Signalling and differentiation in emulsion-based multi-compartmentalized in vitro gene circuits


Multicellularity enables the growth of complex life forms as it allows for the specialization of cell types, differentiation and large-scale spatial organization. In a similar way, modular construction of synthetic multicellular systems will lead to dynamic biomimetic materials that can respond to their environment in complex ways. To achieve this goal, artificial cellular communication and developmental programs still have to be established. Here, we create geometrically controlled spatial arrangements of emulsion-based artificial cellular compartments containing synthetic in vitro gene circuitry, separated by lipid bilayer membranes. We quantitatively determine the membrane pore-dependent response of the circuits to artificial morphogen gradients, which are established via diffusion from dedicated organizer cells. Utilizing different types of feedforward and feedback in vitro gene circuits, we then implement artificial signalling and differentiation processes, demonstrating the potential for the realization of complex spatiotemporal dynamics in artificial multicellular systems.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Artificial multicellular structures.
Fig. 2: Gene induction by diffusing inducers.
Fig. 3: Pulse generation by an incoherent feedforward loop circuit.
Fig. 4: Stochastic differentiation of artificial cells.

Data availability

Raw data used for the generation of the figures are available from the authors upon request. Plasmids pSB1A3-AD009, pSB1A3-AD010 and pSB1A3-AD011 are available on Addgene.


  1. 1.

