Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Space science with CubeSats and nanosatellites

Abstract

At the dawn of the space age, nanosatellites, weighing between 1 and 10 kg, were used because of launcher limitations. In the past twenty years, a renaissance has occurred as a consequence of the success of microsatellites in accessing auxiliary and piggyback launch opportunities driving affordability. In addition, the capabilities and flight demonstrations of microelectronics components in orbit and the revolutionary CubeSat initiative have opened up a wealth of flight opportunities and stimulated an explosion in the supply chain. More recently, nanosatellite capabilities have been driven by the twin forces of commercial and scientific innovation. Commercial innovation has driven both the expectation and reality of reliable nanosatellites as companies build their businesses on the back of CubeSat manufacture; scientific innovation has stimulated the development of high-performance satellite payloads and subsystems. This Perspective reflects on the history and current state of the field, and offers a future outlook for nanosatellite science missions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A jack-in-the-box launcher from Nanoracks capable of accommodating four 3U satellites.

Spire Global.

Fig. 2: A Venn diagram showing the overlap between nanosatellites and CubeSats.
Fig. 3

NASA/JPL-Caltech

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall, R. C. Origins and development of the Vanguard and Explorer satellite programs. Air Power Historian 11, 101–112 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz, N. et al. Laboratory demonstration of an active optics system for high-resolution deployable CubeSat. In Proc. The 4S Symposium (ESA, 2018).

  3. Smith, M. W. et al. On-orbit results and lessons learned from the ASTERIA space telescope mission. In Proc. 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites SSC18-I-08 (AIAA, USU, 2018).

  4. Pong, C. M. On-orbit performance & operation of the attitude & pointing control subsystems on ASTERIA. In Proc. 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites SSC18-PI-34 (AIAA, USU, 2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Douglas Liddle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare the following competing interests: they are employed by In-Space Missions Limited to develop new space missions and provide consultancy and procurement support to the space industry.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liddle, J.D., Holt, A.P., Jason, S.J. et al. Space science with CubeSats and nanosatellites. Nat Astron 4, 1026–1030 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01247-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01247-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing