Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Framing the challenge of climate change in Nature and Science editorials

Abstract

Through their editorializing practices, leading international science journals such as Nature and Science interpret the changing roles of science in society and exert considerable influence on scientific priorities and practices. Here we examine nearly 500 editorials published in these two journals between 1966 and 2016 that deal with climate change, thereby constructing a lens through which to view the changing engagement of science and scientists with the issue. A systematic longitudinal frame analysis reveals broad similarities between Nature and Science in the waxing and waning of editorializing attention given to the topic, but, although both journals have diversified how they frame the challenges of climate change, they have done so in different ways. We attribute these differences to three influences: the different political and epistemic cultures into which they publish; their different institutional histories; and their different editors and editorial authorship practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Primary challenge frames.
Fig. 2: Challenge frames by IPCC era.
Fig. 3: Attribute frames by IPCC era.

References

  1. Boykoff, M. T. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffman, A. J. Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organ. Environ. 24, 3–33 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henderson-Sellers, A. Climatic change: communication changes over this journal’s first ‘century’. Climatic Change 100, 215–227 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Starting a New Conversation on Climate Change with the European Centre-Right (Climate Outreach, 2015); https://climateoutreach.org/resources/starting-a-new-european-conversation-on-climate-change-with-the-centre-right

  5. Aykut, S. C., Foyer, J. & Morena, E. (eds.) Globalizing the Climate: The Global Climate Debate after COP21 (Routledge, Abingdon, 2017).

  6. Nerlich, B. & Koteyko, N. Compounds, creativity and complexity in climate change communication: the case of ‘carbon indulgences’. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 345–353 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. O’Neill, S. J. & Smith, N. Climate change and visual imagery. WIREs Clim. Change 5, 73–87 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. & Upham, P. International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. WIREs Clim. Change 6, 35–61 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, P. & Howe, N. Climate Change as Social Drama: Global Warming in the Public Sphere (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider, S. H. Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save Earth’s Climate (NationalGeographic Society, Washington, DC, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hulme, M. Exploring Climate Change Through Science Essays, Interviews and Speeches (Routledge, Abingdon, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Solomon, G. E. A., Carley, S. & Porter, A. L. How multidisciplinary are the multidisciplinary journals Science and Nature? PloS ONE 11, e0152637 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Callaway, E. Centre of attention. Nature 499, 142–143 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss, R. Nip misinformation in the bud. Science 358, 427 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Biagioli, M. The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science 624–625 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2003).

  16. Scott, A. Peer review and the relevance of science. Futures 39, 827–845 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ciszar, A. The catalogue that made metrics and changed science. Nature 551, 163–165 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kohler, R. E. Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab–Field Border in Biology (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Livingstone, D. N. Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schaffer, S. Ceremonies of measurement: rethinking the world history of science. Ann. Hist. Sci. Soc. 70, 335–360 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baldwin, M. Making ‘Nature’: The History of a Scientific Journal (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jasanoff, S. (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order (Routledge, Abingdon, 2004).

  23. Waaijer, C. J., van Bochove, C. A. & van Eck, N. J. On the map: Nature and Science editorials. Scientometrics 86, 99–112 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pickering, A. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995).

  25. Callon, M. What Does it Mean to Say that Economics is Performative? Working Paper No. 5 (Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, 2016); https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00091596/document

  26. Campbell, P. Statues: an editorial response. Nature 549, 334 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Waaijer, C. J., van Bochove, C. A. & van Eck, N. J. Journal editorials give indication of driving science issues. Nature 463, 157 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoey, J. & Todkill, A. M. An editorial on editorials. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 167, 1006–1007 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smart, A., Tutton, R., Martin, P., Ellison, G. T. & Ashcroft, R. The standardization of race and ethnicity in biomedical science editorials and UK biobanks. Social. Stud. Sci. 38, 407–423 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Waaijer, C. J. Careers in science: policy issues according to Nature and Science editorials. Scientometrics 96, 485–495 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Campbell, P. John Maddox, 1925–2009: in memory of a transformative editor of. Nature 458, 807 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Singer, F. S. Will the world come to a horrible end? Science 170, 125 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The great greenhouse scare. Nature 229, 514 (1971).

  34. Jaspal, R. & Nerlich, B. When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988. Public Underst. Sci. 23, 122–141 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hilgartner, S. & Bosk, C. L. The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. Am. J. Sociol. 94, 53–78 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lederman, L. M. & Malcolm, S. M. The next campaign. Science 323, 1265 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schlesinger, W. H. Carbon trading. Science 314, 1217 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  39. Future-proofing. Nature 528, 164 (2015).

  40. Better climate data required. Nature 410, 287 (2001)..

  41. The heat is on. Nature 438, 296 (2005)..

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. McNutt, M. The beyond-two-degree inferno. Science 349, 7 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McNutt, M. Ignorance is not an option. Science 347, 1293 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gupta, J. & Grubb, M. Climate Change and European Leadership (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shapin, S. Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 23, 5–12 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nerlich, B., Forsyth, R. & Clarke, D. Climate in the news: how differences in media discourse between the US and UK reflect national priorities. Environ. Commun. 6, 44–63 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hoppe, R. in From Climate Change to Social Change: Perspectives on Science–Policy Interactions (eds Driessen, P., Leroy, P. & van Vierssen, W) 109–130 (International Books, Utrecht, 2010).

  48. Hollin, G. J. S. & Pearce, W. Tension between scientific certainty and meaning complicates communication of IPCC reports. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 753–756 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Turnhout, E., Hisschemöller, M. & Eijsackers, H. Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy. Ecol. Indic. 7, 215–228 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mahony, M. & Hulme, M. Modelling and the nation: institutionalizing climate prediction in the UK, 1988–92. Minerva 54, 445–470 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brand Report for Nature (BPA Worldwide, 2017); https://www.bpaww.com

  52. Brand Report for Science (BPA Worldwide, 2017).

  53. Entman, R. M. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43, 51–58 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nisbet, M. C. Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51, 12–23 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  55. de Vreese, C. H. Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration (Aksant Academic, Amsterdam, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cappella, J. N. & Jamieson, K. H. Spirit of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Fleiss, J. L. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76, 378–382 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.H. initiated and designed the study and led the writing of the manuscript. N.O. and M.H. extracted the corpus. M.H., N.O., S.R. and M.B. contributed to coding, analysis, interpretation and improvements to the text. N.O. and S.R. contributed statistical analysis and graphics. M.B. conducted a literature review, analysed citations and Altmetric scores, and extracted author details from Science editorials.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Hulme.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–2, Supplementary tables 1–5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hulme, M., Obermeister, N., Randalls, S. et al. Framing the challenge of climate change in Nature and Science editorials. Nature Clim Change 8, 515–521 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0174-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0174-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing