Michelle Francl wonders if it is time to rethink the naming of units.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Sirach 44:1
Kelvin, W. T. Popular Lectures and Addresses 73 (Macmillan, 1889).
Zimmerman, O. T. & Lavine, I. Industrial Service’s Conversion Factors and Tables (Industrial Research Service Inc., 1955).
Clark, L. & Bright, C. The Electrician. 1, 3–4 (1861).
Clark, L. & Sabine, R. Electrical Tables and Formulae (William Clowes & Sons, 1871).
Gérard Borvon. History of the electrical units. Le blog d'histoire des sciences http://histoires-de-sciences.over-blog.fr/2013/11/electrical-units-history.html (2013).
Francl, M. Nat. Chem. 4, 956–957 (2012).
Cope, A. C. & Hardy, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 62, 441–444 (1940).
Wyckoff, H. O. Round table on SI units: ICRU Activities (International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, 1976); http://www.irpa.net/irpa4/cdrom/vol.2/p2_101.pdf
Hogben, L. T. The Language of Science (Stein & Day, 1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francl, M. A unit of revolution. Nat. Chem. 12, 879–880 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-00557-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-00557-2