The number of small satellites has grown hugely in the past decade, from tens of satellites per year in the mid-2010s to a projection of tens of thousands in orbit by the mid-2020s. This presents both problems and opportunities for observational astronomy. Small satellites offer complementary cost-effective capabilities to both ground-based astronomy and larger space missions. Compared with ground-based astronomy, these advantages are not just in the accessibility of wavelength ranges where the Earth’s atmosphere is opaque, but also in stable, high-precision photometry, long-term monitoring and improved areal coverage. Astronomy has a long history of new observational parameter spaces leading to major discoveries. Here we discuss the potential for small satellites to explore new parameter spaces in astrophysics, drawing on examples from current and proposed missions, and spanning a wide range of science goals from binary stars, exoplanets and Solar System science to the early Universe and fundamental physics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Experimental Astronomy Open Access 29 March 2022
Detection of surface defects and subsurface defects of polished optics with multisensor image fusion
PhotoniX Open Access 02 March 2022
Nature Open Access 17 November 2021
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Jones, H. W. The recent large reduction in space launch cost. In 48th Int. Conf. Environmental Systems, ICES-2018-81 (Texas Tech Univ., 2018)
Massey, R., Lucatello, S. & Benvenuti, P. The challenge of satellite megaconstellations. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01224-9 (2020).
Venkatesan, A., Lowenthal, J., Prem, P. & Vidaurri, M. The impact of satellite constellations on space as an ancestral global commons. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01238-3 (2020).
Tyson, J. A. et al. Mitigation of LEO satellite brightness and trail effects on the Rubin Observatory LSST. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12417 (2020).
Borncamp, F. & Lian Lim, P. Satellite detection in ACS/HST images. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVI, 491–494 (Conference series no. 521, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2019).
Cutri, R. M. et al. Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products (IPAC, 2015); http://wise2.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/release/allsky/expsup/
Megeath, S. T. et al. The legacy of the great observatories: panchromatic coverage as a strategic goal for NASA astrophysics. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 184 (2019).
Pasian, F. et al. ASTERICS: addressing cross-cutting synergies and common challenges for the next decade astronomy facilities. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXV, 57–60 (Conference series no. 512, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2016).
Pardo, J. R., Cernicharo, J. & Serabyn, E. Atmospheric transmission at microwaves (ATM): an improved model for millimeter/submillimeter applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 49, 1683–1694 (2001).
Lord, S. D. A New Software Tool for Computing Earth’s Atmospheric Transmission of Near- and Far-Infrared Radiation. NASA Technical Memorandum 103957 (1992).
Israel, M. et al. NASA Stratospheric Balloons: Science at the Edge of Space. NASA Technical Report NP-2006-3-754-GSFC (NASA, 2010).
Seibert, G. The History of Sounding Rockets and their Contribution to European Space Research. ESA History Study Reports no. 38 (ESA, 2006).
Davies, R. & Kasper, M. Adaptive optics for astronomy. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 305–351 (2012).
Law, N. M., Mackay, C. D. & Baldwin, J. E. Lucky imaging: high angular resolution imaging in the visible from the ground. Astron. Astrophys. 446, 739–745 (2006).
de Gasperin, F. et al. The effect of the ionosphere on ultra-low-frequency radio-interferometric observations. Astron. Astrophys. 615, A179 (2018).
Sokolowski, M. et al. The impact of the ionosphere on ground-based detection of the global epoch of reionization signal. Astrophys. J. 813, 18 (2015).
Koopmans, L. V. E. et al. The cosmic dawn and epoch of reionization with the Square Kilometre Array. Proc. Sci. 9-13-June-2014 (2014).
Thompson, A. R., Moran, J. M. & Swenson, G. W. in Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, 787–808 (Springer, 2017).
Dicke, R. H., Peebles, P. J. E., Roll, P. G. & Wilkinson, D. T. Cosmic black-body radiation. Astrophys. J. 142, 414–419 (1965).
Wilson, R. W. & Penzias, A. A. Isotropy of cosmic background radiation at 4080 megahertz. Science 156, 1100–1101 (1965).
Serjeant, S. Observational Cosmology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).
Gardner, J. P. et al. The James Webb Space Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 123, 485–606 (2006).
Laureijs, R. et al. Euclid Definition Study Report. ESA Technical Report ESA/SRE(2011)12 (2011).
Spergel, D. et al. Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets. WFIRST-AFTA Final Report. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.5422 (2013).
Wyithe, J. S. B. et al. A distortion of very-high-redshift galaxy number counts by gravitational lensing. Nature 469, 181–184 (2011).
Marchetti, L., Serjeant, S. & Vaccari, M. Finding bright z ≥ 6 Ly α emitters with lensing: prospects for Euclid. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470, 5007–5013 (2017).
van Haarlem, M. P. et al. LOFAR: the Low-Frequency Array. Astron. Astrophys. 556, A2 (2013).
Wise, J. H. Cosmic reionisation. Contemp. Phys. 60, 145–163 (2019).
Chung, S. J., Bandyopadhyay, S., Foust, R., Subramanian, G. P. & Hadaegh, F. Y. Review of formation flying and constellation missions using nanosatellites. J. Spacecraft Rockets 53, 567–578 (2016).
Wu, S. et al. SULFRO: a swarm of nano-/micro-satellite at SE L2 for Space Ultra-Low Frequency Radio Observatory. In Proc. 28th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites SSC14-III-9 (Utah State Univ. Libraries, 2014).
Burns, J. O. Transformative science from the lunar farside: observations of the dark ages and exoplanetary systems at low radio frequencies. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06881 (2020).
Bentum, M. J. et al. A roadmap towards a space-based radio telescope for ultra-low frequency radio astronomy. Adv. Space Res. 65, 856–867 (2020).
Saks, N. et al. DARIS, a fleet of passive formation flying small satellites for low frequency radio astronomy. In Small Satellite Systems and Services — The 4S Symposium (ESA, CNES, 2010); https://go.nature.com/3igyOtK
Bergman, J. E. S. et al. First Explorer — an innovative low-cost passive formation-flying system. In Proc. CEAS 2009 European Air Space Conference 1–14 (Royal Aeronautical Society, 2009).
Blott, R. et al. Space-based ultra-long wavelength radio observatory (low cost) –SURO-LC. In EPSC Abstracts Vol. 8, EPSC2013-279 (EPSC, 2013); https://go.nature.com/2ZpgreC
Boonstra, A.-J. et al. Discovering the sky at the longest wavelengths (DSL). In Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conf., IEEE 16121612 (IEEE, 2016).
Cecconi, B. et al. NOIRE study report: towards a low frequency radio interferometer in space. In Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conf., IEEE 17878057 (IEEE, 2018).
Lind, F. D. et al. AERO & VISTA: demonstrating HF radio interferometry with vector sensors. In Proc. 33rd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites SSC19-WKV-09 (Utah State Univ. Libraries, 2019).
Neugebauer, G. et al. The Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) mission. Astrophys. J. 278, L1–L6 (1984).
Kessler, M. F. et al. The Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) mission. Astron. Astrophys. 315, L27–L31 (1996).
Shibai, H. AKARI (ASTRO-F): flight performance and preliminary results. Adv. Space Res. 40, 595–599 (2007).
Werner, M. W. et al. The Spitzer Space Telescope mission. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 154, 1–9 (2004).
Wright, E. L. et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): mission description and initial on-orbit performance. Astron. J. 140, 1868–1881 (2010).
Pilbratt, G. L. et al. Herschel Space Observatory — an ESA facility for far-infrared and submillimetre astronomy. Astron. Astrophys. 518, L1 (2010).
Korngut, P. M. et al. SPHEREx: an all-sky NIR spectral survey. Proc. SPIE 10698, 106981U (2018).
Roelfsema, P. R. et al. SPICA — a large cryogenic infrared space telescope: unveiling the obscured Universe. Publ. Astron. Soc. Austr. 35, e030 (2018).
Yun, W. ISCEA: infrared smallsat for cluster evolution astrophysics. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 4 (2019).
Kelsall, T. et al. The COBE Diffuse Infrared Background Experiment search for the cosmic infrared background. II. Model of the interplanetary dust cloud. Astrophys. J. 508, 44–73 (1998).
Jones, M. H., Bewsher, D. & Brown, D. S. Imaging of a circumsolar dust ring near the orbit of Venus. Science 342, 960–963 (2013).
Shirahata, M. et al. The Cosmic Infrared Background Experiment-2 (CIBER-2) for studying the near-infrared extragalactic background light. Proc. SPIE 9904, 99044J (2016).
Fuschino, F. et al. HERMES: An ultra-wide band X and gamma-ray transient monitor on board a nano-satellite constellation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 936, 199–203 (2019).
Burderi, L. et al. GrailQuest: Hunting for Atoms of Space and Time Hidden in the Wrinkle of Space-Time. ESA Voyage 2050 White Paper. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02154 (2019).
Grindlay, J. Space time-domain astrophysics in the 2020’s. In Proc. The Space Astrophysics Landscape for the 2020s and Beyond LPI contribution no. 2135 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2019).
Cieślak, M. J., Gamage, K. A. A. & Glover, R. Coded-aperture imaging systems: past, present and future development — a review. Radiat. Meas. 92, 59–71 (2016).
Hong, J. et al. Miniature Lightweight X-ray Optics (MiXO) and CubeSat X-ray Telescope (CubeX) for Solar System exploration. In Proc. 48th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference LPI contribution no. 1964 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2017).
Poppenhaeger, K. et al. Transit observations of the hot Jupiter HD 189733b at X-ray wavelengths. Astrophys. J. 773, 62 (2013).
Sagiv, I. et al. Science with a wide-field UV transient explorer. Astron. J. 147, 79 (2014).
Cenko, S. B. The Gravitational-wave Ultraviolet Counterpart Imager (GUCI) network. Am. Astron. Soc. Meeting Abstracts 234, 212.03 (2019).
Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. Nature 378, 355–359 (1995).
Gillon, M. et al. Temperate Earth-sized planets transiting a nearby ultracool dwarf star. Nature 533, 221–224 (2016).
Walker, G., Matthews, J., Kuschnig, R. & Johnson, R. The MOST asteroseismology mission: ultraprecise photometry from space. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 115, 1023 (2003).
Auvergne, M. et al. The CoRoT satellite in flight: description and performance. Astron. Astrophys. 506, 411–424 (2009).
Borucki, W. J. et al. Kepler planet-detection mission: introduction and first results. Science 327, 977–980 (2010).
Batalha, N. Exploring exoplanet populations with NASA’s Kepler mission. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12647–12654 (2014).
Ricker, G. R. The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite. Proc. SPIE 9904, i99042B (2016).
Benz, W., Ehrenreich, D. & Isaak, K. in Handbook of Exoplanets (eds Deeg, H. & Belmonte, J.) 1257–1281 (Springer, 2018).
Rauer, H. & Heras, A. in Handbook of Exoplanets (eds Deeg, H. & Belmonte, J.) 1309–1330 (Springer, 2018).
Knapp, M. et al. Demonstrating high-precision photometry with a CubeSat: ASTERIA observations of 55 Cancri e. Astron. J. 160, 23 (2020).
Tsiaras, A. et al. Water vapour in the atmosphere of the habitable-zone eight-Earth-mass planet K2-18 b. Nat. Astron. 3, 1086–1091 (2019).
Demory, B. et al. A map of the large day–night temperature gradient of a super-Earth exoplanet. Nature 532, 207–209 (2016).
Tinetti, G. et al. A chemical survey of exoplanets with ARIEL. Exp. Astron. 46, 135–209 (2018).
Cowan, N. et al. Characterizing transiting planet atmospheres through 2025. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 127, 311 (2015).
Fleming, B. T. et al. The Colorado Ultraviolet Transit Experiment (CUTE): a dedicated CubeSat mission for the study of exoplanetary mass loss and magnetic fields. Proc. SPIE 10397, 103971A (2017).
Edwards, B. et al. Exoplanet spectroscopy and photometry with the Twinkle space telescope. Exp. Astron. 47, 29–63 (2019).
Burchell, M. Panspermia today. Int. J. Astrobiol. 3, 73–80 (2004).
Jørgensen, J. K. et al. The ALMA Protostellar Interferometric Line Survey (PILS). First results from an unbiased submillimeter wavelength line survey of the Class 0 protostellar binary IRAS 16293-2422 with ALMA. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A117 (2016).
van Dishoeck, E. F. Astrochemistry of dust, ice and gas: introduction and overview. Faraday Discuss. 168, 9–47 (2014).
Auriacombe, O. B. J. E. et al. Terahertz desorption emission spectroscopy (THz DES) — ‘ALMA in the Lab’. In AAS Meeting 228 104.03 (American Astronomical Society, 2016).
de Vera, J.-P. et al. Limits of life and the habitability of Mars: the ESA space experiment BIOMEX on the ISS. Astrobiology 19, 145–157 (2019).
Cottin, H. et al. Space as a tool for astrobiology: review and recommendations for experimentations in Earth orbit and beyond. Space Sci. Rev. 209, 83–181 (2017).
Friis-Christensen, E., Lühr, H. & Hulot, G. Swarm: a constellation to study the Earth’s magnetic field. Earth Planets Space 58, 351–358 (2006).
Abbasi, V. et al. The NEOSSat experience: 5 years in the life of Canada’s space surveillance telescope. In 1st NEO and Debris Detection Conf. (eds Flohrer, T. et al.) (ESA Space Safety Programme Office, 2019).
Moore, C. S. et al. The instruments and capabilities of the miniature X-ray solar spectrometer (MinXSS) CubeSats. Solar Phys. 293, 21 (2018).
Shkolnik, E. L. On the verge of an astronomy CubeSat revolution. Nat. Astron. 2, 374–378 (2018).
Agasid, E. et al. State of the Art of Small Spacecraft Technology. NASA Online Report, https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa (accessed 28 July 2020).
Villalba Corbacho, V., Kuiper, H. & Gill, E. Review on thermal and mechanical challenges in the development of deployable space optics. J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 6, 010902 (2020).
Komatsu, M. & Nakasuka, S. University of Tokyo Nano Satellite Project ‘PRISM’. Trans. JSASS Space Technol. Jpn 7, 19–24 (2008).
Ely, T. A. et al. Using the Deep Space Atomic Clock for navigation and science. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 65, 950–961 (2018).
Ayris, P. et al. Realising the European Open Science Cloud (Public Office of the European Union, 2016).
Norris, R. P. Discovering the unexpected in astronomical survey data. Publ. Astron. Soc. Austr. 34, e007 (2016).
Bèland, S., Boulade, O. & Davidge, T. The extinction curve at Mauna Kea in the visible range. Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Inf. Bull. 19, 16 (1988).
Bodhaine, B. A. et al. New ultraviolet spectroradiometer measurements at Mauna Loa Observatory. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 2121–2124 (1996).
Meier, R. R. Ultraviolet spectroscopy and remote sensing of the upper atmosphere. Space Sci. Rev. 58, 1–185 (1991).
Traub, W. A. & Stier, M. T. Theoretical atmospheric transmission in the mid- and far-infrared at four altitudes. Appl. Opt. 15, 364–377 (1976).
Zatsepin, G. T. & Chudakov, A. E. Method of finding local sources of high-energy photons. Sov. Phys. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 14, 469–470 (1962).
Hinton, J. Ground-based gamma-ray astronomy with Cherenkov telescopes. New J. Phys. 11, 055005 (2009).
We thank the participants of the Springer Nature symposium ‘Future of astronomy with small satellites’ organized in London, November 2019, for contributions and for inspiring some of this Perspective. S.S. also thanks K. Olsson-Francis and H. Dickinson for discussions, the UK Space Agency for support under grant ST/T003502/1, and the ESCAPE project. ESCAPE — The European Science Cluster of Astronomy & Particle Physics ESFRI Research Infrastructures has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement no. 824064.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Serjeant, S., Elvis, M. & Tinetti, G. The future of astronomy with small satellites. Nat Astron 4, 1031–1038 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1201-5
This article is cited by
Detection of surface defects and subsurface defects of polished optics with multisensor image fusion
Experimental Astronomy (2022)
Nature Astronomy (2020)