Binary formation is an important aspect of star formation. One possible route for close-in binary formation is disk fragmentation1,2,3. Recent observations show that small-scale asymmetries (<300 au) around young protostars2,4, although not always resolving the circumbinary disk, are linked to disk phenomena5,6. In later stages, resolved circumbinary disk observations7 (<200 au) show similar asymmetries, suggesting that the asymmetries arise from binary–disk interactions8,9,10. We observed one of the youngest systems to study the connection between disk and dense core. We find a bright and clear streamer in chemically fresh material (carbon-chain molecular species) that originates from outside the dense core (>10,500 au). This material connects the outer dense core with the region where asymmetries arise near disk scales. This new structure type, ten times larger than those seen near disk scales, suggests a different interpretation of previous observations: large-scale accretion flows funnel material down to disk scales. These results reveal the under-appreciated importance of the local environment on the formation and evolution of disks in early systems11,12 and a possible initial condition for the formation of annular features in young disks13,14.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data and analysis that support the findings of this study are available in GitHub (repository https://github.com/jpinedaf/NOEMA_streamer_analysis) with the identifier https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3874992.
Kratter, K. M., Matzner, C. D., Krumholz, M. R. & Klein, R. I. Astrophys. J. 708, 1585–1597 (2010).
Tobin, J. J. et al. A triple protostar system formed via fragmentation of a gravitationally unstable disk. Nature 538, 483–486 (2016).
Wurster, J. & Bate, M. R. Disc formation and fragmentation using radiative non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 2587–2603 (2019).
Tobin, J. J. et al. The VLA/ALMA Nascent Disk and Multiplicity (VANDAM) survey of Perseus protostars. VI. Characterizing the formation mechanism for close multiple systems. Astrophys. J. 867, 43 (2018).
Zhao, B., Caselli, P., Li, Z.-Y. & Krasnopolsky, R. Decoupling of magnetic fields in collapsing protostellar envelopes and disc formation and fragmentation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 4868–4889 (2018).
Sigalotti, L. D. G., Cruz, F., Gabbasov, R., Klapp, J. & Ramírez-Velasquez, J. From large-scale to protostellar disk fragmentation into close binary stars. Astrophys. J. 857, 40 (2018).
Takakuwa, S. et al. Spiral arms, infall, and misalignment of the circumbinary disk from the circumstellar disks in the protostellar binary system L1551 NE. Astrophys. J. 837, 86 (2017).
Matsumoto, T., Saigo, K. & Takakuwa, S. Structure of a protobinary system: an asymmetric circumbinary disk and spiral arms. Astrophys. J. 871, 36 (2019).
Thun, D., Kley, W. & Picogna, G. Circumbinary discs: numerical and physical behaviour. Astron. Astrophys. 604, 102 (2017).
Mösta, P., Taam, R. E. & Duffell, P. C. Gas flows within cavities of circumbinary disks in eccentric binary protostellar systems. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, 21 (2019).
Kuffmeier, M., Haugbølle, T. & Nordlund, Å. Zoom-in simulations of protoplanetary disks starting from GMC scales. Astrophys. J. 846, 7 (2017).
Kuffmeier, M., Frimann, S., Jensen, S. S. & Haugbølle, T. Å. Episodic accretion: the interplay of infall and disc instabilities. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 2642–2658 (2018).
Andrews, S. M. et al. The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). I. Motivation, sample, calibration, and overview. Astrophys. J. Lett. 869, 41 (2018).
Huang, J. et al. The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). II. Characteristics of annular substructures. Astrophys. J. Lett. 869, 42 (2018).
Zucker, C. et al. Mapping distances across the Perseus molecular cloud using CO observations, stellar photometry, and Gaia DR2 parallax measurements. Astrophys. J. 869, 83 (2018).
Stephens, I. W. et al. Mass Assembly of Stellar Systems and their Evolution with the SMA (MASSES)—full data release. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 245, 21 (2019).
Frimann, S. et al. Protostellar accretion traced with chemistry. High-resolution C18O and continuum observations towards deeply embedded protostars in Perseus. Astron. Astrophys. 602, 120 (2017).
Hsieh, T.-H. et al. Chronology of episodic accretion in protostars—an ALMA survey of the CO and H2O snowlines. Astrophys. J. 884, 149 (2019).
Shu, F. H., Li, Z.-Y. & Allen, A. Does magnetic levitation or suspension define the masses of forming stars? Astrophys. J. 601, 930–951 (2004).
Dunham, M. M. et al. in Protostars and Planets VI (eds Beuther, H. et al.) 195–218 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2014).
Wurster, J. & Li, Z.-Y. The role of magnetic fields in the formation of protostellar discs. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5, 39 (2018).
Kuznetsova, A., Hartmann, L. & Heitsch, F. The origins of protostellar core angular momenta. Astrophys. J. 876, 33 (2019).
Kuffmeier, M., Calcutt, H. & Kristensen, L. E. The bridge: a transient phenomenon of forming stellar multiples. Sequential formation of stellar companions in filaments around young protostars. Astron. Astrophys. 628, 112 (2019).
Wurster, J., Bate, M. R. & Price, D. J. There is no magnetic braking catastrophe: low-mass star cluster and protostellar disc formation with non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 1719–1741 (2019).
Yen, H.-W. et al. ALMA observations of infalling flows toward the Keplerian disk around the class I protostar L1489 IRS. Astrophys. J. 793, 1 (2014).
Le Gouellec, V. J. M. et al. Characterizing magnetic field morphologies in three Serpens protostellar cores with ALMA. Astrophys. J. 885, 106 (2019).
Hull, C. L. H., Le Gouellec, V. J. M., Girart, J. M., Tobin, J. J. & Bourke, T. L. Understanding the origin of the magnetic field morphology in the wide-binary protostellar system BHR 71. Astrophys. J. 892, 151 (2020).
Yen, H.-W. et al. HL Tau disk in HCO+ (3–2) and (1–0) with ALMA: gas density, temperature, gap, and one-arm spiral. Astrophys. J. 880, 2 (2019).
Mottram, J. C. et al. Outflows, infall and evolution of a sample of embedded low-mass protostars. The William Herschel Line Legacy (WILL) survey. Astron. Astrophys. 600, 99 (2017).
Mendoza, S., Tejeda, E. & Nagel, E. Analytic solutions to the accretion of a rotating finite cloud towards a central object. I. Newtonian approach. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 393, 579–586 (2009).
van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Schöier, F. L., Jansen, D. J. & van Dishoeck, E. F. A computer program for fast non-LTE analysis of interstellar line spectra. With diagnostic plots to interpret observed line intensity ratios. Astron. Astrophys. 468, 627–635 (2007).
Evans, N. J. II et al. Detection of infall in the protostar B335 with ALMA. Astrophys. J. 814, 22 (2015).
Lee, C.-F., Li, Z.-Y. & Turner, N. J. Spiral structures in an embedded protostellar disk driven by envelope accretion. Nat. Astron. 4, 142–146 (2020).
Ellithorpe, E. A., Duchene, G. & Stahler, S. W. The nature of class I sources: periodic variables in Orion. Astrophys. J. 885, 64 (2019).
Bergin, E. A. & Tafalla, M. Cold dark clouds: the initial conditions for star formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 339–396 (2007).
Sakai, N. & Yamamoto, S. Chem. Rev. 113, 8981 (2013).
Nanne, J. A. M., Nimmo, F., Cuzzi, J. N. & Kleine, T. Origin of the non-carbonaceous–carbonaceous meteorite dichotomy. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 511, 44–54 (2019).
Robitaille, T. & Bressert, E. APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python ascl:1208.017 (Astrophysics Source Code Library, 2012); https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ascl.soft08017R
The Astropy Collaboration et al. Astropy: a community Python package for astronomy. Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013).
GILDAS v.mar19b (IRAM–Observatoire de Grenoble, 2019); http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS.
McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W. & Golap, K. CASA Architecture and Applications. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, Vol. 376 (eds Shaw, R. A. et al.) 127–130 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 2007).
Cox, E. G. et al. ALMA’s polarized view of 10 protostars in the Perseus molecular cloud. Astrophys. J. 855, 92 (2018).
Li, D. & Goldsmith, P. F. Is the Taurus B213 region a true filament? Observations of multiple cyanoacetylene transitions. Astrophys. J. 756, 165–169 (2012).
Rosolowsky, E. W. et al. An ammonia spectral atlas of dense cores in Perseus. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 175, 509–521 (2008).
Loomis, R. A. et al. Non-detection of HC11N towards TMC-1: constraining the chemistry of large carbon-chain molecules. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 4175–4183 (2016).
Dickens, J. E. et al. A study of the physics and chemistry of L134N. Astrophys. J. 542, 870–889 (2000).
Ginsburg, A. & Mirocha, J. PySpecKit: Python spectroscopic toolkit ascl:1109.001 (Astrophysics Source Code Library, 2011).
Pineda, J. E. et al. Direct observation of a sharp transition to coherence in dense cores. Astrophys. J. Lett. 712, L116–L121 (2010).
Pineda, J. E. et al. The formation of a quadruple star system with wide separation. Nature 518, 213–215 (2015).
Stahler, S. W. & Palla, F. The Formation of Stars (Wiley-VCH, 2005).
Enoch, M. L. et al. Bolocam survey for 1.1 mm dust continuum emission in the c2d legacy clouds. I. Perseus. Astrophys. J. Lett. 638, 293–313 (2006).
Scott, D. W. Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization (Wiley, 1992).
Pineda, J. E. et al. The specific angular momentum radial profile in dense cores: improved initial conditions for disk formation. Astrophys. J. 882, 103 (2019).
Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., Tafalla, M., Dore, L. & Myers, P. C. CO depletion in the starless cloud core L1544. Astrophys. J. Lett. 523, 165–169 (1999).
Jones, A. P. & Williams, D. A. Time-dependent sticking coefficients and mantle growth on interstellar grains. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 217, 413–421 (1985).
Tielens, A. G. G. M. & Allamandola, L. J. in Interstellar Processes Vol. 134 (eds Hollenbach, D. J. & Thronson, H. A.) 397–470 (Springer, 1987).
Walawender, J., Reipurth, B. & Bally, J. Multiple outflows and protostars in Barnard 1. II. Deep optical and near-infrared images. Astron. J. 137, 3254–3262 (2009).
J.E.P. thanks A. Burkert, A. A. Goodman, S. S. R. Offner and R. S. Klessen for discussions and comments. Observations were carried out with the IRAM interferometer NOEMA. IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain). This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA\#2013.1.00031.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (United States) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan) and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. This research made use of Astropy, a community-developed core Python package for Astronomy, and APLpy, an open-source plotting package for Python hosted at http://aplpy.github.com.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks Charles Hull and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended Data Fig. 1 Ratio of the integrated intensity of HC3N (10-9) to (8-7) transitions as a function of H2 density.
The ratio is calculated using RADEX, for kinetic temperatures of 10 and 12.25 K in blue and red, respectively. The measured average value and associated uncertainty of the ratio in the streamer is marked by the horizontal solid and dashed lines, respectively. This comparison shows that the average density in the streamer is (4±2) × 104 cm−3.
Extended Data Fig. 2 The streamer is unrelated to the old inner (radius <3,000 au) envelope or to the outflow emission from the young protostellar system.
Comparison between HC3N emission tracing the streamer and “chemically old” dense gas in panels a and b, and with the outflow in panel c. Panels a and b show the dense gas traced by N2H+ and N2D+ in the background, with the contours of the chemically fresh material. The streamer is clearly mostly outside the N2H+ and N2D+ emission, and it shows a significantly different morphology to the inner envelope. Panel c shows the outflow emission traced by CO (2-1) in red and blue contours, while the background emission is the HC3N integrated intensity. This shows that the streamer is unrelated to the outflow interaction. The 50% primary beam response for the N2H+, N2D+, and CO (2-1) observations are shown by the white dotted circle in the left and right panels, respectively. The HC3N contours levels are drawn at 5, 8, 11, 14 and 17x rms, where rms is 8 mJy beam−1 km s−1. The CO contours levels are drawn at 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45x rms, where rms is 0.2 Jy beam−1 km s−1.
About this article
Cite this article
Pineda, J.E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P. et al. A protostellar system fed by a streamer of 10,500 au length. Nat Astron 4, 1158–1163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1150-z
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2021)
FAUST. II. Discovery of a Secondary Outflow in IRAS 15398−3359: Variability in Outflow Direction during the Earliest Stage of Star Formation?
The Astrophysical Journal (2021)
The Astrophysical Journal (2020)