environmental risks and migration: causes and consequences. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, L060201 (2015).

  118. 118.

    Adams, H. Why populations persist: mobility, place attachment and climate change. Popul. Environ. 37, 429–448 (2016).

  119. 119.

    Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).

  120. 120.

    Samir, K. C. & Lutz, W. The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 181–192 (2017).

  121. 121.

    Harris, E. M. & Mohamed, H. S. Picturing immigration: how the media criminalizes immigrants. Polit. Groups Ident. 6, 814–824 (2018).

  122. 122.

    Kelley, C. P., Mohtadi, S., Cane, M. A., Seager, R. & Kushnir, Y. Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3241–3246 (2015).

  123. 123.

    Selby, J., Dahi, O. S., Fröhlich, C. & Hulme, M. Climate change and the Syrian civil war revisited. Polit. Geogr. 60, 232–244 (2017).

  124. 124.

    Sudan: Post-Conflict Environmental Assessment (UNEP, 2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research on climate-related migration by R.M. is supported by an Insight Grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Correspondence to Robert McLeman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Ricardo Safra de Campos and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLeman, R. International migration and climate adaptation in an era of hardening borders. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 911–918 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0634-2

Download citation