The role of reporting standards in producing robust literature reviews

Article metrics

Literature reviews can help to inform decision-making, yet they may be subject to fatal bias if not conducted rigorously as ‘systematic reviews’. Reporting standards help authors to provide sufficient methodological detail to allow verification and replication, clarifying when key steps, such as critical appraisal, have been omitted.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Increasing interest in systematic reviews over recent years.

References

  1. 1.

    Bornmann, L. & Mutz, R. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66, 2215–2222 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Grant, M. J. & Booth, A. Health Inf. Libr. J. 26, 91–108 (2009).

  3. 3.

    Guidelines and Standards for Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management Version 5 (CEE, 2018); https://go.nature.com/2rjhJan

  4. 4.

    Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S. & Stewart, G. Nature 555, 175–182 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Dixon-Woods, M. et al. Qual. Res. 6, 27–44 (2006).

  6. 6.

    Haddaway, N. R. & Verhoeven, J. T. Ecol. Evol. 5, 4451–4454 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Pullin, A. S. & Stewart, G. B. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1647–1656 (2006).

  8. 8.

    Higgins, J. & Green, S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011).

  9. 9.

    James, K. L., Randall, N. P. & Haddaway, N. R. Environ. Evid. 5, 7 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Pullin, A. S. Environ. Evid. 3, 18 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Stead, L. F., Lancaster, T. & Silagy, C. A. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 1, 10 (2001).

  12. 12.

    Haddaway, N. R., Land, M. & Macura, B. Environ. Int. 99, 356–360 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Woodcock, P., O’Leary, B. C., Kaiser, M. J. & Pullin, A. S. Fish Fisher. 18, 668–681 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Group, P. PLoS Med. 6, e1000097 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Page, M. J. & Moher, D. Syst. Rev. 6, 263 (2017).

  16. 16.

    PRISMA Endorsers (PRISMA, 2015); https://go.nature.com/2rcPNEO

  17. 17.

    Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P. & Pullin, A. S. Environ. Evid. 7, 7 (2018).

  18. 18.

    Haddaway, N. R. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1242–1245 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Thomas, J., O’Mara-Eves, A., Harden, A. & Newman, M. in An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (eds Gough, D. et al.) 181–210 (Sage, London, 2017).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Neal Robert Haddaway.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haddaway, N.R., Macura, B. The role of reporting standards in producing robust literature reviews. Nature Clim Change 8, 444–447 (2018) doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0180-3

Download citation

Further reading