Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Geomorphic contexts and science focus of the Zhurong landing site on Mars


As part of the Tianwen-1 mission, the Zhurong rover successfully touched down in southern Utopia Planitia on 15 May 2021. On the basis of the new sub-metre-resolution images from the High Resolution Imaging Camera on board the Tianwen-1 orbiter, we determined that the Zhurong rover landed at 109.925° E, 25.066° N at an elevation of −4,099.4 m. The landing site is near the highland–lowland boundary1 and multiple suspected shorelines2,3,4,5,6,7. Under the guidance of the remote sensing survey, the Zhurong rover is travelling south for specific in situ investigation. Supported by the six payloads on board the rover8, its initial key targets are rocks, rocky fields, transverse aeolian ridges and subsurface structures along the path. Extended investigation will aim at troughs and cones in the distance. A better understanding of the formation mechanisms of these targets may shed light on the historical volcanism and water/ice activities within the landing area, as well as the activities of the wind. These results may reveal the characteristics and evolution of the ancient Martian environment and advance the exploration of the habitability of ancient Mars.


Tianwen-1, China’s Mars exploration mission, aims to complete orbiting, landing and roving in a single mission. The selection of the landing site is required to satisfy both engineering safety and scientific interest. Therefore, before Tianwen-1 was launched, two wide-range preselected landing areas with significant research value were preliminarily chosen with consideration of the engineering constraints9,10 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Within these two preselected areas, detailed evaluation of local elevation, slope, rock distribution, thermal environment and the ability to communicate with Earth was further performed. Two 150 × 60 km2 areas in the southern Utopia Planitia and the western Elysium Mons were then determined as the primary and alternative candidate landing areas (red and green rectangles in Supplementary Fig. 2a). The primary candidate landing area is near the highland–lowland boundary (HLB) and multiple suspected shorelines (see details in Supplementary Information). Evidence of the potential ancient ocean and the historical geologic activities may be revealed by the in situ investigation of the Zhurong rover.

Before the Zhurong rover landed on Mars, the Tianwen-1 orbiter spent about three months conducting a detailed remote sensing survey on the primary candidate landing area via the High Resolution Imaging Camera (HiRIC). The spatial resolution of the images taken from the altitude of 350 km is about 70 cm. The digital orthophoto map (DOM) and digital elevation model (DEM) of the entire area were obtained from the forward and backward stereo images from different orbits (Methods). On the basis of these data, the candidate landing area was further reduced to a safety ellipse of 56 × 22 km2 with an inclination of 1.35° (Fig. 1a). At 7:18 (Coordinated Universal Time + 8) on 15 May 2021, the Zhurong rover successfully landed in this area and captured panorama images around the landing site using the onboard Navigation and Terrain Cameras (NaTeCams) (Fig. 1b). Using images acquired by HiRIC on 2 June, the landing site was eventually positioned at 109.925° E, 25.066° N at an elevation of −4,099.4 m (Fig. 1c, Methods).

Fig. 1: The primary candidate landing area, location of landing site and panorama around the landing site.
figure 1

a, DEM (3.5 m per pixel) of the landing area derived from HiRIC stereo images. The landing ellipse is marked in red, and is 56 × 22 km2 with an inclination of 1.35°. The red cross indicates the landing site. White boxes are the locations of the landforms in Fig. 2. b, The first panorama image around the landing site taken by the NaTeCams on board the Zhurong rover. c, View of the Zhurong rover, lander, heat shield and parachute on the HiRIC image acquired on 2 June 2021. Credit: CNSA/GRAS.

Source data

To assist in the exploration of the Zhurong rover, the geomorphic and geological contexts within the 150 × 60 km2 landing area were analysed from the HiRIC-derived DOM and DEM. At least five geomorphic features within the landing area are identified (Fig. 2, Fig. 3g and Supplementary Fig. 3a).

  1. 1.

    Rampart craters. Two distinct rampart craters appear at the north and south ends of the landing area (Fig. 1a). Figure 2a shows the northern rampart impact crater with a diameter of ~ 9 km and a depth of ~1.2 km. The overall ejecta flow morphologies of rampart craters have always been considered as evidence for high abundance of volatiles (ice/water) in the target materials11,12.

  2. 2.

    Cones. Cones are one of the most significant and controversial landforms in Utopia Planitia. Both isolated cones and clusters are found in the landing area (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 4). The cones in this specific region have been mostly interpreted as cinder cones13, mud volcanoes14 or pingos15. However, the interpretation of the well defined cones in the landing area is inconclusive.

  3. 3.

    Ridges. The ridges distributed in the landing area range from approximately 0.59 to 12.6 km in length. Figure 2c shows one of the ridges ~42.7 km southeast of the landing site. In Utopia Planitia, the ridge-like features are probably attributable to tectonism16 and volcanism13.

  4. 4.

    Troughs. Several troughs appear in the landing area, ranging from 1.2 to 10 km in length and from 1 to 20 m in depth. Two of them are shown in Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 3e. Troughs may be associated with polygonal terrains elsewhere in Utopia Planitia17,18, but this association is not clear for the cases in the landing area. Moreover, troughs are often modified by aeolian deposits19.

  5. 5.

    Transverse aeolian ridges (TARs). High-albedo TARs are common within the landing area, especially in some troughs and craters (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 3a). Most TARs in the landing area run roughly in the east–west direction, indicating that the local wind was dominant in the north–south direction in the past. Their distribution, morphological characteristics, sediment composition and formation processes are indicators of the local ancient wind field and palaeoenvironment20,21,22.

Fig. 2: HiRIC-derived DOM and DEM of the geomorphic features in the 150 × 60 km2 landing area.
figure 2

a, A rampart crater with a diameter of ~9 km and a depth of ~1.2 km, which is located ~66 km northeast of the landing site. b, An isolated cone with a height of 50 m appears ~6.4 km northwest of the landing site. The diameters of its central pit and base are ~450 m and ~1,100 m, respectively. The flank slope is about 8°. c, A ridge located ~42.7 km southeast of the landing site. It is ~3.3 km long and about 4–10 m in height. d, A trough in the landing area ~57 km northeast of the landing site, which is about 5.2 km long, approximately 200–661 m wide and 2–20 m deep. Credit: CNSA/GRAS.

Source data

Fig. 3: Contexts and investigation targets around the Zhurong landing site.
figure 3

a, The topography and major geological features around the landing site (35 × 38 km2). The red cross indicates the Zhurong landing site. Green solid lines represent the troughs. Cones are outlined with black lines. White boxes mark the positions of c and Supplementary Fig. 4. b, North–south topographic profile across the Zhurong landing site (dashed grey line B–B′ in a). c, An accessible investigation region (2.3 × 3.5 km2). The position of d is marked with a white dashed box. The white curve represents the route that the rover has travelled. Yellow arrows denote subsequent travelling directions and five detection targets. d, A detailed view of the current travelling route of the rover; the coloured points represent the locations where images eh were taken. e,g, Panoramas taken by the NaTeCams showing the rocky field and a barchan-like TAR. f,h, The rock images collected by the MSCam (R 650 nm, G 525 nm, B 480 nm); the exposed rock surfaces may be modified by wind erosion. Note that the red crosses on the images represent the detection positions of MarSCoDe; the targets are the rock surfaces with less dust coverage. Credit: CNSA/GRAS.

Source data

These landforms identified by the HiRIC images reflect the abundance and complexity of the geological activities in the landing area, probably involving historical volcanism and tectonism, water/ice activities, wind action and so on. Table 1 summarizes the possible geological factors and materials that could explain the formation of the landforms in the landing area. Such large-scale remote sensing surveys outline the fundamental geological settings of the landing area, strongly supporting the subsequent scientific exploration of the Zhurong rover. Since some landforms have multiple plausible origins and cannot be distinguished by remote sensing detections, in situ investigations using the Zhurong rover are indispensable to obtain additional diagnostic information.

Table 1 Possible geological factors and materials that could explain the landform formations in the landing area (H represents high correlation, L represents low correlation)

To conduct detailed investigations of the landing area, the Zhurong rover is equipped with six payloads8, including the Mars Rover Penetrating Radar (RoPeR), Mars Rover Magnetometers (RoMAG), Mars Surface Composition Detector (MarSCoDe), Multispectral Camera (MSCam), NaTeCams and Mars Climate Station (MCS). The RoPeR consists of two channels. The low-frequency channel will provide a penetration depth of 10–100 m with a resolution of a few metres within the Martian soil. The higher-frequency channel is HH, HV, VH, VV polarization and will penetrate to a depth of 3–10 m with a resolution of a few centimetres within the Martian soil. The RoPeR will investigate the subsurface structures and even clues to underground water/ice distribution along the roving path23. The RoMAG will implement mobile magnetic field measurements on the surface of Mars24. Two identical triaxial fluxgate magnetometer sensors are respectively mounted at the top and bottom of the rover mast (67.5 cm apart). Each magnetometer measures the vector magnetic field with a resolution of 0.01 nT in the range of ±65,000 nT. Mobile magnetic field measurements on the Martian surface would obtain the fine-scale crust field and provide information about its remanent magnetization and any possible intrinsic magnetic field. The MarSCoDe uses laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy to vaporize rock specimens on the surface with a stand-off distance of 1.6–7 m, revealing their compositions25,26. Moreover, the near-infrared spectroscopy at 850–2,400 nm can conduct reflectance spectrum analysis of Martian soils and rocks, and a telescopic microimager can capture high-resolution images of research targets at different distances. The MSCam, with eight narrow bands and a band for solar imaging, will provide detailed information on the geological context, material composition and surface texture8. The NaTeCams are binocular stereo cameras with 270 mm stereo baseline, 13.1 mm focal length, 2,048 × 2,048 pixels and 46.5° × 46.5° field of view27. The MCS will measure the temperature, pressure, wind speed, wind direction and sound on the Martian surface28.

After the successful landing in southern Utopia Planitia, the six payloads on board the Zhurong rover have been switched on and tested. Under the guidance of the remote sensing survey, the Zhurong rover is travelling south for specific in situ investigations, gradually approaching the direction of the HLB and the suspected shorelines. The Zhurong rover may find out if there are any traces of ancient oceans. For example, (1) the low dielectric constant compared with that of the typical volcanic materials may indicate low-density sedimentary deposits, massive deposits of ground ice or a combination of the two29; (2) hydrated minerals, water-related sedimentary rocks and textures, and alteration minerals may reveal early water activities5; (3) some of the anomalous chemistry (such as unusual abundances of S and Cl and their possible presence as sulfate minerals and chloride salts) may be related to the presence of former standing bodies of water30. Currently, the rover travels about 20–30 m per sol and had travelled about 700 m by the end of July 2021. Given the capacity and good condition of the rover, an accessible region was selected as the investigation region for the nominal and short-term extended mission phases, which is shown in Fig. 3c.

The major detection targets of the Zhurong rover are the rocks along the path (Fig. 3f,h). The onboard NaTeCams will preliminarily investigate the terrains around the rover and determine the locations and shapes of the target rocks. The rocks excavated by small impacts or covered in less dust will be the preferred targets. Then the powerful tools MSCam and MarSCoDe will be employed to identify the compositions and physical properties of the rocks. The fine-scale structures, particle sizes and alteration minerals will restrict the geological background of the landing area and may provide indirect evidence of the ancient ocean. Furthermore, the degree and characteristics of wind erosion on the rock surface are helpful to study the paleoenvironment around the landing area.

In the nominal mission phase, some intriguing features in the investigation region will also be targets, such as TARs and rocky fields (regions 1, 2 and 3 in Fig. 3c). The rover has encountered a barchan-like TAR ~200 m southwest of the landing site, with a height of ~0.6 m, ~50 m in length and ~8 m in width (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Fig. 3a). The NaTeCams on board the rover will obtain its three-dimensional geomorphology, while MSCam and MarSCoDe will reveal the composition and particle size sorting of the sand. The MSC will further help monitor the current wind field nearby. This information is of great significance to establish the basic development model of Martian sand dunes. Two wide rocky fields showing rough textures with different albedo are present in the high-resolution images, located ~624 m and ~1,014 m from the landing site, respectively (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 3b,c). Unlike nearby smooth terrains, there are many rock fragments exposed here. The difference in the subsurface structures and underground rock distribution between the rocky fields and smooth terrains will be revealed by the RoPeR.

Subsequently, the Zhurong rover will enter the extended mission phase. The short-term targets in this phase are another narrow rocky field and a trough with the maximum depth of ~10 m, which are located ~1.8 km and ~2.7 km south of the landing site, respectively (regions 4 and 5 in Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 3d,e). In the longer term, we expect that the rover will travel further. From the DEM data, the elevation is constantly rising as the rover travels south. The height difference between the landing site and the highest point is ~60 m, and a scarp appears ~27 km away from the landing site. Many cone features are distributed near the scarp, especially clustered cones (Fig. 3a,b and Supplementary Fig. 4), indicating that this region may have been geologically active in the past. However, how the terrain formed remains unknown. Further research combining remote sensing data from the Tianwen-1 orbiter and in situ data from the Zhurong rover will address these questions. These results may reveal the characteristics and evolution of the ancient Martian environment and advance the exploration of the habitability of ancient Mars.


Landing area topography reconstruction and landing site positioning

Tianwen-1 successfully entered the parking orbit of Mars on 24 February 2021. Before the Zhurong rover landed on the Martian surface, the HiRIC on the orbiter imaged the primary candidate landing area 21 times (including 11 forward-view images and 10 backward-view images to construct stereoscopic images). Each image has a width of about 11 km and a length of 170 km in the north–south direction. These images realized multiview stereo coverage of the 150 × 60 km2 primary candidate landing area. On 2 June, to determine the accurate position of the Zhurong rover, HiRIC carried out a 10 s imaging with a width of about 11 km and a north–south length of about 43 km. The spatial resolution of the above images is about 0.6–1.2 m.

We produced a DOM with a spatial resolution of 0.7 m and a DEM with a spatial resolution of 3.5 m of the primary candidate landing area using these multiview stereo images by photogrammetric processing. The data processing flow is as follows.

  1. 1.

    The imaging geometric model of HiRIC (rational polynomial coefficients model) was constructed on the basis of its geometric calibration parameters and the orientation parameters of the Tianwen-1 orbiter, such as its position and attitude. Then the rigorous geometric relationship between the image points and their corresponding feature points on the Martian surface can be established.

  2. 2.

    Feature point matching of HiRIC images. Scale-invariant feature transform31 feature matching is used here to extract connection points between the forward-view and backward-view images in the same imaging area, and in the overlapping areas between adjacent imaging areas. The mismatches were eliminated by a more precise matching process, such as least squares matching.

  3. 3.

    The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) CTX (Context Camera) image32 with a spatial resolution of 6 m is used as the horizontal position control datum to extract dozens of control points between the forward-view and backward-view images. The elevation for these control points was adopted from the MRO Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) terrain data33 with a spatial resolution of 200 m, whose elevation accuracy is ±3 m.

  4. 4.

    HiRIC images were divided into blocks, and block adjustment was performed on the basis of the photogrammetric bundle adjustment technology34,35. The external orientation elements were optimized to realize the seamless mosaic and high-precision absolute positioning for the HiRIC images.

  5. 5.

    Optimized exterior orientation elements were used to establish the epipolar geometric constraint between the forward-view and backward-view images so that corresponding image points could be matched pixel by pixel. The three-dimensional coordinates of each corresponding point were calculated by the forward ray intersection. Then a regular grid of DEM data was produced using inverse distance weighting, with a spatial resolution of 3.5 m.

  6. 6.

    According to the strict geometric imaging model of HiRIC, the forward- and backward-view images were orthorectified using DEM data to produce DOM data, with a spatial resolution of 0.7 m.

According to the photogrammetric adjustment results, the s.d. of the horizontal position error of the preselected landing area topographic data produced by the HiRIC images is about 0.4 m, and the s.d. of the elevation error is about 1.0 m. Compared with MRO CTX image data, the horizontal position deviation (root mean squared) is 15 m, while the elevation deviation (root mean squared) is about 10 m compared with MRO MOLA data.

According to the orthophoto image from the HiRIC obtained on 2 June, the accurate horizontal position of the landing site was determined, and its elevation was measured on the DEM mentioned above. The determined landing site of Tianwen-1 is 109.925° E, 25.066° N, with an elevation of −4,099.4 m. The coordinate system used here takes the Mars centre of mass as the origin; the reference surface of the elevation is the surface of a spheroid with a radius of 3,396.19 km and the reference plane is the equatorial plane of Mars. Its X axis, Y axis and Z axis are parallel to the corresponding three axes of the Martian fixed coordinate system, which is based on the International Astronomical Union orientation parameter model36.

Data availability

The Tianwen-1 data used in this work is processed and produced by the Ground Research and Application System (GRAS) of China’s Lunar and Planetary Exploration Program, provided by China National Space Administration ( The data used in this manuscript are available at Datasets generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. Tanaka, K. L. et al. Geologic Map of Mars: Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3292 (USGS, 2014).

  2. Sholes, S. F., Dickeson, Z. I., Montgomery, D. R. & Catling, D. C. Where are Mars’ hypothesized ocean shorelines? Large lateral and topographic offsets between different versions of paleoshoreline maps. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 126, e2020JE006486 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ivanov, M. A., Hiesinger, H., Bernhardt, H., Reiss, D. & Reiss, D. Topography of the Deuteronilus contact on Mars: evidence for an ancient water/mud ocean and long-wavelength topographic readjustments. Planet. Space Sci. 144, 49–70 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perron, J. T., Mitrovica, J. X., Manga, M., Matsuyama, I. & Richards, M. A. Evidence for an ancient Martian ocean in the topography of deformed shorelines. Nature 447, 840–843 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carr, M. H. & Head, J. W. Oceans on Mars: an assessment of the observational evidence and possible fate. J. Geophys. Res. 108, E5 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clifford, S. & Parker, T. J. The evolution of the Martian hydrosphere: implications for the fate of a Primordial ocean and the current state of the Northern Plains. Icarus 154, 40–79 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker, T. J., Gorsline, D. S., Saunders, R. S., Pieri, D. C. & Schneeberger, D. M. Coastal geomorphology of the Martian northern plains. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 98, 11061–11078 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, C. et al. China’s Mars exploration mission and science investigation. Space Sci. Rev. 217, 57 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ye, P. J., Sun, Z. Z., Rao, W. & Meng, L. Z. Mission overview and key technologies of the first Mars probe of China. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 60, 649–657 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong, J. et al. Mission profile and design challenges of Mars landing exploration. Int. Archives Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLII-3/W1, 35–39 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mouginis-Mark, P. J. Morphology of Martian rampart craters. Nature 272, 691–694 (1978).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart S. T., O’Keefe J. D. & Ahrens T. J. The relationship between rampart crater morphologies and the amount of subsurface ice. In 32nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstr. no.2092 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2001).

  13. Lanz, J. K., Wagner, R., Wolf, U., Kröchert, J. & Neukum, G. Rift zone volcanism and associated cinder cone field in Utopia Planitia, Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 115, E12 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ivanov, M. A., Hiesinger, H., Erkeling, G. & Reiss, D. Mud volcanism and morphology of impact craters in Utopia Planitia on Mars: evidence for the ancient ocean. Icarus 228, 121–140 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pablo, M. A. & Komatsu, G. Possible pingo fields in the Utopia basin, Mars: geological and climatical implications. Icarus 199, 49–74 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomson, B. J. & Head, J. W. III Utopia Basin, Mars: characterization of topography and morphology and assessment of the origin and evolution of basin internal structure. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 106, 23209–23230 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Séjourné, A. et al. Scalloped depressions and small-sized polygons in western Utopia Planitia, Mars: a new formation hypothesis. Planet. Space Sci. 59, 412–422 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McGill, G. E. & Hills, L. S. Origin of giant Martian polygons. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 97, 2633–2647 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hiesinger, H. & Head, J. W. III Characteristics and origin of polygonal terrain in southern Utopia Planitia, Mars: results from Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter and Mars Orbiter Camera data. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 105, 11999–12022 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bourke, M. C., Wilson, S. A. & Zimbelman, J. R. The variability of TARs in troughs on Mars. In 34th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstr. no.1050 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2003).

  21. Berman, D. C., Balme, M. R., Rafkin, S. C. & Zimbelman, J. R. Transverse aeolian ridges (TARs) on Mars II: distributions, orientations, and ages. Icarus 213, 116–130 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Balme, M., Berman, D. C., Bourke, M. C. & Zimbelman, J. R. Transverse aeolian ridges (TARs) on Mars. Geomorphology 101, 703–720 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, B. et al. The Mars rover subsurface penetrating radar onboard China’s Mars 2020 mission. Earth Planet. Phys. 4, 345–354 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Du, A. M. et al. The Chinese Mars rover fluxgate magnetometers. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 135 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wan, X. et al. Design, function, and implementation of China’s first LIBS Instrument (MarSCoDe) on the Zhurong Mars Rover. At. Spectrosc. (2021).

  26. Xu, W. et al. The MarSCoDe instrument suite on the Mars rover of China’s Tianwen-1 mission. Space Sci. Rev. 217, 64 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liang, X. et al. The Navigation and Terrain Cameras on the Tianwen-1 Mars rover. Space Sci. Rev. 217, 37 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng, Y. Q. et al. Overview of the Mars Climate Station for Tianwen-1 mission. Earth Planet. Phys. 4, 371–383 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mouginot, J., Pommerol, A., Beck, P., Kofman, W. & Clifford, S. M. Dielectric map of the Martian northern hemisphere and the nature of plain filling materials. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L02202 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Head, J. W. et al. Possible ancient oceans on Mars: evidence from Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter data. Science 286, 2134–2137 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lowe, D. G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60, 91–110 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dickson, J. L. et al. The global CTX mosaic of Mars: lessons for the construction and dissemination of massive imaging data sets. In 51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstr. no.2309 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2020).

  33. Fergason, R. L., Hare, T. M., & Laura, J. Mars MGS MOLA–MEX HRSC Blended DEM Global 200m v2 Astrogeology PDS Annex (USGS, 2018);

  34. Wang, Z. Z. Principles of Photogrammetry [with Remote Sensing] (Press of Wuhan Technical Univ. Surveying and Mapping–Publishing House of Surveying and Mapping, 1990).

  35. Brown, D. C. A Solution to the General Problem of Multiple Station Analytical Stereo-Angulation Air Force Missile Test Center Report No. 58-8 (Patrick AFB, 1958).

  36. Seidelmann, P. K. et al. Report of the IAU/IAG Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites: 2000. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 82, 83–111 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, D. E. et al. Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter: experiment summary after the first year of global mapping of Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 23689–23722 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the China National Space Administration (CNSA). We thank the team members of the five systems of the Tianwen-1 mission: the probe system, the launch vehicle system, the launch site system, the Telemetry Track and Command System and the Ground Research and Application System. This research was also funded by the Key Research program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. ZDBS-SSW-TLC001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



C.L., R.Z., J.L. and Y.G. designed the research. J.L., C.L., H.H. and X.W. performed data analysis and made major contributions to writing the manuscript. W.R., X.C., Y.J., H.L., X.W., W.W., Q.F., Y.Z. and J.D. helped with spacecraft and instrument operations and acquired HiRIC and NaTeCam data. X.R., W.Y., X.Z., X.G., W.Z., Y.S., D.K. and H.Z. helped with data receiving, data processing and topography reconstruction.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunlai Li or Rongqiao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks Alfred McEwen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Two wide-range preselected landing areas of Tianwen-1 mission.

The preselected landing area 1 is located in the Chryse Planitia and the preselected landing area 2 is located partly in Isidis planitia and partly in Utopia Planitia (base map is MOLA DEM37, which is available at

Extended Data Fig. 2 The geological background of Zhurong landing area.

a, Red rectangle centred at 24.7° N, 110.3° E (150 × 60 km2) represents the primary landing area and green rectangle centered at 26.5° N, 131.6° E (150 × 60 km2) represents the alternative landing area. Zhurong rover finally landed in the primary landing area. The landing area is in the southern Utopia Planitia (yellow rectangle, 20°N-45°N, 100°E-120°E), which is near the HLB (yellow line1) and the multiple suspected shorelines (lines in black19, red20, pink21, cyan22 and brown23). The base map is MOLA DEM37. b, Geological map1 (adapted from Tanaka et al. 2014) of the landing area and surrounding area. All regions are consistent with Supplementary Fig. 2a. The landing area is within the lHl unit. c, Zoning map of the landforms around the landing area3 (adapted from Ivanov et al. 2014). The coverage area corresponds to the yellow rectangle in Supplementary Fig. 2a and 2b. The base map is Viking Global Mosaic, which is available at d, North–south topographic profile across the landing area in southern UP (X-X’ gray dashed line in Supplementary Fig. 2c). The landing area is located in the transition zone between Area A and Area B, with an elevation range from -3900 to 4150 m.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Views of the five detection targets.

a-e represent the five detection targets, respectively. The locations of these targets are marked in Fig. 3. The base map of a-d is HiRISE image ( The base map of e is HiRIC DEM.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Isolated and cluster of cones.

a, An isolated cone with a height of 80 m located ~16 km southeast of the landing site. The diameters of its central pit and basal are of 320 m and 800 m, respectively. b, A cluster of cones observed in the landing area, located ~24 km southeast of the landing site. The cluster contains 49 regular and irregular circle cones in a 19 km² region, with an average height of 70 m. The diameters of the central pits of these cones are range from 85 to 740 m.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–4 and Discussion.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Li, C., Zhang, R. et al. Geomorphic contexts and science focus of the Zhurong landing site on Mars. Nat Astron 6, 65–71 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing