Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Identification of the strong Brønsted acid site in a metal–organic framework solid acid catalyst


It remains difficult to understand the surface of solid acid catalysts at the molecular level, despite their importance for industrial catalytic applications. A sulfated zirconium-based metal–organic framework, MOF-808-SO4, was previously shown to be a strong solid Brønsted acid material. In this report, we probe the origin of its acidity through an array of spectroscopic, crystallographic and computational characterization techniques. The strongest Brønsted acid site is shown to consist of a specific arrangement of adsorbed water and sulfate moieties on the zirconium clusters. When a water molecule adsorbs to one zirconium atom, it participates in a hydrogen bond with a sulfate moiety that is chelated to a neighbouring zirconium atom; this motif, in turn, results in the presence of a strongly acidic proton. On dehydration, the material loses its acidity. The hydrated sulfated MOF exhibits a good catalytic performance for the dimerization of isobutene (2-methyl-1-propene), and achieves a 100% selectivity for C8 products with a good conversion efficiency.

Fig. 1: MOF-808, MOF-808-SO4 and visualization of differences in molecular decoration.
Fig. 2: Structural characterization of MOF-808-SO4 by a Rietveld refinement of powder neutron data, and NMR evidence for the presence of water being central to the strong acid site.
Fig. 3: Depiction of the zirconium cluster and Brønsted acid site in MOF-808-SO4 as determined by DFT geometry optimization.
Fig. 4: Identification of the resonances attributable to adsorbed water using 1H solid-state NMR, comparing MOF-808-SO4 before and after dehydration.
Fig. 5: Comparison of the catalytic conversion, selectivity and long-term stability of MOF-808-SO4 and dehydrated MOF-808-SO4 against benchmark catalysts.

Data availability

Synthetic and experimental procedures, as well as crystallographic, spectroscopic and computational data are provided in the Supplementary Information. Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this Article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, under deposition numbers CCDC 1871192 (MOF-808), 1871193 (MOF-808-SO4) and 1871194 (MOF-808-SeO4). Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via All other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information, or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Arata, K. Solid superacids. Adv. Catal. 37, 165 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ward, D. A. & Ko, E. I. One-step synthesis and characterization of zirconia–sulfate aerogels as solid superacids. J. Catal. 150, 18–33 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Haase, F. & Sauer, J. The surface structure of sulfated zirconia: periodic ab initio study of sulfuric acid adsorbed on ZrO2(101) and ZrO2(001). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 13503–13512 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bensitel, M., Saur, O., Lavalley, J. C. & Morrow, B. A. An infrared study of sulfated zirconia. Mater. Chem. Phys. 19, 147–156 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Clearfield, A., Serrette, G. P. D. & Khazi-Syed, A. H. Nature of hydrous zirconia and sulfated hydrous zirconia. Catal. Today 20, 295–312 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kustov, L. M., Kazansky, V. B., Figueras, F. & Tichit, D. Investigation of the acidic properties of ZrO2 modified by SO4 2− anions. J. Catal. 150, 143–149 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Adeeva, V. et al. Acid sites in sulfated and metal-promoted zirconium dioxide catalysts. J. Catal. 151, 364–372 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bolis, V., Magnacca, G., Cerrato, G. & Morterra, C. Microcalorimetric characterization of structural and chemical heterogeneity of superacid SO4/ZrO2 systems. Langmuir 13, 888–894 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hino, M., Kurashige, M., Matsuhashi, H. & Arata, K. The surface structure of sulfated zirconia: studies of XPS and thermal analysis. Thermochim. Acta 441, 35–41 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Arata, K. Organic syntheses catalyzed by superacidic metal oxides: sulfated zirconia and related compounds. Green Chem. 11, 1719–1728 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yadav, G. D. & Nair, J. J. Sulfated zirconia and its modified versions as promising catalysts for industrial processes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 33, 1–48 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jiang, J. et al. Superacidity in sulfated metal—organic framework-808. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12844–12847 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Furukawa, H. et al. Water adsorption in porous metal–organic frameworks and related materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4369–4381 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Goesten, M. G. et al. Sulfation of metal–organic frameworks: opportunities for acid catalysis and proton conductivity. J. Catal. 281, 177–187 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Osborn Popp, T. M. & Yaghi, O. M. Sequence-dependent materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 532–534 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cairns, A. B. & Goodwin, A. L. Structural disorder in molecular framework materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 4881–4893 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Furukawa, H., Müller, U. & Yaghi, O. M. 'Heterogeneity within order' in metal–organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3417–3430 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Trickett, C. A. et al. Definitive molecular level characterization of defects in UiO-66 crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 11162–11167 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Åberg, M. & Glaser, J. 17O and 1H NMR study of the tetranuclear hydroxo zirconium complex in aqueous solution. Inorg. Chim. Acta 206, 53–61 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Springborg, J. Hydroxo-bridged complexes of chromium (iii), cobalt (iii), rhodium (iii), and iridium (iii). Adv. Inorg. Chem. 32, 55–169 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hall, J. Lab Manual for Zumdahl/Zumdahl’s Chemistry 656 (Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, 2002).

  22. 22.

    Zheng, A., Zhang, H., Lu, X., Liu, S. B. & Deng, F. Theoretical predictions of 31P NMR chemical shift threshold of trimethylphosphine oxide absorbed on solid acid catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 4496–4505 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zheng, A. et al. 31P chemical shift of adsorbed trialkylphosphine oxides for acidity characterization of solid acids catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. 112, 7349–7356 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zheng, A., Huang, S. J., Liu, S. B. & Deng, F. Acid properties of solid acid catalysts characterized by solid-state 31P NMR of adsorbed phosphorous probe molecules. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 14889 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chen, W. H. et al. A solid-state NMR, FT-IR and TPD study on acid properties of sulfated and metal-promoted zirconia: influence of promoter and sulfation treatment. Catal. Today 116, 111–120 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lunsford, J. H., Sang, H., Campbell, S. M., Liang, C. H. & Anthony, R. G. An NMR study of acid sites on sulfated-zirconia catalysts using trimethylphosphine as a probe. Catal. Lett. 27, 305–314 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gottwald, J., Demco, D. E., Graf, R. & Spiess, H. W. High-resolution double-quantum NMR spectroscopy of homonuclear spin pairs and proton connectivities in solids. Chem. Phys. Lett. 243, 314–323 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schnell, I., Brown, S. P., Low, H. Y., Ishida, H. & Spiess, H. W. An investigation of hydrogen bonding in benzoxazine dimers by fast magic-angle spinning and double-quantum 1H NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 11784–11795 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mahdi, H. I. & Muraza, O. Conversion of isobutylene to octane-booster compounds after methyl tert-butyl ether phaseout: the role of heterogeneous catalysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55, 11193–11210 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Takahashi, K., Yamashita, M. & Nozaki, K. Tandem hydroformylation/hydrogenation of alkenes to normal alcohols using Rh/Ru dual catalyst or Ru single component catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18746–18757 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Behr, A. Ullman’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 223–269 (Wiley, Hoboken, 2010).

  32. 32.

    Izquierdo, J. F., Vila, M., Tejero, J., Cunill, F. & Iborra, M. Kinetic study of isobutene dimerization catalyzed by a macroporous sulphonic acid resin. Appl. Catal. A 106, 155–165 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kamath, R. S., Qi, Z., Sundmacher, K., Aghalayam, P. & Mahajani, S. M. Process analysis for dimerization of isobutene by reactive distillation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 1575–1582 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Song, X. & Sayari, A. Sulfated zirconia-based strong solid-acid catalysts: recent progress. Cat. Rev. 38, 329–412 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Himmel, D., Goll, S. K., Leito, I. & Krossing, I. A unified pH scale for all phases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6885–6888 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Viggiano, A. A., Henchman, M. J., Dale, F., Deakyne, C. A. & Paulson, J. F. Gas-phase reactions of weak Brønsted bases I, PO3 , HSO4 , FSO3 , and CF3SO3 with strong Brønsted acids H2SO4, FSO3H, and CF3SO3H, a quantitative intrinsic superacidity scale for the sulfonic acids XSO3H (X = HO, F, and CF3). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 4299–4306 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work, including the synthesis, characterization and crystal structure analysis, was funded by BASF SE and the US Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA 1-12-1-0053). Work performed at the Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy under Contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. A portion of this research used resources at the Spallation Neutron Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. NMR work was supported as part of the Center for Gas Separations Relevant to Clean Energy Technologies, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences under Award no. DE-SC0001015. T.M.O.P. acknowledges funding from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program. C.Y. acknowledges support from a Hewlett-Packard Stanford Graduate Fellowship. P.U. acknowledges the German Research Foundation (DFG, PU 286/1-1). M.J.K. is grateful for financial support through the German Research Foundation (DFG, KA 4484/1-1). We acknowledge B. Rungtaweevoranit for his assistance with electron microscopy, and S. Teat and L. McCormick for the synchrotron X-ray diffraction data acquisition support at beamline 11.3.1 of the Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Author information




C.A.T. and T.M.O.P. co-wrote the manuscript. C.A.T. performed the PND modelling, single-crystal X-ray diffraction and PXRD experiments. T.M.O.P. performed the solid-state NMR experiments and NMR DFT calculations, with support and advice from J.A.R. J.S., Q.L. and J.B. performed the dimerization catalysis experiments with the support and advice of G.S. C.Y. performed the infrared experiments. J.W. performed the DFT calculations on the cluster models, with support and advice from M.P.H.-G. A.H. performed the PND experiments. P.U. performed the PXRD Rietveld refinements. M.J.K. helped with the thermogravimetric analysis experiments. J.J. supported and advised the synthesis. O.M.Y. supervised the project. All the authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and contributed to useful discussions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar M. Yaghi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Synthetic and experimental procedures; Crystallographic, spectroscopic and computational data; Supplementary Figures 1–30; Supplementary Tables 1–7; Supplementary References 1–14

Crystallographic data

CIF for MOF-808; CCDC reference: 1871192

Crystallographic data

Structure-factor file for MOF-808; CCDC: reference 1871192

Crystallographic data

CIF for MOF-808-SO4; CCDC reference: 1871193

Crystallographic data

Structure-factor file for MOF-808-SO4; CCDC reference: 1871193

Crystallographic data

CIF for MOF-808-SeO4; CCDC reference: 1871194

Crystallographic data

Structure-factor file for MOF-808-SeO4; CCDC reference: 1871194

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trickett, C.A., Osborn Popp, T.M., Su, J. et al. Identification of the strong Brønsted acid site in a metal–organic framework solid acid catalyst. Nature Chem 11, 170–176 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing