Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A two-residue nascent-strand steric gate controls synthesis of 2′-O-methyl- and 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-RNA

Nature Chemistry volume 15, pages 91–100 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Steric exclusion is a key element of enzyme substrate specificity, including in polymerases. Such substrate specificity restricts the enzymatic synthesis of 2′-modified nucleic acids, which are of interest in nucleic-acid-based drug development. Here we describe the discovery of a two-residue, nascent-strand, steric control ‘gate’ in an archaeal DNA polymerase. We show that engineering of the gate to reduce steric bulk in the context of a previously described RNA polymerase activity unlocks the synthesis of 2′-modified RNA oligomers, specifically the efficient synthesis of both defined and random-sequence 2′-O-methyl-RNA (2′OMe-RNA) and 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-RNA (MOE-RNA) oligomers up to 750 nt. This enabled the discovery of RNA endonuclease catalysts entirely composed of 2′OMe-RNA (2′OMezymes) for the allele-specific cleavage of oncogenic KRAS (G12D) and β-catenin CTNNB1 (S33Y) mRNAs, and the elaboration of mixed 2′OMe-/MOE-RNA aptamers with high affinity for vascular endothelial growth factor. Our results open up these 2′-modified RNAs—used in several approved nucleic acid therapeutics—for enzymatic synthesis and a wider exploration in directed evolution and nanotechnology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The two-residue steric gate.
Fig. 2: Site-specific RNA endonuclease catalysts composed of 2′OMe-RNA.
Fig. 3: MOE-RNA synthesis.
Fig. 4: 2′OMe/MOE-RNA aptamers and binding kinetics.
Fig. 5: Nascent strand steric gate and polymerase motifs.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information), except raw sequencing reads, which are available in the NCBI SRA repository, BioProject ID PRJNA847930. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Fidelity analysis of sequencing data for 2′OMe-RNA synthesis by individual polymerases was performed using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA-0.7.17), Samtools and custom scripts, which can be found at GitHub: https://github.com/holliger-lab/fidelity-analysis.

References

  1. Taylor, A. I., Houlihan, G. & Holliger, P. Beyond DNA and RNA: the expanding toolbox of synthetic genetics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, a032490 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Freund, N., Furst, M. & Holliger, P. New chemistries and enzymes for synthetic genetics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 74, 129–136 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wan, W. B. & Seth, P. P. The medicinal chemistry of therapeutic oligonucleotides. J. Med. Chem. 59, 9645–9667 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimitrova, D. G., Teysset, L. & Carre, C. RNA 2′-O-methylation (Nm) modification in human diseases. Genes 10, 117 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dai, Q. et al. Nm-seq maps 2′-O-methylation sites in human mRNA with base precision. Nat. Methods 14, 695–698 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zust, R. et al. Ribose 2′-O-methylation provides a molecular signature for the distinction of self and non-self mRNA dependent on the RNA sensor Mda5. Nat. Immunol. 12, 137–143 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aartsma-Rus, A. & Corey, D. R. The 10th oligonucleotide therapy approved: golodirsen for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nucleic Acid Ther. 30, 67–70 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruckman, J. et al. 2′-Fluoropyrimidine RNA-based aptamers to the 165-amino acid form of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF165). Inhibition of receptor binding and VEGF-induced vascular permeability through interactions requiring the exon 7-encoded domain. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20556–20567 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chelliserrykattil, J. & Ellington, A. D. Evolution of a T7 RNA polymerase variant that transcribes 2′-O-methyl RNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1155–1160 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ibach, J. et al. Identification of a T7 RNA polymerase variant that permits the enzymatic synthesis of fully 2′-O-methyl-modified RNA. J. Biotechnol. 167, 287–295 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, A. J. et al. Transcription yield of fully 2′-modified RNA can be increased by the addition of thermostabilizing mutations to T7 RNA polymerase mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 7480–7488 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burmeister, P. E. et al. Direct in vitro selection of a 2′-O-methyl aptamer to VEGF. Chem. Biol. 12, 25–33 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, T. et al. Evolution of thermophilic DNA polymerases for the recognition and amplification of C2′-modified DNA. Nat. Chem. 8, 556–562 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Z., Chen, T. & Romesberg, F. E. Evolved polymerases facilitate selection of fully 2′-OMe-modified aptamers. Chem. Sci. 8, 8179–8182 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoshino, H., Kasahara, Y., Kuwahara, M. & Obika, S. DNA polymerase variants with high processivity and accuracy for encoding and decoding locked nucleic acid sequences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 21530–21537 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cozens, C. et al. Enzymatic synthesis of nucleic acids with defined regioisomeric 2′-5′ linkages. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 15570–15573 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cozens, C., Pinheiro, V. B., Vaisman, A., Woodgate, R. & Holliger, P. A short adaptive path from DNA to RNA polymerases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8067–8072 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kropp, H. M., Betz, K., Wirth, J., Diederichs, K. & Marx, A. Crystal structures of ternary complexes of archaeal B-family DNA polymerases. PLoS ONE 12, e0188005 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Perera, R. L. et al. Mechanism for priming DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase alpha. eLife 2, e00482 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawai, G. et al. Conformational rigidity of specific pyrimidine residues in tRNA arises from posttranscriptional modifications that enhance steric interaction between the base and the 2′-hydroxyl group. Biochemistry 31, 1040–1046 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nishizaki, T., Iwai, S., Ohtsuka, E. & Nakamura, H. Solution structure of an RNA·2′-O-methylated RNA hybrid duplex containing an RNA·DNA hybrid segment at the center. Biochemistry 36, 2577–2585 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinheiro, V. B. et al. Synthetic genetic polymers capable of heredity and evolution. Science 336, 341–344 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Houlihan, G. et al. Discovery and evolution of RNA and XNA reverse transcriptase function and fidelity. Nat. Chem. 12, 683–690 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor, A. I. & Holliger, P. Directed evolution of artificial enzymes (XNAzymes) from diverse repertoires of synthetic genetic polymers. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1625–1642 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Egli, M. et al. Probing the influence of stereoelectronic effects on the biophysical properties of oligonucleotides: comprehensive analysis of the RNA affinity, nuclease resistance, and crystal structure of ten 2′-O-ribonucleic acid modifications. Biochemistry 44, 9045–9057 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Teplova, M. et al. Crystal structure and improved antisense properties of 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-RNA. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 535–539 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Khatsenko, O. et al. Absorption of antisense oligonucleotides in rat intestine: effect of chemistry and length. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 10, 35–44 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Plevnik, M., Cevec, M. & Plavec, J. NMR structure of 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) modified and C5-methylated RNA dodecamer duplex. Biochimie 95, 2385–2391 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin, P. Stereoselektive Synthese von 2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl)ribonucleosiden: Nachbargruppenbeteiligung der Methoxyethoxy-Gruppe bei der Ribosylierung von Heterocyclen. Helv. Chim. Acta 79, 1930–1938 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, P. Ein neuer Zugang zu 2′-O-Alkylribonucleosiden und Eigenschaften deren Oligonucleotide. Helv. Chim. Acta 78, 486–504 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gillerman, I. & Fischer, B. An improved one-pot synthesis of nucleoside 5′-triphosphate analogues. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 29, 245–256 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ludwig, J. A new route to nucleoside 5′-triphosphates. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Acad. Sci. Hung. 16, 131–133 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Freier, S. M. & Altmann, K. H. The ups and downs of nucleic acid duplex stability: structure-stability studies on chemically-modified DNA:RNA duplexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4429–4443 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kool, E. T. Hydrogen bonding, base stacking, and steric effects in dna replication. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30, 1–22 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu, E. Y. & Beese, L. S. The structure of a high fidelity DNA polymerase bound to a mismatched nucleotide reveals an ‘ajar’ intermediate conformation in the nucleotide selection mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 19758–19767 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, W., Wu, E. Y., Hellinga, H. W. & Beese, L. S. Structural factors that determine selectivity of a high fidelity DNA polymerase for deoxy-, dideoxy-, and ribonucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 28215–28226 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, C. Y. DNA polymerases drive DNA sequencing-by-synthesis technologies: both past and present. Front. Microbiol. 5, 305 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Redrejo-Rodriguez, M. et al. Primer-independent DNA synthesis by a family B DNA polymerase from self-replicating mobile genetic elements. Cell Rep. 21, 1574–1587 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Blasco, M. A., Mendez, J., Lazaro, J. M., Blanco, L. & Salas, M. Primer terminus stabilization at the phi 29 DNA polymerase active site. Mutational analysis of conserved motif KXY. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2735–2740 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kazlauskas, D., Krupovic, M., Guglielmini, J., Forterre, P. & Venclovas, C. Diversity and evolution of B-family DNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 10142–10156 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Franklin, M. C., Wang, J. & Steitz, T. A. Structure of the replicating complex of a pol α family DNA polymerase. Cell 105, 657–667 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rudinger, N. Z., Kranaster, R. & Marx, A. Hydrophobic amino acid and single-atom substitutions increase DNA polymerase selectivity. Chem. Biol. 14, 185–194 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gardner, A. F. & Jack, W. E. Determinants of nucleotide sugar recognition in an archaeon DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2545–2553 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bartel, D. P. & Szostak, J. W. Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences. Science 261, 1411–1418 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wilson, D. S. & Szostak, J. W. In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 611–647 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mutschler H, et al. Random-sequence genetic oligomer pools display an innate potential for ligation and recombination. eLife 7, e43022 (2018).

  47. Fedor, M. J. Structure and function of the hairpin ribozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 297, 269–291 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Skerra, A. Use of the tetracycline promoter for the tightly regulated production of a murine antibody fragment in Escherichia coli. Gene 151, 131–135 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Taylor, A. I. et al. Catalysts from synthetic genetic polymers. Nature 518, 427–430 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Potty, A. S. et al. Biophysical characterization of DNA aptamer interactions with vascular endothelial growth factor. Biopolymers 91, 145–156 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a PhD fellowship from Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (N.F.), the Medical Research Council (MRC) programme (MC_U105178804; A.I.T., S.-Y.P.-C., P. Holliger), a research collaboration between AstraZeneca UK and the MRC (MRC–AstraZeneca Blue Sky Grant; N.S., S.A.-F.), FWO (Flanders Research Foundation) Fund of Scientific Research and the Rega Institute, KU Leuven (M.A., P. Herdewijn), and by National Institute of Health grants R35-GM128562 (B.D.F.) and K99-ES031148 (A.M.W.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Amy M. Whitaker

    Present address: Cancer Epigenetics Institute, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

  2. These authors contributed equally: Niklas Freund, Alexander I. Taylor.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK

    Niklas Freund, Alexander I. Taylor, Sebastian Arangundy-Franklin, Nithya Subramanian, Sew-Yeu Peak-Chew & Philipp Holliger

  2. Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Alexander I. Taylor

  3. Laboratory of Genome Maintenance and Structural Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA

    Amy M. Whitaker & Bret D. Freudenthal

  4. Medicinal Chemistry, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Mikhail Abramov & Piet Herdewijn

Authors
  1. Niklas Freund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander I. Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastian Arangundy-Franklin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nithya Subramanian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sew-Yeu Peak-Chew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amy M. Whitaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bret D. Freudenthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mikhail Abramov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Piet Herdewijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Philipp Holliger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.F., S.A.-F., A.I.T. and P. Holliger conceived and designed experiments. N.F. performed polymerase studies. N.F. and S.A.-F. performed polymerase design and engineering. N.F., M.A. and P. Herdewijn synthesized MOE-nucleotides. N.F. and A.I.T. completed SPR measurements. A.I.T. performed 2′OMezyme selections and characterization. N.S. performed polymerase fidelity measurements. S.-Y.P.-C. performed MS analysis. A.M.W. and B.D.F performed and analysed steady-state kinetic measurements. All authors analysed data, discussed results and co-wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alexander I. Taylor or Philipp Holliger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

UK Research and Innovation has filed a UK patent priority application on behalf of the inventors N.F., S.A.-F. and P. Holliger on the 2M/3M polymerase on 25 May 2022 (application number 2207699.6).

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemistry thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Full materials and methods, Supplementary Figs 1–17, Tables 1–7, references.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Statistical source data for graphs in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Supplementary Data 2

Statistical source data: raw Biacore SPR data that were fitted and plotted in Supplementary Fig. 9a.

Supplementary Data 3

Statistical source data: raw Biacore SPR data that were fitted and plotted in Supplementary Fig. 9b.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed gels for Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed gels for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data for graphs in Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed gels for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4a

Statistical source data: raw Biacore SPR data that were fitted and plotted in Fig. 4a.

Source Data Fig. 4b

Statistical source data: raw Biacore SPR data that were fitted and plotted in Fig. 4b.

Source Data Fig. 4c

Statistical source data: raw Biacore SPR data that were fitted and plotted in Fig. 4c.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freund, N., Taylor, A.I., Arangundy-Franklin, S. et al. A two-residue nascent-strand steric gate controls synthesis of 2′-O-methyl- and 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-RNA. Nat. Chem. 15, 91–100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01050-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01050-8

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing