Various pathogenic bacteria use post-translational modifications to manipulate the central components of host cell functions. Many of the enzymes released by these bacteria belong to the large Fic family, which modify targets with nucleotide monophosphates. The lack of a generic method for identifying the cellular targets of Fic family enzymes hinders investigation of their role and the effect of the post-translational modification. Here, we establish an approach that uses reactive co-substrate-linked enzymes for proteome profiling. We combine synthetic thiol-reactive nucleotide derivatives with recombinantly produced Fic enzymes containing strategically placed cysteines in their active sites to yield reactive binary probes for covalent substrate capture. The binary complexes capture their targets from cell lysates and permit subsequent identification. Furthermore, we determined the structures of low-affinity ternary enzyme–nucleotide–substrate complexes by applying a covalent-linking strategy. This approach thus allows target identification of the Fic enzymes from both bacteria and eukarya.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All relevant data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The crystallography data and corresponding atomic model have been deposited in the PDB under accession code 6SIU. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited at the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE53 partner repository, with data set identifier PXD015599. Data for Figs. 2 and 5 are available as source data with this paper.
Veyron, S., Peyroche, G. & Cherfils, J. FIC proteins: from bacteria to humans and back again. Pathog. Dis. 76, fty012 (2018).
Casey, A. K. & Orth, K. Enzymes involved in AMPylation and deAMPylation. Chem. Rev. 118, 1199–1215 (2018).
Utsumi, R., Nakamoto, Y., Kawamukai, M., Himeno, M. & Komano, T. Involvement of cyclic AMP and its receptor protein in filamentation of an Escherichia coli fic mutant. J. Bacteriol. 151, 807–812 (1982).
Kawamukai, M. et al. Cloning of the fic-1 gene involved in cell filamentation induced by cyclic AMP and construction of a delta fic Escherichia coli strain. J. Bacteriol. 170, 3864–3869 (1988).
Komano, T., Utsumi, R. & Kawamukai, M. Functional analysis of the fic gene involved in regulation of cell division. Res. Microbiol. 142, 269–277 (1991).
Yarbrough, M. L. et al. AMPylation of Rho GTPases by Vibrio VopS disrupts effector binding and downstream signaling. Science 323, 269–272 (2009).
Worby, C. A. et al. The fic domain: regulation of cell signaling by adenylylation. Mol. Cell 34, 93–103 (2009).
Müller, M. P. et al. The Legionella effector protein DrrA AMPylates the membrane traffic regulator Rab1b. Science 329, 946–949 (2010).
Feng, F. et al. A Xanthomonas uridine 5’-monophosphate transferase inhibits plant immune kinases. Nature 485, 114–118 (2012).
Yu, X. et al. Copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (click chemistry)-based detection of global pathogen-host AMPylation on self-assembled human protein microarrays. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 3164–3176 (2014).
Lewallen, D. M., Steckler, C. J., Knuckley, B., Chalmers, M. J. & Thompson, P. R. Probing adenylation: using a fluorescently labelled ATP probe to directly label and immunoprecipitate VopS substrates. Mol. Biosyst. 8, 1701–1706 (2012).
Smit, C. et al. Efficient synthesis and applications of peptides containing adenylylated tyrosine residues. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 9200–9204 (2011).
Albers, M. F., van Vliet, B. & Hedberg, C. Amino acid building blocks for efficient fmoc solid-phase synthesis of peptides adenylylated at serine or threonine. Org. Lett. 13, 6014–6017 (2011).
Niphakis, M. J. & Cravatt, B. F. Enzyme inhibitor discovery by activity-based protein profiling. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 341–377 (2014).
Hu, C. W. et al. Electrophilic probes for deciphering substrate recognition by O-GlcNAc transferase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 1267–1273 (2017).
Xiao, J. Y., Worby, C. A., Mattoo, S., Sankaran, B. & Dixon, J. E. Structural basis of Fic-mediated adenylylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1004–1010 (2010).
Brauckhoff, N., Hahne, G., Yeh, J. T. H. & Grossmann, T. N. Protein-templated peptide ligation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 4337–4340 (2014).
Kinoshita, E., Kinoshita-Kikuta, E., Takiyama, K. & Koike, T. Phosphate-binding tag, a new tool to visualize phosphorylated proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 749–757 (2006).
Mattoo, S. et al. Comparative analysis of Histophilus somni immunoglobulin-binding protein A (IbpA) with other Fic domain-containing enzymes reveals differences in substrate and nucleotide specificities. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 32834–32842 (2011).
Wang, Z. Comprehensive Organic Name Reactions and Reagents (Wiley, 2009).
Perni, M. et al. Delivery of native proteins into C-elegans using a transduction protocol based on lipid vesicles. Sci. Rep. 7, 15045 (2017).
Kinch, L. N., Yarbrough, M. L., Orth, K. & Grishin, N. V. Fido, a novel AMPylation domain common to fic, doc, and AvrB. PLoS ONE 4, e5818 (2009).
Madeira, F. et al. The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W636–W641 (2019).
Broncel, M., Serwa, R. A., Bunney, T. D., Katan, M. & Tate, E. W. Global profiling of Huntingtin-associated protein E (HYPE)-mediated AMPylation through a chemical proteomic approach. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15, 715–725 (2016).
Sanyal, A. et al. A novel link between Fic (filamentation induced by cAMP)-mediated adenylylation/AMPylation and the unfolded protein response. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 8482–8499 (2015).
Preissler, S. et al. AMPylation matches BiP activity to client protein load in the endoplasmic reticulum. eLife 4, e12621 (2015).
Topolska-Wos, A. M., Chazin, W. J. & Filipek, A. CacyBP/SIP — structure and variety of functions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1860, 79–85 (2016).
Grammel, M., Luong, P., Orth, K. & Hang, H. C. A chemical reporter for protein AMPylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17103–17105 (2011).
Kielkowski, P. et al. FICD activity and AMPylation remodelling modulate human neurogenesis. Nat. Commun. 11, 517 (2020).
Sreelatha, A. et al. Protein AMPylation by an evolutionarily conserved pseudokinase. Cell 175, 809–821 (2018).
Engel, P. et al. Adenylylation control by intra- or intermolecular active-site obstruction in Fic proteins. Nature 482, 107–110 (2012).
Zwirzitz, A. et al. Lactoferrin is a natural inhibitor of plasminogen activation. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 8600–8613 (2018).
Ghosh, P., Dahms, N. M. & Kornfeld, S. Mannose 6-phosphate receptors: new twists in the tale. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 202–212 (2003).
Kounnas, M. Z. et al. The α2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein binds and internalizes pseudomonas exotoxin A. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12420–12423 (1992).
Truttmann, M. C. et al. Bartonella henselae engages inside-out and outside-in signaling by integrin β1 and talin1 during invasome-mediated bacterial uptake. J. Cell Sci. 124, 3591–3602 (2011).
Weidow, C. L., Black, D. S., Bliska, J. B. & Bouton, A. H. CAS/Crk signalling mediates uptake of Yersinia into human epithelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2, 549–560 (2000).
Preissler, S. & Ron, D. Early events in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, a033894 (2019).
Truttmann, M. C. et al. The caenorhabditis elegans protein FIC-1 is an AMPylase that covalently modifies heat-shock 70 family proteins, translation elongation factors and histones. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006023 (2016).
Chaudhary, S., Pak, J. E., Gruswitz, F., Sharma, V. & Stroud, R. M. Overexpressing human membrane proteins in stably transfected and clonal human embryonic kidney 293S cells. Nat. Protoc. 7, 453–466 (2012).
Zhang, Z. & Marshall, A. G. A universal algorithm for fast and automated charge state deconvolution of electrospray mass-to-charge ratio spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 9, 225–233 (1998).
Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).
Vettermann, C., Jack, H. M. & Mielenz, D. A colloidal silver staining–destaining method for precise assignment of immunoreactive spots in two-dimensional protein patterns. Anal. Biochem. 308, 381–387 (2002).
Rueden, C. T. et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 18, 529 (2017).
Winter, G. et al. DIALS: implementation and evaluation of a new integration package. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 85–97 (2018).
Evans, P. R. An introduction to data reduction: space-group determination, scaling and intensity statistics. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 282–292 (2011).
Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235–242 (2011).
Tickle, I. J. et al. STARANISO http://staraniso.globalphasing.org/cgi-bin/staraniso.cgi (2018).
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of COOT. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).
Johnson, G. T., Autin, L., Goodsell, D. S., Sanner, M. F. & Olson, A. J. ePMV embeds molecular modeling into professional animation software environments. Structure 19, 293–303 (2011).
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019).
The synchrotron MX data were collected at beamline P14 operated by EMBL Hamburg at the PETRA III storage ring (DESY, Hamburg). We thank G. Pompidor for the assistance in using the beamline. We also acknowledge technical support from the SPC facility at EMBL Hamburg. A.I. acknowledges access to the core facilities and laboratories of the Centre for Structural Systems Biology (CSSB, Hamburg). We thank M. Feige for allowing us to use the cell biology facility and C. Rulofs for general technical assistance as well as G. Schroeder for sharing the LtpG gene construct. B.G. was funded by a Technical University Foundation Fellowship (TUFF, 2016–2017) and an Alexander von Humboldt Post-doctoral Fellowship (AvH, 2017–2019). C.H. thanks the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation Sweden (KAW 2013.0187) and the Swedish Research Council (VR) for generous support. The authors acknowledge the German Research Foundation for support through the Collaborative Research Centre SFB1035 (project B05).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended Data Fig. 1 Schematic representation of the co-substrate-mediated covalent capture workflow for target identification.
Fic enzymes with affinity tags are used to capture their putative targets in mammalian lysates by forming a covalent ternary complex. Those covalent ternary complexes are then enriched by affinity methods and subsequently subjected to tryptic digestion and LC-MS/MS for target identification.
LC/ESI-MS measurements of endogenous cysteine containing proteins such as a, Legionella pneumophila effector DrrA/SidM b, human ras family GTPase HRas and c, human rab family GTPase Rab32 incubated with TReNDs. TReND mix indicates the mixture of TReND-1,2,3,4 and 5 in equimolar ratio. No unspecific coupling observed as shown by the deconvoluted mass spectrum upon TReND incubation. For all panels: Whenever a representative result is shown, each experiment was repeated independently at least twice with similar results.
LC/ESI-MS measurements of Twin-Strep® tagged IbpA I3755C (TS-IbpA) and reactivity of β-γ non-hydrolysable TReND-6 with TS-IbpA. The mass increase of 544 Da reveals that TReND-6 coupled to IbpA and is resistant to hydrolysis even in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2. Whenever a representative result is shown, each experiment was repeated independently at least twice with similar results.
Electron density map covering the whole structure. b, Unbiased electron density map of TReND-1 as covalent linker. Electron density of phosphate atoms suggests an alternative conformation for the TReND-1 in the covalent ternary complex. The absence of adenine base allows the phosphate group and linked tyrosine 32 of Cdc42 to fill in space and adopt an alternative conformation, which is indicated as pink carbon atoms. Canonical conformation is indicated as light-green carbon atom. Electron density of tyrosine 32 is less resolved due to flexibility. OMIT map is constructed with sigma 1.0 and carve distance of 2 Å to the linker.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Intact protein mass spectrometry demonstrating TReND reactivity with other Fic enzymes.
LC/ESI-MS measurements of strategically placed cysteine mutants of Fic enzymes such as a, Bartonella hanselea BepA b, human HYPE/FicD c, Legionella pneumophila LpFic and d, Legionella pneumophila LtpG incubated with TReNDs. Corresponding cysteine modification and reactive TReND is indicated. For all panels: Whenever a representative result is shown, each experiment was repeated independently at least twice with similar results.
a, CACYBP AMPylation spectrum reveals Y71 as the modification site by IbpA. The experiment was repeated independently at least twice with similar results. b, EEF1A2 AMPylation spectrum reveals T432 and c, T261 as modification sites by HYPE/FicD. The experiments in the sections b) and c) were the confirmation of previously published results, therefore performed once.
SDS-PAGE shows that only IbpA I3755C and (1) yielded a ternary complex with Cdc42. Whenever a representative result is shown, each experiment was repeated independently at least twice with similar results.
PhosTag SDS-PAGE shows that only BepA S198C and N111C mutants reacted with TReNDs. BepA S198C mutant showed better reactivity towards (1) and lesser reactivity with (3). BepA N111C showed overall good reactivity with all the TReNDs. Supported with the MS data in Supplementary Fig. 5a, BepA N111C was chosen as the optimal cysteine substitution mutant. Whenever a representative result is shown, each experiment was repeated independently at least twice with similar results.
HYPE H319C mutant showed reactivity with TReNDs 1-3 in a certain degree. However, HYPE E404C showed greater reactivity with TReNDs 1-3. HYPE E404C and (1) was chosen as binary probe for subsequent ternary complex analysis. Whenever a representative result is shown, each experiment was repeated independently at least twice with similar results.
About this article
Cite this article
Gulen, B., Rosselin, M., Fauser, J. et al. Identification of targets of AMPylating Fic enzymes by co-substrate-mediated covalent capture. Nat. Chem. 12, 732–739 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0484-6
Nature Communications (2021)
Nature Communications (2021)