Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A protostellar system fed by a streamer of 10,500 au length


Binary formation is an important aspect of star formation. One possible route for close-in binary formation is disk fragmentation1,2,3. Recent observations show that small-scale asymmetries (<300 au) around young protostars2,4, although not always resolving the circumbinary disk, are linked to disk phenomena5,6. In later stages, resolved circumbinary disk observations7 (<200 au) show similar asymmetries, suggesting that the asymmetries arise from binary–disk interactions8,9,10. We observed one of the youngest systems to study the connection between disk and dense core. We find a bright and clear streamer in chemically fresh material (carbon-chain molecular species) that originates from outside the dense core (>10,500 au). This material connects the outer dense core with the region where asymmetries arise near disk scales. This new structure type, ten times larger than those seen near disk scales, suggests a different interpretation of previous observations: large-scale accretion flows funnel material down to disk scales. These results reveal the under-appreciated importance of the local environment on the formation and evolution of disks in early systems11,12 and a possible initial condition for the formation of annular features in young disks13,14.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: NOEMA and ALMA observations of Per-emb-2.
Fig. 2: Streamer traced by HC3N J = 10→9 emission.
Fig. 3: Sky position and velocity along the line of sight of the streamline model overlaid on the observations.

Data availability

The data and analysis that support the findings of this study are available in GitHub (repository with the identifier


  1. 1.

    Kratter, K. M., Matzner, C. D., Krumholz, M. R. & Klein, R. I. Astrophys. J. 708, 1585–1597 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tobin, J. J. et al. A triple protostar system formed via fragmentation of a gravitationally unstable disk. Nature 538, 483–486 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wurster, J. & Bate, M. R. Disc formation and fragmentation using radiative non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 2587–2603 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tobin, J. J. et al. The VLA/ALMA Nascent Disk and Multiplicity (VANDAM) survey of Perseus protostars. VI. Characterizing the formation mechanism for close multiple systems. Astrophys. J. 867, 43 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhao, B., Caselli, P., Li, Z.-Y. & Krasnopolsky, R. Decoupling of magnetic fields in collapsing protostellar envelopes and disc formation and fragmentation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 4868–4889 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sigalotti, L. D. G., Cruz, F., Gabbasov, R., Klapp, J. & Ramírez-Velasquez, J. From large-scale to protostellar disk fragmentation into close binary stars. Astrophys. J. 857, 40 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Takakuwa, S. et al. Spiral arms, infall, and misalignment of the circumbinary disk from the circumstellar disks in the protostellar binary system L1551 NE. Astrophys. J. 837, 86 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Matsumoto, T., Saigo, K. & Takakuwa, S. Structure of a protobinary system: an asymmetric circumbinary disk and spiral arms. Astrophys. J. 871, 36 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Thun, D., Kley, W. & Picogna, G. Circumbinary discs: numerical and physical behaviour. Astron. Astrophys. 604, 102 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mösta, P., Taam, R. E. & Duffell, P. C. Gas flows within cavities of circumbinary disks in eccentric binary protostellar systems. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, 21 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kuffmeier, M., Haugbølle, T. & Nordlund, Å. Zoom-in simulations of protoplanetary disks starting from GMC scales. Astrophys. J. 846, 7 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kuffmeier, M., Frimann, S., Jensen, S. S. & Haugbølle, T. Å. Episodic accretion: the interplay of infall and disc instabilities. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 2642–2658 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Andrews, S. M. et al. The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). I. Motivation, sample, calibration, and overview. Astrophys. J. Lett. 869, 41 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Huang, J. et al. The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). II. Characteristics of annular substructures. Astrophys. J. Lett. 869, 42 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zucker, C. et al. Mapping distances across the Perseus molecular cloud using CO observations, stellar photometry, and Gaia DR2 parallax measurements. Astrophys. J. 869, 83 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Stephens, I. W. et al. Mass Assembly of Stellar Systems and their Evolution with the SMA (MASSES)—full data release. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 245, 21 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Frimann, S. et al. Protostellar accretion traced with chemistry. High-resolution C18O and continuum observations towards deeply embedded protostars in Perseus. Astron. Astrophys. 602, 120 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hsieh, T.-H. et al. Chronology of episodic accretion in protostars—an ALMA survey of the CO and H2O snowlines. Astrophys. J. 884, 149 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shu, F. H., Li, Z.-Y. & Allen, A. Does magnetic levitation or suspension define the masses of forming stars? Astrophys. J. 601, 930–951 (2004).

  20. 20.

    Dunham, M. M. et al. in Protostars and Planets VI (eds Beuther, H. et al.) 195–218 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2014).

  21. 21.

    Wurster, J. & Li, Z.-Y. The role of magnetic fields in the formation of protostellar discs. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5, 39 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kuznetsova, A., Hartmann, L. & Heitsch, F. The origins of protostellar core angular momenta. Astrophys. J. 876, 33 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kuffmeier, M., Calcutt, H. & Kristensen, L. E. The bridge: a transient phenomenon of forming stellar multiples. Sequential formation of stellar companions in filaments around young protostars. Astron. Astrophys. 628, 112 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wurster, J., Bate, M. R. & Price, D. J. There is no magnetic braking catastrophe: low-mass star cluster and protostellar disc formation with non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 1719–1741 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yen, H.-W. et al. ALMA observations of infalling flows toward the Keplerian disk around the class I protostar L1489 IRS. Astrophys. J. 793, 1 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Le Gouellec, V. J. M. et al. Characterizing magnetic field morphologies in three Serpens protostellar cores with ALMA. Astrophys. J. 885, 106 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hull, C. L. H., Le Gouellec, V. J. M., Girart, J. M., Tobin, J. J. & Bourke, T. L. Understanding the origin of the magnetic field morphology in the wide-binary protostellar system BHR 71. Astrophys. J. 892, 151 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yen, H.-W. et al. HL Tau disk in HCO+ (3–2) and (1–0) with ALMA: gas density, temperature, gap, and one-arm spiral. Astrophys. J. 880, 2 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mottram, J. C. et al. Outflows, infall and evolution of a sample of embedded low-mass protostars. The William Herschel Line Legacy (WILL) survey. Astron. Astrophys. 600, 99 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mendoza, S., Tejeda, E. & Nagel, E. Analytic solutions to the accretion of a rotating finite cloud towards a central object. I. Newtonian approach. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 393, 579–586 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Schöier, F. L., Jansen, D. J. & van Dishoeck, E. F. A computer program for fast non-LTE analysis of interstellar line spectra. With diagnostic plots to interpret observed line intensity ratios. Astron. Astrophys. 468, 627–635 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Evans, N. J. II et al. Detection of infall in the protostar B335 with ALMA. Astrophys. J. 814, 22 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lee, C.-F., Li, Z.-Y. & Turner, N. J. Spiral structures in an embedded protostellar disk driven by envelope accretion. Nat. Astron. 4, 142–146 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ellithorpe, E. A., Duchene, G. & Stahler, S. W. The nature of class I sources: periodic variables in Orion. Astrophys. J. 885, 64 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bergin, E. A. & Tafalla, M. Cold dark clouds: the initial conditions for star formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 339–396 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sakai, N. & Yamamoto, S. Chem. Rev. 113, 8981 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nanne, J. A. M., Nimmo, F., Cuzzi, J. N. & Kleine, T. Origin of the non-carbonaceous–carbonaceous meteorite dichotomy. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 511, 44–54 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Robitaille, T. & Bressert, E. APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python ascl:1208.017 (Astrophysics Source Code Library, 2012);

  39. 39.

    The Astropy Collaboration et al. Astropy: a community Python package for astronomy. Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013).

  40. 40.

    GILDAS v.mar19b (IRAM–Observatoire de Grenoble, 2019);

  41. 41.

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W. & Golap, K. CASA Architecture and Applications. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, Vol. 376 (eds Shaw, R. A. et al.) 127–130 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 2007).

  42. 42.

    Cox, E. G. et al. ALMA’s polarized view of 10 protostars in the Perseus molecular cloud. Astrophys. J. 855, 92 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Li, D. & Goldsmith, P. F. Is the Taurus B213 region a true filament? Observations of multiple cyanoacetylene transitions. Astrophys. J. 756, 165–169 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rosolowsky, E. W. et al. An ammonia spectral atlas of dense cores in Perseus. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 175, 509–521 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Loomis, R. A. et al. Non-detection of HC11N towards TMC-1: constraining the chemistry of large carbon-chain molecules. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 4175–4183 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Dickens, J. E. et al. A study of the physics and chemistry of L134N. Astrophys. J. 542, 870–889 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ginsburg, A. & Mirocha, J. PySpecKit: Python spectroscopic toolkit ascl:1109.001 (Astrophysics Source Code Library, 2011).

  48. 48.

    Pineda, J. E. et al. Direct observation of a sharp transition to coherence in dense cores. Astrophys. J. Lett. 712, L116–L121 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Pineda, J. E. et al. The formation of a quadruple star system with wide separation. Nature 518, 213–215 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Stahler, S. W. & Palla, F. The Formation of Stars (Wiley-VCH, 2005).

  51. 51.

    Enoch, M. L. et al. Bolocam survey for 1.1 mm dust continuum emission in the c2d legacy clouds. I. Perseus. Astrophys. J. Lett. 638, 293–313 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Scott, D. W. Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization (Wiley, 1992).

  53. 53.

    Pineda, J. E. et al. The specific angular momentum radial profile in dense cores: improved initial conditions for disk formation. Astrophys. J. 882, 103 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., Tafalla, M., Dore, L. & Myers, P. C. CO depletion in the starless cloud core L1544. Astrophys. J. Lett. 523, 165–169 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Jones, A. P. & Williams, D. A. Time-dependent sticking coefficients and mantle growth on interstellar grains. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 217, 413–421 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tielens, A. G. G. M. & Allamandola, L. J. in Interstellar Processes Vol. 134 (eds Hollenbach, D. J. & Thronson, H. A.) 397–470 (Springer, 1987).

  57. 57.

    Walawender, J., Reipurth, B. & Bally, J. Multiple outflows and protostars in Barnard 1. II. Deep optical and near-infrared images. Astron. J. 137, 3254–3262 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


J.E.P. thanks A. Burkert, A. A. Goodman, S. S. R. Offner and R. S. Klessen for discussions and comments. Observations were carried out with the IRAM interferometer NOEMA. IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain). This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA\#2013.1.00031.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (United States) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan) and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. This research made use of Astropy, a community-developed core Python package for Astronomy, and APLpy, an open-source plotting package for Python hosted at

Author information




J.E.P. led the project and reduced the ALMA data, led the project and imaged the NOEMA data. N.C. and R.N. reduced the NOEMA data. J.E.P. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the NOEMA proposal, discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime E. Pineda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks Charles Hull and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Ratio of the integrated intensity of HC3N (10-9) to (8-7) transitions as a function of H2 density.

The ratio is calculated using RADEX, for kinetic temperatures of 10 and 12.25 K in blue and red, respectively. The measured average value and associated uncertainty of the ratio in the streamer is marked by the horizontal solid and dashed lines, respectively. This comparison shows that the average density in the streamer is (4±2) × 104 cm−3.

Extended Data Fig. 2 The streamer is unrelated to the old inner (radius <3,000 au) envelope or to the outflow emission from the young protostellar system.

Comparison between HC3N emission tracing the streamer and “chemically old” dense gas in panels a and b, and with the outflow in panel c. Panels a and b show the dense gas traced by N2H+ and N2D+ in the background, with the contours of the chemically fresh material. The streamer is clearly mostly outside the N2H+ and N2D+ emission, and it shows a significantly different morphology to the inner envelope. Panel c shows the outflow emission traced by CO (2-1) in red and blue contours, while the background emission is the HC3N integrated intensity. This shows that the streamer is unrelated to the outflow interaction. The 50% primary beam response for the N2H+, N2D+, and CO (2-1) observations are shown by the white dotted circle in the left and right panels, respectively. The HC3N contours levels are drawn at 5, 8, 11, 14 and 17x rms, where rms is 8 mJy beam−1 km s−1. The CO contours levels are drawn at 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45x rms, where rms is 0.2 Jy beam−1 km s−1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pineda, J.E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P. et al. A protostellar system fed by a streamer of 10,500 au length. Nat Astron 4, 1158–1163 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading

  • From the CMF to the IMF: beyond the core-collapse model

    • V-M Pelkonen
    • , P Padoan
    • , T Haugbølle
    •  & Å Nordlund

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2021)

  • FAUST. II. Discovery of a Secondary Outflow in IRAS 15398−3359: Variability in Outflow Direction during the Earliest Stage of Star Formation?

    • Yuki Okoda
    • , Yoko Oya
    • , Logan Francis
    • , Doug Johnstone
    • , Shu-ichiro Inutsuka
    • , Cecilia Ceccarelli
    • , Claudio Codella
    • , Claire Chandler
    • , Nami Sakai
    • , Yuri Aikawa
    • , Felipe O. Alves
    • , Nadia Balucani
    • , Eleonora Bianchi
    • , Mathilde Bouvier
    • , Paola Caselli
    • , Emmanuel Caux
    • , Steven Charnley
    • , Spandan Choudhury
    • , Marta De Simone
    • , Francois Dulieu
    • , Aurora Durán
    • , Lucy Evans
    • , Cécile Favre
    • , Davide Fedele
    • , Siyi Feng
    • , Francesco Fontani
    • , Tetsuya Hama
    • , Tomoyuki Hanawa
    • , Eric Herbst
    • , Tomoya Hirota
    • , Muneaki Imai
    • , Andrea Isella
    • , Izaskun Jímenez-Serra
    • , Claudine Kahane
    • , Bertrand Lefloch
    • , Laurent Loinard
    • , Ana López-Sepulcre
    • , Luke T. Maud
    • , María José Maureira
    • , Francois Menard
    • , Seyma Mercimek
    • , Anna Miotello
    • , George Moellenbrock
    • , Shoji Mori
    • , Nadia M. Murillo
    • , Riouhei Nakatani
    • , Hideko Nomura
    • , Yasuhiro Oba
    • , Ross O’Donoghue
    • , Satoshi Ohashi
    • , Juan Ospina-Zamudio
    • , Jaime E. Pineda
    • , Linda Podio
    • , Albert Rimola
    • , Takeshi Sakai
    • , Dominique Segura-Cox
    • , Yancy Shirley
    • , Brian Svoboda
    • , Vianney Taquet
    • , Leonardo Testi
    • , Charlotte Vastel
    • , Serena Viti
    • , Naoki Watanabe
    • , Yoshimasa Watanabe
    • , Arezu Witzel
    • , Ci Xue
    • , Yichen Zhang
    • , Bo Zhao
    •  & Satoshi Yamamoto

    The Astrophysical Journal (2021)

  • Four annular structures in a protostellar disk less than 500,000 years old

    • Dominique M. Segura-Cox
    • , Anika Schmiedeke
    • , Jaime E. Pineda
    • , Ian W. Stephens
    • , Manuel Fernández-López
    • , Leslie W. Looney
    • , Paola Caselli
    • , Zhi-Yun Li
    • , Lee G. Mundy
    • , Woojin Kwon
    •  & Robert J. Harris

    Nature (2020)

  • A Case of Simultaneous Star and Planet Formation

    • Felipe O. Alves
    • , L. Ilsedore Cleeves
    • , Josep M. Girart
    • , Zhaohuan Zhu
    • , Gabriel A. P. Franco
    • , Alice Zurlo
    •  & Paola Caselli

    The Astrophysical Journal (2020)


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing