Abstract
In the present era of rapid global change, development of early warnings of ecological regime shifts is a major focus in ecology. Identifying and tracking shifts in spatial regimes is a new approach with potential to enhance understanding of ecological responses to global change. Here, we show strong directional non-stationarity of spatial regimes identified by avian community body mass data. We do this by tracking 46 years of avian spatial regime movement in the North American Great Plains. The northernmost spatial regime boundary moved >590 km northward, and the southernmost boundary moved >260 km northward. Tracking spatial regimes affords decadal planning horizons and moves beyond the predominately temporal early warnings of the past by providing spatiotemporally explicit detection of regime shifts in systems without fixed boundaries.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data are available in the Supplementary Data.
Code availability
R code and instructions for repeating analyses are available in the Supplementary Data.
References
Allen, C. R., Angeler, D. G., Garmestani, A. S., Gunderson, L. H. & Holling, C. S. Panarchy: theory and application. Ecosystems 17, 578–589 (2014).
Dakos, V., Carpenter, S. R., Nes, E. Hvan & Scheffer, M. Resilience indicators: prospects and limitations for early warnings of regime shifts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 370, 20130263 (2015).
Burthe, S. J. et al. Do early warning indicators consistently predict nonlinear change in long-term ecological data? J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 666–676 (2016).
Dakos, V. et al. Methods for detecting early warnings of critical transitions in time series illustrated using simulated ecological data. PloS ONE 7, e41010 (2012).
Carpenter, S. R. et al. Early warnings of regime shifts: A whole-ecosystem experiment. Science 332, 1079–1082 (2011).
Kefi, S. et al. Early warning signals of ecological transitions: Methods for spatial patterns. PloS ONE 9, e92097 (2014).
Cline, T. J. et al. Early warnings of regime shifts: Evaluation of spatial indicators from a whole-ecosystem experiment. Ecosphere 5, 1–13 (2014).
Butitta, V. L., Carpenter, S. R., Loken, L. C., Pace, M. L. & Stanley, E. H. Spatial early warning signals in a lake manipulation. Ecosphere 8, e01941 (2017).
Clements, C. F. & Ozgul, A. Indicators of transitions in biological systems. Ecol. Lett. 21, 905–919 (2018).
Sundstrom, S. M. et al. Detecting spatial regimes in ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 20, 19–32 (2017).
Roberts, C. P. et al. Early warnings for state transitions. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 71, 659–670 (2018).
Allen, C. R. et al. Quantifying spatial resilience. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 625–635 (2016).
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 591 (2001).
Strayer, D. L., Power, M. E., Fagan, W. F., Pickett, S. T. & Belnap, J. A classification of ecological boundaries. BioScience 53, 723–729 (2003).
Angeler, D. G. et al. Management applications of discontinuity theory. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 688–698 (2016).
Holling, C. S. Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 447–502 (1992).
Spanbauer, T. L. et al. Body size distributions signal a regime shift in a lake ecosystem. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 283, 20160249 (2016).
Drake, J. M. & Griffen, B. D. Early warning signals of extinction in deteriorating environments. Nature 467, 456 (2010).
Doncaster, C. P. et al. Early warning of critical transitions in biodiversity from compositional disorder. Ecology 97, 3079–3090 (2016).
Cohen, J. et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nat. Geosci. 7, 627 (2014).
La Sorte, F. A., Hochachka, W. M., Farnsworth, A., Dhondt, A. A. & Sheldon, D. The implications of mid-latitude climate extremes for North American migratory bird populations. Ecosphere 7, e01261 (2016).
Brown, D. G., Johnson, K. M., Loveland, T. R. & Theobald, D. M. Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1851–1863 (2005).
Chen, I.-C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).
Johnston, C. A. Agricultural expansion: land use shell game in the US Northern Plains. Landsc. Ecol. 29, 81–95 (2014).
Allred, B. W. et al. Ecosystem services lost to oil and gas in North America. Science 348, 401–402 (2015).
Donovan, V. M., Wonkka, C. L. & Twidwell, D. Surging wildfire activity in a grassland biome. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 5986–5993 (2017).
Engle, D. M., Coppedge, B. R. & Fuhlendorf, S. D. in Western North American Juniperus Communities (ed. Van Auken, O. W.) 253–271 (Springer, 2008).
Boettiger, C., Ross, N. & Hastings, A. Early warning signals: the charted and uncharted territories. Theor. Ecol. 6, 255–264 (2013).
Hastings, A. & Wysham, D. B. Regime shifts in ecological systems can occur with no warning. Ecol. Lett. 13, 464–472 (2010).
Clements, C. F., Drake, J. M., Griffiths, J. I. & Ozgul, A. Factors influencing the detectability of early warning signals of population collapse. Am. Nat. 186, 50–58 (2015).
Scheffer, M. et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53 (2009).
Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R. & Brock, W. A. Turning back from the brink: detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 826–831 (2009).
Craig, R. K. Stationarity is dead-long live transformation: five principles for climate change adaptation law. HELR Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 34, 9 (2010).
Twidwell, D., Allred, B. W. & Fuhlendorf, S. D. National-scale assessment of ecological content in the world’s largest land management framework. Ecosphere 4, 1–27 (2013).
Baho, D. L., Drakare, S., Johnson, R. K., Allen, C. R. & Angeler, D. G. Similar resilience attributes in lakes with different management practices. PLoS ONE 9, e91881 (2014).
Ficetola, G. F., Mazel, F. & Thuiller, W. Global determinants of zoogeographical boundaries. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0089 (2017).
Glor, R. E. & Warren, D. Testing ecological explanations for biogeographic boundaries. Evolution 65, 673–683 (2011).
Briske, D., Bestelmeyer, B., Stringham, T. & Shaver, P. Recommendations for development of resilience-based state-and-transition models. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 61, 359–367 (2008).
Jantz, S. M. et al. Future habitat loss and extinctions driven by land-use change in biodiversity hotspots under four scenarios of climate-change mitigation. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1122–1131 (2015).
Birgé, H. E., Allen, C. R., Craig, R. K. & Twidwell, D. in Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance (eds Consens, B. & Gunderson, L.) 115–130 (Springer, 2018).
Sauer, J. R. et al. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966–2015 (USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 2017).
Richardson, A. D. et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 169, 156–173 (2013).
Hovick, T. J. et al. Informing conservation by identifying range shift patterns across breeding habitats and migration strategies. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 345–356 (2016).
Drummond, M. A. et al. Land change variability and human–environment dynamics in the United States Great Plains. Land Use Policy 29, 710–723 (2012).
Dunning Jr, J. B. CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses (CRC, 2007)
Barichievy, C. et al. A method to detect discontinuities in census data. Ecol. Evol. 8, 9614–9623 (2018).
Stow, C., Allen, C. R. & Garmestani, A. S. Evaluating discontinuities in complex systems: toward quantitative measures of resilience. Ecol. Soc. 12, (2007).
Nash, K. L. et al. Discontinuities, cross-scale patterns, and the organization of ecosystems. Ecology 95, 654–667 (2014).
Sundstrom, S. M. & Allen, C. R. Complexity versus certainty in understanding species’ declines. Divers. Distrib. 20, 344–355 (2014).
Lipsey, M. W. Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research (Sage, 1990).
Allen, C. R., Forys, E. A. & Holling, C. Body mass patterns predict invasions and extinctions in transforming landscapes. Ecosystems 2, 114–121 (1999).
Wickham, H. Reshaping data with the reshape package. J. Stat. Softw. 21, 1–20 (2007).
Dowle, M. et al. data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame’ v1.12.2 (CRAN, 2018); https://rdrr.io/cran/data.table/.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008).
Galzin, R. & Legendre, P. The fish communities of a coral reef transect. Pac. Sci. 41, 1–4 (1987).
Vermaire, J. C., Greffard, M.-H., Saulnier-Talbot, É. & Gregory-Eaves, I. Changes in submerged macrophyte abundance altered diatom and chironomid assemblages in a shallow lake. J. Paleolimnol. 50, 447–456 (2013).
Leys, B., Finsinger, W. & Carcaillet, C. Historical range of fire frequency is not the Achilles’ heel of the Corsican black pine ecosystem. J. Ecol. 102, 381–395 (2014).
Vormisto, J., Phillips, O., Ruokolainen, K., Tuomisto, H. & Vásquez, R. A comparison of fine-scale distribution patterns of four plant groups in an Amazonian rainforest. Ecography 23, 349–359 (2000).
Juggins, S. rioja: Analysis of Quaternary Science Data v0.9-21 (CRAN, 2017); https://rdrr.io/cran/rioja/man/PTF.html
Bennett, K. D. Determination of the number of zones in a biostratigraphical sequence. New Phytol. 132, 155–170 (1996).
Wood, S. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Lond. B. 73, 3–36 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Complexity Working Group for conceptual development, J. L. Burnett for help in database creation, and D. Ebbeka and C. Bielski for help with data visualization. This work was supported by Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research Development Program W912HQ-15-C-0018, Nebraska Game & Parks Commission W-125-R-1 and the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. The Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly supported by a cooperative agreement between the US Geological Survey, the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, the University of Nebraska, the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Wildlife Management Institute. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.P.R. contributed to conceptualization, programming, validation, formal analysis, data curation, all writing aspects, visualization and project administration. C.R.A., D.G.A. and D.T. contributed to funding acquisition, conceptualization, all writing aspects and visualization.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information: Nature Climate Change thanks Eldar Rakhimberdiev and other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.
Supplementary Data 1
Zipped file of data, R code and instructions for repeating analyses.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, C.P., Allen, C.R., Angeler, D.G. et al. Shifting avian spatial regimes in a changing climate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 562–566 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0517-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0517-6
This article is cited by
-
Parallels of quantum superposition in ecological models: from counterintuitive patterns to eco-evolutionary interpretations of cryptic species
BMC Ecology and Evolution (2024)
-
Predicted future range expansion of a small carnivore: swift fox in North America
Landscape Ecology (2024)
-
NDVI as a potential tool for forecasting changes in geographical range of sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.)
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Panarchy theory for convergence
Sustainability Science (2023)
-
Decreasing predictability as a precursor indicator for abrupt climate change
Climate Dynamics (2021)