Article | Published:

Maleimide–thiol adducts stabilized through stretching

Abstract

Maleimide–thiol reactions are widely used to produce protein–polymer conjugates for therapeutics. However, maleimide–thiol adducts are unstable in vivo or in the presence of thiol-containing compounds because of the elimination of the thiosuccinimide linkage through a retro-Michael reaction or thiol exchange. Here, using single-molecule force spectroscopy, we show that applying an appropriate stretching force to the thiosuccinimide linkage can considerably stabilize the maleimide–thiol adducts, in effect using conventional mechanochemistry of force-accelerated bond dissociation to unconventionally stabilize an adjacent bond. Single-molecule kinetic analysis and bulk structural characterizations suggest that hydrolysis of the succinimide ring is dominant over the retro-Michael reaction through a force-dependent kinetic control mechanism, and this leads to a product that is resistant to elimination. This unconventional mechanochemical approach enabled us to produce stable polymer–protein conjugates by simply applying a mechanical force to the maleimide–thiol adducts through mild ultrasonication. Our results demonstrate the great potential of mechanical force for stimulating important productive chemical transformations.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Code availability

Igor procedures for single-molecule experiment analyses of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Data availability

All data generated and analysed during this study are included in this article and its Supplementary Information, and are also available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Hoyle, C. E. & Bowman, C. N. Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 1540–1573 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Mather, B. D., Viswanathan, K., Miller, K. M. & Long, T. E. Michael addition reactions in macromolecular design for emerging technologies. Prog. Polym. Sci. 31, 487–531 (2006).

  3. 3.

    Jung, H. S., Chen, X., Kim, J. S. & Yoon, J. Recent progress in luminescent and colorimetric chemosensors for detection of thiols. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 6019–6031 (2013).

  4. 4.

    George, N., Pick, H., Vogel, H., Johnsson, N. & Johnsson, K. Specific labeling of cell surface proteins with chemically diverse compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 8896–8897 (2004).

  5. 5.

    Qin, B. et al. Supramolecular interfacial polymerization: a controllable method of fabricating supramolecular polymeric materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7639–7643 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Houseman, B. T., Gawalt, E. S. & Mrksich, M. Maleimide-functionalized self-assembled monolayers for the preparation of peptide and carbohydrate biochips. Langmuir 19, 1522–1531 (2003).

  7. 7.

    Phelps, E. A. et al. Maleimide cross‐linked bioactive peg hydrogel exhibits improved reaction kinetics and cross‐linking for cell encapsulation and in situ delivery. Adv. Mater. 24, 64–70 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Baldwin, A. D. & Kiick, K. L. Reversible maleimide–thiol adducts yield glutathione-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol)–heparin hydrogels. Polym. Chem. 4, 133–143 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Tsurkan, M. V. et al. Defined polymer–peptide conjugates to form cell‐instructive starPEG–heparin matrices in situ. Adv. Mater. 25, 2606–2610 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Chudasama, V., Maruani, A. & Caddick, S. Recent advances in the construction of antibody–drug conjugates. Nat. Chem. 8, 114–119 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Doronina, S. O. et al. Development of potent monoclonal antibody auristatin conjugates for cancer therapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 778–784 (2003).

  12. 12.

    Junutula, J. R. et al. Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 925–932 (2008).

  13. 13.

    Chapman, A. P. et al. Therapeutic antibody fragments with prolonged in vivo half-lives. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 780–783 (1999).

  14. 14.

    Greenwald, R. B., Choe, Y. H., McGuire, J. & Conover, C. D. Effective drug delivery by PEGylated drug conjugates. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 55, 217–250 (2003).

  15. 15.

    Scott, A. M., Wolchok, J. D. & Old, L. J. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 278–287 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Alley, S. C., Okeley, N. M. & Senter, P. D. Antibody–drug conjugates: targeted drug delivery for cancer. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14, 529–537 (2010).

  17. 17.

    Sievers, E. L. & Senter, P. D. Antibody–drug conjugates in cancer therapy. Annu. Rev. Med. 64, 15–29 (2013).

  18. 18.

    Verma, S. et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 367, 1783–1791 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Younes, A. et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) for relapsed CD30-positive lymphomas. New Engl. J. Med. 363, 1812–1821 (2010).

  20. 20.

    Younes, A. et al. Results of a pivotal phase II study of brentuximab vedotin for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 2183–2189 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Senter, P. D. & Sievers, E. L. The discovery and development of brentuximab vedotin for use in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 631–637 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Pasut, G. & Veronese, F. M. Polymer–drug conjugation, recent achievements and general strategies. Prog. Polym. Sci. 32, 933–961 (2007).

  23. 23.

    Baldwin, A. D. & Kiick, K. L. Tunable degradation of maleimide–thiol adducts in reducing environments. Bioconjugate Chem. 22, 1946–1953 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Alley, S. C. et al. Contribution of linker stability to the activities of anticancer immunoconjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 19, 759–765 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Ryan, C. P. et al. Tunable reagents for multi-functional bioconjugation: reversible or permanent chemical modification of proteins and peptides by control of maleimide hydrolysis. Chem. Commun. 47, 5452–5454 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Lyon, R. P. et al. Self-hydrolyzing maleimides improve the stability and pharmacological properties of antibody–drug conjugates. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1059–1062 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Shen, B.-Q. et al. Conjugation site modulates the in vivo stability and therapeutic activity of antibody–drug conjugates. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 184–189 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Kalia, J. & Raines, R. T. Catalysis of imido-group hydrolysis in a maleimide conjugate. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17, 6286–6289 (2007).

  29. 29.

    Tumey, L. N. et al. Mild method for succinimide hydrolysis on ADCs: impact on ADC potency, stability, exposure and efficacy. Bioconjugate Chem. 25, 1871–1880 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Fontaine, S. D., Reid, R., Robinson, L., Ashley, G. W. & Santi, D. V. Long-term stabilization of maleimide–thiol conjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 26, 145–152 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Sohma, J. Mechanochemistry of polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 14, 451–596 (1989).

  32. 32.

    Li, J., Nagamani, C. & Moore, J. S. Polymer mechanochemistry: from destructive to productive. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 2181–2190 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Piermattei, A., Karthikeyan, S. & Sijbesma, R. P. Activating catalysts with mechanical force. Nat. Chem. 1, 133–137 (2009).

  34. 34.

    May, P. A. & Moore, J. S. Polymer mechanochemistry: techniques to generate molecular force via elongational flows. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7497–7506 (2013).

  35. 35.

    Caruso, M. M. et al. Mechanically-induced chemical changes in polymeric materials. Chem. Rev. 109, 5755–5798 (2009).

  36. 36.

    Beyer, M. K. & Clausen-Schaumann, H. Mechanochemistry: the mechanical activation of covalent bonds. Chem. Rev. 105, 2921–2948 (2005).

  37. 37.

    Takacs, L. The historical development of mechanochemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7649–7659 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Zhang, H. et al. Multi-modal mechanophores based on cinnamate dimers. Nat. Commun. 8, 1147 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Hickenboth, C. R. et al. Biasing reaction pathways with mechanical force. Nature 446, 423–427 (2007).

  40. 40.

    Klukovich, H. M. et al. Tension trapping of carbonyl ylides facilitated by a change in polymer backbone. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 9577–9580 (2012).

  41. 41.

    Kryger, M. J. et al. Masked cyanoacrylates unveiled by mechanical force. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 4558–4559 (2010).

  42. 42.

    Klukovich, H. M., Kean, Z. S., Iacono, S. T. & Craig, S. L. Mechanically induced scission and subsequent thermal remending of perfluorocyclobutane polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17882–17888 (2011).

  43. 43.

    Kean, Z. S., Black Ramirez, A. L., Yan, Y. & Craig, S. L. Bicyclo[3.2.0]heptane mechanophores for the non-scissile and photochemically reversible generation of reactive bis-enones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 12939–12942 (2012).

  44. 44.

    Chen, Y. et al. Mechanically induced chemiluminescence from polymers incorporating a 1,2-dioxetane unit in the main chain. Nat. Chem. 4, 559–562 (2012).

  45. 45.

    Karthikeyan, S., Potisek, S. L., Piermattei, A. & Sijbesma, R. P. Highly efficient mechanochemical scission of silver-carbene coordination polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 14968–14969 (2008).

  46. 46.

    Davis, D. A. et al. Force-induced activation of covalent bonds in mechanoresponsive polymeric materials. Nature 459, 68–72 (2009).

  47. 47.

    Larsen, M. B. & Boydston, A. J. ‘Flex-activated’ mechanophores: using polymer mechanochemistry to direct bond bending activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8189–8192 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Lenhardt, J. M. et al. Trapping a diradical transition state by mechanochemical polymer extension. Science 329, 1057–1060 (2010).

  49. 49.

    Huang, W. et al. Single molecule study of force-induced rotation of carbon–carbon double bonds in polymers. ACS Nano 11, 194–203 (2017).

  50. 50.

    Wang, J. et al. Inducing and quantifying forbidden reactivity with single-molecule polymer mechanochemistry. Nat. Chem. 7, 323–327 (2015).

  51. 51.

    Akbulatov, S. et al. Experimentally realized mechanochemistry distinct from force-accelerated scission of loaded bonds. Science 357, 299–303 (2017).

  52. 52.

    Zhang, W. & Zhang, X. Single molecule mechanochemistry of macromolecules. Prog. Polym. Sci. 28, 1271–1295 (2003).

  53. 53.

    Grandbois, M., Beyer, M., Rief, M., Clausen-Schaumann, H. & Gaub, H. E. How strong is a covalent bond? Science 283, 1727–1730 (1999).

  54. 54.

    Merkel, R., Nassoy, P., Leung, A., Ritchie, K. & Evans, E. Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy. Nature 397, 50–53 (1999).

  55. 55.

    Alegre-Cebollada, J., Kosuri, P., Rivas-Pardo, J. A. & Fernández, J. M. Direct observation of disulfide isomerization in a single protein. Nat. Chem. 3, 882–887 (2011).

  56. 56.

    Oesterhelt, F., Rief, M. & Gaub, H. E. Single molecule force spectroscopy by AFM indicates helical structure of poly(ethylene-glycol) in water. New J. Phys. 1, 6.1–6.11 (1999).

  57. 57.

    Cao, Y. & Li, H. Polyprotein of GB1 is an ideal artificial elastomeric protein. Nat. Mater. 6, 109–114 (2007).

  58. 58.

    Evans, E. & Ritchie, K. Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. Biophys. J. 72, 1541–1555 (1997).

  59. 59.

    Bell, G. I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200, 618–627 (1978).

  60. 60.

    Wang, J. et al. A remote stereochemical lever arm effect in polymer mechanochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15162–15165 (2014).

  61. 61.

    Lenhardt, J. M., Black, A. L. & Craig, S. L. gem-Dichlorocyclopropanes as abundant and efficient mechanophores in polybutadiene copolymers under mechanical stress. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 10818–10819 (2009).

  62. 62.

    Li, Y., Qin, M., Li, Y., Cao, Y. & Wang, W. Single molecule evidence for the adaptive binding of DOPA to different wet surfaces. Langmuir 30, 4358–4366 (2014).

  63. 63.

    Oberbarnscheidt, L., Janissen, R. & Oesterhelt, F. Direct and model free calculation of force-dependent dissociation rates from force spectroscopic data. Biophys. J. 97, L19–L21 (2009).

  64. 64.

    Serpe, M. J. et al. A simple and practical spreadsheet-based method to extract single-molecule dissociation kinetics from variable loading-rate force spectroscopy data. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 19163–19167 (2008).

  65. 65.

    Wiggins, K. M., Brantley, J. N. & Bielawski, C. W. Methods for activating and characterizing mechanically responsive polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7130–7147 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported mainly by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants nos. 21522402, 11674153, 11374148, 21774057 and 11334004) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 020414380080). The authors thank Y. Li for discussions.

Author information

Yi.C., W.H. and X.G. conceived the project and designed the experiments. W.H., X.G. and H.L. performed the single-molecule experiments and analysed the data. W.H., Y.Y., Z.Z., Y.L.C. and Y.S. performed the ultrasound experiments and analysed the data. W.H., X.W. and Y.Y. performed the antibody stability experiments. Yi.C., W.W. and M.Q. supervised the project. W.H. and Yi.C. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Wei Wang or Yi Cao.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Figures 1–27, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

  2. Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Fig. 1: Single-molecule force spectroscopy of maleimide–thiol adducts.
Fig. 2: Pre-stretching experiment of maleimide–thiol conjugates.
Fig. 3: Chemical characterization of the force-induced hydrolysis of the maleimide–thiol conjugates.
Fig. 4: Ultrasonication increases the stability of maleimide–thiol-based antibody–PEG conjugates.