    Szathmáry, E. & Smith, J. M. The major evolutionary transitions. Nature 374, 227–232 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Grosberg, R. K. & Strathmann, R. R. The evolution of multicellularity: a minor major transition? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. System. 38, 621–654 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bell, G. & Mooers, A. O. Size and complexity among multicellular organisms. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60, 345–363 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Crick, F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature 225, 420 (1970).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Christian, J. L. Morphogen gradients in development: from form to function. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 1, 3–15 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Green, J. B. A. & Sharpe, J. Positional information and reaction-diffusion: two big ideas in developmental biology combine. Development 142, 1203–1211 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Elowitz, M. B. & Leibler, S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403, 335–338 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Danino, T., Mondragón-Palomino, O., Tsimring, L. & Hasty, J. A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks. Nature 463, 326–330 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Basu, S., Gerchman, Y., Collins, C. H., Arnold, F. H. & Weiss, R. A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation. Nature 434, 1130–1134 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Baccouche, A., Montagne, K., Padirac, A., Fujii, T. & Rondelez, Y. Dynamic DNA-toolbox reaction circuits: a walkthrough. Methods 67, 234–249 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kim, J., White, K. S. & Winfree, E. Construction of an in vitro bistable circuit from synthetic transcriptional switches. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 68 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ayukawa, S., Takinoue, M. & Kiga, D. RTRACS: a modularized RNA-dependent RNA transcription system with high programmability. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 1369–1379 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shin, J. & Noireaux, V. An E. coli cell-free expression toolbox: application to synthetic gene circuits and artificial cells. ACS Synth. Biol. 1, 29–41 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Karzbrun, E., Tayar, A. M., Noireaux, V. & Bar-Ziv, R. H. Programmable on-chip DNA compartments as artificial cells. Science 345, 829–832 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Isalan, M., Lemerle, C. & Serrano, L. Engineering gene networks to emulate Drosophila embryonic pattern formation. PLoS Biol. 3, e64 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zadorin, A. S., Rondelez, Y., Galas, J.-C. & Estevez-Torres, A. Synthesis of programmable reaction–diffusion fronts using DNA catalyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 068301 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tayar, A. M., Karzbrun, E., Noireaux, V. & Bar-Ziv, R. H. Propagating gene expression fronts in a one-dimensional coupled system of artificial cells. Nat. Phys. 11, 1037–1041 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zadorin, A. S. et al. Synthesis and materialization of a reaction–diffusion French flag pattern. Nat. Chem. 9, 990–996 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chirieleison, S. M., Allen, P. B., Simpson, Z. B., Ellington, A. D. & Chen, X. Pattern transformation with DNA circuits. Nat. Chem. 5, 1000–1005 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Adamala, K. P., Martin-Alarcon, D. A., Guthrie-Honea, K. R. & Boyden, E. S. Engineering genetic circuit interactions within and between synthetic minimal cells. Nat. Chem. 9, 431–439 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hasatani, K. et al. High-throughput and long-term observation of compartmentalized biochemical oscillators. Chem. Commun. 49, 8090–8092 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Weitz, M. et al. Diversity in the dynamical behaviour of a compartmentalized programmable biochemical oscillator. Nat. Chem. 6, 295–302 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Genot, A. J. et al. High-resolution mapping of bifurcations in nonlinear biochemical circuits. Nat. Chem. 8, 760 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hansen, M. M. K. et al. Macromolecular crowding creates heterogeneous environments of gene expression in picolitre droplets. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 191–197 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Niederholtmeyer, H. et al. Rapid cell-free forward engineering of novel genetic ring oscillators. eLife 4, e09771 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Semenov, S. N. et al. Rational design of functional and tunable oscillating enzymatic networks. Nat. Chem. 7, 160–165 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lentini, R. et al. Integrating artificial with natural cells to translate chemical messages that direct E. coli behaviour. Nat. Commun. 5, 4012 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Weitz, M. et al. Communication and computation by bacteria compartmentalized within microemulsion droplets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 72–75 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Schwarz-Schilling, M., Aufinger, L., Muckl, A. & Simmel, F. C. Chemical communication between bacteria and cell-free gene expression systems within linear chains of emulsion droplets. Integrat. Biol. 8, 564–570 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Qiao, Y., Li, M., Booth, R. & Mann, S. Predatory behaviour in synthetic protocell communities. Nat. Chem. 9, 110–119 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Villar, G., Graham, A. D. & Bayley, H. A tissue-like printed material. Science 340, 48–52 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Thiam, A. R., Bremond, N. & Bibette, J. From stability to permeability of adhesive emulsion bilayers. Langmuir 28, 6291–6298 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yasuga, H. et al. Logic gate operation by DNA translocation through biological nanopores. PLoS ONE 11, e0149667 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Booth, M. J., Restrepo Schild, V., Box, S. J. & Bayley, H. Light-patterning of synthetic tissues with single droplet resolution. Sci. Rep. 7, 9315 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Elani, Y., Law, R. V. & Ces, O. Vesicle-based artificial cells as chemical microreactors with spatially segregated reaction pathways. Nat. Commun. 5, 5305 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Elani, Y., Law, R. V. & Ces, O. Protein synthesis in artificial cells: using compartmentalisation for spatial organisation in vesicle bioreactors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 15534–15537 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bayley, H. et al. Droplet interface bilayers. Mol. Biosyst. 4, 1191–1208 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Song, L. et al. Structure of Staphylococcal α-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore. Science 274, 1859–1865 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tilley, S. J. & Saibil, H. R. The mechanism of pore formation by bacterial toxins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16, 230–236 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sun, Z. Z. et al. Protocols for implementing and Escherichia coli based TX-TL cell-free expression system for synthetic biology. J. Vis. Exp. 79, e50762 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ghose, A. K., Viswanadhan, V. N. & Wendoloski, J. J. A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. J. Comb. Chem. 1, 55–68 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Petit, J., Meurice, N., Kaiser, C. & Maggiora, G. Softening the Rule of Five—where to draw the line? Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20, 5343–5351 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lipinski, C. A. Rule of Five in 2015 and beyond: target and ligand structural limitations, ligand chemistry structure and drug discovery project decisions. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 101, 34–41 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yang, N. J. & Hinner, M. J. Getting across the cell membrane: an overview for small molecules, peptides, and proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 1266, 29–53 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bindels, D. S. et al. mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat. Methods 14, 53 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Iizuka, R., Yamagishi, M. & Funatsu, T. Kinetic study of de novo chromophore maturation of fluorescent proteins. Anal. Biochem. 414, 173–178 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mangan, S., Itzkovitz, S., Zaslaver, A. & Alon, U. The incoherent feed-forward loop accelerates the response-time of the gal system of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 356, 1073–1081 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Paige, J. S., Wu, K. Y. & Jaffrey, S. R. RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science 333, 642–646 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Eldar, A. & Elowitz, M. B. Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467, 167–173 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Chambers, I. et al. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450, 1230–1234 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hoffmann, M. et al. Noise-driven stem cell and progenitor population dynamics. PLoS ONE 3, e2922 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ozbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Lim, H. N., Shraiman, B. I. & van Oudenaarden, A. Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli. Nature 427, 737–740 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hildebrand, A., Pohl, M. & Bhakdi, S. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin. Dual mechanism of binding to target cells. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17195–17200 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Müller, P. & Schier, A. F. Extracellular movement of signaling molecules. Dev. Cell 21, 145–158 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the European Research Council (grant agreement no. 694410, AEDNA) and the DFG Cluster of Excellence Nanosystems Initiative Munich (DFG EXC 4/3). A.D. acknowledges additional support by the DFG Research Training Group ‘Chemical Foundations of Synthetic Biology’ GRK 2062/1. The authors thank B. Tinao for her preliminary work on the artificial multicellular assemblies. They also thank D. Ziegler and J. List for their help with set-up construction, S. Sagredo and E. Falgenhauer for providing purified enzymes, and M. Schwarz-Schilling for helpful discussions. Correspondence and request for materials should be addressed to F.C.S.

Author information




A.D. and F.C.S. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. A.D. performed the experiments and analysed the data. A.D. and F.C.S. performed the modelling.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich C. Simmel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary methods, text, figures, tables, videos and references

Supplementary Video 1

This video shows the time lapse of Fig. 1b–c

Supplementary Video 2

Time lapse of the diffusion of DFHBI into a network of receivers containing a Spinach RNA transcription

Supplementary Video 3

This video shows 6 arrays containing the pulse propagation circuit, with different numbers of receivers

Supplementary Video 4

These videos show 2D networks containing the pulse generator

Supplementary Video 5

This video shows specifically a time-lapse of Fig. 3g

Supplementary Video 6

This video shows a differentiating network of one sender (indicated by S) and 4 receivers containing the circuit described in Fig. 4b, left panel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dupin, A., Simmel, F.C. Signalling and differentiation in emulsion-based multi-compartmentalized in vitro gene circuits. Nature Chem 11, 32–39 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing