Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Physiology and iron modulate diverse responses of diatoms to a warming Southern Ocean

Nature Climate Change volume 9, pages 148–152 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Climate change-mediated alteration of Southern Ocean primary productivity is projected to have biogeochemical ramifications regionally, and globally due to altered northward nutrient supply1,2. Laboratory manipulation studies that investigated the influence of the main drivers (CO2, light, nutrients, temperature and iron) on Southern Ocean diatoms revealed that temperature and iron exert major controls on growth under year 2100 conditions3,4. However, detailed physiological studies, targeting temperature and iron, are required to improve our mechanistic understanding of future diatom responses. Here, I show that thermal performance curves of bloom-forming polar species are more diverse than previously shown5, with the optimum temperature for growth (Topt) ranging from 5–16 °C (the annual temperature range is −1–8 °C). Furthermore, iron deficiency probably decreases polar diatom Topt and Tmax (the upper bound for growth), as recently revealed for macronutrients and temperate phytoplankton6. Together, this diversity of thermal performance curves and the physiological interplay between iron and temperature may alter the diatom community composition. Topt will be exceeded during 2100 summer low iron/warmer conditions, tipping some species close or beyond Tmax, but giving others a distinct physiological advantage. Future polar conditions will enhance primary productivity2,3,4, but will also probably cause floristic shifts, such that the biogeochemical roles and elemental stoichiometry of dominant diatom species will alter the polar biogeochemistry and northwards nutrient supply.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Individual TPCs under iron-replete conditions for five polar species used in this study.
Fig. 2: TPCs obtained under iron-replete and iron-deplete conditions.
Fig. 3: Thermal performance curves overlaid with Southern Ocean temperature observations and projections.

Data availability

Data on the species and strain identification, collection and maintenance are detailed in Supplementary Table 1. Following publication, these data will be made available (that is, open access) through the IMAS and UTAS (see http://www.imas.utas.edu.au/data). All data collected by IMAS researchers are archived, curated and managed by IMAS, and often supported by related organizations such as the Integrated Marine Observing System, Australian Ocean Data Network and Tasmanian Partnership for Advanced Computing. Our guiding framework is that all data that are not commercial-in-confidence or restricted by legislation should be shared with researchers for analysis and interpretation. IMAS also operates facilities and hosts datasets of national and global interest and for the benefit of the community.

References

  1. Sarmiento, J. L., Gruber, N., Brzezinski, M. A. & Dunne, J. P. High-latitude controls of thermocline nutrients and low latitude biological productivity. Nature 427, 56–60 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore, J. K. et al. Sustained climate warming drives declining marine biological productivity. Science 359, 1139–1143 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd, P. W. et al. Physiological responses of a Southern Ocean diatom to complex future ocean conditions.Nat. Clim. Change 6, 207–213 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, K., Fu, F. X. & Hutchins, D. A. Comparative responses of two dominant Antarctic phytoplankton taxa to interactions between ocean acidification, warming, irradiance, and iron availability. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 1919–1931 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coello-Camba, A. & Agustí, S. Thermal thresholds of phytoplankton growth in polar waters and their consequences for a warming polar ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 168 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas, M. K. et al. Temperature–nutrient interactions exacerbate sensitivity to warming in phytoplankton. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3269–3280 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Laufkötter, C. & Gruber, N. Will marine productivity wane? Science 359, 1103–1104 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leung, S., Cabré, A. & Marinov, I. A latitudinally banded phytoplankton response to 21st century climate change in the Southern Ocean across the CMIP5 model suite. Biogeosciences 12, 5715–5734 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Behrenfeld, M. J. et al. Annual boom–bust cycles of polar phytoplankton biomass revealed by space-based lidar. Nat. Geosci. 10, 118–122 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Henson, S. A. et al. Detection of anthropogenic climate change in satellite records of ocean chlorophyll and productivity. Biogeosciences 7, 621–640 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Assmy, P. et al. Thick-shelled, grazer-protected diatoms decouple ocean carbon and silicon cycles in the iron-limited Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20633–20638 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tagliabue, A. et al. Surface-water iron supplies in the Southern Ocean sustained by deep winter mixing. Nat. Geosci. 7, 314–320 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy, E. J. et al. Comparison of the structure and function of Southern Ocean regional ecosystems: the Antarctic Peninsula and South Georgia. J. Mar. Syst. 109, 22–42 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arrigo, K. R. in Sea Ice (ed. Thomas, D. N.) Ch. 14 (Wiley, New York, 2017).

  15. Hutchins, D. A. & Boyd, P. W. Marine phytoplankton and the changing ocean iron cycle. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1072–1079 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mock, T. et al. Evolutionary genomics of the cold-adapted diatom Fragilariopsis cylindrus. Nature 541, 536–540 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Strzepek, R. F. et al. Iron–light interactions differ in Southern Ocean phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57, 1182–1200 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hunt, G. L. Jr et al. Advection in polar and sub-polar environments: impacts on high latitude marine ecosystems. Prog. Oceanogr. 149, 40–81 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malviya, S. et al. Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world’s ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1516–E1525 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fraser, C. I. et al. Antarctica’s ecological isolation will be broken by storm-driven dispersal and warming. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 704–708 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyd, P. W., Lennartz, S. T., Glover, D. M. & Doney, S. C. Biological ramifications of climate-change-mediated oceanic multi-stressors.Nat. Clim. Change 5, 71–79 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyd, P. W., Arrigo, K. R., Strzepek, R. & van Dijken, G. L. Mapping iron demand provides insights into Southern Ocean supply mechanisms. J. Geophys. Res. 117, C06009 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kudo, I., Miyamoto, M., Noiri, Y. & Maita, Y. Combined effects of temperature and iron on the growth and physiology of the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bacillariophyceae). J. Phycol. 36, 1096–1102 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marañón, E., Lorenzo, M. P., Cermeño, P. & Mouriño-Carballido, B. Nutrient limitation suppresses the temperature dependence of phytoplankton metabolic rates.ISME. J. 12, 1836–1845 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, Y. et al. Between- and within-population variations in thermal reaction norms of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 1570–1580 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Esper, O. & Gersonde, R. Quaternary surface water temperature estimations: new diatom transfer functions for the Southern Ocean. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 414, 1–19 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas, M. K., Kremer, C. T., Klausmeier, C. A. & Litchman, E. A global pattern of thermal adaptation in marine phytoplankton. Science 338, 1085–1088 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sunda, W. G. & Huntsman, S. A. Interrelated influence of iron, light and cell size on marine phytoplankton growth. Nature 390, 389–392 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dutkiewicz, S., Scott, J. R. & Follows, M. J. Winners and losers: ecological and biogeochemical changes in a warming ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 463–477 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Quéguiner, B. Iron fertilization and the structure of planktonic communities in high nutrient regions of the Southern Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Pt II 90, 43–54 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Elzhov, T. V., Mullen, K. M., Spiess, A.-N. & Bolker, B. minpack.lm: R Interface to the Levenberg–Marquardt Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm Found in MINPACK, Plus Support for Bounds (CRAN Repository, 2016); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/minpack.lm/minpack.lm.pdf

  32. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017).

  33. Ratkowsky, D. A., Lowry, R. K., McMeekin, T. A., Stokes, A. N. & Chandler, R. E. Model for bacterial culture growth rate throughout the entire biokinetic temperature range. J. Bacteriol. 154, 1222–1226 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to K. Karsh (CSIRO, Australia) for conducting the phytoplankton laboratory culture assays and maintaining the cultures, R. Corkery (TIA, UTAS, Australia) for curve fitting the TPCs, the laboratory of A. McMinn (IMAS, UTAS, Australia) for isolating the polar species, I. Lima (WHOI, USA) and S. Doney (VIMS, USA) for providing the temperature range from NCAR Community Earth System Model 2, J. Llort and P. Strutton (IMAS) for providing the time-series of temperature and chlorophyll a from the profiling bio-floats, and M. Ellwood (ANU, Australia) for sharing unpublished data on C. neglectus. This work was primarily funded by the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, and by the Australian Research Council through a Laureate awarded to PWB (FL160100131).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

    Philip W. Boyd

  2. Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

    Philip W. Boyd

Authors
  1. Philip W. Boyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip W. Boyd.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–4, Supplementary References, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Materials

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyd, P.W. Physiology and iron modulate diverse responses of diatoms to a warming Southern Ocean. Nature Clim Change 9, 148–152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0389-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0389-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing