Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Filamentary structures as the origin of blazar jet radio variability

Nature Astronomy volume 7, pages 1359–1367 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Supermassive black holes at the centre of active galactic nuclei power some of the most luminous objects in the Universe. Typically, very-long-baseline interferometric observations of blazars have revealed only funnel-like morphologies with little information on the internal structure of the ejected plasma or have lacked the dynamic range to reconstruct the extended jet emission. Here we present microarcsecond-scale angular resolution images of the blazar 3C 279 obtained at 22 GHz with the space very-long-baseline interferometry mission RadioAstron, which allowed us to resolve the jet transversely and reveal several filaments produced by plasma instabilities in a kinetically dominated flow. The polarimetric properties derived from our high-angular-resolution and broad-dynamic-range images are consistent with the presence of a helical magnetic field threaded to the jet. We infer a clockwise rotation as seen in the direction of flow motion with an intrinsic helix pitch angle of ~45° and a Lorentz factor of ~13 at the time of observation. We also propose a model to explain blazar jet radio variability in which emission features travelling down the jet may manifest as a result of differential Doppler boosting within the filaments, as opposed to the standard shock-in-jet model. Characterizing such variability is particularly important given the relevance of blazar physics from cosmic particle acceleration to standard candles in cosmology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The filamentary structure of the jet in 3C 279 revealed by RadioAstron.
Fig. 2: Analysis of the recovered filamentary structure.
Fig. 3: The proposed model for the internal jet structure in 3C 279.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The pre-processed dataset used for imaging is available via Github at https://github.com/aefez/radioastron-3c279-2014.

Code availability

The software packages used to calibrate, image and analyse the data are available at the following websites: AIPS, http://www.aips.nrao.edu/index.shtml; ParselTongue (https://www.jive.eu/jivewiki/doku.php?id=parseltongue:parseltongue), DIFMAP (https://science.nrao.edu/facilities/vlba/docs/manuals/oss2013a/post-processing-software/difmap), SMILI (https://github.com/astrosmili/smili), eht-imaging (https://github.com/achael/eht-imaging) and lmfit (https://lmfit.github.io/lmfit-py/).

References

  1. Kardashev, N. S. et al. ‘RadioAstron’—a telescope with a size of 300 000 km: main parameters and first observational results. Astron. Rep. 57, 153–194 (2013).

  2. Kim, J.-Y. et al. Event Horizon Telescope imaging of the archetypal blazar 3C 279 at an extreme 20 microarcsecond resolution. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A69 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kovalev, Y. et al. Detection statistics of the RadioAstron AGN survey. Adv. Space Res. 65, 705–711 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chael, A. A. et al. High-resolution linear polarimetric imaging for the Event Horizon Telescope. Astrophys. J. 829, 11 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chael, A. A. et al. Interferometric imaging directly with closure phases and closure amplitudes. Astrophys. J. 857, 23 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. IV. Imaging the central supermassive black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L4 (2019).

  7. Jorstad, S. G. et al. Polarimetric observations of 15 active galactic nuclei at high frequencies: jet kinematics from bimonthly monitoring with the Very Long Baseline Array. Astron. J. 130, 1418–1465 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lister, M. L. et al. MOJAVE: monitoring of jets in active galactic nuclei with VLBA experiments. V. Multi-epoch VLBA images. Astron. J. 137, 3718–3729 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. II. Array and instrumentation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L2 (2019).

  10. Pushkarev, A. B. et al. MOJAVE: monitoring of jets in active galactic nuclei with VLBA experiments. IX. Nuclear opacity. Astron. Astrophys. 545, A113 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jorstad, S. G. et al. Kinematics of parsec-scale jets of gamma-ray blazars at 43 GHz within the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR program. Astrophys. J. 846, 98 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bloom, S. D., Fromm, C. M. & Ros, E. The accelerating jet of 3C 279. Astron. J. 145, 12 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weaver, Z. R. et al. Kinematics of parsec-scale jets of gamma-ray blazars at 43 GHz during 10 yr of the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR program. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 260, 12 (2022).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marscher, A. P. & Gear, W. K. Models for high-frequency radio outbursts in extragalactic sources, with application to the early 1983 millimeter-to-infrared flare of 3C 273. Astrophys. J. 298, 114–127 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardee, P. E. On three-dimensional structures in relativistic hydrodynamic jets. Astrophys. J. 533, 176–193 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vega-García, L., Perucho, M. & Lobanov, A. P. Derivation of the physical parameters of the jet in S5 0836+710 from stability analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 627, A79 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayashida, M. et al. Rapid variability of blazar 3C 279 during flaring states in 2013-2014 with joint Fermi-LAT, NuSTAR, Swift, and ground-based multiwavelength observations. Astrophys. J. 807, 79 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raiteri, C. M. et al. Blazar spectral variability as explained by a twisted inhomogeneous jet. Nature 552, 374–377 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shukla, A. & Mannheim, K. Gamma-ray flares from relativistic magnetic reconnection in the jet of the quasar 3C 279. Nat. Commun. 11, 4176 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gabuzda, D. C., Murray, É. & Cronin, P. Helical magnetic fields associated with the relativistic jets of four BL Lac objects. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 351, L89–L93 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Broderick, A. E. & McKinney, J. C. Parsec-scale Faraday rotation measures from general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of active galactic nucleus jets. Astrophys. J. 725, 750–773 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pasetto, A. et al. Reading M87’s dna: a double helix revealing a large-scale helical magnetic field. Astrophys. J. Lett. 923, L5 (2021).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aloy, M.-A., Gómez, J.-L., Ibáñez, J.-M., Martí, J.-M. & Müller, E. Radio emission from three-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamic jets: observational evidence of jet stratification. Astrophys. J. Lett. 528, L85–L88 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuentes, A., Gómez, J. L., Martí, J. M. & Perucho, M. Total and linearly polarized synchrotron emission from overpressured magnetized relativistic jets. Astrophys. J. 860, 121 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moya-Torregrosa, I., Fuentes, A., Martí, J. M., Gómez, J. L. & Perucho, M. Magnetized relativistic jets and helical magnetic fields. I. Dynamics. Astron. Astrophys. 650, A60 (2021).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuentes, A., Torregrosa, I., Martí, J. M., Gómez, J. L. & Perucho, M. Magnetized relativistic jets and helical magnetic fields. II. Radiation. Astron. Astrophys. 650, A61 (2021).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lobanov, A. P. & Zensus, J. A. A cosmic double helix in the archetypical quasar 3C273. Science 294, 128–131 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Perucho, M., Kovalev, Y. Y., Lobanov, A. P., Hardee, P. E. & Agudo, I. Anatomy of helical extragalactic jets: the case of S5 0836+710. Astrophys. J. 749, 55 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruni, G. et al. RadioAstron reveals a spine-sheath jet structure in 3C 273. Astron. Astrophys. 654, A27 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gómez, J. L. et al. Probing the innermost regions of AGN Jets and their magnetic fields with RadioAstron. V. Space and ground millimeter-VLBI imaging of OJ 287. Astrophys. J. 924, 122 (2022).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bruni, G. et al. The RadioAstron dedicated DiFX dstribution. Galaxies 4, 55 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Greisen, E. W. in Information Handling in Astronomy—Historical Vistas Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 285 (ed. Heck, A.) 109–125 (Springer, 2003).

  33. Kettenis, M., van Langevelde, H. J., Reynolds, C. & Cotton, B. ParselTongue: AIPS talking Python. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV Conference Series Vol. 351 (eds Gabriel, C. et al.) 497–500 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2006).

  34. Akiyama, K. et al. Superresolution full-polarimetric imaging for radio interferometry with sparse modeling. Astron. J. 153, 159 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Akiyama, K. et al. Imaging the Schwarzschild-radius-scale structure of M87 with the Event Horizon Telescope using sparse modeling. Astrophys. J. 838, 1 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cho, I. et al. A comparative study of amplitude calibrations for the East Asia VLBI Network: a priori and template spectrum methods. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 69, 87 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Narayan, R. & Nityananda, R. Maximum entropy image restoration in astronomy. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 24, 127–170 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Högbom, J. A. Aperture synthesis with a non-regular distribution of interferometer baselines. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 15, 417–426 (1974).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shepherd, M. C. Difmap: an interactive program for synthesis imaging. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VI Conference Series Vol. 125 (eds Hunt, G. & Payne, H.) 77–84 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1997).

  40. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results. III. Imaging of the galactic center supermassive black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L14 (2022).

  41. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. VII. Polarization of the ring. Astrophys. J. Lett. 910, L12 (2021).

  42. Holdaway, M. A. & Wardle, J. F. C. Maximum entropy imaging of polarization in very long baseline interferometry. In Digital Image Synthesis and Inverse Optics Conference Series Vol. 1351 (eds Gmitro, A. F. et al.) 714–724 (SPIE, 1990).

  43. Hovatta, T. et al. MOJAVE: monitoring of jets in active galactic nuclei with VLBA experiments. VIII. Faraday rotation in parsec-scale AGN jets. Astron. J. 144, 105 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Park, J. et al. Revealing the nature of blazar radio cores through multifrequency polarization observations with the Korean VLBI Network. Astrophys. J. 860, 112 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Newville, M. et al. lmfit/lmfit-py: 1.0.3. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5570790 (2021).

  46. Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Calvani, M. & Moles, M. Comparative analysis of the high- and low-ionization lines in the broad-line region of active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 104, 37–70 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Planck Collaboration et al. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).

  48. Nilsson, K., Pursimo, T., Villforth, C., Lindfors, E. & Takalo, L. O. The host galaxy of 3C 279. Astron. Astrophys. 505, 601–604 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bardeen, J. M. & Petterson, J. A. The lense-thirring effect and accretion disks around Kerr black holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 195, L65–L67 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Morgan, C. W., Kochanek, C. S., Morgan, N. D. & Falco, E. E. The quasar accretion disk size-black hole mass relation. Astrophys. J. 712, 1129–1136 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Mizuno, Y., Lyubarsky, Y., Nishikawa, K.-I. & Hardee, P. E. Three-dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of current-driven instability. III. Rotating relativistic jets. Astrophys. J. 757, 16 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Perucho, M. Dissipative processes and their role in the evolution of radio galaxies. Galaxies 7, 70 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hardee, P. E. Spatial stability of jets: the nonaxisymmetric fundamental and reflection modes. Astrophys. J. 313, 607 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rybicki, G. B. & Lightman, A. P. Radiative Processes in Astrophysics (Wiley, 1979).

  55. Lyutikov, M., Pariev, V. I. & Gabuzda, D. C. Polarization and structure of relativistic parsec-scale AGN jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 360, 869–891 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Hermosa for useful comments on the manuscript. The work at the IAA-CSIC was supported in part by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (grant numbers AYA2016-80889-P and PID2019-108995GB-C21), the Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad of the Junta de Andalucía (grant number P18-FR-1769), the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (grant number 2019AEP112), the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the ‘Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa’ award to the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (grant number SEV-2017-0709) and grant number CEX2021-001131-S funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. J.M.M. and M.P. acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia through grant number PID2019-107427GB-C33 and from the Generalitat Valenciana through grant number PROMETEU/2019/071. J.M.M. acknowledges additional support from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad through grant number PGC2018-095984-B-l00. M.P. acknowledges additional support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia through grant number PID2019-105510GB-C31. Y.Y.K. was supported by Russian Science Foundation grant number 21-12-00241. A.C. is an Einstein Fellow of the NASA Hubble Fellowship Program (grant number HST-HF2-51431.001-A), awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract number NAS5-26555. J.-Y.K. was supported in this research by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) under a grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT; grant number 2022R1C1C1005255). Y.M. acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 12273022) and the Shanghai pilot programme of international scientist for basic research (grant number 22JC1410600). T.S. was supported by the Academy of Finland projects 274477, 284495, 312496 and 315721. The RadioAstron project is led by the Astro Space Center of the Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Lavochkin Scientific and Production Association under a contract with the Russian Federal Space Agency, in collaboration with partner organizations in Russia and other countries. The European VLBI Network is a joint facility of independent European, African, Asian, and North American radio astronomy institutes. Scientific results from data presented in this publication are derived from the EVN project code GA030D. This research is partly based on observations with the 100 m telescope of the MPIfR at Effelsberg. This publication makes use of data obtained at Metsähovi Radio Observatory, operated by Aalto University in Finland. Our special thanks go to the people supporting the observations at the telescopes during the data collection. This research is based on observations correlated at the Bonn Correlator, jointly operated by the Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, and the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy. This study makes use of 43 GHz VLBA data from the VLBA-BU Blazar Monitoring Program (VLBA-BU-BLAZAR; http://www.bu.edu/blazars/BEAM-ME.html), funded by NASA through Fermi Guest Investigator grant number 80NSSC20K1567.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Granada, Spain

    Antonio Fuentes, José L. Gómez, Guang-Yao Zhao, Rocco Lico, Ilje Cho, Efthalia Traianou, Teresa Toscano, Rohan Dahale & Marianna Foschi

  2. Departament d’Astronomia i Astrofísica, Universitat de València, Burjassot, Spain

    José M. Martí & Manel Perucho

  3. Observatori Astronòmic, Universitat de València, Paterna, Spain

    José M. Martí & Manel Perucho

  4. Istituto di Radioastronomia, INAF, Bologna, Italy

    Rocco Lico

  5. Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany

    Andrei P. Lobanov, Yuri Y. Kovalev, Jae-Young Kim, Eduardo Ros & Tuomas Savolainen

  6. Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, INAF, Rome, Italy

    Gabriele Bruni

  7. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    Yuri Y. Kovalev

  8. Princeton Gravity Initiative, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

    Andrew Chael

  9. Haystack Observatory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Westford, MA, USA

    Kazunori Akiyama

  10. National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Japan

    Kazunori Akiyama

  11. Black Hole Initiative at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Kazunori Akiyama

  12. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Katherine L. Bouman & He Sun

  13. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, India

    Rohan Dahale

  14. Joint Institute for VLBI ERIC (JIVE), Dwingeloo, The Netherlands

    Leonid I. Gurvits

  15. Aerospace Faculty, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Leonid I. Gurvits

  16. Institute for Astrophysical Research, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

    Svetlana Jorstad & Alan P. Marscher

  17. Astronomical Institute, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Svetlana Jorstad

  18. Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea

    Jae-Young Kim

  19. Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

    Jae-Young Kim

  20. Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Yosuke Mizuno

  21. School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Yosuke Mizuno

  22. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Goethe-Universit ät Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Yosuke Mizuno

  23. Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland

    Tuomas Savolainen

  24. Metsähovi Radio Observatory, Aalto University, Kylmälä, Finland

    Tuomas Savolainen

Authors
  1. Antonio Fuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José L. Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José M. Martí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manel Perucho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guang-Yao Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rocco Lico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrei P. Lobanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gabriele Bruni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuri Y. Kovalev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Andrew Chael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kazunori Akiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Katherine L. Bouman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. He Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ilje Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Efthalia Traianou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Teresa Toscano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Rohan Dahale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Marianna Foschi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Leonid I. Gurvits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Svetlana Jorstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Jae-Young Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Alan P. Marscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Yosuke Mizuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Eduardo Ros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Tuomas Savolainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.F., J.L.G. and G.Y.-Z. worked on the data calibration. A.F., J.L.G., G.Y.-Z., R.L., A.C., K.A., K.L.B, H.S., I.C. and E.T. worked on the image reconstruction and analysis. G.B. correlated the space VLBI data. J.M.M., M.P., A.F., J.L.G. and Y.M worked on the interpretation of the results. All authors contributed to the discussion of the results presented and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Antonio Fuentes or José L. Gómez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Baseline coverage for our RadioAstron observations of 3C 279 in March 2014.

Rainbow-coloured and grey points indicate individual ground-ground baselines and space-ground baselines, respectively. Dashed circles indicate the baseline length in Earth’s diameter units (D⊕) and the corresponding angular resolution.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Fitting of the polarimetric RadioAstron image to a selection of data products.

Two minute time-averaged data (black points) and image model (red points) self-calibrated visibility amplitudes and phases, closure phases, log closure amplitudes, and polarimetric visibility phases as a function of time. Error bars indicate ± 1σ uncertainty from thermal noise plus 1.5 % non-closing error uncertainties added in quadrature. All these examples include RadioAstron measurements.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Top 48 image reconstructions from the parameter survey conducted.

Each image includes the closure phase (cp) and log closure amplitude (lca) reduced χ2, the image regularizers used and their weight, and the total flux reconstructed.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Synthetic data tests.

In the top row we present the geometric models used to generate the synthetic data. In the middle and bottom rows we show, respectively, the images reconstructed from each data set when RadioAstron is included in the array and when only ground stations participate.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuentes, A., Gómez, J.L., Martí, J.M. et al. Filamentary structures as the origin of blazar jet radio variability. Nat Astron 7, 1359–1367 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02105-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02105-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing