Abstract
Coordination complexes of precious metals with the d6 valence electron configuration such as Ru(II), Os(II) and Ir(III) are used for lighting applications, solar energy conversion and photocatalysis. Until now, d6 complexes made from abundant first-row transition metals with competitive photophysical and photochemical properties have been elusive. While previous research efforts focused mostly on Fe(II), we disclose that isoelectronic Cr(0) gives access to higher photoluminescence quantum yields and excited-state lifetimes when compared with any other first-row d6 metal complex reported so far. The luminescence behaviour of the metal-to-ligand charge transfer excited states of these Cr(0) complexes is competitive with Os(II) polypyridines. With these Cr(0) complexes, the metal-to-ligand charge transfer states of first-row d6 metal complexes become exploitable in photoredox catalysis, and benchmark chemical reductions proceed efficiently under low-energy red illumination. Here we demonstrate that appropriate molecular design strategies open up new perspectives for photophysics and photochemistry with abundant first-row d6 metals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Upon photo-irradiation of a suitable metal complex, the promotion of an electron from the metal to a coordinated ligand can generate a metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited state with diverse applications in photophysics and photochemistry1. In many noble metal complexes, MLCT excited states luminesce and have lifetimes of several tens of nanoseconds or longer, which forms the basis for their use in lighting applications and photocatalysis2,3,4. Octahedral Ru(II), Os(II) and Ir(III) complexes with π-conjugated ligands are prototypical examples with a low-spin d6 configuration5,6 (Fig. 1a), in which three degenerate d-orbitals are all occupied with one electron pair, and two degenerate vacant d-orbitals are energetically above the lowest empty ligand π* orbital (Fig. 1d). In complexes with such an electronic structure, emissive and redox-active MLCT states can then emerge.
First-row transition metals experience weaker ligand fields than second- and third-row transition metals7, and the lowest unoccupied orbitals of 3d6 complexes become metal-based (Fig. 1e), which typically causes ultrafast MLCT deactivation by metal-centred (MC) states8,9. MLCT lifetimes in Fe(II) complexes only recently reached the pico- and nanosecond timescale10,11,12,13, and currently only a handful of 3d6 metal complexes show MLCT photoluminescence in solution at 20–25 °C14,15,16,17,18,19, where the highest reported quantum yield is 0.09% (ref. 16). This situation is very different from the d10 electron configuration of semiprecious Cu(I)20, for which luminescent charge transfer excited states are more readily obtainable21,22, because there are no low-lying MC states when all d-orbitals are filled23. Owing to their privileged 3d10 electron configuration, Cu(I) complexes and their photophysical properties are therefore not directly comparable to 3d6 metal complexes. Emissive complexes of abundant metals with other types of excited states have been reported (Zr(IV) (d0) (ref. 24), Cr(III) (d3) (ref. 25) and Fe(III) (d5) (ref. 26)), but 3d6 analogues of the abovementioned Ru(II), Os(II) and Ir(III) complexes with competitive photophysical and photochemical properties have been unknown27,28.
In this Article, we report two Cr(0) complexes with MLCT excited-state lifetimes close to 50 ns and photoluminescence quantum yields competitive with benchmark Os(II) polypyridines. These photophysical properties permit MLCT-based photoredox catalysis analogous to that known from many precious d6 metal complexes.
Results and discussion
Molecular design, synthesis and characterization
Non-radiative MLCT deactivation in d6 complexes decelerates in strong ligand fields, because the MC states are shifted to higher energies29. Isocyanide ligands create strong ligand fields30, which provide W(0) complexes with promising photophysics and photochemistry31,32. We developed isocyanide chelate ligands that provided brightly emissive Mo(0) complexes33, but with the first-row transition metals Cr(0) and Mn(I), the MLCT luminescence and the excited-state lifetimes remained inferior to noble metal compounds16,18. Two complementary molecular design principles now yield the first 3d6 complexes (Fig. 1c) with photophysical and photochemical behaviour competitive with precious metal-based analogues. The electronic structures of these Cr(0) complexes (Fig. 1f) resemble those of well-known noble metal analogues (Fig. 1g,i), more than those of Fe(II) polypyridines (Fig. 1h).
The new complexes [Cr(LMes)3] and [Cr(LPyr)3] were obtained in 78% and 47% yields, respectively, by reacting the previously unknown ligands LMes and LPyr with CrCl3(THF)3 in the presence of Na/Hg in dry and de-aerated tetrahydrofuran (THF) at room temperature. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, combustion analysis and infra-red spectroscopy establish the identity and purity of the complexes. The key characteristics of isocyanide complexes including the 13C NMR resonances of the coordinating carbon atoms, as well as C≡N stretches in infra-red spectroscopy, are readily detectable (Supplementary Figs. 15, 31, 72 and 81). In the X-ray crystal structure of [Cr(LMes)3] (Fig. 2a), the six mesityl substituents ortho to the isocyanide groups wedge in between the m-terphenyl ligand backbones, and thus impart cooperative rigidity to the overall complex while simultaneously protecting the Cr(0) atom. The absence of EXSY peaks between the two ortho methyl groups of the mesityl in the NOESY and ROESY NMR spectra (Supplementary Figs. 18 and 19) as well as the distinctly different NOE patterns (Supplementary Fig. 18) for the methyl pointing towards the chromium, compared with the outward-oriented methyl group, clearly demonstrate that this rigidity is also maintained in solution. Solid [Cr(LMes)3] and [Cr(LPyr)3] can be stored under air for several weeks without undergoing noticeable degradation, and an initially de-aerated solution of [Cr(LMes)3] showed only 3% of decomposition over 15 days of exposure to air (Supplementary Fig. 33). The single crystal used for X-ray diffraction was grown in an NMR tube that was open to air. Both complexes remained intact for several days in de-aerated toluene-d8 at 115 °C (Supplementary Figs. 32 and 88). A single set of sharp 1H NMR resonances indicates that the three ligands in [Cr(LMes)3] are symmetry related at 298 K, whereas for [Cr(LPyr)3] analogous behaviour is only observed at 378 K, due to hindered rotation of the tert-butyl groups at lower temperatures (Supplementary Fig. 75). Thus, while the pyrene substituents on the backbone of LPyr rotate freely above 318 K as shown by variable temperature NMR (Supplementary Fig. 76) and NOE contacts between the terphenyl protons to both sides of the pyrene substituent at 378 K (Supplementary Fig. 84), the coalescence pattern of the tert-butyl resonances suggests that the structural rigidity of [Cr(LPyr)3] and the steric protection of the metal centre are mainly due to inter-ligand contacts caused by the tert-butyl groups.
Electrochemistry and photophysics
Oxidation of Cr(0) to Cr(I) occurs reversibly near −0.7 V versus Fc+/Fc in both complexes (Fig. 2b), and, along with oxidation of Cr(I) to Cr(II) at higher potentials, is typical for hexakis(arylisocyanide) complexes of Cr(0) (ref. 34). A reversible wave at −2.50 V versus Fc+/Fc observed for [Cr(LPyr)3] is attributable to reduction of the pyrene substituents, whereas reduction of the m-terphenyl backbones of the diisocyanide ligands is outside the electrochemical window of suitable electrolytes15,17.
The free LMes and LPyr ligands absorb only ultraviolet light, but [Cr(LMes)3] and [Cr(LPyr)3] feature MLCT bands covering large parts of the visible absorption spectrum (Fig. 3a,b). The increased π-conjugation network of the pyrene-decorated ligand causes a 100 nm red shift of the MLCT absorption band maximum of [Cr(LPyr)3] compared with [Cr(LMes)3]. Upon photo-excitation, both complexes show broad and unstructured luminescence. Between cyclohexane and THF, the luminescence band maxima shift from 695 nm to 745 nm in [Cr(LMes)3] and from 713 nm to 840 nm in [Cr(LPyr)3], because the emissive MLCT state is energetically more stabilized in high polarity solvents35. Thus, the luminescence of the two Cr(0) complexes occurs in the same spectral range as the MLCT emission of [Os(bpy)3]2+ (Table 1). Differences in solubility between the charge-neutral Cr(0) compounds and the dicationic Os(II) complex preclude direct comparison in the same solvent, yet the energies of the emissive MLCT excited states of [Cr(LMes)3] and [Cr(LPyr)3] in cyclohexane and of [Os(bpy)3]2+ in acetonitrile are evidently similar. The comparison of photophysical properties between these three compounds is therefore more meaningful than comparison with [Ru(bpy)3]2+.
Transient absorption and time-resolved luminescence experiments yield single-exponential MLCT decays for both Cr(0) complexes in de-aerated THF, toluene and cyclohexane at 20 °C (Fig. 3a–d and Supplementary Tables 6 and 10). The observable trend in decay kinetics follows the energy gap law35, leading to the longest MLCT lifetimes (τ) in the most apolar solvent, 31 ns for [Cr(LMes)3] and 47 ns for [Cr(LPyr)3] in cyclohexane at 20 °C. The photoluminescence quantum yields (ϕ) under these conditions are 0.36 ± 0.02% for [Cr(LMes)3] and 1.04 ± 0.05% for [Cr(LPyr)3] (Table 1). For [Os(bpy)3]2+ in de-aerated acetonitrile, τ is 60 ns and ϕ is 0.46%35; hence, the Cr(0) complexes exhibit competitive photophysical properties. The even longer MLCT lifetime and greater luminescence quantum yield of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ are largely due to its 0.3 eV higher MLCT energy, which further limits non-radiative relaxation following the energy gap law35.
The MLCT lifetimes and luminescence quantum yields of [Cr(LMes)3] and [Cr(LPyr)3] exceed those of previously reported 3d6 complexes by at least an order of magnitude8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,19,27. Aside from the rigid interlocked molecular structures discussed above, the extended π-conjugation network of the new diisocyanide ligands contributes to this behaviour. In the ultraviolet (UV)–visible (Vis) transient absorption spectrum of [Cr(LPyr)3] (Fig. 3d), the negative signal around 340 nm coincides with the lowest pyrene-localized 1π–π* transition in the ground state, indicating that the photoactive MLCT state has admixed pyrene character. Thus, the excited electron of the emissive MLCT state appears to be strongly delocalized, in line with the strong emission solvatochromism. Such delocalization causes weaker distortion of the MLCT excited state relative to the ground state (ΔQe in Fig. 1i)36, making non-radiative relaxation less dominant, somewhat reminiscent of the even much more weakly distorted spin-flip excited states of Cr(III) (d3) compounds25,27,37. Compared with these spin-flip MC states of d3 complexes, long-lived and strongly emissive MLCT excited states in first-row d6 complexes are far more difficult to obtain38.
In isoelectronic Fe(II) complexes, internal conversion from the lowest MLCT to MC states (Fig. 1h) commonly represents the dominant non-radiative relaxation pathway7,8,9,10,11,12,13,27,29, and in some cases, this is essentially barrierless39. Temperature-dependent studies suggest that in [Cr(LPyr)3] the activation barrier for internal conversion to an MC state is 24 kJ mol−1 in cyclohexane and 15 kJ mol−1 in toluene (Fig. 3e). Consequently, the higher luminescence quantum yield in cyclohexane is probably the combined result of decelerated non-radiative MLCT relaxation directly to the ground state and slowed internal conversion to MC states; analogous results are obtained for [Cr(LMes)3] (Supplementary Figs. 41 and 42).
Triplet energy transfer, upconversion, photoredox catalysis
Based on the absorption and emission data (Fig. 3a,b), the MLCT energies of [Cr(LMes)3] and [Cr(LPyr)3] are 1.98 eV and 1.90 eV, respectively. Triplet–triplet energy transfer to perylene (Supplementary Figs. 98 and 99) occurs with essentially diffusion-limited kinetics (9.2 × 109 M−1 s−1), indicating that both Cr(0) compounds are amenable to triplet–triplet energy transfer catalysis40. Delayed perylene fluorescence at 480 nm is detectable upon selective excitation of [Cr(LPyr)3] at 635 nm (Fig. 3f), illustrating that the Cr(0) complexes can sensitize triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion41,42. Given the abovementioned MLCT energies and the ease of Cr(0) to Cr(I) oxidation, [Cr(LMes)3] and [Cr(LPyr)3] become strong excited-state reductants with potentials near −2.7 V versus Fc+/Fc (Fig. 2b inset)43. W(0) arylisocyanides have a similar reducing power32,44, but common precious metal-based d6 complexes are far weaker photo-reductants1,4,45 (Table 1). Different aryl halides (Fig. 4) reductively quench the MLCT state of [Cr(LMes)3]. For example, 4-iodoanisole reacts with a rate constant of 1.9 × 107 M−1 s−1 in de-aerated toluene at 20 °C, in addition to showing some static quenching (Supplementary Figs. 104 and 105). Catalytic photoreductions of aryl halides become possible in the presence of tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE), a commercial reductant capable of regenerating Cr(I) to Cr(0) after initial photo-induced electron transfer to the individual substrates (Fig. 4a). Similar hydrodehalogenation reactions with organic or precious metal-based photocatalysts typically require up to two blue or green photons per turnover45,46,47, whereas [Cr(LMes)3] drives the reactions with red light, keeping photodegradation at an acceptable level (Supplementary Fig. 100). Photocatalysis with isoelectronic Fe(II) complexes usually occurs from MC states48,49, and there is only one single report involving a dark (non-luminescent) MLCT state, which, however, relies on consecutive ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) and MLCT excitation of an Fe(III)/Fe(II) system50. Aryl iodides, bromides and even an activated chloride with reduction potentials between −2.4 V and −2.7 V versus Fc+/Fc are reductively dehalogenated by MLCT-excited [Cr(LMes)3] (Fig. 4c), providing the proof of concept for demanding photoreductions under red illumination that are not accomplishable in the same fashion with typical noble metal-based d6 complexes (Fig. 4b)4,45,46.
TDAE is a commercial reductant, but it is more expensive than other commonly used tertiary amine donors; hence, it seemed interesting to explore overall redox-neutral base-promoted homolytic aromatic substitution (BHAS) reactions, for which no electron donor at all needs to be added33,44. We chose 1-(2-iodobenzyl)-pyrrole as a substrate enabling an intramolecular variant of the BHAS reaction. Using [Cr(LMes)3] as a photosensitizer, TMP (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine) as a base, and red light (Fig. 4d), the anticipated C–C coupled product formed in 38% yield at a catalyst loading of 10 mol%. The lower yield of the BHAS reaction and the need for higher catalyst loadings with respect to the hydrodehalogenations in Fig. 4c could have several reasons, including the following. First, the driving force for the reductive dehalogenation step in this specific substrate is only roughly 0.04 V. Second, the driving force for the regeneration of Cr(I) to Cr(0) in the catalytic cycle by the tricylic radical (Fig. 4d) is not known, but is probably in competition with nucleophilic attack of iodide anions at Cr(I), thereby leading to degradation of the sensitizer33. Nonetheless, the BHAS reaction in Fig. 4d provides an important proof of concept for overall redox-neutral reactions involving a thermodynamically demanding reduction step. [Ru(bpy)3]2+, [Ir(ppy)3] and the vast majority of their precious metal-based congeners are unable to catalyse comparable BHAS reactions43, because they lack sufficient reducing power in their MLCT excited states. After thousands of publications exploiting the MLCT excited states of precious 4d6 and 5d6 metal complexes for photoredox catalysis, the hydrodehalogenation and BHAS reactions demonstrated herein represent the first examples in which a luminescent MLCT excited state of a 3d6 metal complex has been used for photoredox catalysis.
After decades of research targeting 3d6 complexes emitting from the same type of MLCT excited state with competitive photophysical properties as hundreds of precious 4d6 and 5d6 metal complexes, only one single Fe(II) complex has been reported to emit from a 3MLCT excited state. This Fe(II) complex has an MLCT lifetime of 1 ns and a luminescence quantum yield close to the detection limit19. Two Mn(I) complexes exhibited 3MLCT lifetimes around 1 ns and luminescence quantum yields below 0.1% (refs. 18,38), and two Cr(0) complexes had slightly longer 3MLCT lifetimes (2–6 ns) and equally modest luminescence quantum yields (0.001–0.09%)15,16. Evidently, these previously reported MLCT-based 3d6 luminophores possess very short MLCT lifetimes and poor luminescence quantum yields. With the Cr(0) complexes reported herein, the MLCT phosphorescence lifetimes and quantum yields of 3d6 complexes finally become competitive with 4d6 or 5d6 compounds based on precious metals, and photocatalysis based on luminescent MLCT excited states is now possible using first-row d6 metal complexes. These findings complement recent key advances with LMCT excited states in complexes based on other abundant transition metals, in particular 3d5 Fe(III) LMCT luminophores with fluorescence lifetimes up to 2.0 ns and quantum yields up to 2.0% (refs. 26,51), in which the direction of charge transfer is opposite. Access to both LMCT and MLCT excited states with mutually complementary charge transfer directionalities is important to target the complete spectrum of photophysical and photochemical applications of first-row transition metal complexes52.
Data availability
Crystallographic data are available for free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre under reference number CCDC-2195170 ([Cr(LMes)3]). The data from the main paper are available from Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22794431); all other data are in Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Arias-Rotondo, D. M. & McCusker, J. K. The photophysics of photoredox catalysis: a roadmap for catalyst design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 5803–5820 (2016).
Balzani, V., Credi, A. & Venturi, M. Photochemical conversion of solar energy. ChemSusChem 1, 26–58 (2008).
Magnuson, A. et al. Biomimetic and microbial approaches to solar fuel generation. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 1899–1909 (2009).
Prier, C. K., Rankic, D. A. & MacMillan, D. W. C. Visible light photoredox catalysis with transition metal complexes: applications in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 113, 5322–5363 (2013).
Campagna, S., Puntoriero, F., Nastasi, F., Bergamini, G. & Balzani, V. in Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds I Vol. 280 (eds Balzani, V. & Campagna, S.) 117–214 (Springer).
Mills, I. N., Porras, J. A. & Bernhard, S. Judicious design of cationic, cyclometalated IrIII complexes for photochemical energy conversion and optoelectronics. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 352–364 (2018).
McCusker, J. K. Electronic structure in the transition metal block and its implications for light harvesting. Science 363, 484–488 (2019).
Zhang, W. K. et al. Tracking excited-state charge and spin dynamics in iron coordination complexes. Nature 509, 345–348 (2014).
Oppermann, M., Zinna, F., Lacour, J. & Chergui, M. Chiral control of spin-crossover dynamics in Fe(II) complexes. Nat. Chem. 14, 739–745 (2022).
Chábera, P. et al. FeII hexa N-heterocyclic carbene complex with a 528 ps metal-to-ligand charge-transfer excited-state lifetime. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 459–463 (2018).
Braun, J. D. et al. Iron(II) coordination complexes with panchromatic absorption and nanosecond charge-transfer excited state lifetimes. Nat. Chem. 11, 1144–1150 (2019).
Cebrián, C. et al. Ultrafast spectroscopy of Fe(II) complexes designed for solar-energy conversion: current status and open questions. ChemPhysChem 23, e202100659 (2022).
Dierks, P., Vukadinovic, Y. & Bauer, M. Photoactive iron complexes: more sustainable, but still a challenge. Inorg. Chem. Front. 9, 206–220 (2022).
Lees, A. J. Luminescence properties of organometallic complexes. Chem. Rev. 87, 711–743 (1987).
Büldt, L. A., Guo, X., Vogel, R., Prescimone, A. & Wenger, O. S. A tris(diisocyanide)chromium(0) complex is a luminescent analog of Fe(2,2′-bipyridine)32+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 985–992 (2017).
Wegeberg, C., Häussinger, D. & Wenger, O. S. Pyrene-decoration of a chromium(0) tris(diisocyanide) enhances excited state delocalization: a strategy to improve the photoluminescence of 3d6 metal complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 15800–15811 (2021).
Bilger, J. B., Kerzig, C., Larsen, C. B. & Wenger, O. S. A photorobust Mo(0) complex mimicking [Os(2,2′-bipyridine)3]2+ and its application in red-to-blue upconversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 1651–1663 (2021).
Herr, P., Kerzig, C., Larsen, C. B., Häussinger, D. & Wenger, O. S. Manganese(I) complexes with metal-to-ligand charge transfer luminescence and photoreactivity. Nat. Chem. 13, 956–962 (2021).
Leis, W., Argüello Cordero, M. A., Lochbrunner, S., Schubert, H. & Berkefeld, A. A photoreactive iron(II) complex luminophore. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 1169–1173 (2022).
Ruthkosky, M., Kelly, C. A., Castellano, F. N. & Meyer, G. J. Electron and energy transfer from CuI MLCT excited states. Coord. Chem. Rev. 171, 309–322 (1998).
Hamze, R. et al. Eliminating nonradiative decay in CuI emitters: >99% quantum efficiency and microsecond lifetime. Science 363, 601–606 (2019).
Hossain, A., Bhattacharyya, A. & Reiser, O. Copper’s rapid ascent in visible-light photoredox catalysis. Science 364, 450–461 (2019).
Yam, V. W. W., Au, V. K. M. & Leung, S. Y. L. Light-emitting self-assembled materials based on d8 and d10 transition metal complexes. Chem. Rev. 115, 7589–7728 (2015).
Zhang, Y. et al. Delayed fluorescence from a zirconium(IV) photosensitizer with ligand-to-metal charge-transfer excited states. Nat. Chem. 12, 345–352 (2020).
Reichenauer, F. et al. Strongly red-emissive molecular ruby [Cr(bpmp)2]3+ surpasses [Ru(bpy)3]2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 11843–11855 (2021).
Kjær, K. S. et al. Luminescence and reactivity of a charge-transfer excited iron complex with nanosecond lifetime. Science 363, 249–253 (2019).
Förster, C. & Heinze, K. Photophysics and photochemistry with earth-abundant metals—fundamentals and concepts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 1057–1070 (2020).
Wegeberg, C. & Wenger, O. S. Luminescent first-row transition metal complexes. JACS Au 1, 1860–1876 (2021).
Liu, Y. Z., Persson, P., Sundström, V. & Wärnmark, K. Fe N-heterocyclic carbene complexes as promising photosensitizers. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 1477–1485 (2016).
Drance, M. J. et al. Terminal coordination of diatomic boron monofluoride to iron. Science 363, 1203–1205 (2019).
Mann, K. R., Gray, H. B. & Hammond, G. S. Excited-state reactivity patterns of hexakisarylisocyano complexes of chromium(0), molybdenum(0), and tungsten(0). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 306–307 (1977).
Sattler, W., Henling, L. M., Winkler, J. R. & Gray, H. B. Bespoke photoreductants: tungsten arylisocyanides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1198–1205 (2015).
Herr, P., Glaser, F., Büldt, L. A., Larsen, C. B. & Wenger, O. S. Long-lived, strongly emissive, and highly reducing excited states in Mo(0) complexes with chelating isocyanides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 14394–14402 (2019).
Bohling, D. A., Evans, J. F. & Mann, K. R. Inductive, steric, and environmental effects in the non-aqueous electrochemistry of hexakis(aryl isocyanide) chromium complexes. Inorg. Chem. 21, 3546–3551 (1982).
Caspar, J. V., Kober, E. M., Sullivan, B. P. & Meyer, T. J. Application of the energy gap law to the decay of charge-transfer excited states. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 630–632 (1982).
Damrauer, N. H., Boussie, T. R., Devenney, M. & McCusker, J. K. Effects of intraligand electron delocalization, steric tuning, and excited-state vibronic coupling on the photophysics of aryl-substituted bipyridyl complexes of Ru(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 8253–8268 (1997).
Kitzmann, W. R. & Heinze, K. Charge-transfer and spin-flip states: thriving as complements. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202213207 (2023).
Sinha, N. & Wenger, O. S. Photoactive metal-to-ligand charge transfer excited states in 3d6 complexes with Cr0, MnI, FeII, and CoIII. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 4903–4920 (2023).
Auböck, G. & Chergui, M. Sub-50-fs photoinduced spin crossover in Fe(bpy3)2+. Nat. Chem. 7, 629–633 (2015).
Strieth-Kalthoff, F. & Glorius, F. Triplet energy transfer photocatalysis: unlocking the next level. Chem 6, 1888–1903 (2020).
Singh-Rachford, T. N. & Castellano, F. N. Photon upconversion based on sensitized triplet-triplet annihilation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 2560–2573 (2010).
Ravetz, B. D. et al. Photoredox catalysis using infrared light via triplet fusion upconversion. Nature 565, 343–346 (2019).
Kim, D. & Teets, T. S. Strategies for accessing photosensitizers with extreme redox potentials. Chem. Phys. Rev. 3, 021302 (2022).
Fajardo, J. Jr. et al. Photoredox catalysis mediated by tungsten(0) arylisocyanides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19389–19398 (2021).
Shon, J.-H. et al. Photoredox catalysis on unactivated substrates with strongly reducing iridium photosensitizers. Chem. Sci. 12, 4069–4078 (2021).
Ghosh, I., Ghosh, T., Bardagi, J. I. & König, B. Reduction of aryl halides by consecutive visible light-induced electron transfer processes. Science 346, 725–728 (2014).
MacKenzie, I. A. et al. Discovery and characterization of an acridine radical photoreductant. Nature 580, 76–80 (2020).
Woodhouse, M. D. & McCusker, J. K. Mechanistic origin of photoredox catalysis involving iron(II) polypyridyl chromophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 16229–16233 (2020).
de Groot, L. H. M., Ilic, A., Schwarz, J. & Wärnmark, K. Iron photoredox catalysis—past, present, and future. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 9369–9388 (2023).
Ilic, A. et al. Photoredox catalysis via consecutive 2LMCT- and 3MLCT-excitation of an Fe(III/II)-N-heterocyclic carbene complex. Chem. Sci. 13, 9165–9175 (2022).
Chábera, P. et al. A low-spin FeIII complex with 100-ps ligand-to-metal charge transfer photoluminescence. Nature 543, 695–699 (2017).
Wood, C. J. et al. A comprehensive comparison of dye-sensitized NiO photocathodes for solar energy conversion. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 10727–10738 (2016).
Caspar, J. V. & Meyer, T. J. Photochemistry of Ru(bpy)32+. Solvent effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 5583–5590 (1983).
Acknowledgements
We thank F. Glaser for valuable input. Funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation through grant number 200020_207329 is acknowledged (O.S.W.). C.W. thanks the Independent Research Fund Denmark for an international postdoctoral grant (9059-00003B).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.S. and C.W. carried out the synthetic, spectroscopic and electrochemical work related to [Cr(LMes)3] and [Cr(LPyr)3], respectively, and analysed the respective data sets. N.S. performed the photochemical studies. D.H. performed and analysed the two-dimensional and temperature-dependent NMR experiments. A.P. conducted the X-ray measurement and solved the structure of [Cr(LMes)3]. O.S.W. conceived the project and provided guidance. N.S., C.W. and O.S.W. wrote the manuscript with inputs and final approval from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Chemistry thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary methods, Figs. 1–118 and Tables 1–13.
Supplementary Data 1
CIF crystal structure CCDC-2195170.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 2
Cyclic voltammograms.
Source Data Fig. 3
UV–Vis absorption spectra, luminescence spectra, luminescence decays, UV transient absorption spectra and Arrhenius plots.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sinha, N., Wegeberg, C., Häussinger, D. et al. Photoredox-active Cr(0) luminophores featuring photophysical properties competitive with Ru(II) and Os(II) complexes. Nat. Chem. 15, 1730–1736 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01297-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01297-9